Paper ID #32601The Ultimate Goal of Ethics Education Should Be More Ethical BehaviorsDr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Delft University of Technology Rockwell F. Clancy is a Lecture at Delft University of Technology. Before joining Delft, he was an As- sociate Teaching Professor in engineering ethics and philosophy at the University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute and Research Fellow in the Institute of Social Cognition and Decision- making, both in Shanghai Jiao Tong University. His research and teaching interests include engineering ethics, moral psychology, philosophy of technology, Chinese
Paper ID #33278Early Career Engineers’ Views of Ethics and Social Responsibility:Study OverviewDr. Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University Stephanie Claussen is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State Univer- sity. She previously spent eight years as a Teaching Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Di- vision and the Electrical Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005 and her M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University in 2008 and 2012, respectively. Her
Paper ID #33268Encountering Engineering Ethics in the Workplace: Stories from theTrenchesMs. Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dayoung Kim is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research interest centers on engineering ethics and social responsibility, and she is specifically interested in cul- tural influences on engineers’ moral formation. She earned her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at Yonsei University (Seoul, South Korea) in 2017 and M.S. in Chemical Engineering at Purdue University (West Lafayette, USA) in 2021.Ms. Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University
Technology Dr. Kate Padgett Walsh is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Iowa State University. She received a B.A. from Middlebury College, an M.A. from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and a Ph.D. from Northwestern University. Her research focuses on ethics and the history of ethics, including the ethics of debt and finance, as well as the scholarship of teaching and learning.Dr. Scott Grant Feinstein, Iowa State University Dr. Scott Feinstein is an expert in research design and comparative and identity politics.Mr. Luan Minh Nguyen, Iowa State University Graduate StudentDr. Kasey M. Faust, University of Texas at Austin Dr. Kasey Faust is an Assistant Professor in Civil, Architectural and Environmental
Paper ID #34179STEM, Gender, Ethnicity, and CyberbullyingDr. Claire Lynne McCullough P.E., High Point University Dr. McCullough received her bachelor’s, master’s, and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Van- derbilt, Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Tennessee, respectively, and is a registered professional engineer in the state of Alabama. She is a member of I.E.E.E., Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, and Eta Kappa Nu. She is currently Professor and Founding Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the High Point University, and teaches courses in such areas as Engineering Ethics, Controls, and
Paper ID #32600The Relations between Ethical Reasoning and Moral Intuitions amongEngineering Students in ChinaDr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Delft University of Technology Rockwell F. Clancy is a lecturer at TU Delft. Before joining Delft, he was an Associate Teaching Professor in engineering ethics and philosophy at the University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute and Research Fellow in the Institute of Social Cognition and Decision-making, both in Shanghai Jiao Tong University. His research and teaching interests include engineering ethics, moral psychology, philosophy of technology, Chinese
Institute for Science and Math Education. Dr. Bergsman received her Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction from the University of Washington.Sara Goering, University of Washington Professor of Philosophy, core faculty for the Program on Ethics, and the UW Disability Studies Program, adjunct faculty in Bioethics and Humanities, and co-lead for the neuroethics group at the UW Center for Neurotechnology.Dr. Eric H. Chudler, University of Washington Eric H. Chudler is a research neuroscientist interested in the neuroactive properties of medicinal plants and herbs and how the brain processes information about pain and nociception. He received his Ph.D. from the Department of Psychology at
Technology Dr. Kate Padgett Walsh is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Iowa State University. She received a B.A. from Middlebury College, an M.A. from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and a Ph.D. from Northwestern University. Her research focuses on ethics and the history of ethics, including the ethics of debt and finance, as well as the scholarship of teaching and learning.Dr. Scott Grant Feinstein Dr. Scott Feinstein is an expert in research design and comparative and identity politics.Dr. Cassandra Rutherford, Iowa State University Dr. Cassandra Rutherford is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil, Constructions and Envi- ronmental Engineering. Her research focuses on geotechnical engineering
Paper ID #34187Class Exercises Involving Ethical Issues Reinforce the Importance andReach of Biomedical Engineering (and the Impact of the Coronavirus onTeaching Strategy and Measures of Assessment)Dr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University IEEE Life Fellow, AIMBE Founding Fellow, U.N.E.S.C.O. Academician. Director, Center for Rehabilita- tion Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. (Retired) Senior Rehab Research Career Scientist, VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and
Paper ID #32865Culturally-based Ethical Barriers for American Indian/Alaska NativeStudents and Professionals in EngineeringProf. Jani C. Ingram, Northern Arizona University Jani C. Ingram, PhD investigates environmental contaminants with respect to their impact on health. A major part of her research is focused on characterizing uranium and arsenic contamination in water, soil, plants and livestock. A critical aspect of her research is to foster collaborations with the Native American community and leaders to build trust, obtain access to field samples and gain insights into their health concerns. Recruiting Native
community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Mr. Jake Walker Lewis, University of Colorado Boulder Graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder holding a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineer- ing and a master’s degree in civil engineering. Presented undergraduate research findings on ethics in co-curricular university environments in the form of a poster at the 2018 Zone IV ASEE Conference. De- fended and published master’s thesis examining ethics introduction in K12 STEM education in November
Paper ID #33770A Graduate-level Engineering Ethics Course: An Initial Attempt toProvoke Moral ImaginationMr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He re- ceived a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical en- gineering learning systems. Yousef
individual and institutional factors that contribute to a ”culture of disengagement” from the ethical dimension of engineering work among students in the engineering profession. His Ph.D. project is funded by the NSF and is concerned with promoting and im- proving engineering students’ ethical behavior and sensitivity through on-campus student organizations. His academic interests include mental health, international development, human rights, and engineering ethics. Currently, his ambition is to work within an international organization such as UNESCO and to be an advocate for promoting science and technology as critical tools of sustainable development as well as to participate in the dialogue between scientists, policy
. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching engineering in particular Electromagnetism and other classes that are mathematically driven. His research and activities also include on avenues to connect Product Design and Engineering Education in a synergetic way. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 TheChallengesofEngineeringEducation,EngineeringPractice,Codeof Ethics,andSocialJustice Abstract
), populated by channelssuch as #lees-liberal-ed-slash-engr-and-society, #ethics, #hallway, and #onlin-learning-and-covid-response.[3] The channel #craftingwhileconferencing also offered an important understoryto the virtual conference on engineering education. It offered refrain from the formal panels andworkshops of the virtual conference through craft. It created a virtual space of multisensoryepistemology and opened up an alternative digital (maker) space: “This is the very beginning ofthe craftingwhileconferencing channel. Description: Frivolous or fundamental to survival in avirtual conference? This channel was created for all the crafters out there who are knitting,crocheting, doodling, whatevering their way to staying focused while attending
algorithms as they enter the workforce, can develop an early awarenessand understanding of bias in information systems. Further, when the students receive suchtraining, the automated systems they generate will produce more fair outcomes. Our pedagogyincorporates insights from computer science, library science, medical ethics, and critical theory.The aim of our algorithm bias instruction is to help computer science students recognize andmitigate the systematic marginalization of groups within the current technological environment.IntroductionSearch-engine bias and unfair outcomes from automated systems have been documented inrecent years. All modern information systems depend on computer algorithms to run effectiveprograms. Algorithms are sets of
learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Prof. JoAnn Silverstein P.E., University of Colorado Boulder JoAnn Silverstein is a Professor in Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering and Associate Dean for Faculty Advancement at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She has a BA in Psychology (Stanford University), BS, MS, and PhD in Civil Engineering (University of California, Davis) and is a registered Professional Engineer (Colorado). Her research interests are Water and wastewater treatment process analysis
learn and experience. Similar discrepancies between faculty andstudents have been seen in previous studies of engineering ethics education [6]. In this paper we ask: 1) What methods do teachers choose to use most often in teaching CSR? 2) What methods are most clearly recognized by students and in what courses? 3) Given student and faculty concerns, what are previous pedagogical methods from ethics literature that may be most effective for teaching CSR? CSR is a broad term encompassing the many ways that corporations attempt to accommodate theneed for maximizing profit and taking into account the needs and wellbeing of the community andenvironment [1]. CSR can be used as a method for teaching macroethics to engineering
systems’” [7].Several previous studies have been devoted to studying trends surrounding social justice inengineering and to maintaining student engagement with the social surroundings of theirprojects. In one paper, George Catalano and Caroline Baillie explored the influence thatengineers have on justice and peace, concluding that engineering ethics should be expanded tothe overall social impact a product of engineering creates [8]. Catalano explores this further byexamining engineering ethics as described within different professional engineeringorganizations. He poses that the main issue with engineering ethics is the demand that anengineer should work to protect the public without a specific definition of who that includes.Rather, the author
engineering design course that aims to enhance theengineering design and engineering disciplines for first-year students in liberal arts universities.Specifically, we examined what learning objectives in this course motivated students. Moreimportantly, the study explored whether these motivations aligned with teacher’s perceptions ofmotivation, and how these motivations varied based on student demographics. The course isdesigned as a highly interactive seminar-style course that explores all aspects of the engineeringprofession, including engineering disciplines, education, creativity and design process, andengineers’ professional and ethical responsibilities. Students here implement the engineeringdesign process to develop prototypes that solve
interest include: STEM Education, Cybersecurity Education, Cybersecurity Policy, Social Engineering, Information Technology Ethics, and Cybersecurity Workforce Development.Dr. Marcus Rogers, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Marcus Rogers, is a Professor and Executive Director of Cybersecurity Programs in the Dept. of Computer & Information Technology, Purdue University. He is the Chief Scientist at the Purdue Tippeca- noe High Tech Crime Unit (HTCU), and the Editor-in-Chief Journal of Digital Forensics Security & Law (JDFSL). Dr. Rogers also sits on the Board of Directors American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). Dr. Rogers’ research and publications focus on cybercrime, cyber-criminal behavioral
Paper ID #34988Teaching Social Justice to Engineering StudentsDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designs and teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity and inclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentors UW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities. She also leads STEM outreach activities for
Paper ID #34487Exploring Values and Norms of Engineering Through Responsible Innova-tionand Critiques of Engineering CulturesDr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster
Shaffer, Lipscomb UniversityDr. Elizabeth Buchanan, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Elizabeth Buchanan PhD is Director of the Office of Research Support Services and Senior Research Scientist at the Marshfield Clinic Research Institute. For over twenty years, Elizabeth’s scholarship has focused on research ethics, compliance and regulations, specifically around Internet, social media, and big data research. In these areas, she has written guidelines for IRBs/REBs, contributed to the Secretary’s Advisory Committee to the Office of Human Research Protections (SACHRP) in 2013, and was co-author to the 2012 Association of Internet Researchers Ethics Guidelines. Elizabeth serves as faculty at the Fordham University’s
students’ understanding. Ethics, for example, is often taught in civilengineering through the use of case studies. Further, case studies offer an opportunity forinterdisciplinary discussions centered on human dignity and justice goals [8] and likewisedevelop empathy for the users impacted by the project. Empathy is increasingly beingrecognized for the central role it may play in connecting crucial inter- and intrapersonal skillswith enhanced abilities to understand and productively work in multidisciplinary environmentswith diverse stakeholder groups [9]. Finally, some professors may not feel comfortable directlydiscussing race and related topics within an otherwise technical classroom environment; casestudies allow the emphasis to be taken off of
,feeding to their fear about saying the wrong thing.The disconnect between the two groups often results in explicitly marginalizing classroomenvironments, i.e., environments where students feel unwelcome from blatantly marginalizing ordiscriminatory behaviors [1]. The data demonstrates that faculty are interested in developingimplicitly inclusive classrooms but fear that their lack of expertise on these topics will lead tofailure and having a negative impact on students. However, students voiced strong support andinterest in having faculty discuss and teach about inclusivity and ethics in their engineeringclassrooms. To create implicitly inclusive environments, faculty are encouraged to acknowledgeand discuss such topics in their classes and
andconducting research from locations in time zones around the globe. The learning goals for thiscourse were developed such that students who participated in the course would: • Learn about research mentoring styles and build skills for communicating about goals and expectations with research mentors • Examine and apply time management skills for balancing academic, research and personal goals during college • Gain an understanding of the structure of research literature and develop skills for identifying and organizing appropriate references within their field of research • Explore methods for documenting and disseminating research results in engineering • Learn about ethical practices for research, and be able to articulate key
Ethics at Boston College. His research is in contemporary environmental issues and their religious, ethical, and political resonances. He is currently at work on a manuscript focused on John Muir, the famed nineteenth-century American conservationist and founder of the Sierra Club, and Muir’s influence on conceptions of the sacred in modern American religious consciousness. Dr. Powell’s research also examines the intersection of race, religion, and environment. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integrating history and engineering in the first-year core curriculum at Boston College1. IntroductionIn What
, makers, designers, and technologists. Currently, she is part of a team setting up the Human-Centered Engineering program at Boston College. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Critical perspectives on teaching design in first-year engineeringIntroductionTo engineer is to bring science and technology into a society filled with competing economic,ethical, and political influences. Yet still, engineering programs teach technical content asseparate from their historical, social, and economic contexts, which creates a duality betweenthe technical and social (Cech, 2014; Faulkner, 2000; Leydens & Lucena, 2017). As studentslearn and practice