. Ladeji-Osias, P. James-Okeke, F. Moazzami, C. Scott, K. Connor, A. Saka “Improving and Expanding Engineering Education in the Middle East and Africa Using Mobile Learning Technology and Innovative Pedagogy in Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and Africa, Current Status, and Future Insights,” Abdulwahed, M., Hasna, M., Froyd, J., Ed (2016)9. L. Zhang, I. Dabipi, Y. Jin, P. Matin, "Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education with Educational Module Library and Vertical Integration Projects," ASEE Conference 2016, Jun. 2016, New Orleans, LA.10. O. Nare, Q. Le, N. Halyo, Z. Hayes, and Z. Sun, “Assessing Potential Impacts an Experimental Centric Approach Can Have in an Introduction to Digital Electronics
students in the geosciences. Advances in Engineering Education. 8(4).Fey, S. B., Theus, M. E., & Ramirez, A. R. (2020). Course-based undergraduate research experiences in a remote setting: Two case studies documenting implementation and student perceptions. Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution. 10(22): 12528-12541.Foertsch, J. A., Alexander, B. B., & Penberthy, D. L. (1997). Evaluation of the UW-Madison’s summer undergraduate research programs: Final report. Madison, WI.Gates, A. Q., Teller, P. J., Bernat, A., Delgado, N., & Della-Piana, C. K. (1998). Meeting the challenge of expanding participation in the undergraduate research experience. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998. FIE’98
. Conf. Proc., 2018.[14] A. M. Cruz, A. R. Rincon, W. R. R. Dueñas, N. F. Luna, and D. A. Q. Torres, “The impact of an introductory biomedical engineering course on students’ perceptions of the engineering profession,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 136–149, 2016.[15] A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles, “Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 68–81, 2000.[16] J. D. Ortega-Alvarez, S. Z. Atiq, and H. E. Rodriguez-Simmonds, “A qualitative study investigating how first-year engineering students’ value beliefs influence their choice of selecting an engineering major,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016-June, 2016.[17] B. D. Jones
. Kinshuk, “Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 17, pp. 133–149, Oct. 2014.[17] E. N. Asiimwe and Å. Grönlund, “MLCMS actual use, perceived use, and experiences of use,” Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101–121, 2015.[18] S. Dart, S. Cunningham-Nelson, and L. Dawes, “Understanding student perceptions of worked example videos through the technology acceptance model,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1278–1290, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1002/cae.22301.[19] X.-F. Lin, C. Deng, Q. Hu, and C.-C. Tsai, “Chinese undergraduate students’ perceptions of mobile learning: Conceptions, learning profiles, and approaches
communicate their status with the instructors.This form of feedback can make the students play a significant role in their classroom educationand enhance the course outcomes.The student’s Autonomy: Student as an agent of changeThe instructor’s goal should be facilitating students’ learning, providing a creative space forencouraging engagement, discussions, and moving towards more in-depth and advanced learning,problem finding, and problem-solving. At the same time, students need to be more than just passiveparticipants, expecting to have a one-directional pathway to knowledge. Students and faculty needto have reflections, discussions, open Q/A, and examination of the expectations several timesduring the process. Students need to be honest
each breakout group, students would work in small groups (<15 students each) to hold deeper conversations about different elements of environmental injustice. ● Friday’s class period (10/30/2020) would consist of a guest presentation by two members of UCCO, followed by a 15-minute Q&A portion, where students could appreciate the perspective of a group leading in environmental activism. Topics would include environmental racism in Connecticut and Puerto Rico as well as the climate movement taking place on the university’s campus.Figure 1. Comparison of EJ week to the rest of the course Monday Wednesday Friday Average Week in the
’ explanations of suffering,” in Morality and Health, A. Brandt and P. Rozin, Eds. London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 119– 169.[28] H. C. Luegenbiehl and R. F. Clancy, Global engineering ethics. New York: Elsevier, 2017.[29] R. F. Clancy, “The development of a case-based course on global engineering ethics in China,” Int. J. Ethics Educ., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40889-020-00103-1.[30] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[31] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[32] H. E. Canary, J. R
Mining Society, 2018.[22] A. Fortino, Q. Zhong, W. C. Huang, and R. Lowrance, “Application of text data mining to stem curriculum selection and development,” in 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE, 2019, p. 354––361.[23] S. Lunn, J. Zhu, and M. Ross, “Utilizing web scraping and natural language processing to better inform pedagogical practice,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2020, p. 1––9.[24] B. Rybarczyk, L. Lerea, P. K. Lund, D. Whittington, and L. Dykstra, “Postdoctoral training aligned with the academic professoriate,” Bioscience, vol. 61, no. 9, p. 699–705, 2011.[25] X. Su, “Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity,” J
look into the student writing samples. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S A Centrality of Military & Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 B Commitment to Problem Solving 0 6 3 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 5 1 2 20 0 6 0 2 C Narrow Technical Focus 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 D Persistence 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 E
students at their institutions,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.7.[8] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01463379709370054.[9] W. Wright-Harp and P. A. Cole, “A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 35, no. Spring, pp. 4–16, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1044/cicsd_35_S_4.[10] N. A. of S. Medicine Engineering, and, P. and G. Affairs, B. on H. E. and Workforce, and C. on E. M. in STEMM, The Science of Effective Mentorship in
. 179. Au, N.; Bayles, T.; Ross, J., Exposing chemical engineering students to real worldproblems: Health care and renewable energy systems. In ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh,PA, 2008.10. Zydney, A. L., Analysis of membrane processes in the introduction-to-ChE course.Chemical Engineering Education 2003, 37 (1), 33-37.11. Lipscomb, G. G., A compendium of open-ended membrane problems in the curriculum.Chemical Engineering Education 2003, 37 (1), 46-51.12. Comolli, N.; Kelly, W.; Wu, Q., The artificial kidney: Investigating current dialysismethods as a freshman design project. In ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2010.13. Harrell, G. K.; McPeak, A. N.; Ford Versypt, A. N., A pharmacokinetic simulation-based module to
, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for
larger group of individuals. Indeed, this resulted in a library ofrecordings that can be used to make the content available online, which could provide a measureof sustainability by facilitating the offering of these materials beyond the conclusion of the awardcurrently funding the NRT.Acknowledgement and disclaimerThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1922694.References[1] E. Santillan-Jimenez, Q. Duan, J. Dariotis, and M. Crocker, "Enhancing graduate education by fully integrating research and professional skill development
forward with their failures.” Another student alsocommented that it was important to realize that many have faced challenges. “Just learning ofothers' experiences really helps let me know that I am not alone in the hardships I face and haveto overcome.”Students were asked to suggest changes to improve the Epic Fail event. One student suggestedlengthening the event time. A number of others suggested providing more time for interactionthrough a Q and A session and time for a discussion or for sharing.DiscussionThe intent of this evaluation was to determine if the EPIC program is meeting its goals throughthe implementation of its three
to students to connect in teams any time. Another engagement strategy this instructor listed was to have optional sessions like office hours on Friday for discussion and for Q&A. However, they did not continue this due to lack of interest. Table 1 below shows a summary of the engagement strategies that faculty listed as being used in the Hybrid in-person and Hybrid remote learning environments. There was no difference in the strategies listed by faculty based on the gender, years of teaching, and number of online classes taught. TABLE 1 List of Primary Engagement Strategies in ENED 1100 Hybrid LEs Strategies In-Person RemoteDiscussions
timeto wrap up conversations before resuming. Once in presentation mode, the host can share theircamera, screen, websites, and videos they may wish to show. Hosts can also invite guests on a"stage," where they can share their camera and screen. Presenters also can record the entiresession to share later. While in presentation mode, another helpful feature is the "Q&A" option,where guests can create questions anonymously that they wish to be answered by the presenterand arrange these questions by importance and popularity. This feature can also be used forpolling the audience about selected topics or as a quiz to check for understanding [8]Use of Remo for Classes, Workshops, and Community Outreach Programs Even though the original
children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Early Child. Res. Q. 29, 333–344.[14] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in society, 6, 52-58.[15] Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18-34). Longman.[16] Creswell., J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among the five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.[17] Chenail, R. J. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Qualitative data analysis as a metaphoric process. Qualitative Report, 17(1), 248-253.[18] Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM: Science Technology Engineering Mathematics
Zealand Journal of Law and Education, vol. 13, no.2, 2008, pp. 21-32.[14] A. O. Madan, “Cyber aggression/cyber bullying and the dark triad: effect on workplace behavior/performance,” International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, vol. 8, no.6, 2014.[15] Q. Li., “Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences,” School Psychology International, vol. 27 no.2, 2006, pp. 157-170.[16] E. M. Lund and S. W. Ross, “Bullying perpetration, victimization, and demographic differences in college students: A review of the literature,” Trauma, Violence and Abuse, vol. 18, no. 3, 2017, pp. 348-360.[17] L. K. Watts, J. Wagner, B. Velasquez, and P. I. Behrens
packed with team building andprofessional development activities. Activities include Skype and in-person alumni talks, industrysite visits and Q&A with engineers, faculty research talks, and a University career center visitwhere staff discusses the college application process, various majors in STEM, alumniconnections and inspirational stories. These features of the camp align with the dimensions ofrelatedness and autonomy in SDT.The code camp was led by a female faculty/lecturer that has extensive experience with teachinglower-level Computer Science courses at the University level. The code camp instruction teamalso included undergraduate student teacher assistants (TAs); two female TAs and one male TA,all of whom were Computer Science
: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/writing_in_engineering/handbook_on _report_formats/reports_and_memos.html. [Accessed: Mar. 4, 2021][18] M. Prince, “Does active learning work: A review of the research,” J. of Eng. Educ., pp. 1- 9, July 2004.[19] Y. Chen, A. K. Awasthi, F. Wei, Q. Tan, and J. Li, “Single-use plastics: Production, usage, disposal, and adverse impacts,” Science of the Total Environ., vol. 752, no. 15, 2021. [Online] Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720353018. [Accessed: Mar. 4, 2021][20] P. G. Ryan, “Entanglement of birds in plastics and other synthetic materials,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 135, pp.159-164, Oct. 2018. https
, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778.[11] L. Watts, “Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication in Distance Learning: A Review of the Literature,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ. Charlotte, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 23-32,56, 2016.[12] M. M. M. Abdelmalak, “Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities: students’ perspectives,” Online Learn. J. OLJ, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87-, Mar. 2015.[13] “70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.” Accessed: Feb. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/70019_Mertler_Chapter_7.pdf.[14] S. L. Walker and B. J. Fraser, “Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance