Jared Markunas who assisted in the development of the survey that will inform the engagementguide prototype.References[1] D. R. Fisher, A. Bagiati, and S. Sarma, “Developing Professional Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students Through Cocurricular Involvement,” J. Stud. Aff. Res. Pract., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 286–302, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/19496591.2017.1289097.[2] G. Young, D. B. Knight, and D. R. Simmons, “Co-curricular experiences link to nontechnical skill development for African-American engineers: Communication, teamwork, professionalism, lifelong learning, and reflective behavior skills,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2014, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/FIE
-9304- 92. K. S. McClain and A. Perry (2017) "Where Did They Go: Retention Rates for Students of Color at Predominantly White Institutions," College Student Affairs Leadership: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 3.3. F. A. Freitas & L. J. Leonard (2011). “Maslow's hierarchy of needs and student academic success.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 6(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.0044. T. L. Strayhorn (2019). College students' sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, pg. 4.5. S. Al-Qudah, J. Davishahl, E. Davishahl & M. Greiner (n.d.). “Investigation of sense of belonging to engineering in undergraduate
; Frost, G. S. (2012, June), "Gamifying"a Library Orientation Tutorial for Improved Motivation and Learning, Paper presented at 2012 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.[11] Gulotta, J. A., & Parisi, N. S., & Bodnar, C. A. (2016, June), Leveling Up by Gamifying FreshmanEngineering Clinic, Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans,Louisiana.[12] Dyrud, M. (2006, June), Industrial Ethics Training: A Look At Ethics Games, Paper presented at2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.[13] Streiner, S. D., & Burkey, D. D., & Young, M. F., & Pascal, J., & Cimino, R. T., & Bassett, L.(2021, August), Workshop: Gamifying Engineering Education - A Playful
. Wiebe, “Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving,” Memory & Cognition, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 238–246, May 1987.[6] D. H. Jonassen, “Toward a design theory of problem solving,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 63–85, 2000.[7] S. E. Dreyfus, “Five-stage model of adult skill acquisition,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 177–181, 2004.[8] M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, and M. J. Farr, The nature of expertise, 1st ed. 1988.[9] E. E. Miskioglu et al., "Situating Intuition in Engineering Practice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 418-444, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20521.[10] K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J
Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," Journal of College Teaching, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 14-20, 2007.[5] T. Ruutman and H. Kipper, "Teaching Strategies for Direct and Indirect Instruciton in Teaching Engineering," in Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Slovakia, 2011.[6] A. Poulsen, K. Lam, S. Cisneros and T. Treust, "ARCS Model of Mtivational Design," November 2008. [Online]. [Accessed December 2014].[7] S. Bjorklund, J. Parente and D. Sathianathan, "Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback on Gains in Student Skills," Journal of Engieering Education, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 153-160, 2004.[8] P. Hsieh, J. R. Sullivan and N. S. Guerra, "A Closer
student resourceutilization could consider materials beyond textbooks (e.g., open educational resources) by usingdifferent methods, such as student and instructor-facing surveys.Our methods study the presence of certain keywords, but this does not quantify the importance orfocus of terms to a particular textbook. For instance, Moran et al. 14 mention “cost,” but this is inthe context of “cost rate balance for turbine(s)”—hardly a major consideration of this textbook.Future work could further develop the methods used here to provide a finer resolution of topicfocus across textbooks.Reserve lists across institutions are potentially useful beyond the focus of the present study. Asnoted above, a reserve list reflects faculty decisions; thus, a
cowling. These results from Ansys Polyflow are very similar in appearance to thesequence of pictures of the thermoforming process as shown experimentally in Figure 6b). Weobserve that the draping process is almost completed after 0.13 s and that the change in thicknessup to 0.6 s is minor and mostly occurs around the base of the cowl. In Figure 7c) is the drapingprocess for the creation of the instrument panel shown. The thickness of the plastic sheet on topof the instrument panel does not change from the thickness of the original undeformed sheet. Thecircles on the instrument panel are clearly developing over time and at 1 s the circles are fullydeveloped.Figure 7b) Thickness contour plots during draping process for the cowl.Figure 7c) Thickness
, and areas of improvements. Total Number of Responses Table 1: Survey Question Responses S. Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree S. Agree Do you feel the E-Dragster was a challenging 0 0 3 1 4 experience? Do you feel the E-Dragster project is a "real-world" 0 1 1 3 3 project for a STEM Learning Environment? Question Topic Commonly Reported Themes Positive Experience Following a Design
. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.Byars-Winston, A., & Dahlberg, M. L. (2019). The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Consensus Study Report. National Academies Press. 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.Eby, L. T., Rhodes, J. E., & Allen, T. D. (2007). Definition and evolution of mentoring. The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach, 7-20.Fisher, D. R. (2013). Educating engineers for the 21st century: a framework for skill development through co-curricular and extracurricular involvement (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).Fisher, D. R., Bagiati, A., & Sarma, S. (2014). Fostering 21st
question is “Whichphase(s) are present at point G and in what fractions?” A figure would be included in this questionin which students interpret and use to answer the question.In the traditional class, there were three high stake exams which means a student’s final gradein the class relied heavily on these exams. The percentage of each test in the traditional classcontributed to 75% of total grade, 25% for each of the three exams. Figure 4 shows thepercentage of incorrect questions according to type, split up by the three different exams fromthe traditional class. When observing the total percentage of questions wrong, Figure 4 showsthat students struggled the least with Exam 1, the second least with Exam 2, and the most withExam 3. Figure 4
, warehouses need the opportunities made available byIndustry 4.0. The above perspectives confirm the need for reskilling the current workforce toadapt to innovations of Industry 4.0, and the COVID pandemic produced a window of time thatmade the benefits of such adaptations apparent. References[1] S. Qiu, M. Natarajarathinam, M. D. Johnson, and E. A. Roumell, "The Future of Work: Identifying Future-ready Capabilities for the Industrial Distribution Workforce," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[2] E. Flores, X. Xu, and Y. Lu, "Human Capital 4.0: a workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0," Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp
Engineering Education PhD Program Quality [Work-in-Progress] Le Shorn S Benjamin PhD, Jerrod A Henderson PhD William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Houston This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant # EEC-2127509 to the American Society for Engineering Education AbstractDoctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree programs occupy the apex of the academic hierarchy. This ismainly because graduates are required to extend the bounds of existing knowledge. In the recentdoctoral discipline of engineering education, students are
, #RecallRatherThanRecognition, #flexibility, #NotMinimalist, #NoErrorRecovery, etc.,) 5. In a paragraph explain the user’s goal/s using the product, the required procedures for users to reach their goal/s, and why you think the product fails to satisfy users’ needs. You should also refer to any human factors’ goals (enhancing performance, safety, and satisfaction) that the example may fail to satisfy. 6. Up to a paragraph, suggest or propose your solution/s. It can be simple or technical. (Try to find an innovative solution for improving the design, redesigning, or changing the procedures--you can be simple but creative)Instruction for contributing to other students’ cases: 1. Each student is required to read all other students' cases
women in engineering, though this type of study can enhancealready existing research. The capitals men and women utilize should be observed forresearchers to gain a better understanding of the different ways these demographics succeed inengineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1734347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Additionally, this work is partially supported by the Clemson University CreativeInquiry program.References[1] S. L. Dika and M. M. D'Amico, “Early experiences and integration in the persistence
and programs to identify gaps or areas where the microcredentials could offer a unique value proposition to veterans. (d). Evaluating the resources available at the HEI to support microcredentials, including faculty expertise and technology infrastructure. (e). Mapping out a plan for marketing and promoting the microcredentials to veterans and relevant employers; a crucial and most important step to ensure the success of the program(s) offering MC to veterans. Rather than engaging digital marketing firms, institutions that develop and offer microcredentials should identify the most effective direct communication channels to reach employers and veterans. For example, reaching out to organizations
institution's administration to explore incentives, support, productivity metrics, graduate student advising, and long-term career goals associated with a transition into EER 4. Pursue funding opportunities geared towards new engineering education researchers who are initiating research in EER9. AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2141984, 2149857, and 2204892. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.10. References[1] J. Bernhard, "Is engineering education research engineering research?," in International
best paper awards. Her professional activities include journal reviews for Computers & Security, Cy- bersecurity, Frontiers in Psychology, and conference reviews for HFES, AHFE, HICSS, Euro S&P, and CyberSA. She is also an advocate for the Cybersecurity Community of Practice at UTEP and a member of the Special Cyber Operations Research and Engineering (SCORE) Interagency Working Group.Yun Wan, University of Houston, Victoria Yun Wan is a Professor of Computer Information Systems in the University of Houston- Victoria. His current research includes electronic commerce and information systems in STEM education. His other research includes text analytics, decision support systems, and enterprise systems development
enjoys creating inclusive environments where students feel supported while exploring STEM related topics. Tanja is also an active member of the prestigious national engineering honor society, Tau Beta Pi, where she serves as an advisor for a local university’s chapter. And more recently, she has stepped into the role of co-advisor to launch a new collegiate SWE affiliation on the Marian Campus.Dr. Hansika I. Sirikumara, E.S. Witchger School of Engineering, Marian University Indianapolis, IN Hansika Sirikumara, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Physics and Engineering at Marian University, E. S. Witchger School of Engineering. She completed her MS and PhD degrees from Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Her
resolute spirit that can help catalyze creative solutions and generate a senseof hope needed in academia.REFERENCES[1] Andre, E., Williams, N., Schwartz, F., Bullard, C. Benefits of Campus Outdoor RecreationPrograms: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership.2017, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp 15-25.[2] Bailey, T., Alfonso, M. Paths to persistence: An analysis of research on program effectivenessat community colleges. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation of Education. 2005.[3] Bauman, S., Wang, N., DeLeon, C., Kafentzis, J., Zavala-Lopez, M., Lindsey, M.Nontraditional students’ service needs and social support resources: A pilot study. Journal ofCollege Counseling, 7, 13-17. 2004.[4] Bell, B.J., Holmes, M. Important
(OP): comments with this code reference program recruitment, enrollment, matriculation, or other overall curricular design • Projects & Assignments (PA): comments with this code reference projects and assignments students completed in a course and may include class activities, readings, tests, papers, etc. • Scholarship (S): comments with this code reference publications or presentations students have published or submitted for publication. • Research Experience (R): comments with this code reference research experiences in classes or with faculty (but not specific to publications or presentations) • Courses (CO): comments with this code reference specific courses taken, not assignments
timeworking in a research lab had a greater impact on their long-term goals than their classes, andworking in the lab made them consider graduate school. “But like, [PROFESSOR]’s lab I think, makes me- it like, put the idea of graduate school in my head, even though that was like never in my- I never thought about it before. I was just kind of going to get my degree and then start doing something I was more interested in. But now, like, since I’m interested in research, it’s opening up different doors in my mind. I’m like, ‘I could do that, in materials science’ or get master’s in materials science and then work still in aerospace, just on the materials side, which would be like, very cool. . . But I still
: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00366.x [3] C. A. Shaffer and S. H. Edwards, “Scheduling and student performance,” in Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ser. ITiCSE ’11. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011, p. 331. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/1999747.1999842 [4] S. Willman, R. Lindén, E. Kaila, T. Rajala, M.-J. Laakso, and T. Salakoski, “On study habits on an introductory course on programming,” Computer Science Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 276–291, 2015. [5] G. Schraw, T. Wadkins, and L. Olafson, “Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination,” US, pp. 12–25, 2007. [Online
Transfer: Measures of Effectiveness in Helping Community College Students to Complete Bachelor’s Degrees (Signature Report No. 13)," National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA, 2017, 2022 update.[4] "Community college enrollment crisis?: Historical trends in community college enrollment," American Association of Community Colleges, Washington, DC, 2019.[5] J. Causey, A. Gardner, H. Kim, S. Lee, A. Pevitz, M. Ryu, A. Scheetz and D. Shapiro, "COVID-19 Transfer, Mobility, and Progress: First Two Years of the Pandemic Report. Ninth in the Series," National Student Clearinghouse, Herndon, VA, 2022.[6] "Current Term Enrollment Estimates: Fall 2022 Expanded Edition," National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, 2023
intersectionality include [13]–[15]. Researchers who have exposure tothis area already will likely recognize that one Crenshaw citation [16] that is used to signal thatintersectionality is being considered. We ourselves are guilty of including just this citation as asignal that we are trying to do something more than just examining our population data, but wefall short when we do not prioritize reading and theorizing beyond that shallow attribution.We call on ourselves and our fellow researchers to recognize that intersectionality is an entirefield and one which we must approach with some humility. We encourage our fellow researchersto recognize (y)our own positionality and limitations, and know when you need to invitesomeone(s) else. We do want to caution
education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1,pp. 13–31, 2019.[11] S. Niles, S. Roudbari and S. Contreras, “Integrating Social Justice and Political Engagementinto Engineering,” International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, vol. 7, no. 1,pp. 57-69, 2020.[12] National Academy of Engineers, “NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering”, EngineeringChallenges, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx[Accessed: October 27, 2022].[13] R. Roscoe, D. Becker, R. Branaghan, E. Chiou, R. Gray, S. Craig, R. Gutzwiller and N.Cooke, “Bridging Psychology and Engineering to Make Technology Work for People,”American Psychologist. vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 394-406, 2019.[14] B. Altay, “User-centered design
whiteheterosexual cisgender woman. The researchers also represent undergraduate student, graduatestudent, and faculty roles in a variety of engineering and/or engineering education fields. Thiswork is deeply rooted in the experiences of oppression and marginalization of the LGBTQ+authors in STEM and seeks to find ways to undermine the systems of oppression that havecaused harm to them and others.Methods This research used focus groups and individual interviews to explore the experiences ofLGBTQ+ STEM undergraduate students at a large R1 university in the U. S. southwest. Datacollection occurred in Fall of 2020. Interview and focus group recruitment was achieved using acall that was sent to out to all graduate and undergraduate students through
] G. L. Downey, The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 1998.[6] W. Faulkner, “Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[7] D. Vinck, Ed., Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2003.[8] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1994.[9] J. Trevelyan, “Reconstructing engineering from practice,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175–195, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.520135.[10] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T
, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.[3] R. N. Savage, K. C. Chen, and L. Vanasupa, “Integrating Project-based Learning throughout the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum,” Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 3 & 4, 2007.[4] R. M. Marra, C. Plumb, and D. J. Hacker, “Developing Metacognitive Skills in PBL Undergraduate Engineering Introduction and Background,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2018.[5] K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. A. Leydens, J. Blacklock, J. Y. Tsai, and N. Plata, “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[6] M. Ashby, Materials
., Plant, T. A., Morris, M. E., & Seel, N. R. (1994). Collaboration media: The problem of design by use and the use of design. In Scrivener, S.A.R. (Ed.), Computer- supported Cooperative Work (1st ed., pp. 113-131). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462276-8Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001Leonardi
isyour major or intended major?” and “What is your gender identity?”Participants self-reported what they perceived their sources of SE in the course to be byanswering the open-ended question: “What experience(s) in this course have contributed to yourconfidence in building circuits?”The complete survey instrument can be found in the Appendix.MaterialsData were collected before and after participants completed an open-ended design project. Aspart of this course project, participants were presented with a lab kit containing a toolbox ofprototyping tools (e.g., digital multimeter, screwdriver, wire strippers, and a solderlessbreadboard), a robotics kit, and other supplies necessary to carry out the design project (seeAppendix for a complete list of