Applied STEM Coursetaking on Advanced Mathematics and Science Coursetaking,” The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 382– 399, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.899959.[4] E. Glennie, M. Mason, B. Dalton, and J. Edmunds, “Preparing students for STEM college and careers: The influence of redesigned high schools in North Carolina,” The High School Journal, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 228–257, 2019.[5] M. Linger, “Plumbing the STEM Pipeline: Exploring Areas of Influence for Promoting STEM Education,” Ed.D., Hofstra University, United States -- New York, 2016. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1821362161/abstract/6D3942D119AA4036PQ/1[6] T. Jungert, S. Levine, and
Institute of Technology. She is currently perusing her doctorate degree in Education from Drexel University with a concentration in innovation and creativity. She is currently the Division Chair - Elect for ASEE Entrepreneurship and Innovation Division. She also holds a Professional Engineering license in NJ. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023How to make engineering programs worse for women: A reversebrainstorming session with SWE studentsAbstractFemale engineering students have unique insights for improving engineering programs and yetthey often do not feel empowered to suggest changes. This paper will describe the creation andexecution of a pilot brainstorming workshop titled, “How to make
students at RutgersUniversity (Riley, 2022), and health equity-focused machine learning algorithms introduced intointroductory biomedical engineering courses at John’s Hopkins University (Storm et al., 2022).Further, systems approaches to health equity are critical components of human factors andsystems engineering (Roscoe et al., 2019). To date, however, the investigation into globalself-awareness, perspective-taking, understanding, and application of global systems and contexthave not been investigated in these implementations.Global mindsets and intercultural awareness are critical to understanding and designing for,diversity and equitable technology outcomes (Lee et al., 2012). While they are most associatedwith study abroad opportunities
, ASEE, FIE, EDUCON), via dedicatedlightning talk at SIGCSE’18 23 , and via email outreach. Approximately 500 email invitations weresent to CS2 textbook authors and computer science departments on all continents. Among thoserecipients, we intentionally included multiple school sizes, and both private and publicinstitutions as well as 4-year and community colleges.The group of 34 experts initially signed up to be a part of our study. We then asked them to take aquick survey on the focus of the CS2 course that they were involved in (focus area meant that atleast 60% of the course was spent on that area). We had identified 3 versions of CS2: one whichtaught students to use existing data structures from libraries (Application-focused CS2), one
. Master and A. N. Meltzoff, “Cultural Stereotypes and Sense of Belonging Contribute to Gender Gaps in STEM,” Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2020.[5] E. Litzler and C. Samuelson, “How Underrepresented Minority Engineering Students Derive a Sense of Belonging from Engineering,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, p. 23.674.1-23.674.20.[6] E. A. Canning, K. Muenks, D. J. Green, and M. C. Murphy, “STEM Faculty Who Believe Ability Is Fixed Have Larger Racial Achievement Gaps and Inspire Less Student Motivation in Their Classes,” Sci. Adv., vol. 5, no. 2, p. eaau4734, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734.[7] M. Wei, T.-Y. Ku, and K. Y.-H. Liao, “Minority Stress and
enrolled in the course. As a result, the number of students in each channel rangedfrom 13-23 students per channel in the earlier terms, but it increased to 23-36 in later terms. SeeFigure 2 for a visualization of the number of students per channel per term as well as the degreeto which students’ channel membership changed over the terms.Figure 2 – Channel size and reassignments across each termNote: Dot size represents the number of students in a channel in each semester. Line widthrepresents the number of students whose channel membership spanned consecutive semesters.Diagonal lines represent students whose channel membership changed, with the line colorshowing their new channel assignment.From the 2018-2019 academic year through the 2022-2023
, perceived stressamong engineering and BDS students,” Indian J. Posit. Psychol., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 514–517, Dec.2013.[16] K. J. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mentalhealth, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 371–392,2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20391.[17] K. Jensen and K. J. Cross, “Board 73: Student Perceptions of Engineering StressCulture,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed:Dec. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-73-student-perceptions-of-engineering-stress-culture[18] A. Danowitz, and K. Beddoes, “Characterizing Mental Health and Wellness in StudentsAcross Engineering Disciplines,” in
webpage for department chairs.This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation underGrant HRD-1409472.References[1] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, “Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019,” Special Report. NSF 19-304, Alexandria VA, 2019.[2] National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), “The Condition of Education 2020 (NCES 2020-144), Characteristics of Postsecondary Faculty.” U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2020.[3] A. Aguirre, “Women and Minority Faculty in the Academic Workplace: Recruitment, Retention, and Academic Culture,” ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report
La Guajira Contenido,” Rev. Espac., vol. 40, 2019.[5] M. Oliveros, E. Cabrera, B. Valdez, and M. Schorr, “La motivación de las mujeres por las carreras de ingeniería y tecnología,” Entreciencias Diálogos en la Soc. del Conoc., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 89–96, 2016, doi: 10.21933/j.edsc.2016.09.157.[6] C. Zapata and M. Elena Truyol, “Factors identifying commitment to gender equality in a School of Engineering,” 2022 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., p. 17, Aug. 2022.[7] T. RAbAzAs RomeRo, A. Resa Ocio, and T. Rabazas Romero, “Organizaciones y políticas supranacionales: una mirada desde la educación superior y la igualdad de género Supranational organizations and policies: perspectives from higher education and gender
conventional classrooms." Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 3.1 (2009): 44-58. 4. Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., et al. "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning." Educational psychologist 26.3-4 (1991): 369-398. 5. Nise, Norman S. Control systems engineering. John Wiley & Sons, 2020. 6. Dorf, Richard C., and Robert H. Bishop. Modern control systems. Pearson, 2011. 7. Oliveira, Paulo Moura, and John D. Hedengren. "An APMonitor Temperature Lab PID Control Experiment for Undergraduate Students." 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE, 2019. 8. Hedengren, John, and Jeffrey Kantor. "Computer Programming and
who is committed to helping his students develop the skills they need to succeed in their careers. He takes a hands-on approach to teaching, emphasizing practical skills and real-world applications in his courses. Dr. Habibi is a licensed Professional Engineer in the state of Minnesota and has worked with many companies such as Milwaukee Tools, Affiliated Engineering, and Alliant Energy. He is also an active member of ASEE. Outside of work, Dr. Habibi enjoys playing the piano and other creative pursuits. He sees a strong connection between his work in engineering and his artistic interests and believes that both fields require a deep understanding of problem-solving and creativity.Tina Alaei
pedagogical strategies translate acrosscultural contexts (Mtika & Gates, 2010; Smith-Keiling, 2019). We know that both learners’engagement and educators’ pedagogical beliefs are shaped by their social, historical, and culturalknowledge (Schweisfurth, 2015); however, currently, there is a limited understanding aboutwhich aspects of AL are replicable across contexts and which aspects may be highly context-dependent. While much exploration remains, current research suggests that factors such aslanguage, cultural context, teacher beliefs, student learner, teacher-learner relations, andcurricular structure influence the implementation of active learning strategies (Ramnarain &Hlatswayo, 2018; Mtitu, 2014). Therefore, to support educators and
power,privilege, oppression and ruling relations within engineering education. A forthcoming scopingreview will include more in-depth analysis and discussion of the full 372-paper dataset andimplications and recommendations for equity-focused engineering education researchers andscholars.AcknowledgementsI am supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. I would liketo thank Dr. Kristen Moore, Dr. Subini Ancy Annamma, Neida Ahmad, Dr. Sheri Sheppard, andthe Designing Education Lab for their valuable discussions. In addition, I would like to thank theanonymous reviewers and ASEE ECSJ Program Chair Dr. Robin Fowler for their insightfulcomments on the draft during the review process.References[1] K. Crenshaw
internationalstudents around the globe. Despite a decrease in the enrollment rate of new international studentsby 34% for undergraduates and 45% for graduates compared to 2019/2020, close to 1 millionstudents still chose to come to the US for their education [1]. More than 80% of these students arepursuing advanced degrees in STEM [2]. Why has the US been able to attract so many internationalstudents into STEM for higher education? Several reasons have been suggested in the literature -the availability of state-of-the-art research labs, opportunities to embark on ground-breakingresearch, the presence of highly qualified researchers, and the benefits of working withintellectuals from other parts of the world [3]. It is humbling to observe from the literature
. 22–31, Oct. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.ece.2022.09.002.[6] L. Theodore and J. P. Abulencia. Open-ended Problems: A Future Chemical Engineering Education Approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.[7] P. C. Wankat and L. G. Bullard, “The Future of Engineering Education--Revisited,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2016.[8] E. S. Vasquez, Z. West, M. J. DeWitt, M. J. Elsass, and D. A. Comfort, “Work in Progress: Implementing an Open-Ended Laboratory Experience in the Unit Operations Laboratory with an Alternative CSTR Reaction,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2019, pp.1-7. https://peer.asee.org/33626[9] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, “Applying Authentic
. Krause, “Undergraduate Students’ Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 560–584, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20150.[12] L. K. Berland and B. J. Reiser, “Making sense of argumentation and explanation,” Sci. Educ., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 26–55, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1002/sce.20286.[13] S. Michaels, C. O’Connor, and L. B. Resnick, “Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life,” p. 15.[14] T. O. B. Odden and R. S. Russ, “Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical construct,” Sci. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 187–205, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/sce.21452.[15] J. M. Kittleson and S. A. Southerland
Safety Coordinator, and lead for the SAFEChE (Process Safety Across the CHE Curriculum) modules as well as the Visual Encyclopedia of Chemical Engineering Equipment. Currently, he serves as a Director for the ASEE ChE Division.Dr. Joanne Kay Beckwith, Carnegie Mellon University Joanne K. Beckwith is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis Janie is a Senior Lecturer in Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Her PhD is in chemical engineering from Purdue University. Research focus areas include laboratory courses, process safety, and chemical engineering pedagogy.Prof
Imperative in Higher Education,” Cent. Stud. High. Educ. Res. Occas. Pap. Ser., no. CSHE.11.10, p. 7, Sep. 2010.[2] R. Rousseau, L. Zhang, and X. Hu, “Knowledge Integration: Its Meaning and Measurement,” in Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, and D. Wolfram, Eds., in Springer Handbooks. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 69–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_3.[3] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Integrating Serious Illness Care into Primary Care Delivery: Proceedings of a Workshop. 2022. doi: 10.17226/26411.[4] N. Fields et al., “How Can Interdisciplinary Teams Leverage Emerging Technologies to Respond to Transportation Infrastructure Needs
-engineering-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Feb. 11, 2023).[4] L. D. McDowell, “The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self- regulated learners of college physical science: a review of empirical studies,” Int. J. of Science Educ., vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 2524–2541, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584.[5] C. Jannette, “Lifelong learning in the 21st century and beyond,” Radiographics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 613-622, 2009, doi: 10.1148/rg.292085179.[6] K. Colthorpe, J. Ogiji, L. Ainscough, K. Zimbardi, and S. Anderson, “Effect of metacognitive prompts on undergraduate pharmacy students’ self-regulated learning behavior,” American J. of Pharmaceutical Educ., vol. 83, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.5688
, 46(1), 32-40.5. Muci-Kuchler, K. H., Degen, C. M., Bedillion, M. D., & Lovett, M. (2019), Extending Systems Thinking Skills to an Introductory Mechanical Engineering Course. ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL. 10.18260/1-2—32826.6. Muci-Kuchler, K. H., Birrenkott, C. M., Bedillion, M. D., Lovett, M., & Whitcomb, C. (2020), Incorporating Systems Thinking and Systems Engineering Concepts in a Freshman- Level Mechanical Engineering Course. ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. 10.18260/1-2— 34813.7. Lalley, A., Bedillion, M. D., Langerman, M., & Korde, U. A. (2015), Early Incorporation of Design for Manufacturing in the Engineering Curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA. 10.18260/p.23902.8. Bedillion, M. D
Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri- Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu is an associate professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence
research focuses on studying different instructional strategies’ unique contributions to students’ learning and motivation. Also, she is interested in designing interventions that help understand conceptually hard concepts in STEM courses. Dr. Anwar is the recipient of the 2022 Apprentice Faculty Grant by the ERM Division, ASEE. Also, she received the 2020 outstanding researcher award from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. Also, she was the recipient of the ”President of Pakistan Merit and Talent Scholarship” for her undergraduate studies.Dr. Bilal Mansoor, Texas A&M University at Qatar ..Dr. Yasser M. Al-Hamidi, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Al-Hamidi holds a Ph. D. degree in
HelpTransform Poor Communities”, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.June 22-25, 2008.[12] M. E. Sharp, A. L. Stevenson, “Creating A Global Solutions Curriculum,” 2013 ASEEInternational Forum, Atlanta, GA. June 22, 2013.[13] A. Johri, A. Sharma, “Learning from Working on Others’ Problems: Case Study of anInterdisciplinary Project-based Global Service-learning Program,” 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX. June 10-13, 2012.[14] ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023, 2021.[15] National Society of Professional Engineers, Code of Ethics, Alexandria, VA, 2019.[16] L. M. Kissane, L. Fang, R. J. Silver, “Female Millennial Perceptions of Engineering’s‘Brand’,” 2015 ASEE Annual
edition, ISBN 0-471-39442-4, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.[3] https://www.mathworks.com/[4] M. P. Hennessey, “Statics and Dynamics Projects Emphasizing Introductory Design and Manufacturing,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 22, 2008, pp. 13-1095.[5] https://www.stthomas.edu/catalog/current/[6] M. P. Hennessey, A. Naqwi, and G. O’Brien, “Dynamics Lab booklet,” School of Engineering, University of St. Thomas, Fall Semester 2022.[7] W. Durfee, P. Li, and D. Waletzko, “Take-Home Lab Kits for System Dynamics and Controls Course,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Boston, MA, USA, June 3-July 2, 2004.[8] A. Tekes, K. Van Der Horn, Z. Marr, and C
. 185-208, 2015.13. Korte, R., Sheppard, S., and Jordan, W., “A qualitative study of the early work experiences of recent graduates in engineering,” Proc. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Ann. Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.14. Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary educational psychology, 26(4), 481-506.15. Kirn, A., & Benson, L. (2015, June). Engineering students' perceptions of the future: Exploratory instrument development. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-641).16. Lande, M. (2020, June), Learning Trajectories through Undergraduate Engineering Curricula and Experiences Paper
her research interests include signal processing, biomedical and materials engineer- ing, design, STEM education and assistive technologies.. She has served in the Mid-Atlantic section of ASEE for a number of years and is active in ASME and IEEE activities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Design of a Junior Level Design Class: Work-in-ProgressAbstractIn order to strengthen engineering students’ preparation to tackle open-ended, multidisciplinaryprojects in their senior-level capstone course, a new junior-level design course was developedand implemented at Loyola University Maryland. Engineering faculty, students, and members ofour industrial advisory board identified
exploring if the different teaching strategiesare useful for students on offering a positive effect on personal performanceaccomplishments, vicarious learning, social persuasion, and physiological and affectivestates. Also, we are examining the fidelity of those instructors' teaching. Those analyseswill provide a deeper understanding of the efficacy of teaching techniques. In the future,we will present a summary of our findings combining all the results. Reference[1] J. Milord, F. Yu, S. Orton, L. Flores, and R. Marra, “Impact of COVID Transition to Remote Learning on Engineering Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations,” 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jul. 2021, Accessed: Feb. 04, 2022. [Online
socially responsible and globally aware engineers and the impactsthey can have on a local and global level. Future work would be to implement this survey inother study-abroad programs with different program designs to find which delivery methodscould foster better global competency development.[1] B. Widdig, “Educating Engineers for the Global Workplace.”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2007.[2] J. M. Grandin, E. Dan Hirleman, and E. Dan, “Educating Engineers as Global Citizens: A Call for Action / A Report of the National Summit Meeting on the Globalization of Engineering Education,” 2009.[3] M. Allan and C. U. Chisholm, “Achieving engineering competencies in the global information society through the integration of on-campus