- Conference Session
- Dynamics
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Brianno Coller, Northern Illinois University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
particularly satisfactory response toconcept question 1. The amount of time each student spent on the first question is tabulated inTable 1. Students’ approaches are outlined below. Table 1. Amount of time that students spent on concept question 1, all three parts. Student P Q R S T U V Time (min:sec) 1:20 5:20 8:30 1:33 2:20 9:00 8:50Student S and Student T had similar approaches to the concept question. Neither of them drew afree body diagram (FBD), even though they always drew FBDs on problem-solving questionsthey encountered on their midterm and final exams. For parts A and B, they simply observed thattension from the string creates
- Conference Session
- Dynamics
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Hirohito Kobayashi, University of Wisconsin, Platteville
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
and the object subjected to the general rigid bodymotion and the deformation is presented in fig.2. Consider a point P in the non-deformedoriginal body translated to point p through rigid-body translation ⃗ . Due to the additional rigidbody rotation and deformation, the target point Q displaced to point q. Subsequently, the smallelement vector changed to .The position vectors of point Q and q are given by ⃗ (5)and ⃗ ⃗ ( ⃗) . (6)By comparing the position vector ⃗ and , the small element
- Conference Session
- Explorations in Mechanics Pedagogy
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Derek James Lura Ph.D., Florida Gulf Coast University; Robert James O'Neill, Florida Gulf Coast University; Ashraf Badir P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
included in this studycompleted both of the exams. Page 26.849.3 Table 2: Ratings of student performance for the study semesters. Statics Mean (SD) Dynamics Mean (SD) ID Q/HW Exam R Survey Q/HW Exam R Survey H1 67(22) 79(12) 0.200 88(5) 64(28) 74(13) 0.181 85(5) H2 81(12) 79(14) 0.003 88(6) 75(25) 75(12) 0.254 88(5) Q1 75(15) 75(17) *0.708 88(4) 73(18) 63(21) *0.478 88(5) Q2 76(11) 81(11) *0.598 90(4
- Conference Session
- Statics Online
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin, Stout
- Tagged Divisions
-
Mechanics
Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[13] Devin R. Berg. Evaluation of student learning outcomes due to self-guided engineering analysis of surroundings. In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014. ASEE.[14] Raymond Cleveland. An impact #engmech https://vine.co/v/OKOQmi03xmH, October 2014. URL https://twitter.com/rayscleveland/status/518826491036303362.[15] Twitter / search - #engmech. URL https://twitter.com/search?q=%23engmech&f=realtime.[16] Patrick Rohlfing. The tension in the line to over come ff in the bearings and the mass moment of inertia to spin is 1/16oz #engmech pic.twitter.com/j2j3xt6hjv, November 2014. URL https://twitter.com/pj rohlf12/status/529673177639952384.[17] Travis