approaches, and serves on the editorial board for Engineering Studies and the Journal of Engineering Education. She joined the ASU faculty in 2014 and teaches courses in the undergraduate engineering program as well as the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. Brunhaver graduated with her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University. She is the recipient of a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on fostering greater workplace adaptability among engineering undergraduates and early-career professionals. Other awards Dr. Brunhaver has won for her research include the 2021 ASEE PIC IV Best Paper Award, the
facilitation oflearning communities, as indicated in civil engineering course syllabi?” The syllabi analyzed inthis study were gathered from second- and third-year core courses from Fall 2019 through Spring2023 in a civil engineering department at an R1 Midwest University. This timeframe captures asignificant disruption to instruction that started in mid-Spring 2020. All syllabi were deductivelycoded using an a priori coding scheme that included the following categories: Instructor-StudentInteraction, Peer-to-Peer Interaction, and Institutional Interaction. The impact on learningcommunities displayed in this analysis is aligned with prior research that indicated students feltisolated during the disruption. There are indications that instructors
,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 69-91, 2005.[10] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, C. E. Brawner, J. B. Main, and C. Mobley, Military veteran students’ pathways in engineering education (Year 5), ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, Florida.[11] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, and H. Kesim, “Technically and tactically proficient: How military leadership training and experiences are enacted in engineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 2. pp. 446–457, 2019.[12] C. Carrigan, E. A. Riskin, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, P. N. Mody-Pan, D. Wiggin, and S. Cunningham, Learning from Pell-eligible
levels over the past two decades. [1,9] AlthoughSTEM education research has flourished, there has yet to be equal activity in the propagation of theseinnovations, as the National Research Council (NRC) highlighted. [10] The NRC called for the propagationof engineering education research into practice, including adopting evidence-based practices. Further, theneed for more successful propagation has also been highlighted by an ASEE report [11] that included anappeal to funding agencies to use resources to propagate better efforts that have proven successful.Although educational innovations have been produced over the past few decades, Rogers highlights aneed for knowledge of how to implement the innovation correctly and a lack of underlying
Instructor and the Tenured Faculty”, International Journal on E-Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5-22. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2008.[2] M. Goryll, T.J. Thornton, C. Wang, S.M. Phillips, D. and Allee, “Online Undergraduate Laboratories in Electrical Engineering”, 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp 1-4, 2019.[3] Y. Astatke, C.J. Scott, K.A. Connor, J.O. Ladeji-Osias, “Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Laboratory Courses”, ASEE Conference, 2012[4] M. Perales, L. Pedraza, and P. Moreno-Ger, “Work-In-Progress: Improving Online Higher Education with Virtual and Remote Labs”, 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1136-1139, 2019.[5
] T. Estrada and S. Atwood, “Factors that Affect Student Frustration Level in Introductory Laboratory Experiences,” en, in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceed- ings, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012, pp. 25.629.1–25.629.7. DOI: 10. 18260/1-2--21386. [8] E. Burkholder, A. M. Price, M. Flynn, and C. E. Wieman, “Assessing problem-solving in sci- ence and engineering programs,” in 2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceed- ings, Provo, UT: American Association of Physics Teachers, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.1119/ perc.2019.pr.Burkholder. [9] S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, B. Hanks, L. Murphy, B. Simon, and C. Zander, “Debugging From the Student Perspective,” en, IEEE Transactions on
Michigan Tech, since 2019. Prior, he was an Associate Professor in the Mechatronics Engineering Department at the German Jordanian University, where he spent 10 years. His industrial experience includes 5 years in software development. He was a senior software engineer in the Laser Color Science and Imaging Department, at Lexmark International, Inc. in Lexington, Kentucky, and with MathWorks, Inc. in Natick-Massachusetts working on software quality engineering for embedded DSP programming using MATLAB and Simulink. His research focus is on unmanned vehicle perception, image analysis, control systems, and mechatronics. Dr. Rawashdeh is a Senior Member of the IEEE. He has worked on projects funded by the NSF, Ford
, 2019.[12] M. Ong, N. Jaumot‐Pascual, and T. Ko. Lily, "Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581-615, 2020.[13] M. Borrego, K. Jennifer, L. D. McNair, and K. Beddoes, "Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 472-512, 2013.[14] B. Beigpourian, and M. W. Ohland, "A systematized review: Gender and race in teamwork in undergraduate engineering classrooms," In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15-19, 2019.[15] N. M
teams: a systematic review," Team Performance Management, vol. 25 No. 7/8, pp. 369-401, 2019.J. D. Carrico, J. Anjum, and A. Anjum, "An interdisciplinary project-based service learning and action research project with mechanical engineering and speech-language pathology students," in Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 22, 2020 - June 26, 2020.L. Fogg-Rogers, F. Lewis, and J. Edmonds, “Paired peer learning through engineering education outreach,” European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(1), 75–90, 2017.K. Geeraerts, J. Vanhoof, and P. Van den Bossche, “Teachers’ perceptions of intergenerational knowledge flows,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 56, pp. 150-161, 2016.E. Kearney
2024Abstract In this paper, we present preliminary research findings regarding the impact of theMaking Academic Change Happen (MACH) curriculum. Engineering education graduatestudents who were enrolled in different doctoral programs were exposed to the MACHcurriculum in one of three settings: the MACH workshop in 2017 that included severalgraduate students among the attendees (faculty, administrators, etc.); the Emerging EngineeringEducators MACH workshop that was designed specifically for early career faculty and graduatestudents in 2019; and the National Science Foundation Revolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) project change community monthly Zoom calls that occurred from 2015 to2023. In this paper, we focus on graduate student
. MethodologyParticipants The study involved elementary and secondary educators enrolled in the 3-credit graduatecourse entitled NanoEnvironmental Engineering for Teachers (NEET). Participants attended thecourse either in person, virtually, or in a hybrid format at one of the four university campusesthat offered the course. In 2018, 2019, 2022, and 2023, the course was fully in-person; in 2020, itwas virtual, and in 2021, it was in a hybrid format. Of the participants, 34 self-describedthemselves to be male, and 74 were female. Each campus had a different instructor, eachpossessing a unique teaching style and perspective. All NEET participants were invited toparticipate in the study; participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from
). Essentially, one in every four 4-year HBCU institutionsexperienced a resignation or termination at the highest level. Presidents at HBCUs have asignificantly shorter tenure, with an average of 3.3 years, than those of other four-yearinstitutions, with an average tenure of 7 years (Kimbrough, 2017; Gagliardi et al., 2017;Washington Lockett, 2019). These changes have been deemed a “crisis” and an added challengeto the ongoing recovery efforts of many HBCUs that are disproportionately impacted by theglobal pandemic. Particular examples highlighting the extent of this crisis include the state ofMississippi, which saw four presidents leave their eight public institutions within one year(Moody, 2023). Two of the four were Jackson State University and
book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas, Quality Measures Dr. Gwen Lee-Thomas is the CEO of Quality Measures, LLC, a Virginia-based consulting firm specializing in program and
determine what works and why in virtual/physical teaching spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 903-920. 10. Pazos, P., Magpili, N., Zhou, Z., & Rodriguez, L. J. (2016, June). Developing critical collaboration skills in engineering students: results from an empirical study. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 11. Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Fuster-Guilló, A., Rico-Soliveres, M. L., Azorín-López, J., & Jimeno-Morenilla, A. (2019). Practical method of improving the teamwork of engineering students using team contracts to minimize conflict situations. IEEE Access, 7, 65083-65092. 12. Lattuca, L. R., Knight, D. B., Ro, H. K., & Novoselich, B. J. (2017). Supporting the
, Science, and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 65-88, February 2010.[5] K. Vela, C. Caldwell, R. M. Capraro, and M. M. Capraro, The nexus of confidence and gender in an engineering project-based STEM camp. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct 15-18, 2019, Cincinnati, Ohio.[6] N. Delgado, H.C. Contreras Aguirre, and L. R. Garcia Carrillo, Latinx undergraduate students: Finding a place of belonging in Engineering, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 25-28, 2023, Baltimore, Maryland.[7] A. M. Núñez, “Employing multilevel intersectionality in educational research: Latino identities, contexts, and college access,” Educational Researcher, vol. 43, pp. 85-92, 2014.[8] K. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the
necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Research work was conducted under institutional IRB protocols, IRB#1965654.References1. J. D. Bransford and D. L. Schwartz, “Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With MultipleImplications,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 61–100, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.3102/0091732X024001061.2. D. K. Detterman and R. J. Sternberg, Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing, 1993, pp. vi, 296.3. De Rosa, A. J. (2020, June). Examining Knowledge Transfer Between Thermodynamics and Mathematics. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/examining
engineering currently has among the highestrepresentation of female tenured/tenure-track (T/TT) faculty. The ASEE reports 26.3% of theT/TT faculty in EnvE are female, which is higher than the 19.6% overall in engineering and justbehind biomedical at 27.7% and engineering management at 26.9% [11]. While EnvE is a long-time leader among engineering disciplines in female faculty, it is about average in the percentageof URM faculty and like other engineering disciplines particularly in URMWF (see Table 2). Asurvey from the AEESP found that its membership was: 52% white, 24% Asians, 7% Latinos,and 4% African Americans, as well as 5% from outside the U.S. [3].Table 2. T/TT Faculty Demographics - ASEE 2020 [12] Discipline Name N faculty % URM
., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 125–136, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.515012.[5] D. Kang et al., “Providing an Oral Examination as an Authentic Assessment in a Large Section, Undergraduate Diversity Class,” Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn., vol. 13, no. 2, May 2019, doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130210.[6] M. A. Nelson, “Oral Assessments: Improving Retention, Grades, and Understanding,” PRIMUS, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 47–61, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/10511970902869176.[7] Y. Zhao, “Impact of Oral Exams on a Thermodynamics Course Performance,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference, Mar. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/impact-of-oral-exams-on-a-thermodynamics-course-performance[8] I
. Trinkle, M. West, and G. L. Herman, “Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules,” Journal of Materials Education, vol. 38, p. 161–174, 2019. [7] A. Kononov, P. Bellon, T. Bretl, A. L. Ferguson, G. L. Herman, K. A. Kilian, J. A. Krogstad, C. Leal, R. Maass, A. Schleife, J. K. Shang, D. R. Trinkle, and M. West, “Computational curriculum for MatSE undergraduates,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017. [8] X. Zhang, A. Schleife, A. Ferguson, P. Bellon, T. Bretl, G. L. Herman, J. A. Krogstad, R. Maass, C. Leal, D. R. Trinkle, and M. West, “Computational curriculum for MatSE undergraduates and the influence on senior classes,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &
://tima-amfors.gricad- pages.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/learnv/.[6] Arm Introduction to Computer Architecture. [Online]. Available: https://www.arm.com/resources/education/education-kits/computer-architecture.[7] Vivado Design Suite User Guide, UG892, v2019.1, Xilinx, Inc., 2019.[8] D. Patterson and J. Hennessy, Computer Organization and Design MIPS Edition, Sixth Edition. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufman, 2021.[9] R. Hayne, “Implementing Serial Communication for the Instructional Processor,” Proceedings ASEE Virtual Conference, June 2020.[10] R. Hayne, “Synthesis vs. Simulation: Developing a Hardware Interrupt System for the Instructional Processor,” Proceedings ASEE Southeastern Section Conference, Charleston, SC, March 2022.[11
Technology", Retrieved March 1, 2020, fromhttp://blog.nsta.org/2016/03/07/teaching-students-about-marine-technology/.[3] Hur, B., Casas, R. Jr., Cervantes, D. A., Comer, J. R., De Anda, B. R., Fly, A., Tsai, G. E., and Davila, E. L."Small-scale Underwater Robotics Development for Underwater Archaeological Applications", in the proceedingsof 2019 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference.[4] Iftekhar Ibne Basith, and Emanuel Sanchez, “SeaKatz – an Underwater Robot”, in the ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition at Montreal, QC, Canada, June 22-26, 2020.[5] https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fplay.ht%2Fuse-cases%2Fcharacter-voice-generator%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ciib002%40SHSU.EDU
32.41 2018 Spring 104 16.35 21.15 33.65 2018 Fall 107 23.36 25.23 34.58 2019 Spring 96 13.54 26.04 38.54 2019 Fall 89 15.73 20.22 37.08 2020 Spring 65 24.62 26.15 33.85 2020 Fall 79 22.78 22.78 30.38 2021 Spring 69 18.84 17.39 28.99 2021 Fall 66 27.27 18.18 27.27 2022
, conference presentations,and plan for future research.AcknowledgementsFunding was provided by National Science Foundation grant EEC- 2306099.References[1] A. Godwin, “The development of a measure of engineering identity,” in 2016 ASEE annual conference & exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[2] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “The Role of Social Capital in the Experiences of Hispanic Women Engineering Majors,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 227–243, 2013, doi: 10.1002/jee.20010.[3] “Engineering by the Numbers,” ASEE, 2019.[4] M. S. Aruguete and A. V. Katrevich, “Recognizing Challenges and Predicting Success in First-Generation University Students,” J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, Jul. 2017
STEM Summer Bridge Program,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 2020-June, 6 2020.[21] S. T. Tripathy, K. Chandra, H.-Y. Hsu, Y. Li, and D. Reichlen, “Engaging Women Engineering Undergraduates as Peer Facilitators in Participatory Action Research Focus Groups,” 7 2021.[22] D. Feil-Seifer, M. Parker, and A. Kirn, “Examining Faculty and Graduate Student Attitudes on Stress and Mental Health,” 8 2022. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[23] J. G. Liang, R. Evans, and S. E. Kulesza, “We are Thriving! Undergraduate Women in Engineering Student Project Teams,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 6 2019.[24] K. Redmond, G. Panther, M. Asadollahipajouh, R. Evans, S. Kulesza
First-Year Programs (FPD) and Computers in Education (CoED) divisions, and with the Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation, Interdivisional Town Hall Planning Committee, ASEE Active, and the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Estell has received multiple ASEE Annual Conference Best Paper awards from the Computers in Education, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Estell received the First-Year Programs Division’s Distinguished Service Award in 2019 and the 2022 Computers in Education
: Custom Laboratory Equipment and Writing-Intensive Pedagogy,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Jan. 31, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/designing-the-laboratory-experience-from-the-ground-up-custom- laboratory-equipment-and-writing-intensive-pedagogy[11] N. Smith, “Guided Peer Review of Technical Writing for Large Laboratory Course,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Nov. 17, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/guided-peer-review-of-technical- writing-for-large-laboratory-course[12] Y. Wu, “Cultivating technical writing skills through a scaffold peer review-approach of lab reports in a
impact of engineeringidentity on retention," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[4] A. D. Patrick and A. N. Prybutok, "Predicting persistence in engineering through anengineering identity scale," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, (2a), 2018.[5] J. Chen et al, "Exploring Students’ Perception of the Influence of PBL Elements on theDevelopment of Engineering Identity," IEEE Transactions on Education, 2023.[6] J. M. Wolfand, K. Bieryla and C. Ivler, "Engineering identity through litter pickup as servicelearning," in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[7] D. Knight et al, "The impact of inclusive excellence programs on the development ofengineering identity among first-year underrepresented
125th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 35 – 27, 2018. Paper ID #21605.[6] A. Badir, J. Liao, G. Papkov and R. O'Neill, “Exam Wrappers, Reflection and Student Performance in Engineering Mechanics – Part II,” in the 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 15 – 19, 2019. Paper ID #26761.[7] H. Trussell and E., “A Study of the Effect of Graded Homework in a Preparatory Math Course for Electrical Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 141-146., 2003.[8] A. Kaw and A. Yalcin, “Does Collecting Homework Improve Examination Performance