for professional life and professional licensure. Undergraduate instruction inengineering ethics may take the form of stand-alone courses, topics within courses or seminars,and student life, e.g. expectations through honor codes and academic conduct. These experiencesshould facilitate career-long development of ethics knowledge and judgment.Rich resources exist for teaching engineering ethics. Technical societies provide many of theseresources especially as part of a defined course of professional study and as means to guide self-regulation of the profession. Many examples of codes of ethics have been developed to provideexplicit statements of and guides for ethical conduct, cf. [2]. Some of the codes are lengthywhile others are succinct
could radiation facilities in student research. Light sources such asconsist of sample preparation, spectroscopy dye lasers pumped by nitrogen lasers offer oscilloscope datainstrumentation, data science, interpretation, billing, and collection experience. A spectrometer from 450 nm to 700 nmreporting to clients. The sustainability aspect is discussed in offers visible alignment experience.terms of future synchrotron radiation projects in a start-up techcompany and student career training in materials science and III. SPECTROSCOPY DATA ANALYSISengineering, instrumentation, and AI-assisted data science
information; 4) sendingapplications; and 5) enrolling. Later, Kotler and Fox [25] developed a seven-stage college choicemodel: 1) discovery of a desire to attend college; 2) research about college options; 3)application to college; 4) acceptance into college; 5) enrollment; 6) persistence; and 7)graduation.However, the choice of which college to attend is only half the battle – the student must alsodecide their college major or discipline. What motivates a student to decide on a career path?This is where existing academic literature on “broadening participation” in engineering splitsinto two segments – into student outreach and student recruitment – which is a significantfinding of this study that is discussed later in this paper. Just like college
howstudent self-beliefs influenced their experience with mental health during graduate school. Wealso found that graduate students’ perception of their experience is influenced by students’gender, nationality, and could influence student career trajectories. The results from our workhighlight the ongoing concerns with graduate school culture, and how it can disadvantage certaingroups. Further, this work can help identify student support mechanisms that can be instituted atthe individual, program, and college level to promote student retention and mental health.IntroductionMental health has become a particularly salient talking point in institutions of higher education[1]. Graduate students are identified as a unique population in academic
Indians entering STEM programs and careers [1], [2], [3].Many of these positions require at least an associate degree as well as a combination of higher-level academic coursework and industry work experience, among other skills. However, this typeof academic and skill preparation oftentimes excludes students who are typically underrepresentedin STEM.As institutions of higher education, community colleges play a crucial role in STEM pathways: in2012, community colleges enrolled nearly half of all U.S. undergraduates [4], and nearly half ofall students in the U.S. who receive STEM bachelor’s degrees complete some undergraduatetraining in community colleges [5]. Given their relative accessibility and affordability, communitycolleges are an important
. The programsreferenced in the literature included: The Invention Bootcamp, Career Advancement MentoringProgram for Young Entrepreneurs (CAMP-YES), Poder (i.e., Spanish for “to be able to” and“power”), Pathways to Innovation, #WatchMeCode and STEM-Inc. We discuss these programsand interventions in the following paragraphs.The Invention Boot CampThe Invention Boot Camp is a four-week interdisciplinary program that focuses on teachingentrepreneurship, innovation, and STEM skills in a college environment to underrepresentedhigh school students in STEM [38]. One benefit of this program is that it utilizes an equitablelens in the recruitment and application process by going into schools with a large percentage ofracially minoritized and low-income
. Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto Dr. Reeve was the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a consulting engineer he made development of personal capability central to his work with engineering students, undergraduate and graduate. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. In 2017, he was co-leader of the team that developed the OPTIONS Program (Opportunities for PhDs: Transitions, Industry Options, Networking and Skills) for engineering PhD students interested in careers outside the academy. He is a
engineering education as a nexus for improved science learning and STEM career awareness. This research and other collaborative efforts undergird a new Center for Research on STEM Teaching and Learning at Oklahoma State University.Adrienne Redmond, Oklahoma State University ADRIENNE REDMOND earned her B.S. in Elementary Education from Oklahoma State University in 2000 and her M.A. in Curriculum and Instruction in 2003. She is currently working on her Ph.D. in Professional Education with an emphasis in mathematics education at Oklahoma State University. She has taught mathematics methods courses at to elementary education majors
Centers for Exploration and New Discovery) program. QCCTechASCEND was a project funded under that program to encourage high school students(mostly seniors with some juniors) to consider careers in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM). Located at a large urban community college, the QCC TechASCENDproject put particular emphasis on technology, but attracted participants considering or willing toconsider other STEM fields.Over the course of three school years, from October 2002 through June 2005, nearly 200 highschool students from 22 high schools participated. Each of the seven groups of participants camefor approximately 30 sessions, each two hours long, devoted to hands-on exploration related tooptics in general, lasers, fiber
development in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) students. In February 2019, Andrea received the prestigious National Science Foundation CAREER award to re- search professional identity development processes in undergraduate AEC women. She has also received grants from East Coast Construction Services, Engineering Information Foundation, and the National Association of Home Builders. Dr. Ofori-Boadu was selected to participate in the 2019 QEM-NSF INCLUDES summit. In 2018, she was selected as a 2018 National Science Foundation - NC A & T ADVANCE IT Faculty Scholar. She also received the 2018 CoST Teaching Excellence Merit Award. Dr. Ofori-Boadu received both the 2017 NC A & T - CoST Rookie
retention is a challenge for all students, it isparticularly apparent for women and minority students whose representation in engineeringdecreases at every education and career milestone.1,2 As a result, women and minorities stillmake up a small fraction of those earning engineering degrees. At our institution, a publicuniversity in the state of Colorado, the undergraduate population is about 20% women and 8%underrepresented minorities (compared to 20% and 11% nationally). Moreover, only about 15%of practicing civil engineers in some subdisciplines, like structural engineering, are women.3 Incontrast, women now make up over 30% of lawyers and physicians, and over 70% ofpsychologists. Since no evidence exists that significant gender or racial
described at feministengineering.org. She received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women. She received ASEE-ERM’s best paper award for her CAREER research, and the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute, both in 2013. She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and re- cently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu
Blackboards is a design-based learning experience in afterschool clubs and summercamps that challenges middle school students to solve real world problems. The program isimplemented in a primarily Hispanic, low-income community adjacent to Austin, Texas a citywith a strong, technology-based economy, and earned district-wide attention with early successin team-based competitions. Beyond Blackboards aims to enhance interest and understanding ofengineering, as well as positively influence education and career goals for participants, andultimately, the entire district. This study examines the effects of Beyond Blackboards on girls’ (atraditionally underrepresented group in engineering) attitudes surrounding engineering.Specifically, this study
Ralph Coats Roe Awards. She earned her PhD from the University of Michigan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Designing good practices for recruitment, admissions and program structure of engineering outreach programs to increase access for marginalized and non-traditional higher education students (Evidence-based practice)AbstractEngineering outreach programs aimed at students in higher education play a key role inproviding pathways for students to access studies and careers in engineering. Marginalized andnon-traditional students may not have the resources to represent their skills, goals and fit in theparlance and format that best matches
held fellowships in Ethics of AI and Technology & Society organizations.James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian, PhD, is a Sr. Lecturer and Associate Academic Director with the Gordon-MIT En- gineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineer- ing and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP
. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Christopher Greg Brinton © American
Paper ID #36707Building a Leadership Toolkit: Underrepresented Students’ Development ofLeadership-Enabling Competencies through a Summer Research Experiencefor Undergraduates (REU) in Engineering EducationMs. Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth is a doctoral student at the University of Florida. She is pursuing a Masters and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering as well as a certificate in engineering leadership. Her research interests involve leadership, the experiences of early career women in engineering and improving diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. She
Assistant Dean for Inclusive Excellence, she leads the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center, overseeing efforts to attract and prepare students for the rigors of engineering study and careers, and to improve student performance and graduation rates. Appointed in January 2014, Miller comes to CU-Boulder from the National Science Foundation, where she worked in STEM education as a American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellow. Sarah believes that every child deserves an excellent education. She has worked in inner-city public schools, both as a teacher and as an administrator, and in the admissions office of Amherst College, where she earned a B.A. in Chemistry. She holds a PhD
neural engineering data and results, and ethical and responsible conduct of research in neural engineering, and the role of neuroethics in neural engineering. 2. Neural engineering best practices: Knowledge of oral and written communication of neural engineering knowledge and research, and innovation. 3. Connections to neural engineering industry and careers: Knowledge of industry’s role in neural engineering, careers in neural engineering, and careers in neuroethics.Conceptual Framework The design of this RET program is guided by sociocultural theories of learning,including: cognitive apprenticeship [6]; situated learning [7], [8]; distributed expertise [9], [10];and
mathematics andscience courses. They further add that these types of curricular reforms are already beingimplemented in some middle schools, are providing opportunities for students to see real lifeapplications of theoretical knowledge acquired in mathematics, physics and other subjects, andare exposing to opportunities in the engineering professions. Godwin et al.18 suggestimplementing the NGSS (Next Generation Science Standards), which explicitly includespractices and core ideas from engineering and technology to develop appropriate identities ofstudents, which can guide them in choosing and performing in their engineering careers. Martin et al. suggest mentoring students pro-actively19. Murphy et al. underline the needfor proactive
howwomen consider leaving a job and in some cases, exit engineering altogether. A 'chilly' climatehas often been implicated as a primary or contributing reason for these exit decisions and hasbeen classified in the literature under such descriptors as a hostile or macho work culture,mysterious pathways to career advancement, and extreme work pressures. This study expands onthese previous studies by (a) emphasizing the engineering workplace experiences of millennialsin order to understand whether these chilly climate conditions have evolved over time or aretending to persist into the next generation; and (b) studying men as well as women to gain deeperinsight into which negative working conditions tend to occur across gender and which may begender
. 1faculty responses in annual faculty advisor surveys in 2012 (21 faculty advisors; 13 responses),2013 (16 faculty advisors; 9 responses), 2014 (13 faculty advisors; 11 responses), and 2015 (19faculty advisors; 6 responses). Our study is identifying themes in the student responsesregarding their self-identified benefits and outcomes, and themes in the faculty responsesregarding the benefits and outcomes of the students. Our approach is to categorize the benefitsaccording to the rubric2 of Seymour et al. (2003), namely: (i) Personal/professional; (2)Thinking and working like a scientist; (3) Skills; (4) Clarification, confirmation, andrefinement of career/education goals; (5) Enhanced career/graduate school preparation; (6)Changes in attitudes
importantengagement strategy to encourage women and girls to pursue STEM education and careers, otherstates can benefit from the story of the Wisconsin and Hawaii collaboration.Hawaii’s Maui Economic Development Board and Wisconsin’s Milwaukee School ofEngineering have partnered under a Women in Technology grant from the U.S. Department ofAgriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service. This grant is toencourage women and girls in rural areas to pursue STEM education and careers.Because students at the Hawaii and Wisconsin partner campuses were enthusiastic about theirMentorNet experience, the Women in Technology grant funded a two-year contract to waivemembership fees for MentorNet for all four-year and two-year University of
students and teachers through the fields of chemistry, human ecology, gifted education, and central administration. She has facilitated programming in Science Olympiad, USFIRST, Engineering & Science Summer Institute (ESSI), Odyssey of the Mind, and STEM activities with local school districts. Dr. Roberts enjoys working with K-12 teachers and providing information relevant to career exploration.Prof. Tom C. Roberts P.E., FASEE, FNSPE, Kansas State University Roberts has more than 35 years experience in planning, organizational development, and leadership train- ing programs. He worked for Black & Veatch for sixteen years, formed Upward Consulting in 1989 and has served as a learning organization and process
Medicine & Rehab, and Orthopedic Surgery at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Cooper is Founding Director and VA Senior Research Career Scientist of the VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Center of Excellence in Pittsburgh. He is also the Co- Director of the NSF Quality of Life Technology Engineering Research Center, a joint effort between the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University.Dan Ding, Dept. of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh Dan Ding, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor in the Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology with secondary appointments in Bioengineering (BioE), and McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh
in sociology at UC San Diego. Her research examines individual-level, cultural mechanisms that reproduce inequality, especially those pertaining to sex segregation in science and engineering fields. Her dissertation investigates the self-expressive edge of inequality, analyzing how gender schemas and self-conceptions influence career decisions of college students over time. She also studies the role of professional culture in wage inequality, cross-national beliefs about work time for mothers (with Maria Charles), and, in a Social Problems article, perceptions of inequality among high-level professional women (with Mary Blair-Loy). She earned Electrical Engineering and Sociology degrees from Montana State
graduateprograms and career pathways, are introduced to spark future career interests. As moreundergraduate engineers are exposed to the topic of public policy, they can begin their careerswith a more well-rounded and holistic understanding of how they can lead and potentiallyimprove the field of civil engineering in serving the public, economy, and the environment.Keywords: public policy, civil engineering, undergraduate, curricula, CEBOK, pedagogyIntroduction Public policy continues to be interconnected with the field of civil engineering as it playsa role in how infrastructure is developed. In the twenty-first century, civil engineers are facedwith multidisciplinary challenges that require skills beyond the traditional technical
explore the predictiverelationships between our constructs and help institutions create strategies for the success of boththeir graduate students and their faculty.IntroductionPositive self-efficacy expectations, a person’s beliefs in their abilities to achieve their goals, havebeen shown to be essential to academic persistence and professional success [1], [2]. As such, inefforts to stave off attrition from graduate programs, engineering graduate students’ self-efficacyin the academic and research domains have received much attention from researchers [3], [4]. Inrecognizing that a students’ self-efficacy is influenced by environmental factors outside of theircontrol, the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) posits that a student’s career and
Program help with the matriculation of becoming an independent scholar (e.g., grant writing, self-efficacy, professor)?Literature Review The postdoctoral to professorate pathway has become a notable means of transition forgraduate students moving to faculty positions, however many of these scholars face structuraland interpersonal challenges as they navigate the transition to faculty positions (Rybarczyk et al.,2016). Studies have identified that the structural challenges postdocs face are due to a lack ofsupport from their institution in terms of career development and interpersonal struggles withfeeling exploited for low-cost labor (Rohn, 2011; Times Higher Education, 2012). A solutionposed, according to Sigma Xi Postdoc survey
-curricular participation. The most common choices of activities arecombinations of recreational, design/research, and professional. Career-related reasons informparticipation in design/research and professional activities, while social reasons most influencechoice of participation in recreational and community activities.This study contributes to understanding how students pursue multiple complementary extra-/co-curricular activities to support their goals and interests. By better understanding the influence ofdifferent activities of extra-/co-curricular participation, students can make more informed choicesin how they allocate their time to pursuing different goals and interests. Additionally, this study’sexamination of factors that influence