Round Tables of Regional or Special Interests, with one table beingopen for initiatives proposed by member organizations outside these areas. The results ofinitiatives or action items for each table were as follows:Group 1. Accreditation Page 14.168.12– led by Iring Wasser (ASIIN), Hasan Mandal (MDTK, GEDC) ̇ Promoting a wider understanding of accreditation ̇ Benchmarking system training of Educators and Accreditors ̇ Overlap with Existing Systems ̇ Accreditation is for Q&A and Recognition but it should serve to facilitate mobility of graduates and studentsGroup 2. Africa– led by Funso
: 2 2 Vin Vout W& elec − Q& + m & in(hin + + gzin ) − m& out (hout + + gzout ) = 0 (1) 2 2If the heat transfer rate and the kinetic energy and potential energy terms are assumed to benegligible then equation 1 is simplified into equation 2. Page 14.1058.6 W& elec = m& outhout − m & in hin = 0 (2
. Rather, a 12-factor model was extractedwith X2 (435) = 921.51, p.80) among the 6 presumed factors, suggesting considerable redundancy among theclaimed factors. In short, the full data set did not support the 6-factor structure proposed by theMCI’s developers.Using a loading criterion of greater than .40, the 7-factor solution showed the simplest and mostinterpretable structure since five of the twelve extracted factors loaded on with single items(factors 6, 9 10 11 and 12). However, noting Table 1, 5 items failed to load on any of the twelvefactors for the varimax rotated factor solutions of less than 0.40 (Q5,Q8, Q16, Q17, and Q22).Some item crossloadings (Q13 and Q 24) making the items somewhat difficult to interpret.Several factors showed
4.7Communicated information effectively 4.6Showed interest in student progress 4.8Student freedom of expression 4.9Course of value to date 4.9Overall course rating 4.7Unofficial Survey Questions:Use of class interaction and Q&A with the professor was at the right level 4.3Class video and guest lecturer enhanced learning and reinforced topics 3.8Use of lecture briefing notes and not a
). The Craft of Scientific Presentations. New York: Springer-Verlag.27 Atkinson, Cliff (2005). Beyond Bullet Points: Using Microsoft PowerPoint to Create Presentations That Inform, Motivate, and Inspire. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.28 Doumont, Jean-luc (2007). Creating Effective Presentation Slides. http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pcs/index.php?q=node/111, audio file. IEEE Professional Communication Society.29 Alley, Michael, Madeline M. Schreiber, Katrina Ramsdell, and John Muffo (2006). How the Design of Headlines Page 14.221.14 in Presentation Slides Affects Audience Retention. Technical Communication, 53 (2), 225–234
. NCES 2000-601.2. National Science Board (NSB). Science & Engineering Indicators 2008. Arlington,VA: National Science Board (NSB);2008.3. Hyde JS, Fennema E, Ryan M, Frost LA, Hopp C. Gender comparison of mathematics attitudes and affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Women Q. 1990;14:299-324.4. Sax L. Mathematical self-concept: how college reinforces the gender gap. Res Higher Educ. 1994;35(2):141-166.5. Sax L. Gender and major-field differences in the development of mathematical self-concept during college. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 1995;1(4):291-307.6. Brainard SG, Carlin L. A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. J Eng Educ. 1998;87:369-375.7. Burtner J. The use
need doing: New messages for enhancing public understanding of engineering, Global Strategy Group-NAE.28. Lederman, N. G. (1986). “Students’ and Teachers’ Understanding of The Nature of Science: A Reassessment,” School Science and Mathematics, 86, 91-99.29. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., and Schwartz, R. S. (2002). “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 6, 497-521.30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publication
on a topic oftheir choice related to sustainability. This assignment was designed to evaluate students’performance towards objectives #1 and #7 and to provide an opportunity for students to work indiverse teams, perform independent research, prepare a report, and present their results. Eachteam was asked to submit a 10-12 page report of their findings and to prepare a 15-minutepresentation (including Q&A) to be delivered in the class. Page 14.1110.8The following topics were chosen by the 9 student teams: ocean/wave energy, water resourcesand pollution, sustainable cities, solar energy, trash incinerator power plant
ignited. To analyze the resulting process, launch the premixed closed-process IGcombustion daemon located in the Daemons> Systems> UnsteadyProcess> Specific>Combustion> Premixed> IG Model page. Configure the reaction in the Reaction Panel fortheoretical combustion of octane. Evaluate the reactants state with p1 = 1 atm, T1 = 298 K, andpartially evaluate the products state with Vol2 = Vol1 (for a constant-volume process). In theProcess Panel, load state-1 as the beginning state (b-state) and state-2 as the final state (f-state),and enter Q = W = 0. Click Calculateand then Super-Calculate to obtain thefinal state. The final pressure andtemperature are found in state-2 as1065 kPa and 2911 K, respectively. Inprocesses where a
also lacked this personality style. The team members did not report ahighly uneven distribution of work, although one student stated: “... we had to divide up the workbetween two smaller sub-groups. We were pretty much in the dark to what our subgroups weredoing.” This lack of coordination may have resulted in the poor quality of the final product.Another person stated: “We noticed some possible error in Q 1-5 but not for sure.” So the Page 14.330.12teammates didn’t do a good job of reviewing each other’s parts and/or didn’t necessarily assignquestions in the strength area of each individual.Another set of teams to compare are the three teams
image to havea greater contrast, the students first converted the RGB (red, green, and blue components) colorimage to the YIQ (luminance channel and chrominance channels) format, and then equalized theluminance component Y (which contains 93% of signal energy) only. Notice that the colorcomponents I and Q were unchanged and left as they were. Next, the students repacked the Ychannel back to the YIQ format, and converted the equalized YIQ format back to its RGB colorformat as displayed in Figure 10b. The indexed-color image equalization and enhancement of thecolor image by equalizing each RGB color channel were conducted, respectively, and theircorresponding equalized effects were verified. a. Original RGB color image
that use energy and environmental themes. In Proceedings of the 113th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006, paper number 2006-262.16. Powers, S. E.; DeWaters, J. E., Creating project-based learning experiences for university-K12 partnerships. In Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004, on CD.17. Powers, S. E.; Graham, M.; Schwob, T.; DeWaters, J. E., Diversity in K-12 initiatives to attract a diverse pool of engineering students. In Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 2003.18. Patton, M. Q., Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, California
the packet Page 14.771.14 (___B5___). What is the application layer protocol of this packet? Answer (___B6___). (Hint: Think about what service is running on the source or destination port.) 6. Press Ctrl-C to stop sniffing. 7. Check the manual about what the switches -d, -e, -v and -L mean by typing man snort 8. Press spacebar to scroll down. Record what “-d” enables (___B7___). Record what “-e” enables (___B8___). Record what “-v” enables (___B9___). Record what “-b” enables (___B10___). Record what “-L” enables (___B11___). (Note: Please remember Linux is case-sensitive.) 9. Type q to exit from man page.C
. Hence, both making the exercises zero 1 Page 14.316.13weighted and using student tutors was successful in changing quite fundamentally thelearning culture in the department.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Duncan White of CSG for developing the onlinequestionnaire software Q. 1 Page 14.316.14References.Anderson, G., Boud, D., 1996, Extending the role of peer learning in university courses. Research andDevelopment in Higher Education, 19, 15-19Congos, D.H., Mack, A., 2005
Directors of Enron Corp. February 1, 20022. Business Week has published numerous articles about the Enron and its collapse, including: Street Wise: Why Enron Isn’t Your Run-of-the-Mill Utility, December 6, 2000 Newsmaker Q&A, Enron’s Ken Lay: There’s No Other Shoe to Fall, August 24, 2001 The Enron Debacle, November 12, 2001 The Fall of Enron, December 17, 2001 Enron: Let Us Count the Culprits (Editorial), December 17, 2001 Commentary: How Governance Rules Failed at Enron, January 21, 2002 Special Report–The Enron Scandal, January 28, 2002 The Man Behind Enron’s Deal Machines, February 4, 2002 Jeff Skilling: Enron’s Missing Man, February 11, 2002 At Enron, “The
Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks In Development And Evolution.Elsevier Academic Press, Boston.19. Papin, J.A., T. Hunter, B.O. Palsson, and S. Subramaniam. 2005. Reconstruction of large-scale cellularsignaling networks and analysis of their properties. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 6:99-111.20. Bild, A.H., G. Yao G, J.T. Chang JT, Q. Wang, A. Potti, D. Chasse, M.B. Joshi, D. Harpole, J.M. Lancaster, A.Berchuck, J.A. Olson Jr., J.R. Marks, H.K. Dressman, M. West, and J.R. Nevins. 2006. Oncogenic pathwaysignatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies
experienceand the introduction of the student participants and project staff to the audience of AB membersand Symposium invitees. The Symposium continues with the students’ oral presentations of theirwork and obtained results. Each presentation was followed by a brief Q&A session, duringwhich the audience asked the students pertinent questions about their research topic. Also, foreach presentation the AB members filled out an evaluation rubric to be utilized for feedbackpurposes. Furthermore, a poster session was held during the extended lunch break. Studentsattend their posters, while AB members and the other invitees (such as university dignitaries,etc.) have the opportunity go around, mingle with the participants, visit each poster and have