). We expect thatour work will inform future efforts to moderate behaviors and team dynamics throughinterventions such as conflict management and self-advocacy.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Research Initiation inEngineering Formation (RIEF) program under Grant No. 2106322. Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of NSF. We also acknowledge the work of Ana Biviano, a graduateresearcher on this project. We thank anonymous reviewers to an earlier draft of this manuscript.References 5Aragon O., Pietri E. and Powell B. (2023) Gender bias in teaching
Endeavour staff was experiencing in and out of the classroom. Also, the researchers felt thatthe high frequency of the survey delivery (five times over the two-year period of the program)was leading the students to not reflect on the survey questions as deeply as was desired sincethey had seen the questions so many times before. Therefore, modifications were continuouslybeing made to the original study design with the first three cohorts (e.g., a shift to focus groupsas opposed to Liker-scale surveys). Although the initial survey data would still prove useful forachieving specific aim 3 (an engagement dashboard), engagement measures have since moved tomore qualitative methods of data collection [8]. Work is still being done by the staff to pull in
(grant number2034800). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors thank our project evaluator Dr. Elizabeth Litzler and advisory boardmember Diana Gonzalez for their support and guidance on this project. The authors also thankthe Year 2 participants for supporting this work by sharing their experiences in our survey.References[1] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. Beltran-Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 36, pp. 282- 284, 2018.[2] A. K. Flatt, “A Suffering Generation: Six factors
presented, or when their idea might be perceived as contradicting another person’s idea.To help students overcome these concerns, the first skill we taught the students was to treatevery idea as having potential to contribute to a positive outcome.All team members are empowered to act this way, not just the “Team Leader” or “ProjectManager”. We discussed how to foster psychological safety by asking for input: • Ask for input from everyone. • Encourage multiple ideas from people. • Encourage out-of-the-box ideas.We also discussed how to foster psychological safety in how a person responds to teammembers’ contributions: • Affirm the value of contributions as they are made. • Reflect back the potential value of an idea.To practice this
3083Similarly, using either Pearson’s Chi-Squared test for independence or Fisher’s exact test (p-value 0.027 or 0.023 respectively) resulted in rejecting the null hypothesis that gender isindependent of student’s outcome (Pass or FW). Analysis supports that gender and the studentoutcome are not independent. Specifically, female students have a significantly higher passingrate. Predicting student success based on ethnicity, gender, and all the interactions between thosevariables using a logistic regression model is significantly better than a null model (p-value <9.83(10)-16 using a drop in deviance test). However, in this model no individual factor wassignificant in predicting student success (all p-values > 0.05).These findings reflect
Figure 2. It reflects the diversity of the collegeof ECST. 13 of 24 students responding to a question about ethnicity were LatinX. A majority of respondents(15) indicated an expected graduation date of 2023, meaning that they enrolled in the Robotics courseduring their second- or third-to last semester at college. More than half of the students (55%) werecommunity college transfer students. Figure 2. Student participants by race/ethnicity To understand the impact of the course, information on students’ previous experience with hands-onengineering projects in their major was also collected, as shown in Figure 3. Only 8 students (33%) hadtaken courses in the past that provided hands-on experience in their major
of retention. Anecdotally,one group that worked on the wind turbines suggested that the wind turbines be painted purplesince insects stay away from ultraviolet light, and therefore the birds would not be attracted toflying into the wind turbines, thus reducing bird kills. Connecting color to bird kills in a fluidmechanics course is at the “Create” level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.ConclusionThe course grades have shown significant improvement with the implementation of a semester-long group project, while the final exam grades do not reflect this. However, with three yearsrunning of the course with the project, it has been noted by the instructors that the students maynot retain each lecture topic or the material on the comprehensive final exam, but
ability to interact effectivelywith people from different cultural backgrounds were measured using a standardized surveyinstrument. Participants reported an increase in their average research competency ratings aftercompleting the program, as indicated by the survey findings. Those improvements cut acrossdemographics such as gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and school type.Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation’s InternationalExperience for Students (IRES) Site grant. (Grant Numbers: OISE# 1952490-TAMU, 2208801-NCAT,and 195249-UNLV). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation
legitimacy among their colleagues and influence the twistedperceptions before arriving at the STEM threshold.Women of Color Faculty As women of Color emerge inspirit through the academic doorway and nestle into facultypositions, it is important to understand the journey. Some challenges women of Color facultyundergo ominously reflect on their days as students. Previous studies outline issues ofinsufficient cultural representation in the curriculum [7], stereotyping, isolation, faltering DEI(diversity, equity, and inclusion) policies and practices, tokenism, and false impressions ofacademic achievement [7]. The splendor of academic potential expeditiously dissipates as theimpenetrable fog of inequity surrounds and persists, overshadowing their
do engineering, self-confidence in their own ability tosuccessfully pursue an engineering degree, and how many declare and persist in an engineeringmajor. Full development of assessment methods, both qualitative and quantitative, is currentlyunderway.DisclaimerThe views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Air Force Academy, the Air Force, theDepartment of Defense, or the U.S. Government.References[1] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, “Diversity, Equity & Inclusion.” https://www.abet.org/about-abet/diversity-equity-and-inclusion/ (accessed Apr. 1, 2023).[2] National Science and Technology Council, “Charting a
should take (e.g., over email, in person, online chat,etc.), what additional training may be helpful for the faculty and peer mentors to be effectivementors to this population of students, and generally what aspects of the mentoring experience ismost impactful for the students. We plan to use these results to improve the existing scholarshipprogram and to share effective strategies with the engineering community on how to motivateand support engineering transfer students.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #1742627. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
participants to confirm that ourinterpretations of the data were consistent with their lived experiences and perceptions. Our aimwas to enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the research findings by ensuring that theyaccurately reflect the participants’ perspectives. Five of the seven participants responded to ourrequest and informed us that the experiences and perceptions we reported were accuratelycaptured and documented. Two participants did not respond to us.ParticipantsThe study participants were seven international graduate students majoring in Sciences andEngineering. All seven participants were older than 18 years of age. They were pursuinggraduate studies at public research universities in the US at the time of data collection. Six
strategies embedded in the PEARLS program, offer renovated alternatives to positively impact the level of success achieved by students in their paths to complete degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Acknowledgment This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award DUE 1833869. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References[1] Rogers, J. J., & Rogers, A. A., & Baygents, J. C. (2020, June), Effects of High School Dual-Credit Introduction to Engineering Course on First-year Engineering Student Self-efficacy and the Freshman
and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of theUnited States Military Academy, Department of the Army, DoD, or U.S. Government.References[1] S. Nicholson, “Creating Engaging Escape Games for the Classroom,” Child. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2018.14203.[2] E. Ozcelik, N. E. Cagiltay, and N. S. Ozcelik, “The effect of uncertainty on learning in game-like environments,” Comput. Educ., vol. 67, pp. 12–20, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.009.[3] R. Garris, R. Ahlers, and J. E. Driskell, “Games , motivation , and learning : A research and practice model,” Simul. Gaming, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 441–467, 2002, doi: 10.1177
university if I need it.”In the current reflection, students highlighted the financial challenges associated with internetaccess and having devices connected to the internet. One student suggested that providing freeinternet access or offering the ability to borrow or rent a university computer could ensure equalaccess for all. Another student mentioned that paying for internet services can be prohibitivelyexpensive, especially for those who do not live close to campus due to financial constraints.Therefore, remote lab developers should prioritize creating tools that are less dependent onresources that may be inaccessible to some students. This would help alleviate the digitalinequality barrier and promote more equitable access to remote lab
boundaryless new spaces of knowledge. To truly impact the world, webelieve this is the next step in STEAM and encourage faculty to push themselves to explore thesespaces and collaborations.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1811119. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.We would also like to acknowledge and thank the faculty participants for this work who werewilling to engage with the public in this unique format. We are grateful for your participationand insights.Finally, we would like to acknowledge the rest of the larger study
protocol was organized into 3 parts: backgroundinformation; program experience; and DEI in practice (see Appendix A). Immediately after theinterviews, researchers created memos as a space for reflection and initial data analysis. Theresearch team completed two rounds of coding and refining the interview data [6]. During thefirst round of analysis, the first and second author individually coded each interview. The secondround of analysis consisted of the first and second author comparing and consolidating theircodes, which led to the creation of nine themes (Table 1). Table 1: Nine Themes What Mentorship Means to Program Goals
survey. Examining and coding the 392open-ended responses from students allowed for research analysis based on the frequency ofcodes. Reading all open-ended responses allowed for course development faculty reflection onhow the current peer mentors are, or are not, helping students develop confidence in their roles.AnalysisQuantitative Data. Given the constraint of not having a control group or pre-post scores forcomparison, we determined that the best way to analyze our data was descriptively. Ourquantitative data consisted of the frequencies for the five levels of our three Likert scale items.Thus, our analysis focused on calculations of central tendency and variation to report our datadescriptively.Qualitative Data. We analyzed our qualitative
papers published by the IRES student Alumni, patents granted, as well as researchawards, grants, and fellowships awarded to them. Table I summarizes these achievements. Table II expands upon the awards,grants, and fellowships, awarded to the 27 students since their participation within the IRES program. IV. A SSESSMENT RESULTS The following section are the results from the independent evaluator [13]. These results come from the pre-travel and post-travel questionnaire and interview questions given to an IRES Cohort of students who fully completed the program. It shouldbe noted that these results are reflective of a case study for the specific Cohort in the IRES project itself and cannot fully
navigation-based class project focused on principles of haptics and promotinginclusive design thinking. With that in mind, a number of design requirements had to be met forthe device. First, the design needed an easily changed component system for rapid adjustments,providing each student team with the ability to modify the HapConnect in their own fashion.With the condensed timeframe for the learning module, simple motor changes were desiredinstead of in-depth code adjustments to reflect physical changes to the device. The deviceadditionally needed to take up minimal arm space, conform tightly to the skin, and adjust forvariability in arm size in order to allow for direct skin contact of the vibration motors. Finally,remote communication between the
. Sherespected expertise. Not in a way that was defensive (maybe just a little), Carson wanted to proveherself; mostly to herself. She also very much enjoyed (often a bit surprised) when she wasrecognized by others for her work and her accomplishments. Finally, she was reflective, notnecessarily in a formal way, but still routinely reviewing what she was doing, why she was doingit and how she might get better.Exemplary quotes from different participants supporting theme two. “I did all sports and all that kind of stuff, and most of leadership was through that sportslens. And then in high school I picked up all the clubs, because for some reason my best friendand I thought the more bullet points on the resume would mean the better resume. I
news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, which is reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 An Insight into User Experiences of an Intelligent Tutoring System to Learn Sketching Skills Donna Jaison Dr. Hillary Merzdorf Lance White Dr. Kerrie Douglas Dr. Karan Watson P.E. Dr. Tracy HammondAbstractSketching is a valuable skill for many engineering students to support the development of variousauxiliary skills such as refined spatial visualization, problem-solving
months into the first year of our work, we engaged in immediate one-on-one interviews tounderstand the group perspective of the situation.Arguably, the most important lesson we learned was that the RPP team members truly felt as iftheir voice was heard, reflected in our memos, and kept confidential. As we wrote the memos, wewere careful not to share who was quoted and the videos of the interviews were not sharedwidely. Developing this sense of anonymity created an environment where barriers weredismantled and the historical imbalances of power could be directly addressed.Zarch, McGill ASEE 20236 RecommendationsReflecting on our lessons learned and the literature about
based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underAward No. 2205033. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] N. Choe and M. Borrego. “Prediction of engineering identity in engineering graduate students,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 181-187, 2019. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8667045.[2] M. Bahnson, H. Perkins, M. Tsugawa, D. Satterfield, M. Parker, C. Cass, and A. Kirn. “Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110
also betransferrable to other institutions. The reported assessment of the final project option showedgreat potential to increase creativity in the Statics course, which could have a further impact onthe engineering education curriculum.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underIUSE/PFE: RED Grant No. 1920761 (PI: Prof. Maria Chrysochoou). Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would like to thankProf. Mousumi Roy and Caressa Wakeman for their valuable assistance in rating projects.References[1] J. C. Blickenstaff, “Women and science
to graduate college. Quittingor failing was not an option.Degree attainment resources: The codes of “Navigational Capital,” “Self-reliance,” and “Pridein self” are rooted in where the student found confidence, value, and resources to progresstoward graduation. He sensed that although “...people that do belong, um, are willing to help youalong the way,” he felt that he had to be self-sufficient: “I feel like they could tell. You know,that, that I was different, but I was trying…just gotta work hard. Takes a lot of work.”This student mentioned the importance of hard work throughout his interview. For example, “Mylearning has always been a reflection of my hard work…” and “I’ve always believed that youcan, you can, you can work to get where you
, higher education is part of a broader inequitable system. If inequities that occur beforecollege divert students from pursuing STEM degrees, changes to university programs will havelittle impact.The current work is a quantitative study focused on studying the systemic factors that impact therepresentation of women among chemical engineering graduates. We note that the granularity ofour analysis is limited by the use of institutional data. For example, we have ACT scores as acrude proxy for opportunity gaps in high school (the hypothesis being that opportunity gapswould be reflected in this metric).Following the framework of Costello et al. (2023), wehypothesize that the lack of representation of women in chemical engineering could be due to (1
orientation also covered best practice advice on how to get the most out of the mentoringexperience focused particularly on being prepared to connect, learning to ask questions to thementor, and listening for examples that connect with their goals, being open and honest in thecommunication, and periodically assessing and reflecting with their mentor to make sure bothparties were bringing what the other needs to the connection.At the end of the meeting, any mentoring pairs who were present were encouraged to take timeto meet in breakout rooms.MeetingsThe mentoring relationship lasted for 10 weeks. Table II, shown on the following page, includesthe suggested meeting schedule that was shared with participants. This schedule was based onthe model of