AC 2009-1474: PEER AND SELF ASSESSMENT IN DEVELOPING TEAM SKILLSIN A CORE DESIGN SEQUENCEKeith Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology Keith Sheppard is a Professor of Materials Engineering and Associate Dean of Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. He earned the B.Sc. from the University of Leeds, England and Ph.D. from the University of Birmingham, England, both in Metallurgy. As Associate Dean, Sheppard is primarily responsible for undergraduate programs. He is a past Chair of the ASEE Design in Engineering Education Division.Edward Blicharz, Stevens Institute of Technology Edward Blicharz is a Distinguished Service Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer
AC 2009-1928: DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION FOR ASSESSINGSTUDENT PRACTICES, INDEPENDENCE, AND RESPONSIBILITY IN DESIGNCOURSESRenee Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Renee Rogge is an Assistant Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering. She co-developed and co-teaches the biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Renee is a member of the DEED division and has educational research interests in assessment of design.Kay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C Dee is a Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering and the Founding Director of the Rose-Hulman Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education. Kay
AC 2009-639: FORMING AND MANAGING PROJECT TEAMS IN A LARGECAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEEdward Lumsdaine, Michigan Technological University Dr. Edward Lumsdaine is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological University (MTU) and Special Professor of Business, Institute for Enterprise and Innovation, University of Nottingham (UK). For many years he was management consultant at Ford Motor Company in high-tech education and training. In 1994 he received the ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award for innovation in engineering education. He has co-authored books on creative problem solving, engineering design, entrepreneurship and innovation. He has work experience in industry, seven
AC 2009-1046: TEACHING COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING DESIGN IN ADISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENT THROUGH EXPERIENTIAL LEARNINGXiaobo Peng, Prairie View A&M University Xiaobo Peng is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Prairie View A&M University. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from University of Missouri-Rolla in 2005. His research interests include CAD/CAM, haptics, solid modeling, virtual reality, and virtual product design. Dr. Peng is the member of ASEE and ASME.Katie Grantham Lough, Missouri University of Science and Technology Assistant Professor, Interdisciplinary Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyBenjamin
AC 2009-1843: SCORECARDS: TRACKING PROGRESS IN SENIOR DESIGNPROJECT COURSESJames Baker, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyMark Yoder, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyBruce Black, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyRobert Throne, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyWilliam Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Page 14.1043.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Scorecards – Tracking Progress in Senior Design Project CoursesAbstractMonitoring and evaluating the status of engineering design projects has traditionally been part artand part science. Weekly and monthly status reports, Gantt charts, design reviews, time logs,demonstrations, and presentations
AC 2009-1405: FIRST-YEAR DESIGN EXPERIENCE: ASSEMBLING THE “BIGPICTURE” THROUGH INNOVATIVE PRODUCT DESIGNKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech UniversityDavid Hall, Louisiana Tech UniversityMark Barker, Louisiana Tech UniversityPatricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Page 14.633.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 First-Year Design Experience: Assembling the “Big Picture” Through Innovative Product DesignAbstractAs part of the freshmen engineering curriculum at Louisiana Tech University, students developnovel solutions to problems that “bug” them. During the spring quarter, students are asked tospend several weeks
. Page 14.1038.2 Rube Goldberg (1883 – 1970) was an engineer turned cartoonist who drew incrediblemachines that completed simple tasks, such as turning off a light switch, in as complex of a wayas possible. His cartoons were meant as a social commentary on how technology to solve simpleproblems is often needlessly complex, but this context provides an excellent context for childrento learn about engineering design. Combining Rube’s ideas with an engineering design processgives students an opportunity to have positive experiences where they have a lot of room toexplore and be creative while still following an engineering design process and understandingthe basic process that engineers go through to design. These positive experiences
AC 2009-107: WHAT HAS FINS LIKE A WHALE, SKIN LIKE A LIZARD, ANDEYES LIKE A MOTH? THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERINGMarjan Eggermont, University of CalgaryCarla Gould, Ontario College of Art and DesignCasey Wong, Ontario College of Art and DesignMichael Helms, Georgia Institute of TechnologyJeannette Yen, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDjordje Zegarac, University of CalgarySean Gibbons, University of MontanaCarl Hastrich, Ontario College of Art and DesignBruce Hinds, Ontario College of Art and DesignDenise DeLuca, Biomimicry Institutejessica ching, Ontario College of Art and Design Page 14.1365.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 “What has fins like a whale
AC 2009-1617: ENGINEERING DESIGN IN THE CREATIVE AGERobert Fleisig, McMaster UniversityHarry Mahler, Ontario College of Art and DesignVladimir Mahalec, McMaster University Page 14.548.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Engineering Design in the Creative AgeAbstractMcMaster University has initiated a new graduate program in engineering practice aimed ateducating tomorrow’s engineering design leaders. Graduates of engineering schools are wellversed in technology and its application but must acquire new skills and competencies ininnovation and design in order to become global leaders in their industries. The leading thinkersin engineering design
universities.The focus of the project is on microwave processing of composite materials, includingcharacterization of materials properties before and after heat treatment and vibrational analysis ofthe composite system. This year's senior engineering students are participating in the first yearof the multi-year project.To accelerate the project achievements for subsequent student participants, an interdisciplinarytransitional summer program is being proposed as a method for technology transfer from thisyear's seniors to the upcoming seniors via a four-week team interaction.IntroductionTo succeed in today’s complex and rapidly advancing global marketplace, graduating engineersmust be able to work on interdisciplinary teams that may be geographically spread
AC 2009-425: COHERENCE AND CORRESPONDENCE IN ENGINEERINGDESIGN EVALUATIONSJonathan Evans, MIT Jonathan R. Evans earned his Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Utah in 2007. He has spent time designing devices ranging from nuclear waste processing equipment to special effects technology. He is currently working on his Master's degree at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Mechanical Engineering. His research focuses on the application of decision-making cognitive methods to the engineering design process.Konstantinos Katsikopoulos, Max Planck Institute for Human Development Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos received his Ph.D. in industrial engineering and
). Page 14.2.13References1 Boyer Commission, 1998, “Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities,” http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/ (accessed February, 2009).2 ABET, 2008, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, The Engineering Accreditation Commission of The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, http://www.abet.org/Linked Documents- UPDATE/Criteria and PP/E001 08-09 EAC Criteria 12-04-07.pdf (accessed February, 2009).3 Friedman, Thomas H., 2005, The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.4 Dym, C. L., 1994, "Teaching Design to Freshmen: Style and Content," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 83
operations at major corporations.3. Engineer's Council for Professional Development (ECPD). (1947). Canons of ethics for engineers.4. See: http://www.sache.org/ [accessed Feb 1, 2009]5. Kletz, T.A., T.A., 1978. What you don’t have, can’t leak. Chemistry and Industry, 6 May 1978, p 287-292.6. NIOSH (DHHS) Publication No. 2006-136, EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND THE SAFETY AND HEALTH OF WORKING PEOPLE: Knowledge Gaps and Research Directions, August 2006.7. See: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/SHAPE/ [accessed Feb 1, 2009]8. Christensen, W.C. & Main, B.W. Compendium; 1996 Symposium: Integrating safety through design: Developing concepts of safety, health, and environmental knowledge to be incorporated into engineering curricula
Noted author andproduct designer Robert G. Cooper sums up the dilemma well, stating that “most companies lackmuch in the way of effective product innovation and technology strategy, and worse yet, seem ata loss for developing such a strategy.”14 Obviously, universities are, at least in part, as much responsible for this problem as theyare for the solution. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology recognizes thisshortcoming in engineering programs, and has clearly outlined the technical and non-technicalskills necessary for success in an increasingly complex and interdisciplinary workplaceenvironment.15 Teaching cognitive processing skills, communication and team working skills,ethics, global awareness, and environmental
. W 9. Appropriately model the physical world with mathematics. W 10. Consider economic, social, and environmental aspects of a problem. W 18. Design experiments to better understand systems and verify ideas/hypotheses. HW 19. Handle uncertainty and ambiguity is system modeling. H 20. Use statistical techniques as well as engineering intuition to make reasonable estimates. WA3: Information Collection/Dissemination Capabilities: 6. Find information and use a variety of resources (i.e., resourcefulness). W 7. Identify critical technology and
AC 2009-309: START EARLIER, PREPARE BETTER: AN ENGINEERINGSENIOR SEMINAR COURSEDing Yuan, Colorado State University, Pueblo Ding Yuan received the B.S. degree in industrial automation from Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China, in 1998 and the Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, in 2006. She is currently an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Colorado State University-PuebloNebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC received the Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering from Belgrade University in 1984, the M.S. in electrical engineering, M.S. in industrial engineering, and Ph.D. in
AC 2009-445: A TEAM-BASED DESIGN COMPETITION FOR FRESHMANENGINEERING STUDENTS THAT EMPHASIZES SUSTAINABLE DESIGNRobert Prins, James Madison University Robert Prins received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2005; he is currently an assistant professor in the School of Engineering at James Madison University (JMU). Prior to joining JMU, Dr. Prins was a faculty member at Virginia State University. Dr. Prins' industrial experience includes one year as a suspension engineer at Visteon, Inc. and five years as an engineer at Perceptron, Inc., a machine vision company. Page
viewed as problematic in a rapidly changing technology-oriented world where Page 14.419.3generating new ideas is essential to survival 3, 4. Industry has also perceived new BS engineeringgraduates as lacking design capability or creativity, as well as an appreciation for consideringalternatives. In the past several years, universities have responded to these challenges by addingmore design content and introducing more open-ended design problems into their engineeringcurricula. As Liu and Schonwetter put it: “Since creativity emanates from problems, it seemsmore natural for engineering students to gain creativity through practice of problem
AC 2009-518: DEVELOPING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ DESIGN SKILLSUSING ON-LINE VIDEO MODULES AND ACTIVE-LEARNING EXERCISESKatie Cadwell, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGreta Zenner, University of Wisconsin, MadisonNaomi Chesler, University of Wisconsin, MadisonWendy Crone, University of Wisconsin, Madison Page 14.460.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Teaching Undergraduate Engineering Students Auxiliary Design Skills via Online Video Modules and Active Learning ExercisesAbstractBiomedical Engineering undergraduates at the University of Wisconsin-Madison participate insix semesters of engineering design. In addition to engineering design aptitude
.” James Shapiro’s forty years as a bacterial geneticist Page 14.751.9has led him to the stunning conclusions that bacteria are “natural genetic engineers” and “thateven the smallest cells are sentient beings.” In an article entitled “Bacteria Are Small but NotStupid: Cognition, Natural Genetic Engineering and Socio-bacteriology”39, he writes “The take-home lesson of more than a half century of molecular microbiology is to recognize that bacterialinformation processing is far more powerful than human technology…these small cells areincredibly sophisticated at coordinating processes involving millions of individual events and atmaking them precise
withinengineering”[5]. The Engineering Science curriculum is divided into two sections, theFoundation and the Options, each lasting two years (four academic terms). The fourFoundation terms “…provide a strong foundation in science, math, technology and design”,and include courses that cover classical mechanics, structures and materials, quantumphysics, systems biology, fluid dynamics, robotics design, thermodynamics, linear algebra, Page 14.1216.2calculus, computer programming, and electrical fundamentals[6]. Engineering Science is bynature a multidisciplinary program that enables students to work within and acrossdisciplines.In their third and fourth years
AC 2009-2009: SERIOUS GAMING FOR AEROSPACE ENGINEERING DESIGN:EXPLORING LEARNING POTENTIAL AND STUDENTS' READINESSYogesh Velankar, Purdue University Yogesh Velankar is a graduate student in Purdue University School of Engineering Education. His research interests are in the area of corporate learning and designing effective learning environments.Sean Brophy, Purdue University Dr. Sean Brophy, is an assistant professor in Purdue University School of Engineering Education. His research interests are in using technology for learning and assessment. He brings experience in designing effective learning experiences based on theories of knowing and how people learn.Masataka Okutsu, Purdue University
AC 2009-1789: CONSTRUCTIVIST DESIGN AND BLENDED INSTRUCTION:RETHINKING COURSE DESIGN FOR THE ENGINEERING CLASSROOMMarie-Pierre Huguet, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteFrank Wright, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Page 14.363.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Constructivist Design and Blended Instruction: Rethinking Course Design for the Engineering ClassroomAbstractThe engineering classroom is changing1: the student body is ethnically, linguistically, andculturally more diverse2 than ever before and the infusion of technology is redefining work skillsand society's expectations. Web-based technology has grown to become a critical
AC 2009-290: THIS IS NOT TIMES NEW ROMAN: ENGINEERING DESIGNLESSONS VIA TYPEFACE DESIGNMarjan Eggermont, University of CalgaryColin McDonald, University of Calgary Page 14.1268.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Page 14.1268.2Page 14.1268.3Page 14.1268.4Page 14.1268.5 Figure 9: Romain4. Romantic: high contrast between strokes within the letterforms, geometric construction throughout, but referring to historical proportions and layouts (Fig. 10). Figure 10: Walbaum5. Realist (19th and early 20th centuries): scribal traditions are essentially absent. The emphasis is on
AC 2009-478: STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE SELF-APPRAISAL ANDSELF-MANAGEMENT, AND THE LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY OF ANENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECT: ARE THEY RELATED?Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University Oenardi Lawanto is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology Education at Utah State University. He received his B.S.E.E. from Iowa State University, M.S.E.E. from University of Dayton, and Ph.D. from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Before coming to Utah State University, Dr. Lawanto taught and held several administrative positions at the Universitas Surabaya in Indonesia. His long years of teaching experiences in the area of electrical engineering have offered him new
knowledgemanagement for engineering design projects. The knowledge that students use in their designprocess comes from a variety of sources, including prior published work, past student projects,their team-mates, and the intermediate products they have produced along the way. We proposeto construct the product structures underlying an engineering artifact from these relevantdocuments created or referenced during the course of a design project using machine learningapproaches and language technologies. We present a qualitative analysis of data collected in acapstone engineering design course and the preliminary design of information managementtechnology that we refer to as DesignWebs.DesignWebs build upon the concept of co-word analysis that maps the strength
used for determining the project content focus wasrepresented along the following distinctions: Amorphous Future Quotient Specific Future Quotient Amorphous Design Quotient Specific Design Quotient Engineering Technology Quotient Engineering Optimizing Quotient Production Technology Quotient Production Optimizing QuotientThe array of these can be seen in Figure 4. The dispersal of Project Content Focus in projectsfrom 1979, 1999 and 2006 can be seen in Figure 5
AC 2009-1930: DEFINING THE ROLE OF THE FACULTY ADVISOR IN AMECHANICAL ENGINEERING CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEGregory Watkins, California State University, Chico Gregory Watkins received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University, a Master of Engineering Management from Old Dominion University, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He is an assistant professor in the department of mechanical engineering, mechatronic engineering, and manufacturing technology at California State University Chico. He previously taught in the Engineering Technology department at UNC Charlotte and the Engineering Technologies Division at
level of understanding andconfidence in implementing projects using the engineering design process.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Sue Wainscott for her insightful comments concerningassessment of student knowledge, as well as Drs. Ming Huang, Rick Olson, and Susan Lord, fortheir help in collecting assessment data during the design exercise. The authors would also liketo thank the DEED reviewers for their helpful feedback. USD Institutional Review Boardapproval was obtained in the Fall 2008 semester (project number 2008-09-009).Bibliography1 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 1998 ABET Accreditation yearbook, IV.C.3.d(3)(c), 1998.2 W. C. Oakes, L. L. Leone, and C. J. Gunn, Engineering Your Future: an
project can be described as designing a portable robotic workcell for industry to showcasestate-of-the-art equipment and technologies in robotics. The industrial sponsor for this project isApplied Manufacturing Technologies (AMT) located in Orion, Michigan. AMT plans to use theworkcell for demonstrating current robotics technology in tradeshows, industrial open housesand/or robotics conferences. In addition, the workcell is to be used as a platform to providetraining to engineers working in robotics industry on robot programming, machine vision andsystems integration. The small size, flexible design and durability make the workcell appealingto many other applications in robotics engineering.An engineering senior project design team composed of