Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

W.N.P. Hung; H-J. Sue; B.R. Varadharajan

tip displacement that was measured by thedial gage. For example, considering the second displacement state of the experiment, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education0.2783P = 0.398⇒ P = 1.43 NWe use this value of force to calculate the nominal stress and the stress acting near thehole. 1.43 × 8.5 × 0.75 × 12σ nom = = 15.57 MPa 2 × 1.52 3⇒ σ hole = 1.79 × 15.57 = 27.87 MPaDynamic analysisThe following symbols are used in explaining this methodM = Mass matrixK = Stiffness matrix •Q = Force matrixu

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

W. Roy Penney; Nathaniel S. Weston; Megan V. Park; Edgar C. Clausen; Dave C. Marrs; Anthony M. Scalia

Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationFigure 2. Schematic of Test Arrangement for the Plates and Test Materials Figure 3. Photograph of Wooden Box used to Heat Aluminum Plate Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 4. Photograph of Thermal Conductivity Apparatus SetupData Reduction 1. A heat balance on the center plate, with no heat generation within the plate, yields: − qout = q acc (1) 2. The accumulation term for

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

W. Roy Penney; Lauren N. Leach; Jeffrey R. Dorman; Edgar C. Clausen; Daniel E. Fluornoy; Alice K. Keogh

⎟ (3) ⎜ ⎛ (Ts − Tin ) ⎞ ⎟ ⎜⎜ ln⎜ ⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎜ (T − T ⎟ ⎝ ⎝ s out ) ⎠ ⎠ 4. Calculate the experimental heat transfer coefficient: qin = q out qin = he * As * LMTD (4) ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ q out ⎟ ∴ he = ⎜ A * LMTD ⎟ ⎜ s ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ 5. Calculate the experimental Nusselt number: he * d i Nue = (5) k 6

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Wayne N.P. Hung; V. Jorge Leon

International Teamwork and Global Orientation," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 475-483.9. McGraw, D., 2004, "Putting It into Perspective," Prism, ASEE, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 24-29.10. Hsieh, S.J. and Hsieh, P.Y., 2004, "Integrated Virtual Learning System for Programmable Logic Controller," Journal of Engineering Education, April 2004, pp. 169-178.11. Kutlu A., 2004, MicroLab: A Web-based Multi-user Remote Microcontroller Laboratory for Engineering Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 879-885.12. You, S., Wang, T., Eagleson, R., Meng, C., and Zhang, Q., 2001," Low-cost Internet-based Telerobotic System for Access to Remote Laboratories," Journal of

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Jignesh Rathod; Farouk G. Attia

quality systems and correspondingassessment documents, Supplier Quality Assurance Manual, Q-101 Quality SystemStandard, and NAO Targets for Excellence respectively. While in Europe, suppliers hadthree major sets of standards, namely, EAQF (French), VDA 6.1(German) and AVSQ(Italian).The American OEMs harmonized their QMS requirements under Quality SystemsRequirements: QS 9000 in August 1994 through the efforts of the Supplier QualityRequirements Task Force. This task force included participating members from the bigthree American automotive manufacturers, representatives from major truckmanufacturers like Mack Trucks, Navistar International, Peterbilt Trucks, Volvo GM,Kenworth Trucks and Freightliner Corporation, and the automotive division of

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Rita Caso; Kristi J. Shryock; Jo Howze; Jeffrey Froyd; Arun R. Srinivasa

collection, analysis, and reporting of first-to-second semesterretention. Other elements of the assessment plan include: • Analysis of progression within the engineering program in relation to Q-drops for first semester students of STEP and non-STEP classes; • An online perceptions survey for students in STEP and non-STEP classes at the beginning of the second semester, similar to that given at the end of the previous semester; • Re-examination of second semester STEP to non-STEP group comparability in light of changes in class composition; • Mid semester perception feedback from STEP class students on pedagogical innovations, • Common problems and questions in engineering, math, and physics exams; and