this qualitativecase study was to better understand engineering students’ learning experiences in a EWB project,looking specifically at how students participating on the project exhibit attributes of globalengineering competencies. The case study investigates an EWB project with the mission ofdesigning and implementing a solar-powered electricity system for a school in Uganda. Wefound that students do exhibit attributes of global engineering competencies, although attributesregarding engineering cultures and ethics were exhibited more strongly than attributes regardingglobal regulations and standards. We discuss implications of these findings for educationalpractice and future research.IntroductionProviding engineering students opportunities
: technical coordination; understanding and negotiating engineering cultures;and navigating ethics, standards and regulation.16 Yet, the knowledge, skills, and attitudesrequired remain a subject of ongoing empirical research.17 Moreover, the lists of attributes thathave been developed suffer from methodological and theoretical concerns and are largely notgrounded in empirical research.18One broad definition of global competency is “the knowledge, ability, and predisposition to workeffectively with people who define problems differently than they do.”19 As this definitionhighlights, global competency requires not only specific knowledge, but also the ability andpredisposition to recognize that engineering problems are defined and solved differently
where learning may becompounded with new developments in electronic media. Sections 4 and 5 discuss theimportance of communications, ethics and accreditation which are important to have in aprogram competing in a global market. Section 6 provides suggestions, based on new trends and Page 26.337.3methodologies to meet the challenges in Pakistani engineering institutions having tremendousincrease in student enrollment. Section 7 summarizes the key points presented in the paper.2.0 Challenges of Teaching and LearningSeveral differences can be identified between the educational environments of developing andindustrialized countries such as
preparedness of STEM graduatesMany researchers have approached the question of what makes a globally competent STEMgraduate by identifying lists of requisite knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs).28,29.Parkinson’s30 survey of experts from industry and academia identified the attributes of aglobally competent engineer, including an ability to appreciate other cultures and tocommunicate across cultures; familiarity with the history, government and economic systems ofseveral target countries; an ability to speak a second language at a conversational level and at aprofessional (i.e. technical) level; proficiency working in or directing a team of ethnic andcultural diversity; ability to effectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or
, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of
and their consent should be taken. Ensure to inform family anduniversity in timely manner about your safety and progress while in field. While exiting researchsite it is important to leave on a good note and this will help in any future field work. Also tryany opportunity to learn about the culture, remember field research is not just about how peopledo things to perform specific tasks, which is your area of research, but what are the externalfactors, which effect people and motivate to work in that manner.Research ethics It is important to maintain the research ethics for maintaining integrity, validity andsecuring participant identity in the research2. Researchers need to abide by the University IRBrequirement. The entire
underserved communities globally.Prior research shows that difficulties often arise as students arrive unprepared to addressthe cultural and technical challenges international work entails. For example, oneparticular case study in Gary Downey’s book highlighted the challenges inimplementation of a program to connect student engineers with underserved communitiesin an international setting. Differences in culture and language coupled with thegeographical distance compounded made the project untenable and it had to stop. Someof the reasons she cited included that “the large body of knowledge in the developmentarea was not readily accessible or available to engineers,” and students did not activelyseek out the ethical and social understanding necessary
IME Elect (END XXX) 3 Prod Plan. and Control IME 483 (END 421) 3 Integr. Eng. Design IME 490 (END 492) 3 Plantwide Process Control IME 476 3 Eng. Ethics & Prof. PHIL323 (ITB 217E) 3 Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Interdisciplinary Studies IS XXX 3 3 TOTAL 15 18The number of credit hours taken at SIUE is 67 and the number of credit hours taken at ITU is 76,making the total 143. Although this number is well above the SIUE’s requirements, it is the
lecture on nextgeneration aircraft design and group discussions on ethics. Dean Washington’s luncheon talkcontextualized the need for global leadership in engineering. Student representatives from eachAviation Club and the two US universities presented on their research and activities andparticipated in icebreakers and a design challenge. Tom Wujec’s Marshmallow Challenge 9 waschosen to highlight lessons in creativity, innovation and global collaboration. Teams of four,including both U.S. and Chinese students, were asked to create the tallest freestanding structurepossible, using only dry spaghetti, string and masking tape. Towers had to be topped with amarshmallow, and groups were given just 18 minutes to complete the task. Successful
countries; 4. Speak a secondlanguage at a conversational level; 5. Speak a second language at a professional (i.e.technical) level; 6. Are proficient working in or directing a team of ethnic and culturaldiversity; 7. Can effectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or nationaldifferences; 8. Understand cultural differences relating to product design, manufacture anduse; 9. Have an understanding of the connectedness of the world and the workings of theglobal economy; 10. Understand implications of cultural differences on how engineeringtasks might be approached; 11. Have some exposure to international aspects of topics such assupply chain management, intellectual property, liability and risk, and business practices; 12.Have had a
achieving their set goals; they also need to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes if need be, solicit advice and assistance with the consent of the instructor, and maintain effective working relationships among the members. Instructors also should monitor group progress, give feedback on how well each group is doing, report each group’s progress to the class as a whole, and insure adherence to accepted standards of: ethics, social responsibility, and safety.Success in implementing cooperative learning is attributable, in large measure, to: properplanning, efforts, dedication, and foresight of the instructor. Experience definitely is a majorfactor. A proper start for instructors
II.1 The ability to adapt to cultural norms in a professional arena and act appropriately II.2 The ability to make ethical and socially responsible decisions in the context of a culture divergent form my own. II. 3 The ability to analyze problems from a different cultural frame of reference II.4 The ability to communicate professionally in a culturally appropriate manner12 Global Cultural III.1 The ability to practice social and cultural responsibility, e.g. resource sustainability III.2 Proficiency in a second language III.3 The ability to
first-year engineering design course onstudent intellectual development as measured by the Perry scheme. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1),39-45.[26] Douglas, E. P., & Chu-Chuan, C. (2009). Work in Progress - Use of Guided Inquiry as an Active LearningTechnique in Engineering. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference.[27] Creswell, J W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative andQualitative Research. England: Pearson College Division.[28] Zhang, L. F. (1997). The Zhang Cognitive Development Inventory. Unpublished text, The University ofHong Kong, Hong Kong. See Appendix A.[29] Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme
humor, and his/her ethics and professional integrity. (11)A new international faculty member can learn from other teaching experiences by attendingteaching workshops. One such workshop, for example, is “Engineering Engineering Education:A Catalyst for Change”. (12) The workshop helps the faculty member gain an ability to redesignhis/her courses such that students become more active, find effective ways to engage students ininteracting with each other, develop a better understanding of teamwork and how it works best,and learn about new assessment tools especially assessing team performance. At anotherteaching workshop "ExCEEd Teaching Workshop" a faculty member can gain skills that allowhim/her to improve ways of communicating with students
conducted a survey of the 2008 NSF Summit on Globalization during which the topfive competencies were identified. Among these were an appreciation of other cultures, an ability tocommunicate across cultures and in other languages, an ability to work in cross cultural teams and dealwith ethnic and cultural diversity and having an international work/educational experience.6 In additionthe global engineer must have a higher standard of competency in the broad range of electroniccommunication tools over the internet and over a broad range of ethical and professional standards whichincludes a sensitivity to norms other than one’s own country. These attributes among others take on new
University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
ethics of service learning. The course was meant to be a part of abroader wrap-around approach for service-learning teams, although the framework at this pointremains ad hoc.26 Like most programs, we are working toward developing a broader, systematicstrategy toward increasing students’ global engagement.Reflections on the Variety of Reentry PracticesThese programs offer a limited, unrepresentative sample of engineering education abroadprogramming. Further, they all come from the United States, which severely limits theirrepresentativeness. Future comparative work in the area would be worthwhile. Nevertheless,these reentry programs do offer a number of approaches to consider. They take a wide variety offorms and address different aspects of the
Paper ID #11783Go Green on Campus Project: A Collaborative International Student ProjectProf. Patricia Fox, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Professor Patricia Fox is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue Uni- versity Indianapolis (IUPUI). Pat has been a member of the faculty for over 32 years. She has previously served as Associate Chair and Associate Dean in the School. Pat teaches leadership, ethics, sustainabil- ity, and study abroad courses. She has held a number of
, such as through first-year introduction to engineeringcourses or through required design “cornerstone” subjects throughout the undergraduatecurriculums across the US. This is partly driven by the requirements that ABET sets forengineering degrees. ABET Criteria 3 (a) through (k) include design explicitly, especially Page 26.1362.2through criteria (c) and (e). The ABET criteria also implicitly include design throughrequirements for teamwork, ethics, social context, and other broad considerations. Another driving factor to include engineering design in freshman courses is to increase student interest inengineering, improve retention, and improve
international counterparts] want to validate is, can Itrust you as person… that you’re going to be honest with me, and you are ethical … until theproper level of trust and respect is validated, your international counterpart will be somewhatskeptical.”Interviewee 2 echoes this recommendation, stating, “Well, I think you always, no matter what Page 26.1068.13part of the world, you always have to build trust.” Further, as she continues, “And you knowtrust is a different definition to different people. I’ve never done business in Poland, or theUkraine, or Russia, but I’m going to guess that trust means something different there than it doesmaybe in the