Paper ID #21056What Do First-year and Senior Civil Engineering Students Think About Rais-ing the Bar on the Education Requirements for Professional Licensure?Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for the department. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E
communicate your solution, it is useless. So, communication is critical in all areas of engineering.” “When engineers need to communicate the results of our analysis, writing is critical.”Unfortunately, this conceptualization often fails to take the next step toward a broaderunderstanding of writing. In fact, only one respondent indicated a view of writing as valuable toengineers as a part of process of problem solving: “In the formulation of engineering problems andtheir proposed solutions, including the reasoning process that was applied in developing the bestsolution” and one other indicated writing as part of “assessment and interpretation of resultsobtained.”This gap parallels some of the components of the definition of meaningful
provided feedback on our coding process, Noa Bruhis and Ieshya Anderson for theirperspective and advice, and the reviewers of this manuscript for their support and thoughtfulsuggestions.References[1] T. Church, “Returning Veterans on Campus with War Related Injuries and the Long Road Back Home,” J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2009.[2] L. Zinger and A. Cohen, “Classroom : How Can Colleges Be Better,” Contemp. Issues Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2010.[3] L. McBain, Y. Kim, B. Cook, and K. Snead, “From Soldier to Student II: Assessing Campus Programs for Veterans and Service Members,” 2012.[4] A. Shackelford, “Documenting the Needs of Student Veterans with Disabilities
Review (PDR) and Critical DesignReview (CDR), respectively. Each of these milestones require the students to submit a technicalreport outlining their design and processes, and a comprehensive presentation to their advisoryboards. 2.2. Motivation FactorsPintrich identified the importance of motivation on academic performance.10,18,19 The MSLQ is awidely used tool in the academic community to measure student motivation. The students arerequired to self-assess their motivation on a seven-point Likert scale, with a value of 1corresponding to “not true to me at all” and a 7 corresponding to “very true to me”. A value of 4is accepted as neutral and the other values are a gradient between the aforementioned digits. Thefive factors observed in
-future to their attention may only cause additionaldistress and lack of motivation. In future research directions, we will assess how engineeringprograms can consider all of these different ways of thinking about the future to create aninclusive and supportive environment for all types of student motivations.Further, this research has also prompted a discussion for how we are considering the students inour policy decisions. It is important to consider how the flexibility of engineering curricula or thecourse load for those crucial middle years for engineering students impact students’ motivations.By allowing for some flexibility in engineering curricula, we would be providing a safeopportunity for students to find the career path that is the
that challenge? Thesequestions, and others, were meant to prompt the participants to think about ways they might haveused empathy and engineering throughout the day.Survey data, observational data and interview data were first reviewed independently as threediscrete data sources. Quantitative survey data was statistically and graphically analyzed.Qualitative data reduction by thematic analysis was completed for the survey qualitative data,observational data and interview data. As themes were revealed for each data source, it was clearthat these sources triangulated thematic findings. Major assessment findings are shared bysurvey, observation and interview categories, with appropriate supporting data from relatedcategories. Culminating thematic
Course", ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, 2011.[4]. Bringle, R. G. and Hatcher, J. A., “A service-learning curriculum for faculty,” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, (pp. 112-122), 1995.[5]. Peterson, S. J. and Schaffer, M. J., “Service learning: A strategy to develop group collaboration and research skills,” Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 38, no. 5, (pp. 208-214), 1999.[6]. Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., and Dymnicki, A., “A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students,” Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 34, no. 2, (pp. 164-181), 2011.[7]. Gray, M. J., Ondaatje, E. H., Fricker Jr., R. D. and Geschwind, S. A., “Assessing service learning: Results from as
University of Michigan. Her research interests lie in assessing and amending curricula to help students transition from undergraduate to professional practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 First-year engineering experience from the rural student’s perspectiveIntroductionThis complete research paper will explore the experiences of first year engineering students fromrural communities. According to the United States Department of Education, 31.3% of publicelementary and secondary schools are in rural communities, serving 21.3% of students in theUnited States [1]. Of these students, only 27.1% will continue their education by enrolling in acollege or university by the time they turn 24
within their local community.The lure of Silicon Valley can overshadow opportunities that can be just as lucrative andimpactful to their careers. Smaller local companies can offer benefits to students with non-traditional matriculation challenges (multigenerational families, first generation students, caringfor family members with health challenges, etc.). Opportunities like co-ops and internships allowstudents to interface with a company and assess their fit, get experience in industry, expand theirnetworks, and identify mentors.MICWIC: I think it is vital to have some key individuals involved who truly believe in theimportance of a regional BPC. But the organization cannot rely solely on a few individuals. Wehave a well-established committee
, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/successes-and-challenges-in-supporting-undergraduate-peer-educators-t o-notice-and-respond-to-equity-considerations-within-design-teams.[16] R. A. Atadero, C. H. Paguyo, K. E. Rambo-Hernandez, and H. L. Henderson, “Building inclusive engineering identities: implications for changing engineering culture,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 378–398, May 2018, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1396287.[17] K. Rambo-Hernandez, R. Atadero, C. Paguyo, and J. Schwartz, “Inclusive Engineering Identities; Two New Surveys to Assess First-Year Students’ Inclusive Values and Behaviors,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, Jun. 2017, p. 28502
undergraduate IDPs [9] and materials from the Center for the Improvement ofMentored Experiences in Research.New scholars take the CliftonStrengths assessment and attend an orientation workshop to learnabout the program opportunities and expectations, set goals, and schedule one-to-one meetingswith mentors. During the semester they attend workshops, connect with recent alumni aboutnavigating the transition to post-bachelor’s opportunities, and obtain individualized advice abouthow to connect with both on-campus and off-campus resources to work toward their goals. Animportant component is building relationships and creating a trusting environment in whichstudents can seek assistance with any obstacles or barriers they may be experiencing.An explicit
Introductory Computer Programming SequenceOur computer science and engineering program wishes to increase sense of community amongstudents taking the three-course introductory computer programming sequence, with a specialfocus on women and underrepresented minority (URM) students as these groups may be at adisadvantage when beginning the sequence [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. We started a 5 year program tocoordinate interventions across courses and assess the effect of these interventions. Interventionsinclude[19]: • balanced teaching staff in terms of gender and race (visual representation is critical) • staff training on implicit bias, imposter syndrome, and stereotype threat • student activities related to implicit bias and imposter syndrome • in
% 48% White/ Hispanic 8%Figure 3: The four graphs compare the P-TECH demographics to that of the high school for each cohort. 6Since the Riverfront P-TECH program is relatively new, there are only three New York Statestandardized assessments to compare: Integrated Algebra, Common Core Algebra I and LivingEnvironment. The average score on both mathematics exams for the P-TECH students waswithin one point of the corresponding high school cohort’s
AC 2007-1027: THE STATE OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONScott Danielson, Arizona State UniversityTrian Georgeou, Arizona State University Page 12.1472.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The State of Manufacturing Engineering Technology EducationAbstractIn response to a need identified by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers’ Education andResearch Technical Community, a survey was conducted to assess the health of ABET-accredited manufacturing engineering technology programs in the spring of 2005 and 2007. In2005, thirty-eight programs received the survey via email and twenty-two programs provided aresponse. Survey questions focused on
establishment of joint course offerings between these international universities using distance learning technology. This has already begun between the Technical University of Munich and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Curriculum for global engineering education of 2020The curriculum for global engineering education includes content and methodologies that helpstudents learn a global perspective, broader social awareness, lifelong learning, and business andpersonal skills. Curriculum, therefore, includes learning outcomes and assessment strategies.Curriculum: Global perspectiveThe increasing globalization of business has created organizations where colleagues are very
.”The mid-term progress report summary for the second semester (DP-8 alt.) is planned to be a 3-page concise report of the progress of their report, together with a one-page evaluation of howthey used the creative problem solving process and the insights gained from the HBDI. Inparticular, the instructor will seek to assess how team members with strong quadrant C andquadrant D preferences fared on their teams. Typically, in very quadrant A-dominant engineeringteams, individuals with strong quadrant C and D thinking preferences may be treated as outsiderswho do not receive much respect and consideration for their ideas.One of the most exciting results of this capstone design course was with a company who had 15of their employees take the HBDI
lifestyle, occupied and settled onpieces of land and started farming. In addition, hunting still continued away from settlements.The number of humans grew and they learnt various professions such as farming, fencing,shoe/dress-making, and doing the job of a blacksmith. Individual/family wealth/possessionsstarted to grow and accumulate. While ways of visualizing quantities are subjective, humans felt the need for improvedmeans of assessing quantities and also keeping a track/record of them. The necessity promptedthem to innovate or improve upon the means.50,000 to 20,000 BC: Computing using fingers/pebbles/bones The first tool used ascomputational aids were most certainly man’s own fingers. Thus it is no coincidence that thename "digit" comes
AC 2007-1883: FACULTY SCHOLARSHIP AND TECHNICAL CURRENCY: 2007STATUS REPORT ON A NATIONAL SURVEY OF ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY FACULTYAhmed Khan, DeVry University Dr. Ahmed S. Khan is a senior Professor in the EET dept. at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Outcomes Assessment, and Application of Telecommunications Technologies in Distance Education. He teaches Wireless Engineering, Network Engineering
assessment .42Female college students, even those who select math-intensive majors, have difficultyassociating math with the self if they implicitly stereotype mathematics as masculine.43 Despitetheir current self-perceptions as positively inclined toward mathematics and science, women inone study could not , or would not construct possible selves in the realm of engineering and thephysical sciences – perhaps because such possible selves were at odds with their notions aboutfeminity, or perhaps because they had no female role models in these areas to help themarticulate a possible self.44On the basis of their gender, students may be encouraged or discouraged from certain choices and may learn to view themselves as fitting well or poorly into certain
instructors of parallel and subsequent courses.The insertion of projects into an existing class is not without peril. Students are used tohomework and quizzes; they do not learn the same things from projects; and often do not feelthat projects prepared them “for the exam”. The most frustrating comments come from thosewho “LEARNED THE MOST FROM THE PROJECTS”, while complaining that the projectstook to much time, hurt their grades as they could not spend their time in other course activities.In short, our goals of student learning don’t match well with their goal of maximizing grades.Part of the student discomfort can be addressed by explicitly telling them that the projects aregeared towards developing and assessing a different set of skills than
Doing Science? In Naming Silenced Lives: Personal Narratives and Processes of EducationalChange, McLaughlin, D.; Tierney, W. G., Eds. Routledge: New York, 1993; pp 9-27.15. Margolis, J.; Fisher, A., Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. The MIT Press: Cambridge,Mass., 2002.16. Olds, B. M.; Moskal, B. M.; Miller, R. L., Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approachesand Future Collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education 2005, 94, (1), 13-25.17. Malgwi, C. A.; Howe, M. A.; Burnaby, P. A., Influences on Students' Choice of College Major. Journal ofEducation for Business 2005, 80, (5), 275-282.18. Shivy, V. A.; Sullivan, T. N., Engineering Students' Perceptions of Engineering Specialties. Journal
could be very informative.• Gibb31 states that most business-school based entrepreneurship education adversely impacts the entrepreneurial spirit. Perhaps, it is because in these settings, the emphasis is on analysis of large amounts of information, largely in the classroom with information from experts, and with evaluation by written assessments. In contrast, the entrepreneur with limited resources mostly operates with a gut feeling, recognizing the hidden agendas of others’ goals, and making decisions on the basis of trust and competence of those involved23. Thus, Gibb31 suggests (1) developing an independence from external sources of information and expert advice, and (2) use of feelings, attitudes and values outside
, assessment and feedback of the degree programA summary of the modifications to the ASE curriculum that would result in the aeronautics andastronautics concentrations was circulated electronically to the members of the ASE AdvisoryBoard, plus one alumnus of the Mississippi State University ASE program who currently worksat NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Of the individuals polled,many responded with comments. There were no direct objections to the proposed changes in thecurriculum. Two of the respondents thought that the program should move into the area ofrotorcraft. This is a possibility which will warrant further consideration. However, rotorcraftanalysis and design is a topic that would fall under the aeronautics