,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 112, pp. 841–854, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.134.[4] B. A. Al-Sheeb, A. M. Hamouda, and G. M. Abdella, “Modeling of student academic achievement in engineering education using cognitive and non-cognitive factors,” JARHE, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 178–198, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-10-2017-0120.[5] M. Khan, M. Ibrahim, and N. Wu, “Measuring Self-Efficacy in Engineering Courses – Impact of Learning Style Preferences,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 33092. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 33092.[6] M. Khan and M. Ibrahim, “Women in Engineering – Focus on Self-Efficacy in Modeling and Design through
Engineering Instructor of the year award, 1999 ASEE-GSW Outstanding New Faculty Award. His teaching and research interests are in the thermal sciences. In 2015-2016, he chaired the American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest section and in 2018-2019 he chaired the Academy of Distinguished Teaching Scholars at UTSA. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Texas.Dr. Amir Karimi, The University of Texas at San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1982. His teaching and research interests are in thermal
/0162243913504305Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2018). LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20239Cech, E. A., Waidzunas, T., & Farrell, S. (2017). The inequality of LGBTQ students in U.S. engineering education: Report on a study of eight engineering programs. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(March1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065Cieminski, M. (2019). Queer(y)-ing technical practice: Queer experiences in student theater
., Linsey, J. S., Paige, M. A., Williford, B., Li, W., & Hammond, T. A. (2017, June). Board# 52: engineering drawing for thenext generation: students gaining additional skills in the same timeframe. In 2017 ASEE annual conference & exposition.[28] Hilton, E. C., Linsey, J., Li, W., & Hammond, T. (2018). Effectively teaching sketching in engineering curricula. The International journal ofengineering education, 34(2), 644-652.[29] Watson, M. K., Davis, W. J., Mays, T. W., Welch, R. W., & Ryan, J. C. (2019). Measuring Undergraduate Student Design Self-Efficacywithin an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Curriculum. In ASEE annual conference exposition proceedings.[30] Baker, D., Krause, S., & Purzer, S. (2008, June). Developing an
part of aprofessional development and training that would be required before faculty could access thedashboards. This is intended to guide faculty from focusing on the exceptions and rare cases andmore towards the use of aggregate data (that can be disaggregated) to identify bottlenecks, gaps,and trends that could be addressed to support student success and improve student retention. Thedata will also be used to explore the stories that faculty tell about their observations, in which thedata might tell different stories from the assumptions that faculty might have, providing potentiallevers for change.References[1] Rehrey, G., Shepard, L., Hostetter, C., Reynolds, A., & Groth, A. (2019). Engaging Faculty in Learning Analytics: Agents of
in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. The IDE program hosts a BS degree in IDE accredited by the ABET EAC under the general criteria and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Bielefeldt is a Fellow of the ASEE and a licensed P.E. in Colorado. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Paint Bucket Model of Dis/ability in STEM Higher Education: Axioms 1-3AbstractDis/ability is a complex, evolving, and nuanced concept. Recognizing the absence of a cleardefinition of dis/ability, the first author proposed a “paint bucket dis/ability
. Laughton, “Shaping Good Old-Fashioned Students through Reading and Note-taking: A Work in Progress,” in ASEE Southeastern Section Conference, Arlington, VA: ASEE SE, 2023. Accessed: Mar. 17, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://monolith.asee.org/public/conferences/329/papers/36612/view[30] C. R. Rogers, “The interpersonal relationship in the facilitation of learning,” in Culture and Processes of Adult Learning, Routledge, 1993.[31] Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer, 3rd ed. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415221[32] D. Benson, “Development, Implementation And Assessment Of
(s) may only search within ASEE PEER and Google Scholar, but not any otherdatabase. This diminishes the amount of duplicate articles. The second strategy is the use ofBoolean operators such as AND/OR and specific keywords to diminish or broaden search results.This strategy allows for a more detailed analysis of the articles being given without having to siftthrough a mountainous amount of these articles. However, depending on the database used, aBoolean operator is not as reliable due to inconsistencies in the proper usage of AND, OR, andapostrophes. The third strategy is the use of a filter to sift through the culminated articles/papersto acquire articles/papers that would be useful to the analysis or discussion at hand. For example,after
with other mechanical engineering faculty who areinterested in or have experience with such an undertaking, to further the shared knowledge of themechanical engineering higher education community. We look forward to the discussion andinsights that will be gained from this experience at ASEE.References[1] Y. Siow, J. Szwalek, J. Komperda, H. Darabi, F. Mashayek, “A Critical Look at MechanicalEngineering Curriculum: Assessing the Need”, in ASEE IL-IN Section Conference Proceedings,2019, Purdue ePubs: epubs@purdue.edu[2] S. A. McNeilly, K. Pakala, D. Plumlee, “Revolutionizing the Mechanical EngineeringUndergraduate Curriculum,” in Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020,American Society for Engineering Education.[3] F. Buitrago-Florez
progression of the internet, enabled through the deployment of connected devicesfor humanitarian, environmental, industrial, and smart city use-cases, and applications.Projections for the impact of IoT indicate 100 billion connected devices with a global economicimpact of more than $11 trillion by 2025 [8]. The number of devices that are connected tointernet is constantly growing [9]. The IoT sensor costs are rapidly decreasing over time.According to Microsoft’s “2019 Manufacturing Trends”, the average IoT sensor cost hasdecreased from $1.30 in 2004 to $0.38 in 2020 [10]. The IoT links people and things from allaround the world. IoT has many applications, including automobile response, buildingautomation, acute stress, fast health services, and smart
mining and learning analytics in engineering education, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving
its increasing use among students and scholars, alongsideLatin* [see also 23].B. Sample and Settings Our analytic sample consists of multiple cohorts of undergraduate students who participated in materialsscience summer research internship programs between 2019 and 2023 in a diverse historically black collegesetting. Table 1 displays self-reported background information for the participants included in this study. Theparticipants were diverse in terms of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and home college/university, aseach cohort included students from the engineering college host site as well as students recruited nationallyfrom other campuses including research-intensive universities, other HBCUs, and most recently alsocommunity
. (2000). “Using Senior Design Capstone as Model for Graduate Education”. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 126(2), 83-88.[13] Phillips, J. J. (2018 June), “Current trends in Architectural Engineering Education”. Presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30246.[14] Solnosky, R., & Phillips, J. J. (2019, June), “Benchmarking Architectural Engineering Capstones”. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32144[15] Solnosky, R., & Phillips, J. J. (2021, June), “Benchmarking Architectural Engineering Capstones 2”.[16] Retherford, J., & Hartmann, B. L., & Al
? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on Retention," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019/06/15 2019: ASEE Conferences. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32674. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32674[14] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock, "Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 312-340, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20118.[15] K. L. Tonso, "Engineering Identity," in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds Eds., A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds.: Cambridge University Press, 2014, ch. 14, pp
engenharia: O projeto “OPENFAB” na disciplina de introdução à engenharia.” Brazilian Journal of Development nov.5, n.9, p.16085-16098. ISSN2525-8761, 2019.[14] Dodson, K. H., & Patterson, K. E., & Tipton, J. B., Work-in-Progress – “Emphasizing Human-Centered Design in the Freshman Year through an Interactive Engineering Design Process Experience” Paper presented at 2017 FYEE Conference, Daytona Beach, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/29448[15] Fila, N. D., & McKIlligan, S., & Guerin, K., “Design Thinking in Engineering Course Design” Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—30271[16] Faber, C. J., & Kit, K., & Pionke, C. D., “Understanding the Processes
Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019. [Online] Available:[40] D.B. Oerther, “Using Modified Mastery Learning to Teach Sustainability and Life-Cycle Principles as Part of Modeling and Design,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 39, pp. 784-795, 2022.[41] D.B. Oerther, F.L. de los Reyes, and L. Raskin, “Interfacing Phylogenetic Oligonucleotide Probe Hybridizations with Representations of Microbial Populations and Specific Growth Rates in Mathematical Models of Activated Sludge,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 39, pp. 11-20, 1999.[42] P.G. Stroot, and D.B. Oerther, “Elevated Precursor 16S rRNA Levels Suggest the Presence of Growth Inhibitors in Wastewater,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 47, pp
Culminating Event Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. https://peer.asee.org/33987[14] Wambeke, B. (2022, August). Construct First, Design Later–Evolution over the past 25 years. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[15] Wambeke et al 2023[16] Sloan, J.A., Beauregard, M.S., and Russell, M.M. (2023). “Chapter 4: High impact practices in the civil engineering major at the United States Air Force Academy.” High Impact Practices in Higher Education: International Perspectives (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, 51). Sengupta, E. Editor. Emerald Publishing Ltd, U.K.[17] Beauregard, M.S., Sloan, J.A., Brannon, M. (2019
.[13] D. R. Simmons, G. D. Young Collins, S. G. Adams, and J. P. Martin, “Non-Curricular Activities Help African-American Students and Alumni Develop Engineer of 2020 Traits: A Quantitative Look,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014. https://peer.asee.org/22870[14] D. R. Simmons and S. M. Lord, “Removing Invisible Barriers and Changing Mindsets to Improve and Diversify Pathways in Engineering,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2019. https://advances.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/vol07/issue02/papers/AEE-issue-24- EAGER-Simmons-Lord.pdf[15] C. J. Finelli and S. M. Lord, “Integrating Sociotechnical Issues in the Introduction to Circuits Course,” 2023 European Society for Engineering
," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual, 2021.[9] K. S. Double, J. A. McGrane and T. N. Hopfenbeck, "The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 481-509, 2019.[10] U. Bergmark and S. Westman, "Student participation within teacher education: emphasising democratic values, engagement and learning for a future profession," Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1352-1365, 2018.[11] A.-H. I. Mourad and M. Y. E. Selim, "On the Awareness of Engineering Students with ABET accreditation Elements," Journal of Education Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-16, 2010.[12] H. L. Andrade, "A
: Diversity and collaboration in an undergraduatepreengineering course,” Mind, Culture, and Activity, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 285-296, 2017.[24] H. Yi. “Robotics and kinetic design for underrepresented minority (URM) students inbuilding education: Challenges and opportunities,” Computer Applications in EngineeringEducation, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 351-370, 2019.[25] Gates et al. “The computing alliance of Hispanic-serving institutions: Supporting Hispanicsat critical transition points,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), vol. 11, no. 3,pp. 1-21, 2011.[26] A. C. Strong, M. R. Kendall, G. Henderson, and I. Basalo. “Impact of faculty developmentworkshops on instructional faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions,” in ASEE Annual Conference&
ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2017, pp. 1–9.[19] A. Heimdal, R. T. Thorstensen, and P. Svennevig, “Investigations on the use of Student Peer Review to Improve Supervision of Capstone Courses in the Civil Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, The Design Society, 2020. doi: 10.35199/EPDE.2020.54.[20] R. A. Flores and F. Rios, “Incorporating peer review techniques to enhance students’ communication skills and team performance in engineering capstone projects,” he International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1969–1982, 2019.[21] M. Mandala et al., “Impact of collaborative team peer review on the
education,” Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019.[11] B. Hughes, et al. “Do I think I’m an engineer? Understanding the impact of engineeringidentity on retention,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2016.10.18260/1-2--32674.[12] A. Godwin, “Development of a measure of engineering identity,” 2016 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016. 10.18260/p.26122.[13] J.C. Major, A. Kirn, “Engineering identity and project-based learning: How does activelearning develop student identity?” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus,Ohio, 2017. 10.18260/1-2--28255.[14] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri and R. Anderson, "On the development of aprofessional identity: engineering
mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Experiences of Engineering Students with Disabilities in the Accommodations ProcessBackground and MotivationStudents with disabilities attend higher education institutions, but the exact number is not clear.In the 2019-2020 academic school year, 21% percent of undergraduate students reported havinga disability, of which eight percent were formally registered as having a disability with theirinstitution (Postsecondary National Policy Institute (PNPI), 2022). These numbers are anunderestimation. Disabled students may not be
identity development.AcknowledgementsThis worked is supported by the Department of Engineering and King’s InternationalFoundation at King’s College London. The views expressed are my own.References[1] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[2] A. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26428. doi: 10.18260/p.26428.[3] M. S. Ross, J. L. Huff, and A. Godwin, “Resilient
://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189X211027528[10] Goldman, A. (2019), “Interpreting Rural Students’ Stories of Access to a Flagship University,” The Rural Educator, National Rural Education Association, 40(1).[11] Miller, P., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2012), “Early academic skills and childhood experiences across the urban-rural continuum.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 234–248.[12] Gattis, C., & Adams, P., & Delgado Solorzano, X., & Popp, J., & Lo, W., & Muralidhara, D. (2023 June), Helping Rural and Underrepresented Students Succeed in STEM, Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD.[13] Adams, P., & Delgado Solorzano, X., & Lo, W., & Gattis, C
, Engineering,and Medicine—is undertaking to raise awareness of, stimulate interest in, and inspire action oncultural, ethical, social, and environmental responsibility in engineering (CESER). It outlines thehistory of the consideration of these impacts by the profession, cites some current efforts,summarizes NAE’s earlier programs, and details the development, goals, and status of the newprogram.Importantly, the paper also serves as a call for the membership of the ASEE to share theirknowledge and experience, and provide their input on the effort at the 2024 annual conference.The CESER advisory committee is formulating its initial activities and would welcome input onsuggested areas of focus and opportunities to bring attention to crucial issues
Immersion and a Focus on Identity,”Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City,UT: ASEE 2018.[3] Y.-L. Han, K. E. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with Engineers:Revolutionizing a Mechanical Engineering Department through Industry Immersion and a Focuson Identity,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,Tampa, FL: ASEE 2019.[4] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with Engineers:Fostering Engineering Identity through Industry Immersion,” 2020 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition, Montreal, Québec, Canada: ASEE 2020.[5] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with
the lower-level properties. For the human brain, the total mass of allthe neurons is a resultant, while consciousness is an emergent [32]. Although a requirement forthe Macro-level, emergence exists across all hierarchical boundaries (Micro-Meso and Meso-Macro).Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Flows Between the Micro, Meso, and Macro levelsDynamics within each of the Micro, Meso, and Macro levels are influenced by the conditions ofthe other levels. A high Micro-level of thriving might prevent a decrease in Meso thrivingfollowing a disruption at the Macro-level. For example, a community of resilient individualsmight have minimal disruption to their ASEE student chapter meeting schedule during theCOVID pandemic due to shifting their meetings
is raised on nuestro impacto (our impact) in thepractice of engineering education.IntroductionTo support higher education Faculty Development Programs (FDP), national entities,universities, and individual colleges invest large amounts of resources and money to train,mentor, support, and coach these faculty to learn about evidence-based practices for classroom-based activities and interventions (Borrego et al., 2013; Freeman et al., 2014; Prince, 2004).Even though faculty development programs are viewed as integral to support classroominnovation and the scholarship of teaching and learning, there is still a wealth of evidencesuggesting that its use and transfer into the classrooms are low (Berger et al., 2022; Laursen,2019; Stains et al
–61, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1145/3330794.[3] R. T. Javed et al., “Get out of the BAG! Silos in AI Ethics Education: Unsupervised Topic Modeling Analysis of Global AI Curricula,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 73, pp. 933–965, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1613/jair.1.13550.[4] L. Tuovinen and A. Rohunen, “Teaching AI Ethics to Engineering Students: Reflections on Syllabus Design and Teaching Methods,” 2021.[5] J. Lönngren, “Exploring the discursive construction of ethics in an introductory engineering course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 44–69, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20367.[6] R. F. Clancy, Q. Zhu, and Philosophy Documentation Center, “Why Should Ethical Behaviors Be the Ultimate Goal of Engineering Ethics Education?,” Bus. Prof