. In this paper, we focus on the findings from the studentinterview data, though we note that prior research has shown strong agreement with respect to Page 24.1122.4practices across all three data sources.18CasesBoth data collection sites were large, comprehensive universities, with one located in the mid-Atlantic and the other in the Mountain West. The course studied at the mid-Atlantic site was aone-semester course focused on innovation and entrepreneurship, in which student teamsdeveloped a product or service in order to launch a startup company. In the Mountain West, thecourse was an in-major capstone design class. The following sections
demonstrations and received similar coaching tosuccessfully complete their in-person tool competencies. After completing all training, studentswere given two weeks to complete the IDE project. Two consecutive laboratory sections werededicated to the project, and teaching assistants supervised additional open laboratory hours toprovide students with more time to complete the IDE project.MethodsStudy Context. The setting for this study was the first mechanical engineering design coursetaken by all mechanical engineering majors at a mid-sized (ca. 160 students/year), ABET-accredited program at a land grant university in the mid-Atlantic United States. The timing ofthis study was such that it coincided with a pre-planned change in the undergraduate
. Sheppard, E. McGrath, and B. Gallois, “Promoting Systems Thinking inEngineering and Pre-Engineering Students,” in American Society for Engineering EducationSpring 2008 Mid-Atlantic Section Proceeding. 2008.[2] J.E. Mills, and D.F. Treagust, “Engineering Education—Is Problem-Based or Project-BasedLearning the Answer,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3, pp. 2-16 2003.[3] D. J. Cappelleri and N. Vitoroulis, "The Robotic Decathlon: Project-Based Learning Labsand Curriculum Design for an Introductory Robotics Course," IEEE Transactions on Education,vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 73-81, Feb. 2013.[4] M. Yim, et al. "AC 2008-2230: A Practice-Integrated Undergraduate Curriculum inMechanical Engineering," ASEE PEER, pp. 13.81.1 - 13.81.15 Jun
Education and Back” October 26-28, 2010, NSF ATE Principal Investigator Conference4. Ronald E. Barr, “Current Status of Engineering Education and ASEE.” In proceedings of The ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 28-29, 2006. Brooklyn, NY. Page 25.82.95. Ann Higdon, President and Founder, Improved Solutions for Urban Systems (ISUS), “The Art of Enlightened Self-Interest”, October 26-28, 2010, NSF ATE Principal Investigator Conference6. Andy Zhang, Iem Heng, Sidi Berri, and Farrukh Zia. “Introduction of Mechatronic Technology into Cross-Department Product Design Curricula.” In proceedings of The 118th Annual ASEE Conference &
belief surveys. One of the most commonly used measures is Fisherand Peterson’s Adaptive Expertise Beliefs survey [1]. As part of a larger post-semester survey,researchers at a mid-Atlantic university administered Fisher and Peterson's Adaptive ExpertiseBeliefs survey [1] to students enrolled in two sections of a senior design capstone course.Instructors taught one section of the course using methods based on the principles of adaptiveexpertise, while the other course section involved the use of the traditional lecture-based methodof instruction. Results indicated a significant difference in overall adaptive expertise beliefscores. However, researchers did not find significant differences between the two groups on anyof the individual Fisher and
, "Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers," Distance Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 421-439, 2011.8. E. Haase, "Moving a team-based freshmen biomedical engineering and design course online," Teaching Tips - Special Issue (COVID), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31-36, 2021.9. E. Haase, "Enhancing the freshman experience with upperclassmen lab managers: a win-win situation," Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, 2017.10. Kutner, M.H., Nachtsheim, C.J., Neter, J., & Li, W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, pp. 641-1208 (2005).
insight into how to foster students’ systems thinkingabilities such that students may be bettered prepared to enter the 21st century workforce.Herein, the results of a study exploring undergraduate engineering students’ mental models ofcommon, household engineered products are presented and discussed. Results come from twostudent populations, sophomores and seniors, both attending the same engineering undergraduateprogram at a medium (~20,000 students) public mid-Atlantic, liberal-arts research university.Through the comparison of sophomores to seniors, the authors look to explore how students’mental models develop over the course of an undergraduate engineering degree.The study involved the completion of an in-class activity that elicits mental
Enrollment 5,922 324Engineering Graduate Enrollment 1,549 33Student/Faculty Ratio 16:1 14:1Carnegie Foundation Classification RU/VH DRUCampus Size 2,600 acres 350 acresSetting Primarily Residential Highly ResidentialLocation Mid-Atlantic New EnglandTechnical Background and GoalsIt had been demonstrated through extensive research over the past two decades that microwaveheat treatments could lead to reduced processing times4, lower processing
timed trial.ParticipantsThe participants for this study came from a mid-Atlantic engineering focused institution andwere all in the final year of their undergraduate curriculum. All students came exclusively froma mechanical engineering background and were enrolled in this capstone design project as acourse requirement for graduation within their major. These students were given the option toenroll in one of forty-one projects, with this particular project having an enrollment limit of tenstudents. Of the ten student team members, eight agreed to be interviewed. Of the studentparticipants, there were seven males and one female with experience ranging from courseworkonly, to several years in industry. Amongst these students were three active
theimpact of PFX on students’ prototyping awareness. In this study, students at a large Mid-Atlantic university were taught three prototyping lensesbased on the PFX methodology: (1) Prototyping for Viability, (2) Prototyping for Feasibility, and(3) Prototyping for Desirability. This paper presents preliminary findings on the relationshipbetween these three prototyping lenses and students’ prototyping awareness, which we define asstudents’ ability to identify their mental models during the prototyping process. We useprototyping awareness as a proxy to measure adoption and implementation of PFX methods. ThePrototyping AWareness Scale, or PAWS was created for this study, and we discuss its internalconsistency and future iterations. Data were
following the design method taught in class.In this paper, the authors will describe the rationale, pedagogical choices, and administrativetasks involved in providing a design-related service learning experience for first-year students onsuch a large scale. Excerpts from students’ reflection essays are presented as anecdotal evidencethat the proposed program assisted students in achieving the course objectives and learningoutcomes.1. Offering a First Year Engineering Design Experience on a Large Scale1.1 Context: “Exploration of Engineering Design”The context for this paper is a required introductory course for first-year engineering students ofVirginia Tech. Virginia Tech is a large mid-Atlantic land-grant university; the engineeringcollege is its
from the Mid Atlantic and NewEngland region. Page 13.585.2In 1998, the awarding of an NSF Grant entitled “Integrating Engineering Design with theHumanities, Social Sciences, Sciences, and Mathematics” was the initiative for a major revisionof the curriculum of all of the engineering programs1,2. The emphasis of this grant was tointegrate design throughout the curriculum. This was accomplished by (i) Redesign of thefreshman engineering course by incorporating Integrative Learning Blocks by involvement offaculty from engineering, mathematics, physics, humanities and social sciences; (ii) Creation of anew engineering sophomore design course that
study was conducted in the department of engineering at an undergraduate focused teaching-institution located in the mid-Atlantic region of the United states. This engineering departmentoffers a singular Bachelor of Science degree (BS) and is ABET accredited. The capstoneprogram at this department is four semester long with each semester lasting 15 weeks. Theparticipants were third year engineering students in a second semester capstone design class.These students were chosen for the study because while these students have experiencedgenerating concepts for design problems, they have not learned about creativity in a classroomsetting. Participation in the study was completely voluntary, and the participants could decide notto complete the study
., Dahm, K., Harvey, R., Courtney, J., Pietrucha, B., Diao, C., Accini, D., “BottleRockets and Parametric Design in a Converging-Diverging Design Strategy,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2006, Chicago, IL.17 Riddell, W.T., Jansson, P.M. and Law, R.J., “Measurement and Conservation of Energy Use in CampusBuildings,” Proceedings of the ASEE Mid-Atlantic Conference, Fall 2004.18 Riddell, W. T., Jansson, P.M., Dahm, K.D., Benavidez, H.S., Haynes, J., and Schowalter, D., “Conservation ofEnergy for Campus Buildings: Design, Communication and Environmentalism through Project Based Learning,”ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2006, Chicago, IL.19 J. A. Newell, H. Newell, and K. D. Dahm, “Rubric Development
techniques (2nd Edition). Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.[18] Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.[19] Pahl, G. and W. Beitz (1995). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer-Verlag.[20] Pugh, S. (1991). Total design: Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Reading: Addison- Wesley.[21] Samuel, P. and K. W. Jablokow (2010). Psychological inertia and the role of idea generation techniques in the early stages of engineering design. Proc. of the Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, Oct. 15- 16, 2010, Villanova University.[22] Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[23] Suh, N. P
teaching-institution is located in the mid-Atlantic region of the UnitedStates, with a predominantly white student population hailing from the Commonwealths ofVirginia and Pennsylvania and States of New Jersey, Maryland, and New York.Learning ObjectivesThe following learning objectives were established for students:At the end of successful completion of this course, the students should be able to: - Understand the principles and workings of basic mechanical elements such as linkages, gears, and cams. - Select appropriate mechanisms for desired motions - Execute steps of the design process such as requirements gathering, concept generations, concept selection and prototyping - Demonstrate technical and creative
anduniversity has their own culture, the paper focuses on the aspects of the process that are mosttransferable to other institutions.Private, mid-Atlantic, Liberal Arts CollegE (PALACE) is a medium-sized, elite, primarily-whiteliberal arts institution that is located in a rural area in the mid-Atlantic region. PALACE issimilar to many other liberal arts universities, but has three colleges including arts & sciences,engineering, and management. The College of Engineering has six departments that offer a setof engineering programs that do not differ greatly from those at other universities. Eachdepartment currently has a great deal of autonomy regarding their curriculum within the structureof the University.Two aspects of PALACE’s structure are
domain,ME offers a useful study focus. The sites range in size from a small program graduating 30-50students annually to larger programs with over 350 graduates per year. All include at least a full-year of senior design; one has a four-semester design sequence that begins in students’ junioryear. All include industry-sponsored projects, with some having options that include faculty-sponsored projects, competition teams, and service projects. Finally, all use a course coordinatorcoupled with individual faculty and/or industry mentors for each team. Team sizes are generally4-6 students. The sites are also geographically diverse (northeast, mid-Atlantic, mountain west,and southwest).SamplingBeginning in late spring 2017, we recruited participants
AC 2011-202: STUDENTS LEARN FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERINGDESIGN WHILE PURSUING THEIR OWN ENTREPRENEURIAL IDEASKevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. from WPI in 1992 and his Ph.D. from MIT in 1998. He has published on teaching engineering design, assessment of student learning, and use of process simulation in undergraduate education. He is the recipient of the 2004 Fahien Award and the 2010 Mid-Atlantic Section Outstanding Teaching Award from ASEE.William Riddell, Rowan University William Riddell is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Engineering Department at Rowan University. His research interests include design
courses.While LA programs were initially developed for science and math courses, many LA programssupport LAs in a wide range of disciplines. This paper describes a pilot adaptation of the LAprogram for engineering design courses that we have developed at the University of Maryland,College Park Campus. All LAs assist in 14 separate sections of University of Maryland’sengineering design course for first-year undergraduate students. Our seminar integrates topicsfrom the discipline-general LA pedagogy seminar (cognitive science of learning, facilitation ofclassroom discourse, collaboration, metacognition) with topics especially relevant to engineeringdesign (design reviews, design thinking, expert-novice practices in engineering design,engineering
-institutional study of students’ transitions fromtheir capstone (senior) design experiences into engineering work [21-24]. The sections belowdescribe the sites, participants, data collection, and data analysis.Site DescriptionsThe research study involves four different universities: two large public comprehensiveuniversities (one in the mountain west and one in the mid-Atlantic), one small public technicaluniversity in the southeast, and one small private college in the northeast. Three have a year-longcapstone design program and one has a four-semester design sequence that spans the junior andsenior years. All focus heavily on industry-sponsored projects; three also include faculty-sponsored and national-competition projects. All emphasize