programming based on the surveys, with a push in 2019 for awareness of Diversity,Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), with a symposium and new DEI Task Group, eventually adding aRacial Equity Task Group. Programming in the 2021-2022 year included a long-term mentoringprogram, a racial equity book club, and a DEI training for firm leaders. SE3 published resultsfrom a study of pressure points for people of color studying structural engineering by analyzingdata from programs in California. From early 2022, SE3 increasingly focused programming onequity in design as well.Hierarchy of knowledge – ‘real’ engineeringThe consequences of perceived boundaries of ‘real’ engineering, which limit engineering totechnical work, are evidenced in the accounts of the work and
Towards Seeing Themselves as Scholars," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 42, pp. 1527-1547, 01/01 2019, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2019.0074.[13] J. P. Azevedo, M. Gutierrez, R. de Hoyos, and J. Saavedra, "The unequal impacts of COVID-19 on student learning," Primary and secondary education during Covid-19: Disruptions to educational opportunity during a pandemic, pp. 421-459, 2022.[14] E. CAMP. "Students lost one-third of a school year of learning during the pandemic." https://reason.com/2023/02/03/children-lost-one-third-of-a-year-of-learning-during-the- pandemic-analysis-finds/ (accessed Feb 3, 2023.[15] K. A. Bird, B. L. Castleman, and G. Lohner, "Negative impacts from the shift to online learning
., vol. 11, no. 1s, pp. 127–135, 2014.[2] A. R. Peterfreund, E. Costache, H. L. Chen, S. K. Gilmartin, and S. Sheppard, “Infusing innovation and entrepreneurship into engineering education: Looking for change as seen by ASEE Members, 2012 to 2015,” in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016, vol. 2016-June.[3] KEEN, “The Framework for Entrepreneurially Minded Learning,” Engineering Unleashed, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework.[4] C. Q. Li, R. S. Harichandran, M. I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Development of an instrument to measure the entrepreneurial mindset of engineering students,” in American Society
Museum” [20]. The time in Mexicoincludes living with host families and collaborating with students at Mexican universities ineducational and research undertakings. Fall commitments for the participants are “an onlinelearning community and writ[ing] a research proposal on the research problem identified while[the student was] in Yucatan” [20] and presenting their proposal as a research poster. Theseactivities were offered through the ELCIR project from 2015 to 2019 with marked success forparticipants by exposing them to research and international contexts early in their academiccareers [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20]. Therefore, outcomes for students similar to those reported in [11,12, 13, 14, 15] were expected for the summer 2022 IRAP cohort.2.2
, 2023).[24] S. Donohue, “Student Water Scholars and Broader Impact Outreach: Motivations and Hindrances toParticipation,” University of New Mexico Shared Knowledge Conference, 2022.https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/skc/2022/posters/25/ (accessed Feb. 14, 2023).[25] Lee, Y., Kothuis, B. B., Sebastian, A., & Brody, S. Design of transformative education and authenticlearning projects: Experiences and lessons learned from an international multidisciplinary research andeducation program on flood risk reduction. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.AppendixDetails concerning the FNI flood studyFreese and Nichols (FNI) requested interviews to be conducted with residents using two onlineinstruments–an online survey that allows
apply feminist theories to engineering education.Ms. Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan Elizabeth is a graduate student at the University of Michigan studying Engineering Education Research under doctoral advisor Aaron Johnson. Her research focuses on weaving macro ethics into existing aerospace engineering curricula and institutional support methods for working class engineering students. Elizabeth earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan in 2019 with foci in Biomed- ical Engineering and Applied Mathematics.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Fac- ulty member of the Engineering
Wenderoth.References[1] Z. S. Wilson, S. S. Iyengar, S.-S. Pang, I. M. Warner, and C. A. Luces, “Increasing Access for Economically Disadvantaged Students: The NSF/CSEM & S-STEM Programs at Louisiana State University,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 581–587, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9348-6.[2] M. Walpole, “Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–73, 2003, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2003.0044.[3] M. L. Strutz and M. W. Ohland, “Low-SES First-generation Students’ Decision to Pursue Engineering,” presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2012, p. 25.907.1-25.907.15. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available
, practices,facility characteristics, inspections, and engineering controls [3,4]. For example, national studiesin 2002 and 2022 found that only 81% and 83% of educators respectively had the appropriateeye protection for all students engaged in science and engineering activities in their courses [4].Furthermore, a national study published in 2022 by the International Technology andEngineering Educators Association (ITEEA) in collaboration with the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) and the National Science Education Leadership Association(NSELA), discovered a number of alarming safety deficiencies among P-12 programs andeducators providing engineering instruction in the United States (U.S.) [3]. Further analysesfound that teachers who
traditional LIWC analysis with the standard dictionarygives a psychologically verified and impartial look at the language, while with the customdictionary it gives a measure of the known signposts for a topic. The MEM analysis gives theemergent themes within the topic. When these two a priori and in vivo thematic computationalmethods arrive at similar landmarks, researchers can be confident that although this took lesstime, the adventure has not only been worth the computations, but it has also arrived in thecorrect place.6 References[1] ASEE, “Engineering by the Numbers, 2010,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2011.[2] ASEE, “Engineering &
: Accelerating female talent in science, engineering, and Technology. Center for Talent Innovation, 2014. [Online]. http://www.talentinnovation.org/publication.cfm?publication=1420 [3] J. Williams, S. Li, R. Rincon, and P. Finn, “Climate Control: Gender and Racial Bias in Engineering?,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4014946. [4] R. Yonemura and D. Wilson, “Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive, and Otherwise Chilly Conditions,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 26-29, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26843. [5] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships
protocol following a critical incident approach [31]. Senior faculty included those atthe Professor rank and Associate Professor rank for a minimum of two years. Junior facultyincluded those at the Assistant Professor rank and Associate Professor rank for less than twoyears. Participants were recruited from the top twenty largest US doctoral-granting engineeringschools, as determined by the 2021 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Engineering by the Numbers report [32]. The research team contacted the heads/chairs ofengineering departments within each of these twenty institutions with a request to share a studyinvitation and screening survey link with their engineering faculty. The screening survey wasdesigned to take approximately 10
-Buonincontro J (2019) STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31: 31-43.3. Aguilera D, Ortiz-Revilla J (2021) STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7): 331.4. Akçalı E, M Buraglia, A Essenfeld, J Williams (2021). Poetry writing in engineering education: Results and insights from an exploratory study, 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, https://peer.asee.org/375855. Akçalı E, J Williams, Burress R, Aguila A, M Buraglia, (2023). In their own words: Student perceptions of technical poetry writing in discipline-specific undergraduate engineering courses: Opportunities and challenges, INFORMS Transactions
engineering program, and over three years at a community college. Dr. O’Riordan-Adjah help develop the college’s strategic plan during his time at one of the community colleges. He is committed to aligning student learning to not only the strategic plan but also the real world, and employer needs. He understands how the college can serve students holistically by focusing on retention and student success initiatives, like improved advising, success coaching, and connections to employers. He is also an advocate of the Building and Construction Trades which provides a great opportunity for hands-on student enthusiasts. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference
Paper ID #40074The Person behind the Mann Report: Charles Riborg Mann as an Influentialbut Elusive Figure in Engineering EducationDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She has served twice as chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is co-director of the Communication Across Divisions initiative. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Person Behind the Mann