wereidentified as A1,B3, E4 .. etc.The response rate to the survey was 66% from 42 students representing the 20 project groups.The number of respondents who belong to the same project group varies as shown in Table 2.Table 1. Project assignment of the survey respondents Project# No. of respondents No. of groups Subtotal of respondents per project E 4 1 4 A, B, C, D, F, G 3 6 18 H, I, J, K, L, M, N 2 7 14 O, P, Q, R, S, T 1 6 6 Total
MISR Figure 3: RAM test using MISRLiner Feedback Shift Register (LFSR): It is often used to generate test patterns as well as tocompress test outputs into signatures. It has a serial input that is derived from the outputs ofsome stages by passing them through an X-OR gate as shown in Figure 4. The generated outputsare pseudo random in nature. LFSR can be used to build MISR as well. X-OR D Q D Q D Q CLOCK Page 22.456.5 Figure 4: A simple LFSRBuilt-in Logic
Page 22.198.15Public gen As IntegerPublic maxGen As IntegerPublic bestFV As DoublePublic bestFVIndex As IntegerPublic historyBestFV As DoublePublic historyBestFVIndex As IntegerPublic feasibilityArray() As DoublePublic x As DoublePublic y As IntegerPublic z As IntegerPublic t As IntegerPublic start As IntegerPublic finish As IntegerPublic feasibilityBestIndex As IntegerPublic feasibilityBestProjNum As IntegerPublic feasibilityBestWeight As IntegerPublic infeasibleIndex() As IntegerPublic infeasibleTemp() As IntegerPublic Sum As IntegerPublic infeasible As IntegerPublic q As IntegerPublic r As IntegerPublic Form As BooleanPublic sheetName As StringSub Main()'Student Assignment Problem'January 4, 2011
(U) are calculated in the usualmanner set forth in any standard heat transfer text, see for example Holman[3]. In addition, thetechnical evaluation of an immersion chiller in this application has been covered by Joye andSmith.[4] Q = mcool ⋅ Cp ⋅ (Tcw,out − Tcw,in ) = U ⋅ Aex ΔTLM [1]where Q is the heat transfer rate, mcool is the cooling water flow rate, Cp is water heat capacity,Tcw,out is the cooling water outlet temperature, Tcw,in is the cooling water inlet temperature, U isthe overall heat transfer coefficient based on Aex , the outside surface area of the cooling coils,and ΔT LM is the log-mean average temperature driving force. Students are asked to calculate Ufor each data set and plot
otherquestions related to course contents and lecture delivery methods. The questions relevantto this study include:Q 1) I am a “learning by thinking” person (logic analysis). Page 22.1686.9Q 2) I am a “learning by feeling” person (personal involvement and/or past experience).Q 3) I am a “learning by doing” person (active experimentation and hands-on).Q 4) I am a “learning by watching and listening” person (observations).Q 5) I need to know the physical evidence and/or numbers that back up a concept. I pay attention to details in lab procedures and I am a quantitative person.Q 6) Knowing the big picture or concept is all I care about
/ g 0 V02 q 10Here, Ps is the pressure on the spherical surface, P is the pressure at infinity, is the density ofthe fluid, g0 is the gravitational constant, V0 is the air flow velocity of the wind tunnel and q isthe dynamic pressure. The difference between the high pressure in the front stagnation regionand the low pressure in the rear separated region causes a large drag contribution called pressuredrag. This is added to the integrated shear stress or friction drag of the body, which it oftenexceeds. The relative contributions of the friction drag and the pressure drag depend on thebody’s shape, especially its thickness
) integrand=x.^3;Then using the following command, you can evaluate this definite integral as: >> Q=quadl(@myint,-2,6) Q = 320Which is the correct value, that can be verified by calculating: >> 6^4/4-(-2)^4/4 ans = 320Alternatively, we could use an inline function to define our integrand, such as: >> myint=inline('c*exp(j*pi*x)','x','c') myint = Inline function: myint(x,c) = c*exp(j*pi*x)In this case our integrand consists of two variables, c, and the variable of integration, x. To makesure the function quadl knows which variable is the variable of integration we would use the syntax: Q=quadl(@(x)myint(x,2),0,1) Q = 0.0000 + 1.2732iThis command evaluates the integral
. Davis, K. A. Law, A. C. Barton, S. D. Collyer, S. P. J. Higson, and T. D. Gison,“Label-Free and Reversible Immunosensor Based Upon an AC Impedance InterrogationProtocol,” Analytica Chimica Acta, 537, 163-168 (2005).12. J. Wang, and M. Musameh, “Carbon Nanotube/Teflon Composite Electrochemical Sensorsand Biosensors.” Anal. Chem., 75, 2075-2079 (2003).13. Y. Tu, Y. Lin, and Z. F. Ren, “Nanoelectrode Arrays Based on Low Site Density AlignedCarbon Nanotube,” Nano Letters, 3, 107-109 (2003).14. J. Li, H. T. Ng, A. Cassell, W. Fan, H. Chen, Q. Ye, J. Koehne, J. Han, and M. Meyyappan,“Carbon Nanotube Nanoelectrode Array for Ultrasensitive DNA Detection,” Nano Letters, 3,597-602 (2003).15. J. Koehne, J. Li, A. M. Cassell, H. Chen, Q. Ye, H. T. Ng, J
product.Bibliography[1] About STEMworks INDIANA. (2011) Retrieved January 18, 2011, from http://www.stemworksindiana.org/?q=about/about-stem-works-indiana[2] Council for Interior Design Accreditation. (2009). Professional Standards. Grand Rapids, MI.[3] Panero, J., & Zelnik, M. (1979). Human dimension & interior space : a source book of design reference standards. New York: Whitney Library of Design.[4] Tilley, A. R., & Henry Dreyfuss Associates. (2002). The measure of man and woman : human factors in design (Rev. ed.). New York: Wiley. Page 22.446.7
teaching and learning statics,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference, 2003.13 Dollár, A. and Steif, P. S., “Learning modules for the statics classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference, 2003.14 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Assessment results of multi-intelligence methods used in dynamics,” Proceedingsof the ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.15 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Increasing success in dynamics course through multi-intelligence methods andpeer facilitation,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.16 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R., editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool (Expanded Edition). National Academies Press, 2000.17 Kypuros, J. A. and Tarawneh, C
and user interface operations (e.g., modulation/demodulation,coding/decoding, interleaving/deinterleaving, etc …) without exceeding the product’s bill ofmaterials (BOM) target. This processor must therefore, be fast and powerful enough, but not toocapable, since this will eventually drive up the component’s cost.A straight forward comparison of traditional communication system design and aUSRP/LabVIEW-based design follows. The USRP performs the traditional analog signalconditioning functions required of almost any radio, the required signal conversion (ADC andDAC), and then performs the rate conversion necessary to provide in-phase and quadrature (I &Q) signal samples, both to and from, the processor. In a USRP/LabVIEW-based system
: Question manager m interface to be uused by the ccourse instruuctor. Page 22.1481.5 Figurre 3: Active question q inteerface to thee displayed dduring lecturre.4. Featu ure Selectio onAs noted d in §2, many y implementtations of stu udent responnse systems eexist today. H However, thheMobile Participation P System provvides severaal features thhat are currenntly not offered in otherdevices. It is these feeatures specifically that make m the MP PS superior tto other
/const_inst1.html.7. Kafai, Y, and Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=XaJiLh92ZCUC&dq=Constructionism&printsec=frontcover&source=in&hl =en&ei=2KP5TLWoH8OAlAeK44S8Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=12&ved=0CHwQ6AEw Cw#v=onepage&q&f=false.8. de Grazia, J.L., Sullivan, J.F.,Carlson, L.E., and Carlson, D.W. (2001). A k-12 / university partnership: creating tomorrow‟s engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, Oct. 2001 . pp. 557-563. Retrieved from http://soa.asee.org/paper/jee/paper-view.cfm?pdf=426.pdf.9. Ayorinde, E.O., Gibson, R.F. (1995). A pre
, B. “Leaving the Ivory Tower: A Sociological Analysis of the Causes of Departure from Doctoral Study.”Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1996.3. Brown, S. V. (2000). The preparation of minorities for academic careers in science and engineering. In G.Campbell, R. Denes, & C. Morrison (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 239–268). New York: Oxford University Press.4. Redmond, S. P. (1990). Mentoring and Cultural Diversity in Academic Settings. American Behavioral Scientist,34(2), 188-200.5. Hill, R. D., Castillo, L. G., Ngu, L. Q., & Pepion, K. (1999). Mentoring Ethnic Minority Students for Careers inAcademia: The WICHE Doctoral Scholars Program. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(6), 827
of bacteria, i.e., methanotrophs. The laboratory study is conducted as follows:in sterilized serum bottles, methanotrophic bacteria in the exponential growth phase areinoculated in a Milli-Q water-based medium containing nitrate, other key nutrients (P, K, Na,Mg, Ca, etc.), and selected trace metals. The primary substrates, methane and oxygen, are thenintroduced and each bottle is placed on a shaker-table for incubation. Gas samples areperiodically withdrawn from the headspace of each bottle and manually injected into a gaschromatograph to measure the concentrations of methane, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. Thisallows students to monitor the amount of substrates consumed and the amount of end productproduced at different time points. Students
evidencefrom an offering of the course instead of perceptions of faculty members about what they mightwant. This process also provided some insight into the alignment of skills engineering faculty Page 22.153.5felt were necessary to be successful in the course and those that are actually utilized in thecourse. From this analysis, a list of skills in mathematics and physics mechanics was constructed(see Figure 2).Figure 2. Portion of Q-matrix Used to Determine Skills in Homework and Exam Problems Homework Problems 3-1 3-5 3-6 3-47
Introductions at thebeginning of a semester, HW assignments, Discussion Questions, usage of course Calendar, Q/AForum, term Projects, posting Slides, conducting Quizzes, showing Industry Videos (or softwaredemonstrations) and usage of Chat, which all received scores 4 or higher. Page 22.1151.8 Ranking of Online Tools and Practices 5 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.8 4
chemical engineers are well acquainted with the theory and correlations developed forheat exchanger design we describe the exact methods used for calculations in the particular labexperiment at hand so there will be no confusion as to what was done. Experimentally, theamount of heat transferred in the exchanger may be calculated from the average valuesdetermined by energy balances for the shell and the tube sides of the exchanger. Eq 1 Eq 2Validity of the experimental values for the two fluids may be checked by comparing the twovalues of Q – this adds validity to
assemble and validate the project with thePCB-based platform. From the follow-up survey for the Engineering Day and the ECEDay events, it has been shown that these events had a very positive effect on high schoolstudents for considering careers in ECE.Bibliography:[1] Sundaram, R. and Zheng, Q., “Stem-Based Projects to Integrate the Undergraduate Electrical and Computer Engineering Program with the K-12 Stem curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, June 20-23, 2010.[2] Frechtling, J. and Sharp, L. (2002). The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Evaluation, NSF 02-057. Arlington, VA: NSF.[3] NSF 97-153: User-Friendly Handbook for
, Gain Saturation, and Gain Cross-Section Longitudinal and Transverse Modes Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Broadening Rayleigh Range Spontaneous and Stimulated emission or absorption Blackbody Radiation and Spontaneous/Stimulated Radiation Spectral, Spatial, and Temporal Coherence Finesse and Q-factor Etalon Population inversion Constant phase surfaceThe final language related challenge noted in this work is the use of a similar symbol to representa parameter in multiple contexts. For example, the term linewidth is in laser theory
the video data. Table 1. Constraint Codes Code ExplanationDesign ConstraintsManufacturability DC/M Ease of manufacturability of final designHealth & Safety DC/HS Health and safety of end users engaging with final designLife Cycle DC/LC Life cycle concerns of final designEthical DC/E Ethical considerations associated with final designErgonomic DC/ERG Ergonomic considerations associated with final design and end usersQuality DC/Q Overall quality of final designFunctionality
, W., K., Digital Image Processing, John Wiley & Sons, NY, (1991). 13. Russ, C. J. and Russ, J. C., Introduction to Image Processing and Analysis, CRC Press, Florida, (2008). 14. Schalkoff, R. J., Digital Image Processing and Computer Vision, John Wiley & Sons, NY, (1989). 15. Schmeelk, J., “Transforms Filters and Edge Detectors in Image Processing”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 46, No. 2, (2008), 199-208. 16. Zhang, I., Wang, Q.,G., Qi, J., P.,” Processing Technology in Microscopic Images of Cancer Cells in Pleural Fluid Based on Fuzzy Edge Detection Method”, Journal of Physics: Conference, 48, (2006), 329-333.JOHN SCHMEELKjschmeelk@qatar.vcu.eduVirginia
based on the Lorentz force effect.1.2 Second step - Generator action: E W / q lB V Fig. 2. Linear generator (linear dynamo) based on the Lorentz force effect.1.3 Third step - Brake action: Fb lI b B l 2B 2 / R Page 22.276.3Fig. 3. Braking effect of the Lorentz force - motor (or generator) setup.2. Rotating DC machine. Torque constant and voltage constant (one lecture)The lecture sequence is outlined using four figures that follow. We first derive the torqueconstant, then introduce the stall torque and the stall current. Finally, we proceed to theequivalent circuit model of a motor and to the voltage constant. This lecture
) ்Where "்ܸ " is the thermal potential and it is equal to and “K” is the BOLTZMAN constant, “q” is the charge of an electron and “T” in C is temperature, and "ܸ" is the applied voltage. 0 ܫൌ ܫ௦ െ ܫ (2) ೇ ܫൌ ܫ௦ െ ܫ ൜݁ ೇ െ 1ൠ (3)The open circuit voltage occurs when ܫൌ 0 and therefore we obtain the following equations
fictional student’s answer to a qualitative problem on static equivalence. They are thenasked to answer the following three questions a. Do you agree with Peter? Justify your answer. b. Compare the resulting forces in systems I and II. c. Compare the resulting moments relative to point Q for both systems.which roughly correspond to the three steps in the instructional strategy outlined above. Page 22.792.10 12Nm 6N IPeter: "System II is equivalent to sys- P Qtem I. Remember, M = d × F
a considerable amount of background didactic instruc-tion needed to be presented before the ethics and other nuances of a topic could be discussed.Another 1/4th of the lectures consisted of a Socratic Q&A with the class, working it from simpleto complex. One-fourth dealt with discussions of case studies, which were often a lead in orfollow up to the Q&A sessions. The remainder of the instructional part of the class dealt withcurrent media reports on BmE activities that followed the topic being discussed. Students wererequired to give a 3-slide, 3-min talk during the last week of the class, accompanied by a 4 or 5page paper. The presentation and paper were to discuss and analyze one current interaction orresearch activity at the
appear to have magical power to theuninitiated. By the end of the hour we can alter the function generators settings, scramble theoscilloscopes controls, and the students can recover the signal (albeit with some guidance from acheat sheet).We then present two ways of considering capacitors. First, we present the physical model as adevice that stores charge, and draw the corresponding analogy from hydraulics (water stored in atank or bucket). We then give a more abstract definition that a capacitor is a device that obeys the Page 22.90.8equation V = q/C, and draw the parallel to Ohm's law, where I is replaced by q and R by 1/C. Webriefly touch
1.32 1.71 +.39**o. PowerPoint software 2.50 2.45 -.05p. Blogs 1.19 1.63 +.44**q. Podcasting .58 1.21 +.63*r. Modeling software .88 1.46 +.58*s. Computer game development software .76 1.15 +.39**t. Robotics programming software .54 1.27 +.73**Difference from pre to post is statistically significant at alpha ≤ .05**Difference from pre to post is
. 16 Jan 2011 .[2] Rosen, G., Silverman, J., Chauhan, A., "Connecting Artistically-Inclined K-12 Students to Physics and MathThrough Image Processing Examples,"Digital Signal Processing Workshop and 5th IEEE Signal ProcessingEducation Workshop, 2009. DSP/SPE 2009. IEEE 13th vol., no., pp.419-424, 4-7 Jan. 2009.[3] NSF GK-12 Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education. 2011. 9 Jan 2011 .[4] Warter-Perez, N., Dong, J., Kang, E., Guo, H., Castillo, M., Abramyan, A., & Young, K. (2010). Strengtheningthe K-20 engineering pipeline for underrepresented minorities. Paper presented at the meeting of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY.[5] Teach Engineering Resources for K-12. 2011. 9 Jan 2011 .[6] Q. Zhou and J. Aggarwal
. equally. Page 22.1135.14 Answers questions, Cannot answer Far exceeds Q&A but behaves improperly Meets expectations questions expectations during Q & A session D = 24 - 27 C = 28 - 31 B = 32 - 35 A = 36