varied among them.Some had very highly articulated courses, while others, though they claimed to offer formalcapstone courses, used only a few elements. Table 1 lists some of those good practices andthe usage percentage amount the seven institutions. TABLE 1 – CHARACTERISTICS PRESENT IN CAPSTONE COURSES IN DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS % of seven institutions CAPSTONE COURSE CHARACTERISTICS Present A (consulting) team is created 86 An intervention proposal is documented 43 A defined methodological focus for the intervention is
the adiabatic process, the students were asked if the heat, Q, wasgreater for process 1. Although the acceptable selection ranged from 40% to 56% percent, only11% gave an acceptable response based upon the first law of thermodynamics. This implies thatalthough the students could get the correct answer, they could not give an acceptable reasonabout why it was correct. This could be because they lack conceptual understanding of the firstlaw, but not necessarily procedural understanding. In addition, Loverude and others (2002) showthat students did not consider the first law of thermodynamics when given a problem that neededthe first law to be answered correctly. Loverude and others questioned 36 thermal physicsstudents during two rounds of
modified a prototype ROV. Page 25.116.2 1 INTRODUCTIONThe Summer Bridge program is designed for incoming freshmen with STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics) majors who desire an educational approach that emphasizes learningthrough participation in research and engineering activities in their field of study. The students mustapply for, and be accepted into, a research group that most interests them. Students in the research groupare then given a project assignment, and provided with the necessary knowledge (principles, tools, andtechniques
building blocks of a robot, to design a robotwith minimum number of off-the-shelf components, and to initiate the robot assembly andassociated programming phases. The course learning objectives are: i) Students will be able to describe stationary and mobile robot kinematics in mathematical frameworks ii) Students will identify and use different types of locomotion iii) Students will become familiar with the theoretical and practical aspects of various sensors and actuators iv) Students will develop a timeline to design a robot for the regional competition v) Students will perform peer-mentoring activities at college and high school levels.The course introduced the fundamental robotics concepts, given in Table 1
the National ScienceFoundation (NSF), the UTeachEngineering faculty team from The University of Texas atAustin originally focused their efforts on preparing in-service teachers to teachengineering at the secondary education level. The teacher professional developmentconsisted of a 6-week summer intensive program to learn the basics of engineering andhow to apply those basics to hands-on engineering design challenges. In order to enablethe teachers to learn and experience engineering design, the instructional faculty devisedan engineering design process. Figure 1 illustrates this original engineering designprocess. Based on the classic “waterfall” approach to design, the process in Figure 1shows a series of steps cascading in sequence
students gain experience with: 1. The design process as applied to mechatronics. 2. Debugging and troubleshooting a multidimensional project with interacting electronic, Page 25.119.2 mechanical and software components 3. Team work and communications. The independent project presents the instructor with important challenges that, if not metcan result in a poor experience for the student that will negate the positive aspects of the projectand potentially turn-off the students to the field of mechatronics. A project poorly conceived thatis too complicated, too large, or too advanced given the students' knowledge and resources
Page 25.120.2environment is one of its typical applications. Compared with existing real-time automatic waterenvironment monitoring systems, WSNs-based water environment monitoring system hasstrongpoint as follows3, 5-8: 1) Less effect of the system on ecological environment: nodestransmit water environment parameters to base station by low power and low radiation wirelesschannel and multi-hop communication protocol. Marine wireless sensor networks offer anunmatched option to a wide range of different domains. The significance of the aforementionedresearch lies in the fact that it opens the door for a variety of applications as well as new areas ofrelevant research in wireless networks. The possibility of having hundreds of thousands of
teachingassistants (TAs) often lead recitation sessions and hold “office hours” in tutoring centers, it isimportant that these TAs can clearly communicate new, discipline-specific, technical informationto other students who have a technical background, but lack expertise in the topic at hand. Thesame can be said for any engineering student who will be required to communicate on technicaltopics after graduation. ASME’s “Vision 2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical EngineeringEducation”, cites the results of a survey of over 1000 engineering managers as pointing tocommunication as an area where engineering graduates need improvement.1 At the same time,Felder and Brent report that learning through teaching is highly effective in enhancing studentlearning. 2
addition to views and suggestions of: colleagues, students, graduates, andbusiness leaders in the Region.IntroductionEngineering education in the Arab Gulf States (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, United ArabEmirates, Qatar, and Sultanate of Oman) faces many challenges today. Changes in the externalenvironment (e.g. reduced funding, increased costs, demands by industry for well-seasonedgraduates, and rapid advances in technology) coupled with the quest for educational relevance inundergraduate engineering, are forcing colleges of engineering in the Region (the Arab GulfStates) to “rethink” engineering education and to undertake constructive steps towards reformingthe current systems. (1, 2, 3, 4)The higher education arena interacts in a complex way
across the wide-ranging needs of 9th-12th grade students.Pilot Curriculum: Mobile App Development for K-12 StudentsIn the summer of 2011, one hundred 9th to 12th grade students participated in introduction toengineering camps at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Students were introduced toComputer Science in one of the following programs: -‐ Program 1 (P1): A 1 week course for 30 underrepresented minority and women students entering the 9th grade. Students received CS instruction from 8am – 5pm each day in the form of individual labs combined with group projects. -‐ Program 2 (P2): A 12-day course for 10 underrepresented minority and women students entering the 10th and 11th grades. This was part of a
research efforts that look this parental leave policy, we explore twonew emerging themes: 1) how do faculty come to access and understand the parental leave policyand 2) who contributes to the actual affordances of leave a faculty member receives, and how arethose affordances negotiated? To answer these questions we analyze on 8 interviews (with 9interviewees total) from STEM faculty members, department chairs and policy administrators.We also draw on the concepts of organizational roles and networks within organizations tounderstand the dynamics of access and definition of the policy at the university.We find that, given the limitations of formal modes of accessing the policy, informal accessnetworks can supplement access to the policy. We also
at HU spent a month at UH in September/November 2008 and anothermonth in September 2009. He shadowed the Associate Dean of Engineering at UH. Shadowingactivities included: 1. Observation of engineering classes at different levels. 2. Supervised assistance teaching a variety of engineering courses to develop a variety of pedagogical models and options. 3. Developing course(s) for HU, particularly in an electronic/computer-based classroom or for distance learning environment. One point of emphasis is the development of future shared projects between UH and HU students. 4. Observation, study, and practice of administrative and management skills, including ongoing faculty and curriculum development and revision. 5
to outcomes based assessment, many universities acrossthe nation use various formats and processes to evaluate student work in demonstrating essentiallearning outcomes, such as the knowledge, skills and abilities that have been deemed vital tostudent’s academic and social maturation. Technical knowledge, quantitative skills, corecommunication proficiencies, critical thinking abilities are just a few learning outcomes facultymembers assess. Universities seek accreditation from regional and international accreditationagencies to earn national and international educational recognition as well as extensive fundingcontributions, such as grants (Lubinescu, 2001) 1. Before approval is issued from the agencies tothe universities, the accreditation
University, apredominantly white institution, developed a program designed to increase communication andinteraction between multicultural engineering students and the general engineering studentpopulation. This program, Making Choices, was presented to Introduction to Engineeringclasses within different engineering disciplines to encourage students to engage in activediversity interaction. We defined active diversity interaction as seeking out opportunities andchoosing to interact with students outside the groups in which they normally networked. Duringthe activity, students interacted and discussed (1) underrepresented populations in engineering,(2) the need for diversity in engineering, (3) interaction opportunities, and (4) the benefits
active learningstrategies, processes, and procedures. In looking at the literature, limited information has beenfound on strategies to integrate active learning. The active learning strategies discussed willfocus mainly on course content that can be utilized in engineering/technical graphics courses inhigher education settings.Introduction“Schools exist to provide educational opportunities. Education should enable students to developmentally, physically, morally, and aesthetically through the "experienced" curriculum”1 [p. 650].Formal instruction has two primary objectives1. First, cognitive development provides long-termacquisition and retention of stable and organized extensive bodies of knowledge and meaning.Second, is the growth in the
, stimulates interest in engineering and enhancescommunication, teaming and time management skills.6,7,8IntroductionThe first-year engineering courses at Michigan Technological University (Michigan Tech)emphasize hands-on, active learning where student teams work to solve engineering problems.Our first-year curriculum has two paths as shown in Figure 1: one for calculus-ready students(ENG1101 and ENG1102) and one for pre-calculus ready students (ENG1001, ENG1100, andENG1102). About 75% of the incoming students are calculus-ready when they arrive on campus.Each of the courses has a heavy design component and students learn about design through thecompletion of design exercises ranging from a design/build/test process in ENG1001 andENG1101 to a design
globally-integratedworld5. In Engineering for a Changing World, Duderstadt provides a summative snapshot ofmany of these voices, stating that engineers “must appreciate the great diversity of culturescharacterizing both the colleagues they work with and the markets they must compete in.”6Although the need for engineering education to prepare engineers for a globalized future may bewell-recognized, the prominent voices in engineering education seem to be wrestling withpractical approaches to addressing this need by asking two salient questions: 1) What attributes characterize globally competent engineers?7, 8, 9, 10 2) How can post-secondary education engender such global competence?7, 8This paper explores these questions and examines
. in education and construction management. Prior to grad- uate school, Elliott worked in construction project management for an ENR Top 100 general contractor in Washington, D.C., USA. For the past four years, Elliott has been a Graduate Teaching Assistant in the Department of Construction Management, teaching estimating courses. For the 2009-2011 academic years, Elliott was promoted to Primary Instructor and given full responsibility for the Estimating 2 course. In addition, he has taught several lectures in scheduling for CSU’s construction certificate program at the Denver, Colo., campus and is an Estimating 1 instructor during the summer session at the main cam- pus in Fort Collins, Colo., USA. Elliott received
thecourse: 1. At least 50% of the course will focus on the global aspects of energy. 2. Students will demonstrate an understanding of the change of energy sources and uses over time, and will understand energy in a comparative and cross‐national manner. 3. Students will understand how energy issues affect different communities, nations, and regions, including the impact of energy on the economic, cultural, social, and political aspects of these communities, nations, and regions. 4. Students will demonstrate an understanding of the civic complexities and responsibilities of energy choices and policies, including both the commonalities and the differences globally. 5. Students will demonstrate an awareness of
Member of the Kentucky Board of Engineers and Land Surveyors (its Chairman in 2010). He is also an Emeritus Member of the National Council of Examiners of Engineers and Surveyors, and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of ABET. Page 25.133.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Addressing the Public Understanding of Engineering: A Case StudyIn 2008, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)1 asserted that, “despite the impactof engineering in our daily lives, most Americans do not understand what engineers doand are largely unaware
things to do in the teaching profession is motivate and inspire students tolearn. There are numerous examples to motivate students as expressed by Barbara Davis. Theserange from incorporating different instructional behaviors to various ways to structure the coursesuch as de-emphasizing grades, giving feedback, and influencing student preparation. 1 Anotherobservation by James Lang is that “comprehension lies outside of the classroom.”2 With somuch student time spent outside of class preparing for tests and other requirements, instructorsmay not have a good idea for how students spend their time. It is this time outside of class that iscritical to learning. Chickering and Gamson argue that time on task and active learning leads tobetter
involved.Because common tests may be given to a large population at one time, split into multiple rooms,there is generally no opportunity for whimsical changes during the testing time. Therefore, it’simportant to make the test as bulletproof as possible. In general, we have found that for a 20 MCquestion, 1 workout question test, it takes at least 1.5 hours to review a first draft of the test andat least 7 iterations to finalize the test with a teaching team of 8 faculty members. The amount oftime it takes for a majority of students to complete a test is also important. Have GTAs whowere not involved in creating the test take it to make sure timing is adequate.One of the challenges of a large common course is trying to maintain fairness across all
25.136.2of perspectives, accomplishments, priorities, and expectations compared to their youngerclassmates.There is a concern regarding recent national trends in engineering education. According to arecent U.S. Department of Education report,1 over the last decade undergraduate degreesawarded in the fields of Engineering have dropped from 6.3 to 5.4 percent of the total degreesconferred in the country (p. 297). The numbers are easily misconstrued by the fact that the rawnumbers of engineering degrees have actually risen during the same time period. However, thisrise in number of degrees is due to the larger number of total degrees conferred. The proportionof students pursuing engineering degrees is declining with students instead populating fields
visualization to design, develop and assess a cyberlearning tool thatadvances personalized learning and helps students develop deep and broad conceptualknowledge. The proposed visualization tool, the “adaptive concept map,” overcomes theproblem of map shock by providing the user control over the quantity and level of detail ofinformation displayed, thus providing a means for navigating content in a manner that isadaptable to their personal cognitive load needs. In this paper, the authors present the progressthat has been made in this project thus far. Specifically, the development of a course-wideconcept map for an entire Statics course and a description of the software development processare presented.1. MotivationThe continued success and growth of
understood. For instance, one might know how and where to use sugar (skill) butat the same time have no idea of how sugar is produced (theoretical knowledge). Also, onemight know how to describe the chemical and physical reaction that arrests material degradationin a galvanized metal (theoretical knowledge) but have never galvanized a part.In summary, this paper has three goals:1. Provide some ethical motivation for university administrators to put in place programs thathelp a prospective student choose a degree program that matches his/her interests, academicskills and immediate and long-term career plans.2. Present a graphical representation that can be used to contrast the various characteristics ofengineering programs that can be used as a
engineering and especially non-engineering disciplines that can beborrowed and applied to aerospace engineering. There have been numerous efforts in variousdisciplines where college and university professors have been challenged to develop instructionalmethods that transform students from passive listeners to active learners [1]. In the author’sexperience, introducing such techniques in a highly conceptual and mathematically intensiveaerospace class is ‘easier said than done.’Active learning is in short, anything that students do in a classroom other than merely passivelylistening to an instructor’s lecture. This includes everything from listening practices which helpstudents to absorb what they hear, to short writing exercises in which students
augment existing course material for approximatelya two-hour lecture environment. The development of each module attempts to follow similarformats using the standard development sequence outlined in Table 1. The modules includepresentations in PowerPoint format and instructor notes in Word format. Both formats mayinclude links to online content that has been identified as relevant and vetted by the academicreview team. The graphics contained in each module reflect real world applications and havebeen approved for public domain. Recommended lab activities are also included as a part of theinstructor’s notes. Current and planned technical content is outlined in Table 2.Lab kits have been introduced with the newest grant and lab exercises are
close with some discussion of alternatives to outcomes-based education thatmight better support change in engineering education.Introduction – EC 2000This paper is part of a session that seeks to continue an ongoing conversation about accreditationand liberal education, that has taken many forms over the years, and was most recently taken upby historians at the 2011 ASEE conference.1 My particular concern here is to bring critiques ofoutcomes-based education (OBE)2 from critical scholarship in Education to bear on our ownversion of OBE in engineering in the U.S. – EC 2000. This is very much a work in progress,drawing on discussions among Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division members in
credential. The 15 technical college credits can be used by workers as creditbearing stackable credentials. They provide education and training for defined skill setsneeded by employers as well as convenient “stops” along the way to an A.S. Degree.Details of the ET Degree specialization tracks, college credit certificates, as well as Page 25.142.2colleges which offer the various programs can be found on FLATE’s “Made in Florida”web site, http://madeinflorida.org/engineering-technology-degree/e-t-overview/ andhttp://www.fl-ate.org/projects/Stackable-Credentials-Aligned-Certificates.html. (1, 2).MSSC Certified Production TechnicianThe MSSC Certified
determined thatgraduates of the university systems were looking for some basic guarantees and opportunities: 1. Top salaries for engineers (competitive for market conditions) 2. Job security 3. Health and savings benefits 4. Work-life balance 5. Technical challenges and growth opportunities 6. Leadership development programs 7. A constant learning and growth environment 8. Mentoring for technical, management, and career advice 9. Community service programs 10. Opportunities to lead early in one’s career 11. Tuition reimbursement programs for advanced degree pursuit (MS and MBA)The recent graduate from the university setting today has great expectations centered on self,concentrating on personal growth and development, while