Columbus, Ohio
June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
Curricular Issues in Computing and Information Technology Programs I
Computing & Information Technology
9
10.18260/1-2--28066
https://peer.asee.org/28066
673
Accomplished IT leader with experience in project management, strategic technology implementation, and professional development responsibilities – including curriculum development. Areas of expertise include database maintenance and implementation, IT systems, IP phone systems, healthcare training technology and professional development training for certified teaching staff, including technical writing responsibilities, payroll systems implementation, support, and administration. Proven ability to lead, manage, and improve operations.
Skills Include:
Systems Integration Planning
RFP Development/Grant Writing
Technical management including software development, system administration , telecommunications
Professional Development
Process Re-engineering
Disaster Recovery
End User Training
ERP Design/Implementation
IT Management
Project Management
Solution Engineering
Systems Support
Dennis Owen is an Associate Professor of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University. His primary teaching interests include application development and computer hardware. He is active in recruiting and curriculum transformation.
Recruiting consumes considerable resources for any post-secondary institution. Many institutions also have a mission of K-12 engagement. A concurrent credit system can help an institution fulfill its K-12 outreach mission and also provide valuable recruiting opportunities. This paper explores the process of creating and implementing a Concurrent Credit program. Traditional dual credit courses are high school courses delivered by high school faculty, for which students can also earn college credit. This University did not participate in traditional dual credit courses because of concerns with course content and rigor. Alternatively, This University has allowed high school seniors, and in some cases juniors, to enroll in This University courses. While this made This University courses a possibility for high school students, very few where geographically close enough to a This University campus to take advantage of the opportunity. The challenge was to create a mechanism that would satisfy This University’s concerns regarding dual credit and still keep the course accessible to high school juniors and seniors. A system has been implemented to deliver university courses taught by university faculty on the high school campuses. High school juniors and seniors enroll in these courses as part of their conventional high school schedule. The students begins to build a university transcript and, in addition, the high school awards high school credit for the university course. This approach is referred to as Concurrent Credit to help differentiate it from conventional dual credit delivery mechanisms and thus mitigate This University’s concerns over course content and rigor. The implementation of an introductory information systems development course in the Concurrent Credit model at A Local High School will be presented as an example. Specific topics include establishing a relationship with a high school, identifying courses that provide Concurrent Credit opportunities, scheduling, university faculty involvement and commitment, and pedagogical differences between high school and college students. Success rates, the K-12 outreach mission, and recruiting outcomes are also examined.
Barnett, L. J., & Owen, D. O. (2017, June), Concurrent Credit: K-12 Outreach, Recruiting, or Both? Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28066
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015