©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Learning the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion modules in an undergraduate electrical engineering classroomAbstract:In this paper, we present the design and implementation of a set of diversity, equity, andinclusion (DEI) based modules, created to be deployed in an introductory computing courseoffered to first year students in our program. Our objective is to ensure that engineeringundergraduate students, who are not historically exposed to DEI content within the engineeringcurriculum, are introduced to these important topics in the context of their technical courseworkand that they understand the relevance of DEI to their careers. We created 6 modules that cover awide range of topics
engineering learning environmentsfor students across backgrounds [5]. The course seeks to build the foundational professionalskills of students with varying interests toward engineering through engineering designexperiences [6]. Ninth through twelfth grade students in the United States can enroll in thecourse as a one-semester or a full-year course depending on the participating school.Survey Development and Overview Pre and post-surveys were given to e4usa students during the 2021-2022 school year toexamine pre-college engineering student perspectives in the course. The surveys were developedby the e4usa research team, which includes engineering education and psychology researcherswith expertise in using Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT
that preclude them from leaving their job, even for a year. In addition, obtainingthe Ph.D. may be perceived by industry as a desire to switch careers to academia; thus,employers may not offer tuition reimbursement support even if the program is offered online.The Doctor of Engineering (D.Eng.) degree, a professional engineering doctorate, addressesthese concerns as it provides access for working professionals to the highest education level,while enabling continual professional growth with an employer.The competitiveness and economic growth of the United States depends on engineeringdoctorates transitioning from academia into the workforce [Chang et al., 2022]. More doctoralgraduates in the STEM fields, particularly with respect to underserved
science students. In addition to providingscholarship support for the students, the NSF project also provides career development activities(e.g. resume critique, interview tips, etc.), opportunity to join a learning community (LC) in astrategic area for the UNM School of Engineering (SOE) (e.g. bioengineering or aerospaceengineering), and last but not least, an opportunity to participate in service learning (SL) orcommunity-engagement (CE). The community engagement is presented to the students in theform of a bigger concept or umbrella: Peace Engineering (PE). PE encompasses engineeringactivities that generally promotes world peace. The students learn throughout a scholarship yearabout PE through SL/CE. There are two main ways for the students to
Paper ID #38333Creation of an Engineering Technology ProgramDr. Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is a Teaching Professor in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineer- ing and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University and an ASEE Fellow member. Throughout her career, she has supported engineering teams as a mathematician and provided complete life-cycle manage- ment of Information Systems as a Computer Systems Analyst for the U.S. Department of Energy; taught mathematics, statistics, computer science, and fundamental engineering courses and served in several ad- ministrative
grades due to the pandemic is impacting their transition to college-level engineeringcourses.In order to fill this research gap, the purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of thepandemic on first- and second-year engineering students’ readiness for engineering courseworkfrom the perspective of instructors who teach first- and second-year engineering courses. Byidentifying weaknesses in students’ development, this research will enable us to recommendadaptations that can provide more localized support in undergraduate engineering programs tobetter prepare students for their future engineering careers. Accordingly, this paper addresses thefollowing research question: What impacts has the COVID-19 pandemic had on first- and second
experience a true work environment before being thrust intothe workforce after graduation. A three-week virtual summer research internship (SRI) programwas offered in Summer 2021 to students at Texas A&M University-Kingsville and its nearbyuniversities and community colleges. The SRI program is designed as a mini-internship to provideacademic, professional, and career preparation to SRI participants. A total of 19 students wereselected as SRI participants in Summer 2021, who were divided into four teams. Four graduatestudents with research experience were selected as “SRI fellows” in the SRI program to assistfaculty advisors to provide research and career guidance to SRI participants. So, each teamcomprised five SRI participants, one SRI fellow
theory, which has been used to analyze students’motivation to persist in rigorous engineering programs (Matusovich, 2013).Similarly, religious identity refers to similar characteristics, values, and beliefs and directly affectsbehaviors of many individuals within the communities. For more than a generation, studies have shownreligiously engaged individuals to be more civically engaged (Wuthnow, 1999; Lewis, Mcgregor &Putnum, 2013; Rockenbach, 2020). This characteristic may directly relate to women from religiouscommunities finding more meaning in careers such as engineering as they relate to contributions tobroader society.Women are less prominent in engineering fields than men (Pawley 2019). While there has been growthand change in recent
for all and expand opportunities for those traditionally underserved andmarginalized in engineering to pursue careers as engineers and expand the STEM workforcepipeline. IntroductionThe societal role of engineers has steadily evolved from a technical problem solver to that of a“technical mediator,” in which engineers engage with stakeholders to define the problem, ideate,and develop solutions [1,2]. Yet, engineering curricula still tends to focus on guiding studentsthrough problems that can be answered in a single, technical solution [3], ignoring thecomplexities needed to prepare students to solve real world problems [3, 4]. As stated bySchwartz et al. [2], “of particular interest to educators are
significant real-world problems and strengthen theintegration of knowledge, understanding, and practices of engineering within STEM (1). Another affordance ofSTEM partnership is bringing in STEM professionals to support content teachers are transferring to students (2).Many students have yet to learn first-hand how their math and science courses relate to careers they may beinterested in pursuing (1). The engineering education partnership in this paper aims for the primary STEM educationgoals of ensuring students spark interest and excitement in STEM, understand STEM content and knowledge,engage in STEM reasoning and computational thinking, reflect on STEM, use the tools and languages of STEM, andidentify with STEM Enterprise (1). As
scholarship.Engineering Identity DevelopmentCareer identity is the construct that individuals formulate around their perception of themselvesand their career choice. Therefore, engineering identity can be defined as the construct thatengineering students and professionals construct at the intersection of their perception ofthemselves and their career in engineering [8-9]. Research shows that engineering identity isdirectly correlated to personal values that can assist in the development of becoming an engineerand their understanding of engineering as a field. This development can lead to the enhancementof the altruistic and individualistic goals of engineering students [8]. Student’s engineeringidentity development is needed for a growing engineering program and
student experience.To extend understandings of interdisciplinary scholar development beyond students’ immediatesurroundings and to incorporate graduate students’ perspectives into this research space, thisstudy takes a qualitative approach grounded in Ecological Systems Theory [4][5]. The dataconsist of 48 semi-structured interviews with students in an interdisciplinary graduate program,spanning four program cohorts and three years. The study investigates how the broader academicsocial environment in which interdisciplinary graduate students operate influences students’abilities to see themselves as interdisciplinary scholars and align their studies with convergentresearch career goals.Ultimately this longitudinal qualitative case study suggests
country [26], [18]. Finally,with long-term orientation Ecuador does not have a score within the Hofstede tool fornow, however in the United States its low score reflects that citizens are not pragmatic,this is reinforced in that Americans have strong ideas about what is good or bad so theycan refer to issues such as abortion the use of drugs among other controversial issues,also in the country companies measure performance in the short term, this drives peopleto seek to obtain quick results [26].Through the national analysis provided by the Hofstede tool, it is possible to consider apoint of reference to make the academic comparison between construction careers in thetwo universities of study, for example, in Ecuador due to the high score in
eitherstudent success or engineering lab tours. The student success topics presented to the on-sitestudents included time management, GPA calculation, resume building and internshipopportunities, library services, and personal learning styles.The faculty lectures discussed the engineering design process; engineering disciplines;importance of mathematics in engineering, chemistry and computers in engineering; leanmanufacturing; engineering mechanics; data analysis and visualization; ethics; professionallicensure; and career searches. Content varied from material that would be included infreshmen engineering courses to material that introduced advanced (upper-level) engineeringcourses. The portion of the SBP program involving industry professionals as
indicates the presence of all fourpathways. All results taken together demonstrate how understanding individuals’ experiencesthrough early childhood and high school can evolve or stagnate with age and development.1. IntroductionIt is the unique experiences and perceptions of an individual which develop personal identity;often each of those experiences are heavily influenced by others surrounding us [1-2]. One’schoice in a college, or major, or even a particular career path is shaped by both positive andnegative perceptions of prior experiences, often emerging from passions or interests developedthroughout childhood [3]. Perception is a subjective evaluation of these experiences, and thus,positive and negative experiences differ from person to
explanation of the situation based on my own experiences.Table 2Composite Narrative ExampleComposite Narrative Excerpt Direct Quote from Manager Decisions in Developing a Narrative ThreadAs a recent graduate, Sofia is excited So we had hired in November of last year, an Each of the three excerpts focused on anto be a design engineer – a role she is engineer, mid-career probably about 10 years engineer at a different career stage (late, mid,passionate about and has experience of experience, to come in as a design or early). I chose to use the mid-career designin. She starts her new position, and engineer on a specific project. The project engineer example with the early
case for using undergraduates in research by discussing the benefits of usingthem in research programs; it also identifies some pitfalls. Based on these observations and theliterature, the recommendation is made to engage undergraduates in research early in theiracademic career, during their first or second year. Benefits for undergraduates in research overtheir academic career can result in these students continuing with the graduate program at theirhome institution or at other institutions.The Kern Foundation recognized the importance of undergraduates in research and sponsored aRequest for Proposal (RFP) to address this topic. A collaboration of five universities from theKern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) answered the RFP and
, departments and universities often rely on aprofessional development driven approach to establish community. While useful, these effortsare misdirected because literature shows that women’s isolation and lack of sense of community,rather than lack of career preparedness, contribute to attrition from graduate programs. To besteradicate this isolation and lack of belonging among graduate women in engineering, we took auser-centered approach. Community-led, stakeholder-centric, participatory research is astakeholder-owned means by which to elicit community member needs. This process translatesinto strategies that are developed by community members themselves to address those needs.The authors of this paper developed a pilot survey distributed to all
programs in the EAC have to compete withother engineering disciplines, making it more challenging to attract students compared tosurveying programs in the ETAC and ANSAC. Arcidiacono et al. [13]; Wiswall and Zafar [14]found that earnings expectations and ability / aptitude perceptions have a critical role majorselection. Of note is that surveyors have one of lowest median pay among the architecture andengineering professions [15], making it extremely difficult to persuade students to follow a majorthat has the same mathematics requirements and settle for a considerably lower salary.The choice of career selection for students entering college is a combination between theirpersonal interests, abilities / aptitudes, and limitations / needs of the
two workshops conducted in 2022 with 56 participants as examples. Thefirst workshop was for a group associated with 9 North Carolina State University CollegeAdvising Corps (CAC) members, recent college graduates who may or may not have a STEMdegree. These CAC advisors with high school students in rural parts of the state to advise themalong career pathways. The second workshop was for 49 teachers in a K-8 STEM schoolneeding to understand integrated STEM instruction and get ideas for nearly immediateimplementation in their classrooms. Both groups needed orientation with regards to authenticengineering for K-12 students, as well as an understanding of engineering careers. Bothworkshops included hands-on engineering activities, discussion of
we take a different tack, wanting to identify the nexus, or common ground, ofInnovative and Entrepreneurial self-efficacies, and Innovative and Entrepreneurial behaviors.Thinking about common ground is a useful lens with which to look at the intentional or focusedcreativity of engineers, whether they are working in new or existing enterprises. First, we showthe development of this intersectional/nexus concept (which we call Embracing New Ideas, ENI)in terms of measures of self-efficacy (ENI-SE; consisting of six items, with a Cronbach’s Alphaof .85) and behavior (ENI-B; consisting of five items, with a Cronbach’s Alpha of .80). Thenbased on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), we model ENI-B (our dependent variable) asa function of ENI-SE
Transfer Partnership program is to increase bachelor’sdegree completion of low-income transfer students.Our initial efforts focused on identifying shared data needs around student success barriers,establishing inter-institutional data sharing protocols, and developing a framework to significantlyincrease, diversify, and enhance our existing outreach, recruitment and academic advisingpractices in support of these students. We present a holistic data model for transfer pathway(Academic Success, Career Preparation, College and Transfer Navigation, Basic Needs andFunding, and Psychological Factors) to build on the Transfer Student Capital model [6] to obtaina more complete understanding of educational barriers as they interplay with each other.BIPOC
. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on engineering graduate students’ experiences and motivation centered on career planning and preparation.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studenDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University
, The Boeing Company (Space Division), Alcatel, USA (Alcatel-Lucent) and the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). My professional goals consist of achieving the position of Senior Executive Service (SES) member within the Department of Defense (DoD). Afterwards, I would like to pursue either a research position at a national laboratory, think-tank, or board of directors and/or academia as a second career. I am a certified scuba diver, I enjoyed skydiving, trying different foods/eating, traveling the world, live sporting events/comedy shows, attending events such as Homecoming at Prairie View A&M University, spending time with my family, friends, fraternity brothers, and love ones!Dr. Janie M. Moore, Texas A&M
to expand across the globe 4 butstill primarily focusing on the “employability/ placement” as the objective5.It is important not only that a student be employable at the end of his/ her graduation, but thats/he continues to remain employable for the rest of the career by staying relevant and future-ready, particularly in the sectors that adopt rapidly transforming technologies.Can the WIL model of education, which has been found successful in meeting theemployability demand serve the graduates to remain relevant? Can such a model be used tomeet the continuing education needs of the people at scale without compromising on the 1A descriptive study of
incorporate inclusive practices in the engineering curriculum which preparesneurodiverse students to achieve their full potential in the workforce. This work-in-progresspaper seeks to capitalize on the unique strengths of marginalized neurodiverse engineeringstudents. In this study, the innovation self-efficacy of engineering students who self-identify asneurodiverse is explored before and after a curricular intervention, which has been shown tohave the potential to enhance innovation self-efficacy, in an environmental engineering targetcourse. A previously validated Likert-type survey was used, which included the Very BriefInnovation Self-Efficacy scale, the Innovation Interests scale, and the Career Goals: InnovativeWork scale. Among the 47
motivational aspects might also be crucial determinants for determining theperformance and perseverance of engineering students [3].Many engineering students in Bangladesh are primarily motivated by their own aspirations.Increased self-efficacy is mainly congruent with the idea of greater ambition. When studentsbelieve in their ability to complete a particular activity or objective, they are driven to act inways that increase the likelihood of success [1]. Often, students are motivated to succeed inengineering by their passion and attitude [11]. In addition, a solid foundation in disciplines suchas mathematics, physics, and science inspires students to pursue higher education in engineeringto pursue a career in various sophisticated and intriguing
participant who did not submit a post-survey. Figure 4. Pre/Post Survey Results for Career InterestsThe results seen in Figure 5 below display the answers to the second Likert Scale question in thepre- and post-surveys that asked students about their outlook on the limitations and career desiresassociated with pursuing a degree in aerospace engineering. This data reveals that the hydrofoilboat activity did not significantly change students’ perspectives on if an aerospace engineer’sintended career pursuit lies within the aeronautics/space sectors (red bar). However, the datareveals a shift from 32.5% (pre-survey) to 51±3% (post-survey) of students that agreed thataerospace engineering is more limiting than other engineering fields
. He has also con- ducted a Faculty in Residency at Google during the summer of 2018 to learn more about this company’s culture, practices, and to understand the expectations for candidates (e.g. aspiring CS majors) who pursue career opportunities at this company and related prominent companies in tech.Abigail DinaMariah McMichaelTheodore Wimberly Jr.Lauren Brown Lauren Brown is a Morgan State University Research Assistant majoring in Computer Science.Krystal L. Williams, University of Georgia ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exposing Early CS Majors to Technical Interview Practices in the Form of Group-Based Whiteboard Problem Solving ActivitiesAbstract:Upon degree
trainingand real-world applications. While students have learned the necessary technical skills in college,they may not have had the opportunity to apply the body of knowledge in a practical setting.Addressing this challenge generally requires colleges offering S/G programs to incorporateproject-based learning opportunities into their curricula. Such opportunities provide studentswith hands-on experience and help develop their critical thinking and problem-solving skills thatare essential for a successful career in today’s evolving geospatial industry.2. LiDAR Point CloudsA point cloud is essentially a huge collection of individual points in 3D space. Each point in thecloud corresponds to a specific location, and may also include additional