Ejike Ewim, The Ohio State UniversityLeonardo Rodrigues da Costa MoraesBeenish SabaShawanee’ Patrick, Texas A&M University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Doing Academia Differently: The Creation of a Cohort-Based Postdoctoral Scholars Program for Emerging Engineering Faculty (EBR)Abstract The postdoctoral to professoriate pathway is a conventional path to develop significantengineering faculty talent and diversify the engineering academia workforce. Relatively fewstudies have examined the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) postdocexperience, even though these scholars have faced structural and interpersonal challenges as theynavigate the
and Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Kali’s research interests center on exploring the ex- periences of marginalized engineering students, with a particular focus on their hidden identity, mental health, and wellbeing. Her work aims to enhance inclusivity and diversity in engineering education, con- tributing to the larger body of research in the field.Gabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University Gabriel Van Dyke is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. His current research interests are engineering culture and applying cognitive load theory in the engineering classroom. He is currently working on an NSF
Creative Problem Solving Methodologies," Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/3901.[4] J. Katz-Buonincontro, O. Davis, A. Aghayere, and D. Rosen, "An exploratory pilot study of student learning experiences in engineering technology courses designed to promote creativity," Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 55-79, 2016, doi: 10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.55.[5] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert, "Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses," (in English), Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 417-449, 2014.[6] M. Agogué, P. Le Masson, C. Dalmasso, O. Houdé, and M. Cassotti, "Resisting classical solutions: The
Paper ID #38269Indigenous Innovators: Creating Collaborative Student-EngineerInnovation Teams between Tribal Colleges and Research InstitutionsMr. Nicholas M. Bittner, University of North Dakota Nick is currently a Biomedical engineering student at the University of North Dakota since graduating with a associates in engineering from Cankdeska Cikana Community College located on the Spirit Lake nation. Utilizing the innovation based learning model found in his new department, he is spear heading an effort connect the Tribal colleges and Universities to forge long lasting and productive relationships.Ms. Rebecca Kennedy
Paper ID #38828The Application of Small Batch Sizes to the Design and Delivery ofEngineering CoursesDr. John A. Mirth, St. Cloud State University John Mirth is a professor in the Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Department at the St. Cloud State University in Minnesota. Prior to this, he had positions at the University of Denver, the University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the University of Iowa. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Application of Small Batch Sizes to the Design and Delivery of Engineering
Paper ID #38397Supporting Graduate Women in Engineering: The Approach and Findingsof aYear-Long Program at UIUCMs. Aadhy Parthasarathy, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Aadhy Parthasarathy is a Ph.D. candidate in Aerospace Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (UIUC). Her Ph.D. research is focused on understanding the effects of spatially- and temporally- varying pressure gradients on turbulent boundary layers. She is committed to Diversity, Equity, and In- clusion, and is involved with various related efforts around the UIUC campus.Rupal Nigam, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Paper ID #38088Thinking Systemically to Better Serve Engineering Students’ MentalHealth Needs: Policy and Process RecommendationsDr. Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University Kacey Beddoes is a Project Director in the College of Engineering Dean’s Office at San Jose State Univer- sity. She holds a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Further information about her work can be found at www.sociologyofengineering.org.Dr. Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Andrew Danowitz received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University in 2014, and is
professionals. She has a BA in Elementary Education from Johnson State College and believes that all youth should have access to high-quality and engaging afterschool programs. In 2014, Nicole was chosen as a Next Generation Leader by the National AfterSchool Association.Tracy L Truzansky ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Linking Engineering to Life: Expanding Gender Diversity in STEM Through an Afterschool ProgramBackgroundThe vitality and diversity of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforceis a significant concern in the US, according to the 2022 US National Science and EngineeringIndicators, in part due to the “missing millions” of workers from
, DC, pp. 1– 77, 2012.[5] National Research Council, “Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Summary of Two Workshops,” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011. Accessed on 13 June 2016 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13099[6] T. A. Litzinger and L. R. Lattuca, “Translating Research into Widespread Practice in Engineering Education,” in A. Johri and B. Olds. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 375–392, 2014.[7] S. Zappe, K. Hochstedt, E. Kisenwether, & A. Shartrand, “Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach
practicedevery detail so that the performance seems natural, much like a well-rehearsed play. And like thelead in the play, Ace will need to weave the story for his students, helping them to not only applythe engineering design principles to real life, but to acknowledge the development of theseequations and standards as they have evolved alongside the technology used to analyze engineeringprojects.After all, the classroom can be seen as a dramatic arena, in which the instructor is giving theperformance on stage (sometimes, actually on a raised platform at the front of the room) while theaudience of students observe [2].Act II: Rising ActionBut if Ace is to approach class as a story, he must well prepare the tale of engineering that he willshare, for
Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 254–265, May 2018.[19] K. Tonso, “Engineering Identity,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 267–282.[20] M. R. Kendall, M. Denton, N. H. Choe, L. M. Procter, and M. Borrego, “Factors Influencing Engineering Identity Development of Latinx Students,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 173–180, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TE.2019.2909857.[21] J. Wilks and K. Wilson, “Going on to uni? Access and participation in university for students from backgrounds of disadvantage,” Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 79–90, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2012.642335.[22] M
; Construction Disciplines. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,June 15 – 19, Tampa, FL.Wankat, P. and Oreovicz, F. (2003). Tenure in Teaching. Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice 129(1): 2 – 5.Wheatley, B.B., Miskioglu, E., Christou, E., and Tymvios, N. (2020). Pre and Post Tenure:Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments for Mechanical Engineering and MechanicalEngineering Technology Faculty. 2020 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22 – 26(Virtual).Yeung, A.T. (2006). Reappraisal of University-Level Engineering Education. Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 132(2): 103 – 111.Youn, T.I.K. and Price, T.M. (2009). Learning from the Experience of Others: The Evolution
Westminster College in Salt Lake City, UT, and her PhD in Environmental Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Sabina has research interests in the areas of K-12 engineering education, mentoring, and identity development.Dr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Dr. Medha Dalal is an associate director of scholarly initiatives and an assistant research professor in the Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She holds a PhD from Arizona State University in Learning, Literacies and Technologies with a focus on engineering education. Her research interests span four related areas: democratization of engineering education, ways of thinking, engineering curiosity among pre-college students, and
Learning Technology, vol. 28, Jul. 2020.[8] M. Fryling, “From flipped, to flipping out, to mostly sunny: How the flipped classroom model made the move to emergency remote learning less stormy,” Issues in Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 281–289, 2020.[9] N. F. M. Azmin, M. F. A. Wahab, F. Ahmad, A. L. Asnawi, A. Z. Jusoh, S. N. Ibrahim, and D. N. Jimat, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions and Acceptance of the Online Flipped Classroom for Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 52–62, Nov. 2021.[10] B. Beason-Abmayr, D. R. Caprette, and C. Gopalan, “Flipped teaching eased the transition from face-to-face teaching to online instruction during the COVID-19
education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.31. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational researcher, 32(1), 9-13.32. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational researcher, 32(1), 25-28.33. Bannan-Ritland, B., & Baek, J. Y. (2008). Investigating the act of design in design research: The road taken. Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching, 299-319.34. Godwin, A. (2016). The development of a measure of engineering identity. In ASEE Annual Conference
Paper ID #38667Board 371: Relationships Between Metacognitive Monitoring During Examsand Exam Performance in Engineering StaticsDr. Chris Venters, East Carolina University Chris Venters is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina, USA. He teaches introductory courses in engineering design and mechanics and upper-level courses in fluid mechanics. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech in 2014, and his research primarily focuses on conceptual understanding in engineering mechanics courses. He received his M.S. in Aerospace
Paper ID #36963Board 196: A Framework to Assess Debugging Skills for ComputationalThinking in Science and EngineeringDerrick Hylton, Spelman CollegeDr. Shannon Hsianghan-huang Sung, Institute for Future Intelligence Shannon H. Sung is a Learning Scientist at Institute for Future Intelligence. Her research focuses on technology-enhanced learning and assessment, interdisciplinary STEM learning, and the cognitive learn- ing processes.Xiaotong DingMary Johanna Van Vleet ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Framework to Assess Debugging Skills for Computational Thinking in
and served in several ad- ministrative roles within higher education; secured over $5.5M funding and support for STEM education research; and led several program development efforts, including: a childcare facility at a federal research laboratory, STEM K-12 teacher training programs, a Molecular Biology/Biotechnology master’s degree program at a small internationally-focused teaching institution, as well as a first-year engineering program and a B.S. Engineering Technology degree program at an R1 research institution. She has been recognized for her teaching, advising, and service, and as an Exemplary Faculty Member for Excellence in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.Dr. David A. Wyrick PE, CPEM, West Virginia
& Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses.Dr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. is research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology used in the classroom.Mr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nick Hawkins is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at
Paper ID #38134Work in Progress: Qualitative Content Analysis of Quantitative Literacyin First-Year Engineering CoursesDr. Raenita A. Fenner, Loyola University, Maryland Dr. Raenita Fenner is an Associate Professor of Engineering in the Department of Engineering at Loyola University Maryland.Dr. Peggy O’Neill, Loyola University, Maryland Peggy O’Neill, PhD, is a professor of writing at Loyola University Maryland where she has served as di- rector of composition, department chair, and associate dean. Her primary research is in writing pedagogy and assessment, and she has taught a wide variety of writing courses
engineeringcurriculum. Ph.D. dissertation. Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of TechnologySydney. Available at: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/129421 (Accessed: 10 March2022).Hanson, J. et al. (2010) ‘Using Video Technology To Extend Learning Styles In A GeotechnicalEngineering Laboratory’, in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. 2010 AnnualConference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky: ASEE Conferences, p. 15.1345.1-15.1345.13.Available at: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--15967.Herrington, A.J. (1985) ‘Writing in Academic Settings: A Study of the Contexts for Writing inTwo College Chemical Engineering Courses’, Research in the Teaching of English, 19(4), pp.331–361.HILGERS, T.L., HUSSEY, E.L. and STITT-BERGH, M. (1999) ‘“As
Paper ID #37961Board 169: Making Families Aware of Engineering through the PublicLibrary (Work in Progress)Dr. Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington Dr. Kelli Paul is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Dr. Jungsun Kim, Indiana University-Bloomington Jungsun Kim, Ph.D. is a research scientist at Indiana University at Bloomington. Her research focuses on how students can consistently develop their talent throughout their
spaces) [10], [11]. Forstudents, such a perspective can guide them to draw connections between their personalexperiences with AI technologies, their communities, and potential impacts on the larger societyof which they are a part. Informed by research in engineering ethics education that much of the ethics instructionwould run the risk of being only superficially effective if it does not address three categories oflearning objectives: emotional engagement (want to make ethical decisions), intellectualengagement (know how to make ethical decisions), and particular knowledge (be aware of thecurrently accepted guidelines for ethical practice) [12], [13], we curated a suite of ethicsactivities that expose students to various aspects of AI
Paper ID #37186Development of Student Comfort with Various Fabrication Methods inAerospace and Mechanical Engineering Design CurriculumDr. Tyler Carter Kreipke, CSC, University of Notre Dame Tyler Kreipke, CSC, received his Bachelor of Science from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2011, majoring in Biomedical Engineering with a concentration in Biomaterials and minoring in German. He completed his doctorate in Bioengineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017, where his dis- sertation focused on bone mechanobiology. He is currently pursuing theology studies at the seminary at the University at Notre Dame
. Interviewees were recruited exclusively from “pSTEM” disciplines,which include only the physical sciences along with technology, engineering and math.This approach resulted in interviews with 13 men and 18 women. Most participants worked inengineering departments (8 men and 15 women), but the sample population also includedphysics (3 men and 1 woman), mathematics (1 man), and computer science (1 man and 2women). The faculty were intentionally drawn from different types of universities according toCarnegie Classification: doctoral universities with very high research activity (4 men and 11women), master's college and universities (5 men and 5 women), associate's colleges (1 man and1 woman), baccalaureate/associate's colleges (2 men and 1 woman), and a
, Virtual Conference, Jul. 2021. doi: 10.18260/1-2- -36531.[9] G. Downey, “Are engineers losing control of technology? From ‘problem solving’ to ‘problem definition and solution’ in engineering education,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 583–595, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1205/cherd.05095.[10] R. Stevens, A. Johri, and K. O’Connor, “Professional Engineering Work,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 119–138. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.010.[11] L. Kamp, “Engineering education in sustainable development at Delft University of Technology,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 14, no. 9–11, pp. 928–931, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro
concept of failing, iterating, and retrying is near the top ofthe first-year list yet is virtually absent on the Capstone list. This research provides a usefulinvestigative approach for other engineering educators to examine their programs and informs morefocused planning through the curriculum for students’ future success.KeywordsCornerstone, Capstone, Engineering Design, Technical Skills, Professional Competencies, Co-op,Cooperative Education, Work ExperienceIntroductionFor the past few decades, several initiatives have been designed to improve and strengthen students’outcomes in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields at all levels ofthe educational system. For example, the Department of Education published a letter
Paper ID #37161Student perspectives on engineering design, decision-making,adaptability, and support in capstone designMs. Shruti Misra, University of Washington I am a graduate student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. My research interest is broadly focused on studying innovation in university-industry partnerships. I am interesting in various ways that universitiesDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self
/2611987978/se-2[2] C.A. Mertler. Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2019.[3] National Science Board, National Science Foundation. 2021. The STEM Labor Force of Today: Scientists, Engineers and Skilled Technical Workers. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022. NSB-2021-2. Alexandria, VA. Available https:// ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212.[4] American Society for Engineering Education. “Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 2021.” Washington, D.C. 2022.[5] S. Jaschik. “New Push for a Shift in Promotion and Tenure: A Proposal to Add Innovation and Entrepreneurship to Tenure and Promotion Criteria,” Inside Higher Ed, September 30, 2020
.[24] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20377.[25] E. H. Schein, “Organizational Culture and Leadership.” Rochester, NY, 1985. Accessed: Apr. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1496184[26] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[27] G. T. Chao and H. Moon, “The Cultural Mosaic: A Metatheory for Understanding the Complexity of Culture.,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol