students to analyze a film and address leadership topics in the PD-3 curriculum. During these presentations, the instructors noted that the higher levels of the cognitive domain were not reached. Therefore, a group presentation was carefully designed to target analysis, synthesis and evaluation levels of the cognitive domain. The design included case scenarios that required the students to analyze the information given and, through the use of synthesis and evaluation, prepare and present their position. During a Q&A portion of their presentations, student responses to certain questions further help instructors analyze their learning and internalization of the course content
Page 11.1188.8 Pimmel, Russ, “Cooperative Learning Instructional Activities in a Capstone Design Course,” Journal ofEngineering Education, (July 2001), accessed online athttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:mTq_X9wN5dkJ:https://www.asee.org/jee/papers/EE009-16.pdf+pimmel+capstone+cooperative+learning on December 14, 2005.5 Jenkins, S. Rod, et al., “Capstone Course in an Integrated Engineering Curriculum,” Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, (April 2002), pp. 75-82.6 US Military Academy Website, www.usma.edu/mission.asp, accessed January 17, 2006.7 Kaufman, pg. 26.8 Ibid, 28.9 Project Management and System Design, Instructional Memorandum, Academic Term 2006-2 (springsemester
) C / 9b2 84.2 ± 37.5 (19) 100.0 ± 0.0 (20) A / D3 78.8 ± 19.7 (17) 70.9 ± 22.3 (35) B / D3 88.3 ± 10.3 (12) 70.8 ± 22.9 (43) C / D3 87.4 ± 22.6 (19) 91.3 ± 5.0 (20)1 Equilibrium constant expression K from common exam questions.2 Equilibrium quotient expression Q from common exam questions.3 Multiconcept equilibrium problem.Table 2. Results from Examination 1, reported as mean ± standard deviation(sample size). Results are shown for the instructor’s test and standard hours.References1. Hawkes, S.J., J. Chem. Ed., 2003, 80, 1381.2. Lewis, D.L., J. Chem. Ed., 2004, 81, 1265.3. de Levie, R. Aqueous Acid-Base Equilibria and
papers; 2) if students want to improve their papers based on the results in the evaluationforms, they must turn in the final version of the paper at the end of the tenth week. Theinstructor will calculate a new score for the paper if it has been updated according to theevaluation results. For example, if a student loses points due to spelling errors and later revisesthe paper to correct the errors, then the deducted points will be credited.The second in-class test is given in the fourth class period of this week.Week 10: Presentation.Students are required to give a presentation in class, using Microsoft PowerPoint slides. Eachpresentation is followed by a 2-minute Question-and-Answer (Q&A) session. The students areexpected to clearly address
, e.g., overhangs, light shelves, … etc. i. Form of the ceiling. j. Reflectances of interior surfaces. k. Design of the space, i.e., rectilinear, irregular, ... etc. l. Type of glass used, i.e., its visible transmittance. m. Level of maintenance provided for the space. n. Task performed in the space, i.e., the recommended illumination level. o. Height of the workplane above the floor, where illumination level is measured. p. Type of the desired lighting system, i.e., general, task, or a combined general and task. q. Schedule of occupancy in the space; daily and seasonally.6. The Need for Experimental ResearchTo overcome the current overlooking of daylighting systems and to make their design the norm,further
real-worldinto engineering classrooms at Hispanic-serving institutions, improve the higher-level cognitiveskills of the students, and provide materials that will meet the requirements of ABET 2000. Wehad about 40 participants from Chile and 6 participants from the U.S. Most of the participantsfrom Chile were either the deans, heads of department, or senior faculty from the engineeringschools. Dr. Susan Kemnitzer, NSF, gave an excellent keynote address for the participants andhad a lively Q&A session. We conducted an evaluation of the workshop. At the end of the meeting, the participants were required to assess the usefulness andorganization of the workshop by filling out a questionnaire comprising of 8 items. Items were in
FORCE GAGE I Q HAMMER TIP CHARACTERIZATION M LEAKAGE U HAMMER TIP DIFFERENT PULSE SHAPES E WINDOWS E FOURIER SERIES & FFT
through the National Science Foundation Integrative GraduateEducation and Research Traineeship (IGERT) Program grant number DGE-0504345.References1. P.T. Anastas, J.B. Zimmerman, “Design through the 12 principles of green engineering” Envir. Sci. Tech. 2003, 37, 95A-101A2. J.R. Mihelcic, J.C. Crittenden, M.J. Small, D.R. Shonnard, D.R. Hokanson, Q. Zhang, H. Chen, S.A. Sorby, V.U. James, J.W. Sutherland, J.L. Schnoor, “Sustsainability Science and Engineering: The Emergence of a New Metadiscipline” Env. Sci. Tech. 2003, 37, 5314-5324.3. J.A. Vanegas, “Road Map and Principles for Built Environment Sustainability”, Env. Sci. Tech. 2003, 37, 5363- 53724. Calder, W. and RM Clugston, “US Progress Towards Sustainability in Higher
engineeringLittman/ one 3 2 yes yes yesBillingtonOllis one 3 2 yes yes noRosa 3 quarters 4/q 3 yes yes w/other engineeringShraibati one 3 3Whitman summer 3 4 yes yes yes________________________________________________________________________Course Theme Compared to Instructor Expertise Inspection of the titles and contents of these courses reveals some similarities andmany differences in content. A much clearer picture arises if we
”, American Council on Education (ACE), 2001.[4] Laura Siaya, Maura Porcelli, Madelaine Green, “Public Opinion Pool - One Year Later -Attitudes About International Education Since September 11", ACE 2002(http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:qnflchynPnIJ:https://san4.dii.utk.edu/pls/portal30/docs/FOLDER/SACS/SACSQEP/docs/2002_one-year-later.pdf+%E2%80%9COne+Year+Later+Attitudes+About+International+Education+Since+September+11%22&hl=en).[5] Jane Knight, “Internationalization remodeled: Definition, Approaches, and Rationales”Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol 8 No. 1, Spring 2004 5-31.[6] Charles M. Vest’s, “U.S. Engineering Education in Transition” the annul meeting of theNational Academy of Engineering, 1995, (http://web.mit.edu
interaction among students, faculty, staff,and practicing engineers in developing students’ learning experiences as well as their careers. 6) Tools and artifacts as cultural repositoriesThe main cultural repository of the students’ work is represented by their publications inconferences and journals, which form a shared archive in the WEMPEC library and morerecently on the website15. More informal repositories are the prototype hardware devices builtby the students for their thesis projects retained in the laboratory for future use and/or salvaging. 7) Mediation of artifactsThroughout the process of interactive activities in and outside the classroom students learn todevelop and mediate artifact terms, tools and activities such as ‘d-q models
T o ta l H a rm o n i c R e p e a ti n g M ea n Va lue1 Di sto rsi o n S e q u e n ce V e ri fi e r fo r In p u t/O u tp u t S ta i r
defined in the model using either P-Q load values or R-L-C component values.A three phase measurement block is used to obtain the line current (rms) and time plots of thethree-phase voltages and currents. This model was developed in a short amount of time, andcould augment a homework or laboratory activity. 6.099 signal rms 6.101 Vabc Scope 6.101 A
Confident Confident ConfidentSample Operations Survey Questions ∧ ∧ ∧Q-1 I can generate forecasts and use them in Yes …… 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 production planning. NoQ-6 I understand the relationship between MRP and Yes …… 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ERP systems. No I can provide examples of how production Yes …… 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Q-10 planning and control decisions are linked to No accounting/finance.Sample Technology Survey QuestionsQ-1 I can navigate around
. Page 11.79.2 y L φa φ(x) φb Ta x a b T q, moment/length b x Figure 2. Material Law Formulas for a uniform shaft with end torsional couples and
Education and Human Resources, June 1996), pp.ii, 2, 4, 21, 41, 51, 65.3. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061 Update (Washington, DC: AAAS, 2001-2002).4. National Research Council, Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Washington, DC: National Research Council, 2003), p. 116,5. Ann Q. Gates, Patricia J. Teller, Andrew Bernat, Nelly Delgado, and Connie Kubo Della-Piana, “Expanding Participation in Undergraduate Research Using the Affinity Group Model,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 4 (October 1999), p. 409.6. “The Reinvention Center at Stony Brook,” http://www.sunysb.edu/Reinventioncenter/ (Stony
use ofdemonstrations follow: • “The instructor uses extremely effective learning tools in class, and they really helped me to better understand the material presented.” • “This has been my favorite class…. Even though it was more work than any other class, it really stimulated my learning and excitement of being a Civil major.” • “Good visual aids” • “It was very possible to visualize all the concepts so it was easier to realize what was going on.” • “The models used to illustrate concepts were useful.” • “The material was relative and interesting.” • Q: Strengths of course. A: “The instructor demos and visual aids”; “Practical applications”; “Interesting material, vital to
n br Q ar rs ai O discipline-specific databases and C Li
. 2004. Clustering of bio-products technologies for zero emissions and eco-efficiency. Industrial Crops and Products 20: 169-180.9. Kamm, B., and M. Kamm. 2004a. Biorefinery systems. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 18(1): 1-6.10. Kamm, B. and M. Kamm. 2004b. Principles of biorefineries. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 64: 137-145.11. Ohara, H. 2003. Biorefinery. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 62: 474-477.12. Askew, M. 2005. The biorefinery concept. Renews, Renewable Energy Newsletter, European Commission.13. EIA AEO. 2002. Annual Energy Outlook 2002. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration.14. US DOE. 2003. Industrial Bioproducts: Today and Tomorrow. Prepared by Energetics, Incorporated
the value of a rural biorefinery – part II: analysis and implications. Agricultural Systems 76: 61-76.8. Gravitis, J., J. Zandersons, N. Vedernikov, I. Kruma, and V. Ozols-Kalnins. 2004. Clustering of bio-products technologies for zero emissions and eco-efficiency. Industrial Crops and Products 20: 169-180.9. Kamm, B., and M. Kamm. 2004a. Biorefinery systems. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 18(1): 1-6.10. Kamm, B. and M. Kamm. 2004b. Principles of biorefineries. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 64: 137-145.11. Ohara, H. 2003. Biorefinery. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 62: 474-477. Page 11.1294.1112. McKendry, P
10 12 14 Time G a in (K ) = - 8 . 4 6 , T im e C o n s t a n t ( T 1 ) = 0 . 0 0 1 5 , D e a d T im e ( T D ) = 0 .0 1 4 8 G o o d n e s s o f F it : R - S q u a r e d = 0 .0 , S S E = 8 2 2 2 1 8 0 9 Figure 7: Example Output from Control Station where Initial Transients Have Not Been RemovedPage 11.872.17
Early Years of the West PublishingCompany, 5 Leg. Ref. Servs. Q. 115 (Spring 1985).29 The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Ms. Meredith Dibert, J.D. Candidate Univ.of Tulsa College of Law, for her work in compiling this table.30 92 Ohio St.3d 92, 748 N.E.2d 1091 (Ohio 2001).31 A Code rule is cited because Ohio is a Code state and not a Model Rules state.32 See generally e.g. Texas Board of Professional Engineers Disciplinary Actions,http://www.tbpe.state.tx.us/disciplinary.htm.33 An exception to this general observation is NSPE Board of Ethical Review opinions.34 Michael Davis, Three Myths about Codes of Engineering Ethics 8, 14, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine,(Fall 2001).35 Oklahoma Bar
for specific applications. The college’s two Q-switchable, doublable,mode-lockable neodymium: YAG (yttrium aluminum garnet) lasers, and a 10-watt carbondioxide laser were the stars of the show. Participants saw the destructive results of high-powerlasers from some samples available in the College’s high powered laser laboratory.The favorite experiments were definitely the holograms and the high-power laser demonstration,and possibly the alignment exercise. Least favorites were the monochromator and thepolarization-sensitivity experiments. Overall, most of the active participants indicated that theygot a very valuable experience from this part of the program.CAD: The computer aided-design portion of TechASCEND introduced participantsto basic
Philosophy (e.g., HPL) Principles Q-E-M (iterative) FIE + (e.g., NRC) (research) Figure 1. INTRO Course OrganizationTo accomplish the goals of building community and developing identity within engineeringeducation, faculty centered course content on the development of a first set of engineeringeducation philosophy statements, including an engineering “elevator speech” (a response to thequestions “what is engineering?” and “what is your role?” as if
ofVocational Behavior 2005, 67, 87-101.19. Bauer, K. W.; Liang, Q., The Effects of Personality and Precollege Characteristics on First-Year Acitivitiesand Academic Performance. Journal of College Student Development 2003, 44, (3), 277-290.20. Rhoads, T. R.; Murphy, T. J.; Trytten, D. A. In A Study of Gender Parity: Department Culture from theStudents' Perspective, Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2005; Indianapolis, IN,2005.21. Lancaster, S. M.; Walden, S. E.; Trytten, D. A.; Murphy, T. J. In The Contribution of Office-Hours-TypeInteractions to Female Student Satisfaction with the Educational Experience in Engineering, Proceedings ofAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and