- Conference Session
- Laboratory Experiences in Electronics and Circuits
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Tooran Emami Ph. D., U.S. Coast Guard Academy ; Richard J. Hartnett P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy
- Tagged Divisions
-
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
methodologies. In this paper is the extended of ourlaboratory 4 in Linear Circuit course at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy.The current paper presents some of the successful design and compensation techniques from onelaboratory in a junior-level Linear Circuits class that reinforces student learning about finitegain-bandwidth product limitations. Students learn graphical technique in the classroom thatpredicts the impact of Gain-Bandwidth Product limitation of a µA741op-amp.In this lab, students are asked to design two Sallen-Key second order low pass sections, using aµA741op-amp, in order to meet two specific resonant frequencies. In their first design( f o = 72.3 kHz and Q = 2) , students typically fall short of the desired resonant frequency by15% or
- Conference Session
- Laboratory Experiences in Electronics and Circuits
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Avik Dayal, Virginia Tech; Kathleen Meehan, Virginia Tech; A. A. (Louis) Beex, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Divisions
-
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
filter for the POTS application with a 400 to 3400 Hz passband. A good approach tothis problem was to design two cascaded filters that had different center frequencies andbandwidths while keeping the Q constant (ratio of center frequency to bandwidth) of thecascaded filter sections the same; this normalization maintains the shape of the (Bode plot)magnitude response when the center frequency is varied over the (Bode plot) logarithmicfrequency scale. Once students realized this, they could adjust their design until they met thespecifications of their filter. In many design results, students designed for two filter sections thathad center frequencies close to the cutoff frequency specifications of the filter. For instance, onesample design had two
- Conference Session
- Laboratory Experiences in Signal Processing and Controls
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ding Yuan, Colorado State University - Pueblo
- Tagged Divisions
-
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
AREA 40cm 15cm 15cm RED AREA Figure 3: The working area layout of the projectAs Aristotle19 mentioned, “the kind of questions we ask are as many as the kinds of things whichwe know,” the students deepened their understanding of the problem through these Q&Asessions. And the importance of understanding the problem in a design procedure wasstrengthened during the discussion as well. Then, a more detailed project description was givenas: design a sorting system to satisfy the following requirements: 1. The whole system (except arms/sensors) should be placed in the shaded green area in
- Conference Session
- Laboratory Experiences in Mechanical, Materials and Thermal Systems
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Roger A Beardsley PE, Central Washington University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
10 Effectiveness 50 TotalMET314 Energy Consumption Lab Typical Data & ResultsRoom Lights Data:Assume 35 wks/yr, 10 hr/day x 5 days per week = 1750 hr/yrLocal Electricity E100 Rate = $0.0593/kw-hrEnergy Before, Room 215: 196 bulbs @ 40 W ea = 7840 WCost before = 7.84 kW x 1750 hr/yr x $0.0593/kW-hr = $813.60/yrEnergy After, Room 205 (building remodel): 56 bulbs @ 32 W = 1792 WCost After = 1.792 kW x 1750 hr/yr x $0.0593/kW-hr = $185.96Shower Energy Data:Mass = (10 +- 1 min) x (2.5 +- .5 gpm) = 25 gal x 3.7854 lit/ 1gal x .990kg/lit = 93.69 kgEnergy Q = m Cp dT = 93.69 kg x 4.18 kJ/kg-C x (30 +-2 C) = 11749 kJ = 3.263 kW-hrEstimated Energy Cost =3.263 kW-hr/shower x $0.0593/kw-hr = $0.193 / showerEnergy Cost