Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies
First-Year Programs
14
10.18260/1-2--31302
https://peer.asee.org/31302
453
Dr. Krystal Corbett is a lecturer for the Mechanical Engineering Department at Louisiana Tech University. She teaches in their prestigious Living with the Lab first year program as well as other mechanical engineering related courses. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering (2008/2010), M.S. in Mathematics (2012), and Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2012) at Louisiana Tech University. Formerly, she was the Director of Curricula at the Cyber Innovation Center (CIC) where she managed various educational enterprises.
A curriculum can be thought of as a set of living documents that should change and be updated periodically, allowing the content and student activities to adapt to different generational learning styles and interests. This paper describes the evolution of a project-based, first-year curriculum called Living with the Lab (LWTL) that was implemented in 2007 for all engineering students at Louisiana Tech University. In 2011 the content underwent a major redesign to incorporate the Arduino microcontroller as the key hardware component for instruction. Implementation and adaptation of the curriculum continues at universities across the nation.
Given that it has been six years since the previous content update, course materials are currently being restructured to more systematically foster student ability to solve complex, multi-step problems involving circuits, conservation of energy, material balance, statics and engineering economics, while also utilizing a new cost-efficient robot that was designed in-house. More focus is also placed on soft skills like teamwork and communication. Some of the revision materials for the curriculum includes: notes that have more structure and clarity, new engaging projects that drive the fundamental concepts presented, more time built-in during class to work on projects, structure for group assessments, and a fresh set of homework questions.
This work in progress will chronicle the revision process while assessing preliminary student performance data pre- and post-revision. A comparative analysis of exam questions related to core fundamental topics from students in previous years with students in the current revision will serve as the primary source of assessment data. The researchers will use this data to determine whether or not the new scaffolding attempts in the revision are resulting in better performances by students. Lessons learned and future goals will also be discussed.
Corbett, K. S. (2018, June), Work in Progress: Redesigning Curriculum to Foster Student Success Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--31302
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015