Conference Session

Globalizing Engineering Education II: Best Practices

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan McNeill, University of Florida, Gainesville; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

ASEE Global Programs

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Santosh Devasia, University of Washington; Jim L. Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington; Jae-Hyun Chung, University of Washington; Jiangyu Li, University of Washington; Amy Shen, University of Washington; Nathan Sniadecki, University of Washington; Junlan Wang, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Conference Session

FPD VII: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-Year Courses

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Plouff, Grand Valley State University; Deborah Morrow, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

Effective Projects and Experiments in Instrumentation and Control

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Akram Hossain, Purdue University, Calumet; Md. Rasheduzzaman, Purdue University, Calumet

Tagged Divisions

Instrumentation

mechanicalanalogous representation: Electrical Variable Mechanical Variable Voltage = v Force = f Current = i Velocity = u Page 22.915.3 Resistance = R Damping Coefficient = D Inductance = L Mass = M Capacitance = C Spring Compliance = K Charge = q Displacement = xLinear Motion VariablesFor the purpose of modeling mechanical systems with electrical circuits it is also necessary todefine the relationship among variables within each group. According to Newton’s Laws ofmotion, when a force is

Conference Session

Ethical Perspectives on the Grand Challenges of Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M Riley, Smith College

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

). Broadening the Appeal by Changing the Context of Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference.5. Rippon, S. and Collofellow, J. (2010). Camping the Way to Higher Retention Rates. ASEE Annual Conference.6. Zhang, Q., Vanasupa, L., Zimmerman, J., and Mihelcic, J. (2010). Development and Dissemination of Learning Suites for Sustainability Integration in Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference.7. Heun, M. and VanderLeest, S. (2008). Why a Liberal and Multidisciplinary Education is Needed to Solve the Energy Crisis. ASEE Annual Conference.8. Foster, J. and Heeney, A. (2009). The Engineering Science Praxis Sequence: Challenges and Opportunities when Integrating Sustainable Development into the Engineering Design

Conference Session

Advanced Aerospace Student Projects

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Horacio Andrés Trucco; Martina Y. Trucco, Hewlett-Packard Labs

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

; its hanging gondola enables the pilot to support the vehicle on his/her shoulder, see Figure 7. In flight the pilot reclines backwards, a comfortable position for pedaling that allows shifting of the center of gravity during flight, see Figure 8. An ideal design goal would be to attain a takeoffspeed V=15 [km/hr] which pre-establishes adynamic pressure q= 1.084 [kg/m2]. Forexample, a glider with wing surface area S=20[m2] will require a CL=2.95 to lift an 80 [kg]load. Such a relatively high CL level isimpossible to achieve

Conference Session

Architechtural Engineering Eduction: Emergent Topics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmed Cherif Megri, University of Wyoming

Tagged Divisions

Architectural

the return.Other multizone hot water recirculation systems exist, such as those with multiple dedicated heaters, orwith a single or multiple pumps.Drainage/venting:  Terminal velocity: The drainage is a gravity system, where the water drainage flow (1/3) tends to attach to the piping wall forming a hollow cylinder of water, with a core of air (2/3) in the center, and opposed by the friction forces applied by the pipe asperity. These opposite forces limit the water drainage velocity to the value given by the following equation: 2/5 q Vt  3.0  d  (1

Conference Session

Tools of the Trade

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

; Williams, B. (2005). Six Sigma for Dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing, Inc.2. Cloutier, M., Richards, J. (1994). Examining customer satisfaction in a big school. Quality Progress (September), 117-19.3. Mazur, G. H. “The Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to Design a Course in Total Quality Management (TQM) at The University of Michigan College of Engineering”, Proceedings of International Conference on Quality-1996 Yokohama, JUSE, October 15-18, 1996, pp.1-7.4. Wang Q, "Program Design for Industrial Engineering Education in China Based on QFD," vol. 3, pp.333-336, 2010 Second International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science.5. El-Haik, B., & Al-Aomar, R. (2006). Simulation-Based Lean Six-Sigma

Conference Session

Best of Computers in Education Division

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carole E. Goodson, University of Houston; Susan L. Miertschin, University of Houston; Barbara L. Stewart, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

; (10):18-27.15. El Emam K, Drouin J-N, Melo W (eds). SPICE: The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1998. 473 p.16. Marshall S, Mitchell G. Benchmarking international e-learning capability with the e-learning maturity model. EDUCAUSE in Australasia. Melbourne, 2007.17. National Standards for Quality Online Teaching: International Association for K-12 Online Learning (iNACOL), 2010.18. Wang Q. Quality assurance-Best practices for assessing online programs. International Journal on E Learning. 2006;5(2):265. Page 22.506.1419

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research in K-12

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gamze Ozogul, Arizona State University; Martin Reisslein, Arizona State University; Amy Marcelle Johnson, University of Memphis

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

-427.[14] Dunsworth, Q., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image. Computers and Education, 49, 677-690.[15] Yung, H.I. (2009). Effects of an animated pedagogical agent with instructional strategies in multimedia learning, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 18(4), 453-466.[16] Murray, M., & Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Computerized pedagogical agents as an educational means for developing physical self-efficacy and encouraging activity in youth. Journal of Educational Computing and Research. 42(3), 267-283.[17] Moreno R., Reisslein, M., & Ozogul, G. (2010). Using virtual peers to guide visual attention during learning: A test

Conference Session

New Trends in ECE Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farzad Pourboghrat, Southern Illinois University; Narayanan Ramachandran, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Aishwarya Vasu, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Arjun Shekar Sadahalli, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Prashanthi Banala, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale; Giampiero Campa, MathWorks

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Conference Session

Issues Affecting Engineering Program Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Miguel Angel Ramos, University of Houston; Lauren Chapman, Boston College; Mac Cannady, Boston College; Enrique Barbieri, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

and Exposition, Austin TX, 2009, IEEE Division.4. E. Barbieri, W. Shireen, F. Attarzadeh, R. Pascali, M. Ramos, W. Fitzgibbon. “CDIO-based 2-year common templates for ECE/ECET and for ME/MET”, AC 2009-2026, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin TX, 2009, ETD Division.5. E. Barbieri, F. Attarzadeh, R. Pascali, W. Shireen, and W. Fitzgibbon. “On B.S.E and B.S.ET for the Engineering Profession”, Journal of Engineering Technology (Invited), Sp. 2010, pp.42-46.6. Project Website http://faculty.tech.uh.edu/?q=content/e-and-et-forum (Use “Compatibility Mode” if viewed in Internet Explorer Version 8 or higher

Conference Session

High School Engineering Programs, Curriculum, and Evaluation

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David R. Shields P.E., University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Krishna Prasad Kisi, University of Nevada Las Vegas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

), 335-38.8. Hutchison, M. A., Follman, D.K., Sumpter, M., and Bodner, G.M. (2006). Factors influencing the self- efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 39-47.9. Yurtseven, H.O. (2002). How does the image of engineering affect student recruitment and retention? A perspective from the USA. Global Journal of Engineering Education 6 (1), 17-23.10. Li, Q., McCoach, D.B., Swaminathan, H., and Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students. Journal of Engineering Education 97(1), 47-5611. CCSD Fast Facts 2009-10. Clark County School District, http://ccsd.net/news/publications/pdf/CCSDFastFacts.pdf

Conference Session

FPD XI: Assessing First-Year Programs, Experiences, and Communities

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech; Kelly J. Cross, Virginia Tech University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Really Gained? ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. October 22-25: Saratoga Springs, NY.Lichtenstein, G., H. Loshbaugh, and B. Claar (2009). An Engineering Major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergrad eng. Major. Journal of Engineering Education 98(3): 227-234.Lindberg-Sanda, A. and T. Olsson. (2008). Sustainable assessment?: Critical features of the assessment process in a modularised engineering programme. International Journal of Educational Research. 47(3): 165-174.Loui, M.C., Robbins, B.A., Johnson, E.C., & Venkatesan, N. (2008). ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. October 22-25: Saratoga Springs, NY.Malik, Q., M. Koehler, P Mishra (2009

Conference Session

Developing Young MINDS in Engineering, Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Taboada, University of Texas, El Paso; Jose F. Espiritu, University of Texas, El Paso; Emmanuel Gurrola

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Data sources: tests, assignments, discussions, Q&A Level 1 Key question: What was the student reaction to the learning environment? Reaction Timing: Usually done immediately or soon after the learning event Data sources: student surveys, focus groups, interviews, previous data Kirkpatrick, D. (1994). Evaluating Training programs: the Four Levels. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler Figure 5. Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation

Conference Session

Issues Affecting Engineering Program Development

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jimmy Bill Linn, East Carolina University; Merwan B. Mehta, East Carolina University; Janet Hooper Sanders, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

q. ITEC 3290 Technical Writing r. ITEC 3292 Industrial Safety s. ITEC 3300 Technology Project Management t. ITEC 3800 Cost and Capital Project Analysis u. ITEC 4293 Industrial Supervision v. ITEC 4300 Quality Assurance Concepts w. CHEM 1020 General Descriptive Chemistry Page 22.392.8 x. ITEC 3200 Introduction to Statistical Process Control y. MATH 1074 Applied TrigonometryIssues with a Bearing on the Creation of the New BS-PSET Program:Two additional issues that were identified as extremely important in the structuring of theprogram were the selection of the accreditation agency

Conference Session

Graduate Education and Undergraduate Research in ET

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mike Murphy, Dublin Institute of Technology; Gary R. Bertoline, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robert J. Herrick, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kathryne Newton, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sancho Maria-Ribera, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; Nuria Castell, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; James L. Barnes, James Madison University; Matthias Kuder, Freie Universität Berlin; Gareth O'Donnell, Dublin Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

#>8P* * * * * * *****!8'8?$8P* ** * *******1>#('P** *Q(%&*-/,"*),""8$&*#$A*"8)8$&*#)&(@(&(8%HA,&(8%*E()*#$AH/"*%)'#"'-*#)&(@(&(8%*E#-*?/%(&(@8'-*)/$&"(0,&8*&/*&<8*?"/;8)&*#$A*08*/=*08$8=(&*&/*-/,P* !<8%8*?"/?/%8A*#)&(@(&(8%*E(''*)/$&"(0,&8*&/*&<8*?"/;8)&*($*&<8*=/''/E($F*E#-%P* * * * * * * !<8%8*?"/?/%8A*#)&(@(&(8%*E(''*08*08$8=()(#'*&/*>8*($*&<8*=/''/E($F*E#-%P* * * * * * * Attention: This action has received funding from the European

Conference Session

Evolving Engineering Libraries: Services, Spaces, and Collections

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jody T. Hoesly, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Anne C. Glorioso, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

be at multiple campus libraries, but only onecopy needed to be verified so additional processing needed to be done to select the libraries tocheck. Because the weeding reports are run by our call number range, there ended up beingmultiple checklists for each library. For example, we have one Physics monograph checklist forour A-P call number range and another for our Q-QC call number range.After duplicate copies were verified, there also needed to be coordination with the other librariesregarding items missing or found in poor condition. Sometimes the other libraries took ourcopies to replace their missing or poor condition volumes, sometimes they only wanted selectivevolumes, and sometimes they were not interested in any replacement

Conference Session

Assessing, Developing, and Enhancing the Engineering Experiential Education Experience

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emilia Andreeva-Moschen, FH Joanneum University of Applied Science, Graz; Adrian J. Millward-Sadler, FH Joanneum University of Applied Science, Graz

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

andacceptance analysis; to the DDT; to our industrial partners and finally to all studentsand external lecturers who have supported us graciously with significant and highlyuseful information and statements.Bibliography 1. Matusovich, H., Strevelar, R., and Miller, R.: Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of student’s motivational values. IJEE, October 2010 2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J., Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2009, Vol. 98 No. 4, 361 ff. 3. Gardner, H., Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons (2006: New York, Basic Books) 4

Conference Session

They're Not "Soft" Skills!

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ruth Wertz P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Meagan C. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael Fosmire, Purdue University Libraries, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education 94, 41-55 (2005).2. Lattuca, L.R., Terenzini, P.T. & Volkwein, J.F. Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000, (ABET, Baltimore, MD, 2006).3. Holliday, W. & Li, Q. Understanding the Millenials: Updating Our Knowledge About Students. Reference Service Review 32, 356-366 (2004).4. Brophy, J. & Bawden, D. Is Google Enough? Comparison of an Internet Search Engine with Academic Resources. New Information Perspectives 57, 498-512 (2005).5. Denick, D., Bhatt, J. & Layton, B. Citation Analysis of Engineering Design Reports for Information Literacy Assessment. in 2010 American Society for Engineerin Education Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Project-Based Education in Energy Curriculum

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hassan Moghbelli, Ph.D., Texas A&M University, Department of Mathematics; Haitham Abu_Rub, Texas A&M University at Qatar, ECE Department

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

internal shunt resistor in the model, the current-voltagecharacteristics of a solar cell can be obtained from (1) and (2): Page 22.44.5 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 2011 Fig.4. Simplified equivalent circuit of a solar cell (1) (2)Where, Iq is light generated current, Isat is the reverse saturation current, q is the electroniccharge, A is a dimensionless factor, K is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature in

Conference Session

Engineering as the STEM Glue

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ben Pelleg, Drexel University; David Urias, Drexel University; Adam K. Fontecchio, Drexel University; Eli Fromm, Ph.D., Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Education AnnualConference. AC 2010-1639.7. Brown, Q., Mongan, W., Kusic, D., Garbarine, E., Fromm, E. and Fontecchio, A. Computer aided instruction asa vehicle for problem solving: scratch boards in the middle years classroom. American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference. 2008. AC 2008-1377.8. Cathell, M., Birnkrant, M., Robinson, J., Blount, P., Fontecchio, A., and Fromm, E. Using Simcity 4 software asan educational tool to complement middle school science and mathematics. American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference. 2008 AC 2008-1970.9. Birnkrant, M., Cathell, M., Blount, P., Robinson, J., Fontecchio, A., and Fromm, E. Introducing engineeringthrough candy. ASEE Annual Conference. 2008. AC 2008-2070.10. Coyle, E

Conference Session

Digital Simulation Tools in Energy Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert McMasters, Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

      l  Pressure P V T Pi  i 1 i 1 i Ti 1ViTemperature Found by an iterative process by a pre-programmed routine to match Ucalc and U(T)Time  t 360( RPM )q Normalized combustion function of time shown in Figure 2.Ucalc Internal energy of the fuel/air/exhaust mixture from the previous step minus the work from the previous step.U(T) Internal energy of the fuel/air/exhaust mixture as a function of

Conference Session

Sustainable Energy Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University; Keith L. Coogler, Sam Houston State University; Ayhan Zora, Deere & Company

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

, Minneapolis, MN.[4] Jeffrey L. Wieringa, Electric Motor Drive for A Boat. Patent Number: 5580287, December 31996. Accessed on January 10, 2011.http://www.google.com/patents?hl=en&lr=&vid=USPAT5580287&id=58slAAAAEBAJ&oi=fnd&dq=electric+boat+project&printsec=abstract#v=onepage&q=electric%20boat%20project&f=false[5] 3.5kW Hydrogen fuel cell assisted sail boat. Accessed on December 29, 2010.http://www.agoenvironmental.com/Under_development.htm[6] Solar Powered Electric Boats. Accessed on January 7, 2011.http://sunboat.com/history/history.html[7] General Dynamics. Electric Boat. Accessed on January 11, 2011. http://www.gdeb.com/[8] Duffy Boats. Accessed on January 15, 2011. http://www.duffyboats.com/[9] Nauticraft

Conference Session

Teaching Dynamics

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Josue Njock-Libii, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler and Ronald M. Miller, How They See Themselves: Students whoidentify with engineering persist in the field. ASEE Prism, Vol. 20, Number 3, November 2010, page 47.17. Debbie Chachra, Adding Value to Teaching: what can we offer that students can’t get online?.ASEE Prism, Vol. 20, Number 3, November 2010, page 84.18. Group2: Drew Hudson, Jordan Knerr, and Jacques Janssens, Dynamics, CE/ME 251, Spring 2010.19. Group4: Blake Pettit, Joshua Schrock, and Zaadvinder Singh “Tony”, Dynamics, CE/ME 251, Spring 2010.20. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Average_height_pro_basketball_player#ixzz1AO9jH4Ed Page 22.218.13

Conference Session

Design Communications & Cognition II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caleb DeValve, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Richard M. Goff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Page 22.904.12References[1] Malik Q, Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Buch N, Shanblatt M, Pierce SJ, 2010. Understanding student attitudes in a freshman design sequence. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1179-1191[2] Farrell S, Hesketh RP, Newell JA, Slater CS, 2001. Introducing freshmen to reverse engineering and design through investigation of the brewing process. International Journal of Engineering Education; 17(6): 588-592[3] Al-Rizzo H, Mohan S, Reed M, Kinley D, Hemphill Z, Finley C, Pope A, Osborn D, Crolley W, 2010. Directional-based cellular e-commerce: undergraduate systems engineering capstone design project. International Journal of Engineering Education; 26(5): 1285-1304.[4] Hines PD

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Technical Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pavlos George Mikellides, Arizona State University; Chen-Yuan Kuo, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

              Averages   5.81  9.33  2.94  4.33  4.40 7.45 6.07 8.31 4.93 7.93  2.19  3.24 Table 3. Test Performance from 21 students in EGR302/394. Columns headed by QZ*(*) denote scores before the project with (*) being the maximum points available, columns headed by Q*FX denote scores after the project, administered during the final exam. The bottom row denotes the average score from each column and is paired for each quiz for the relevant comparison.VI. Conclusion The study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a different approach to enhance students’competence in several technical areas during a junior level stand-alone project course. Specifically, theuniqueness of the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holli Burgon, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Bruce Elliott-Litchfield, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; David E. Goldberg, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

individual results as well as handouts tohelp the students interpret the meaning of and understand their results. Sessions also includedlecture, discussion, and Q&A about the research study and instruments, providing students withadditional scaffolding to understand and interpret their individual results. Results KAI and ATTAData analysisDescriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) for first- and fourth-year students werecalculated for total scores on the KAI and ATTA and examined using SPSS (v.17). In addition,descriptive statistics were also calculated within and across groups using other demographicsincluding race, gender and nationality. Independent

Conference Session

FPD I: Attacking the Problems of Retention in the First Year

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yvette Pearson Weatherton, University of Texas, Arlington; Andrew P. Kruzic, University of Texas, Arlington; Beth R. Isbell, University of Texas at Arlington; Lynn L. Peterson, University of Texas, Arlington; Carter Tiernan, University of Texas, Arlington; Vu V. Pham, University of Texas at Arlington

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Scholarships inScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program entitled “Focus OnRetention in Cohorts of Engineering Students” (FORCES).References1. Veenstra, C.P., Dey, E.L. and Herrin, G.D. “A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention.” Advances in Engineering Education. Vol. 1 No. 3 (2009): 1-33.2. Li, Q., Swaminathan, H. and Tang, J. “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention.” Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 98 No. 4. (2009): 361-376.3. Lenning, O.T., Ebbers, L. H. “The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities: Improving Education for the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Courses and Outcomes II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica R. McCormick, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Beverly Radloff, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Nancy Lamm, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

knowledge g. Communicate effectively orally h. Communicate effectively in writing i. Work successfully as a member of a team j. Take initiative k. Integrate mathematics and science into your work l. Knowledge from humanities and the social sciences m. Evaluate the quality and validity of data, information and evidence n. Understanding and appreciation of ethics and professionalism o. Awareness of value of considering diversity and differences in cultures p. Awareness of the impact of your work in a global context q. Awareness of the importance of safety issues in your work 14. Use this space to provide additional comments (i.e. program