easilyreviewed by the advisor and student during a meeting or via email in order to develop a transferplan that is visible and tangible to the student.In addition to advisor interaction, the students were provided guest speakers during the springand fall 2008 semesters of the EGR 100 course. The speakers were diverse, and included ISUCollege of Engineering faculty members, advisors, and staff members from career services, aswell as, industry professionals. Based student evaluations for the fall 2008 semester, the guestpresentations were the highest rated portion of the course. Based on student comments, the guestspeakers provided real-life information that the students perceived as very valuable in theirunderstanding of engineering, how to successfully
assignedand stayed with a student until the end of the third semester, at which point students elected anengineering major and were assigned an advisor in their chosen engineering discipline. TheEngineering Seminar involved groups of 20-24 students meeting weekly with an individualengineering faculty member with all groups following the same syllabus. The faculty experiencewith this course was that initial student interest started to wane after a number of weeks.Feedback from students indicated that a quite a few resented having to spend the time meetingevery week given the heavy credit load at Stevens. Students also indicated a desire to have moreopportunity to focus on engineering careers, program-related topics and experiences outside theclassroom
under the moniker “Future Faculty Series” wasoriginally created by student chapter members and has been offered by the student chapter sincemid 1990’s. Recently the CoE instituted a program of their own, called Academic Careers inEngineering and Sciences (ACES) with very similar objectives and structure. The describedobjective of ACES is to prepare senior graduate students for careers at research-orienteduniversities and institutes. The student chapter found that ACES directly mirrored three of the Page 11.1429.2four Future Faculty Series sessions offered by ASEE. The student chapter was even approachedby the Dean of Graduate Students and asked
Paper ID #17717Developing America’s Next Generation of Electric Utility ProfessionalsMrs. Sonya Overstreet, EASi Sonya Overstreet, Learning and Development Manager (North America) at EASi a global engineering services company. Mrs. Overstreet’s professional career includes years of experience in the engineering field. For several years, she managed the integration, use, and support of engineering design software at a multi-regional civil engineering firm. In her current position, Mrs. Overstreet is responsible for executing learning & development strategies to ensure the building of employee capabilities, development
American,and Pacific Islander engineering graduates remain significantly underrepresented in engineering[1]. Progress in increasing the retention and persistence of underrepresented populations inengineering degree programs and the engineering workforce has been slow [2]. Furthermore,even less progress has been made in diversifying the engineering workforce, with marginalchange in the proportion of underrepresented minority engineers in the workforce in recentdecades [3], [4]. To address problems of diversification and retention in the STEM workforce,we must explore potential mechanisms to support these aims.The transition from college to the workforce is a critical period for retaining a diverse STEMworkforce. Early retention in STEM careers is
several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017. Dr. Jordan co-developed the STEAM LabsTM program to engage middle and high school students in learning science, technology, engineering, arts, and math concepts through designing and
opportunities forunderrepresented students. Students are expected to learn to work independently and tocollaborate with other group members as they conduct research in specific topics in energyresearch. This will enable them to understand their own levels of aptitude and interest in a careerin science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and give them the tools to preparefor the next stage in their education and career development. Students will report and present theirresearch results in multiple settings. The research, educational, and career mentorship provided bythe program is envisioned to stimulate the students to look at their academic work in a new lightand to provide a spark for possible careers in academic research or industrial
=(0.0259) 7. I am interested in a career in a STEM field. (SD=3.52) t(7)= -1.71, p=(0.1318) 8. I am knowledgeable about the variety of STEM career opportunities available to me. (SD=3.81) t(7)= -3.90, p=(0.0059) 9. I feel confident that my time in college will let me explore things I am interested in. (SD=4.38) t(7)= -1.29, p=(0.2371) 10. I feel knowledgeable about the different opportunities available to me in college (ex: honors colleges, study abroad, undergraduate research). (SD=2.93) t(7)= 2.93, p=(0.0222) 11. I believe the skills/knowledge I will gain at TSSP will be useful later in life. (SD=6.3) t(7)= -.28, p=(0.7871)Only five questions met requirement for a p-value of
Paper ID #24865Board 8: Aligning A.S. Manufacturing/Engineering Curriculum to IndustryNeedsDr. Marilyn Barger, National Science Foundation ATE Centers (FLATE) Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Founda- tion and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathways; has produced award winning curriculum design and
Paper ID #15756Becoming Boundary Spanning Engineers: Research Methods and Prelimi-nary FindingsProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Office of Global Engineering Programs, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from
director of the Nonlinear and Autonomous Systems Laboratory (NASLab). She is a recipient of 2015 National Science Foundation CAREER award and 2015 Office of Naval Research YIP award.Dr. Mo Rastgaar, Michigan Technological University Mo Rastgaar received the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, in 2008. He is currently an Associate Professor in mechanical engineering and the Director of the Human-Interactive Robotics Lab. His present research focuses on assistive robots by characterizing the agility in the human gait. Dr. Rastgaar is a recipient of 2014 NSF CAREER Award.Saeedeh Ziaeefard, Michigan Technological University Saeedeh
Enrichment Program for incoming engineering freshmen and, in the past, the HEARD (Higher Education Awareness Response in Delaware) Project, a college awareness program, funded by the Department of Education through Philadelphia GEAR UP for College Network. Globally in the College, he manages academic programs and policies that impact the careers of all engineering students at both the undergraduate and graduate level. Dean Vaughan is focused on enhancing the College’s student/faculty interface by fostering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #16743 successful academic and
Paper ID #17396Approaches to Entrepreneurship and Leadership Development at an Engi-neering UniversityMrs. Galina Burylina, Kazan National Research Technological UniversityDr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University - West Lafayette Dr. Sanger is a professor in the School of Engineering Technology in the College of Technology of Purdue University. His focus and passion is real world, industry based, senior capstone experiences both domes- tically and internationally. He has successfully developed this area at Purdue and at Western Carolina University. Prior to his career in academia, Dr. Sanger had a successful 30 year
Department of Engineering Technology. Through these activities, students gainhands-on experiences on computing, communication, as well as smart sensor technologies.Students increase their confidence in pursuing future career opportunities in the abovementionedareas, especially in agriculture and engineering. By doing so, not only the students are equippedwith cutting edge technology but also they will be more competitive in their future careers. Theteaching project also provides a platform for collaboration among educators from diversifieddisciplines for enhancing agricultural and engineering education at Prairie View A&MUniversity.IntroductionEngineering education is more about problem solving and trouble shooting, especially in senioryear. It
and faculty member be consistent in theirattendance. Students must also be invited in order for them to express their interests. If possible,it would be appropriate to include graduates of the programs to see how the programs preparedthem for their new careers in industry. All facets of any particular program can be reviewed atthis meeting, including course content, the course text, and any labs associated with the program,etc. There must be open dialog on the course by all participants – it isn’t a witch hunt, but anattempt to continue to provide the very best material for the benefit of the student.Internships Internships are of particular value to the student and to Industry. The internship may be aSummer hire, or could be an
proposed to provide a framework for structuring the knowledge areas and learning processesfor undergraduate engineering students. This model responds to needs identified from majorconstituents, applicable references, and educational requirements from various engineeringdisciplines.The Impetus for ChangeEngineers in all stages of career and professional development want to be successful in thiscompetitive world, where global outsourcing is just one the many challenges facing them. Inresponse, ASEE President, Ron Barr, summarizes the opinions of many academic and industryprofessionals: “We have to produce American engineers who are not only obviously technically well- grounded but more talented at things like creativity, leadership
challenges that help develop students’ self-efficacy throughhands-on activities and practical application of math and science. An example of this is the Math,Engineering, Science, Achievement (MESA) program which uses a plethora of activities thatoffer exposure to engineering fields and careers.Co-curricular programs such as the MESA program have shown some success in providingpathways to STEM careers. MESA has created a model that is currently being used in nine statesemploying a range of activities to introduce underrepresented students to STEM careersincluding: college and career advisement, hands-on activities, state competitions, field trips, andguest lecturers.4 The Engineering Self-Efficacy, Interests, and Perceptions Survey (ESIPS)instrument
faculty development presentations during their first semester of teaching and unique,hands-on teaching experiences. Other facets of this faculty development program includeregular feedback sessions with the department chair, interaction with a new visiting professorevery year, attendance at professional conferences, a strong emphasis on professional registrationand working experience early in the teaching career. Feedback to instructors includes peerclassroom visits and student course critiques. This paper examines the total faculty developmentprogram with the intent of provoking discussion and sharing good ideas for faculty development.BackgroundThe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the United States Air ForceAcademy employs
such as computer literacy, teamwork, and critical thinking as well asstrong technical competencies in quality and process control, production philosophies includinglean, Just-In-Time, and integrated production systems in order to be successful in their careers.Not enough high school graduates consider an advanced manufacturing career as an option andare not aware of the skills needed to work in this environment. A survey by the NationalAssociation of Manufacturers stated that 80 percent of respondents reported a moderate toserious shortage of qualified job applicants3.It is obvious that the K-12 system does not providestudents with these skills or provide educational experience for them to be familiar withadvanced manufacturing career
Physics 2.1% 4.0% Engineering 6.5% 7.1% Biology, Chemistry, and 23.7% 27.4% PhysicsIn all areas, except AP Biology, women complete higher-level math and science courses at alower rate than male students. Assuming completion of the courses listed is necessary to beoptimally prepared to enter college engineering, only 2% (physics being the lowest commondenominator) of female high school graduates have the necessary background to enter collegeengineering. The lack of necessary preparation closes a door on opportunities to earn a B.S.degree in engineering which can lead to exciting careers in the engineering industry
education is to prepare students for engineering in the 21stcentury. Yet critics of engineering education point to the lack of preparation students obtain inschool. This paper examines the career supports and barriers that one cohort of recentengineering graduates experienced in the workplace. Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT)describes supports and barriers as environmental factors that individuals perceive as having thepotential to either aid or hinder their pursuit of a particular career goal.1 In this study, supportsand barriers are identified in the engineering departments of four U.S.-based companies. Thedata were gathered from semi-structured interviews with 59 newly hired engineers who hadrecently graduated from college. In two of the
the opportunity to demonstrate transferof knowledge and skills gained during the completion of their degree and therefore represents theculmination of their training MS degree training in stem cell research.IntroductionIn order to prepare our students for an increasing number of careers in stem cell research2, weestablished three Master’s of Science degree specializations in Stem Cell Technology atCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. The specializations are available tostudents from three departments at our university- Biomedical Engineering in the College of Page 15.165.2Engineering, Animal Science in the College of
using both faculty and studentteams. SC ATE has two curriculum components available, the Technology Gateway and the ETCore. The Technology Gateway is a pre-engineering technology curriculum for slightly under-prepared students who want to major in engineering technology. The ET Core is a series ofgeneral education courses taught in the context of technology applications for the first year ofstudy in any engineering technology major.The Technology Gateway has six scenarios covering career exploration, simple machines, basicelectricity, optics, thermal, and hydraulics. This pre-ET curriculum was designed primarily toaddress weaknesses in mathematics in the slightly under-prepared student seeking entry in toengineering technology. The curriculum
rolling out process of a STEM initiative in such a districtwhere a needs assessment survey of area high school teachers and counselors came out insupport of this endeavor. Analysis of the survey data made it immediately apparent thatcreating a STEM initiative that served as a pathway to higher education in the STEM fieldswould be well-received by the respondents. The collaborative STEM initiative was designedfor a local high school and it consisted of a course designed to provide an introduction tohigh technology careers in science, mathematics, engineering and engineering technology.Through combination of lectures, projects, and shared experiences, students were to learn todifferentiate between these fields. Students would also learn to make
scientific reasoning and mathematical computation. Students construct charts to record data and graphs to display data. The scientific method is primarily followed throughout the process.3. Discussion: In the discussion segment, students ask questions, present observations, data, and results. Students are also informally or formally quizzed about what they have learned. a.) Career Exploration: At least two or three careers related to laboratory experience are discussed. b.) Further Exploration: Students are provided opportunities to further Page 10.742.3
Educational Materials for High School Summer Engineering Programs *Dr. H. Estrada, P. E. (corresponding author) and *Dr. P. Leelani, P. E. *Civil Engineering Program Texas A&M University – Kingsville MSC 194 Kingsville, Texas 78363 Hector.Estrada@tamuk.edu Abstract It is well known that the main reason many students do not pursue careers in engineering isbecause they are not aware of the opportunities available or simply do not know engineering
1505 Kettering University’s Bioengineering Summer Program for High School Women Janet Brelin-Fornari, Betsy Homsher, Laura Sullivan Kettering UniversityAbstractIt has been documented that young women are more likely to pursue a career that they perceiveas contributing to the common good of society. Also, the number of young women that obtaindegrees in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) is steadily decreasing orremaining stagnant. To address these two issues, Kettering University has developed a summerprogram that introduces high
professionally oriented graduate educationto be more relevant to the needs of the practicing profession in industry to ensure a strong U.S. engineeringworkforce. This paper suggests a framework of guidelines for curricular design of innovative master,doctoral, and fellow level professional graduate programs crafted to meet the career-long needs ofengineering professionals in industry and guided by the incorporation of five major attributes of high-quality graduate programs that positively affect the growth and development of working professionals. Theguidelines are based on the functional requirements, tasks, and responsibilities that engineering leadersencounter throughout their professional careers. The paper presents a new vision for shaping
Engineering Day program was developed and implemented in the spring of 2000 as apossible solution to recruiting potential students into engineering.The goals of Discover Engineering Day are to create awareness among pre-college studentsabout engineering as a challenging and rewarding career choice. A career fair environment thatintegrates interactive presentations was chosen over a lecture or “talking heads” format. Theincorporation of display boards, videos, demonstrations, hands-on activities, and multimediapresentations helped ensure students left with an understanding of engineering. Moreover,interaction with undergraduate and graduate students, professionals/company representatives,student organizations, and professors are also incorporated into
first-year students a chance to get advice andreassurance from juniors and seniors.The Cognitive Profile Inventory (CPI) determines a subset of the Myers-Briggs indices (N/S andT/F) and focuses on the most appropriate strategies for learning and studying for people of eachof the four resulting types. 4 The Self-Directed Search (SDS) uses a student’s preferences andtalents to find the three-letter Holland summary code associated with the careers where thestudent will most likely have success and interest.5 In Fall 2000, the CPI and SDS wereadministered in evening sessions.Classes do not formally meet for the rest of the week of Clemson’s Fall break and the beginningof Thanksgiving week. In addition to accommodating project work, these “days off