.[10] Jovanovic V., Dean T., Considine C., Arcaute K., Katsioloudis P., Tomovic M., Stout T., Schwalm C., Michaeli J., Shen Y., “Pilot program for veterans transition to engineering fields.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education - Annual Conference, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, LA.[11] Palm J.W. III, “System Dynamics.” McGraw Hill[12] https://www.google.com/search?q=ship+rudder+photos&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ& sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjCj- jvuNHSAhWCMyYKHV2rB8QQsAQIGQ&biw=1417&bih=903#q=ship+rudder+photos &tbm=isch&tbs=rimg:CXxO7GGHWrnYIjhaX4XgpnP52nwDTEwfGEUojJW7LGRYH9 mTVtEkJ2Iw58yQjziHvs2VUEuO
plastic is injectedinto the mold. After 10 minutes the average temperature of the plastic is within the parameters for being injected,but the extra time is to help make the flow smoother which creates a better final product.To find the heat flux, the amount of heat that can be passed through the material can be computed using Fourier’sLaw using Q as heat flux, k as the material conductivity, and T as the temperature: 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑄𝑄 = −𝑘𝑘 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑The CFD program uses the nodes to find the (x,y,x) coordinates needed for the formula of
will develop an understanding of the core concepts of technology 2 (Objectives M, N, P, Q, T, W, X, CC, BB)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the relationship among 3 technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study (D, F, G, H, J)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the cultural, social, economic, and 4 political effects of technology (D, E, H, I, K)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the effects of technology on the 5 environment (D, F, G, H, I)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the role of society in the 6 development and use of technology (D, E, F, G, J)Standard Students will develop an understanding
tray locationcan be determined graphically by using the McCabe-Thiele method.In the analysis that follows, the following parameters are defined: ● Feed rate (F) ● Feed molar composition (z, for light component) ● Feed thermal condition (q; 0 if vapor and 1 if liquid) ● Column operating pressure (P) ● Reflux flowrate (R) ● Distillate flowrate (D) ● Bottoms flowrate (B) ● Reflux Ratio (RR=R/D) ● Vapor rate in rectifying section (VR) ● Vapor rate in stripping section (Vs) ● Liquid rate in rectifying section (LR) ● Liquid rate in stripping section (Ls) ● Distillate composition for light component (xD) ● Bottoms composition for light component (xB) ● Total number of trays (NT) ● Feed tray (NF)Figure A
Long-term Education Reform and Development Plan (国家 中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要), http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/201007/t20100729_171904.html3. R. Jones, Exporting American Higher Education, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20094. Z. Zhou, C. Pezeshki, Understanding Change and Development of Engineering Education in China, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20145. R. Parker, Motivation and Vision of xxx, Journal of International Higher Education (internal journal), Vol. 4, No. 3, Sept. 20116. Q. Zhu, B. Jesiek, J. Yuan, Engineering Education Policymaking in Cross-National Context: A Critical Analysis of Engineering Education Accreditation in China, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20147. X. Tang, Q. Zhu, H. Pang
explore laminar, transitional and fully turbulentconditions.To determine the volumetric flow rate through the pipe test section, water flowing out ofthe pipe was caught in a measuring cup, and the time required to fill 500 mL measuredwith a stopwatch. The pressure drop along the pipe was determined using the fourmanometers integrated with the pipe and positioned 3.0 inches apart. The uncertainty involumetric flow measurements that ranged between Q = +/- 1 ml/s at low flow rates (10ml/s) to Q = +/- 2 ml/s at high flow rates (30 ml/s). The uncertainty in the pressuremeasurements using the integrated manometers was +/- 2 mm H2O or +/- 20 Pa.The pipe flow/head loss experiment shown in Fig. 3 was characterized by measuring thepressure drop along the
. (2015). Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out of Class Involvement. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.14. Simmons, D. R., & Yu, R. (2015). Conducting a Q Study to Refine and Develop New Measures of Engineering Student Co-Curricular Involvement. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2015, Dublin, Ireland.15. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Sage.16. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage publications.17. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation: Sage.18
. Q&A and leading group per class period · 100% reported communicating discussions) · 97% indicated that the most common weekly with UGTFs (but one · 75% of the UGTFs reported meeting interaction with UGTFs was Q&A; responded that they did not with their faculty at least 1x/week, 60% indicated that UGTFs also personally meet a weekly basis) but 1 UGTF reported not asked questions; 30% noted that the · 75% reported that UGTFs increased communicating outside of class at all UGTFs facilitated group discussions the level of in-class student group with
laboratory environments.Acknowledgement This research is funded by the National Science Foundation NSF NRI #1527148. Anyopinions, findings, or conclusions found in this paper are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.References1. National Robotics Initiative 2.0: Ubiquitous Collaborative Robots (NRI-2.0) (nsf17518) | NSF - National Science Foundation.2. Tucker C, Kumara S. An Automated Object-Task Mining Model for Providing Students with Real Time Performance Feedback. In: ; 2015:26.178.1-26.178.13.3. Hu Q, Bezawada S, Gray A, Tucker C, Brick T. Exploring the Link Between Task Complexity and Students’ Affective States During Engineering Laboratory Activities. In: ASME 2016
” boundary condition) to find v(r). Sketch v(r) in the figure. c) Find the volume flow rate Q by integrating v(r) over the cross section of the tube. By which factor is Q changed if the diameter of the tube is increased by i) a factor of 1.5 and ii) a factor of 2, without changing the pressure gradient p/L?ReferencesArney, D. C., W. P. Fox, K. B. Mohrmann, J. D. Myers, and R. A. West. 1995. Coremathematics at the United States Military Academy: Leading into the 21st century. Problems,Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 5(4), 343–367.Carr, S.H. 2003. Engineering First at Northwestern University: Where are we in 2003?Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, June
, H., Yao, C., Zheng, Q., Yang, V. W., Mi, H., Kim, M. Cho,S. J., Park, D. W., Jiang, H., Lee, J., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., Cai, Z., Gong, S. and Ma, Z. “High-performance green flexible electronics based on biodegradable cellulose nanofibril paper”,Nature Communications (2015) 1-11.
–819.Guilford, W. H. (2001). Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(3), 167–175.Lesh, R. A., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for Developing Thought Revealing Activities for Students and Teachers. In A. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 591–645). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Moreira, D. de A., & da Silva, E. Q. (2003). A method to increase student interaction using student groups and peer review over the internet. Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023926308385Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2003). Web-based
knowledge. discussion. Teaching Use pictures Ask students Emphasize Emphasize Project Strategies and visuals; to produce tiered compare and presentations in SLA- speak slowly, simple questions and contrast for by students aBLe use simple, programs in use “think, different to enhance shorter words addition to pair, share” to concepts. learning to draw multiple- process the Allow through connection choice new concepts. students to Q&A. between SLA questions
, results, and conclusion) are highlighted to provide students with a framework fortheir final reports. Guidelines for the research paper (Appendix C) and examples of past researchreports (from the previous FIRE course) are made available to the students for reference.Additionally, a list of online resources offering tips for creating attractive and effective researchposters and academic writing guides are distributed to further aid in preparing the finaldeliverables. The research poster session is held during the last lecture session. Teams present theirsemester’s work in a 7 minute presentation, followed by 3 minutes of Q&A with the audience.Team research reports are also collected at this last meeting. In 2015, the poster session was
-based learning on metacognitive strategies during an engineering design task. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 1-18.17. Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. State University of New York at Buffalo [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm.18. Mazumder, Q. H. (2010). Metacognition approaches to enhance student learning in mechanical engineering classroom. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).19. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self- regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues
important in their work?." Journal of Engineering Education 101.1 (2012): 95-118.[11] Nguyen, Duyen Q. "The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students." Global J. of Engng. Educ 2.1 (1998): 65-75.
personality and social psychology, 77(6), 1121. 7[3] Piech, C.; Huang, J; Chen, Z.; Do, C., Ng, A., Koller, D. "Tuned models of peer assessment in MOOCs,” Proc. 6th International Conf. on Educational Data Mining, Memphis, TN, July 2013.[4] Boud, D. and Falchikov, N., “What does research tell us about self-assessment?” Chapter 12 of Boud [1].[5] González, J.C. and Murthy, A., “Including peer and self-assessment in a continuous assessment scheme in electrical and electronics engineering courses,” Frontiers in Education 2014, Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2014.[6] Liang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Qian, R.; and Yiqing, Y., “Using a web-based system to explore peer, self, and tutor assessment in
Design Engineering Division and Lockheed Martin.Bibliography[1] C. Corbett and C. Hill, "Solving the equation: the variables for women’s success in engineering and computing," The American Association of University Women, Washington, D.C.2015.[2] U.S. Census Bureau. (2014, February 5, 2017). American Community Survey 1-year Estimates: Tables B24125 and B24126. Available: http://www.factfinder.census.gov[3] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, "Planning early for careers in science," Science, vol. 312, 2006.[4] C. S. Hulleman and J. M. Harackiewicz, "Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes," Science, vol. 326, pp. 1410-1412, 2009.[5] A. Krishnamurthi, M. Ballard, and G. G. Noam, "Examining
handbook for visual designersand artists (No. 6812). Mit Press.Shiffman, D., Garner, S., Chorng, J., Mooney, G., Murray, S., & Reas, C., (2013).Processing Hour of Code. Retrieved from http://hello.processing.org/editor.Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers inscience. Life sci, 1, 0-2.Tsukamoto, H., Takemura, Y., Nagumo, H., Ikeda, I., Monden, A., & Matsumoto, K. I.(2015, October). Programming education for primary school children using a textualprogramming language. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015.IEEE (pp. 1-7). IEEE.Urness, T., & Manley, E. D. (2013). Generating interest in computer science throughmiddle-school Android summer camps. Journal of Computing
Retrieved from http://cns.utexas.edu/fri. 11. Wurdinger, D. D., & Carlson, J. A. (2010). Teaching for experiential learning: Five approaches that work. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education. 12. https://facultyinnovate.utexas.edu/teaching/engagement/experiential-learning/defined 13. Lewis, L.(2011) - Report and Recommendations on experiential learning https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=experiential+learning+report
Assessing Students' Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind‐Set." Journal of Engineering Education 94.2 (2005): 233-243. 2. Ochs, John B., Todd A. Watkins, and Berrisford W. Boothe. "Creating a truly multidisciplinary entrepreneurial educational environment." Journal of Engineering Education 90.4 (2001): 577-583. 3. Vickers, Ken, et al. "Creation of an entrepreneurial university culture, the University of Arkansas as a case study." Journal of Engineering Education 90.4 (2001): 617. 4. Erdil, N. O., & Harichandran, R. S., & Nocito-Gobel, J., & Carnasciali, M., & Li, C. Q. (2016, June), Integrating e-Learning Modules into Engineering Courses to Develop an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Students Paper presented
Antoine coefficient AB Antoine coefficient BC Antoine coefficient CArea Cross-sectional area of cylinder in vaporizer (cm2)h Height of fluid in vaporizer reservoir (cm)∆h Change in height of fluid in vaporizer reservoir (cm)∆t Observation time (s)𝑉𝑉̇ Volumetric flow rate (cm3/s)𝑚𝑚̇ Mass flow rate (g/s)𝜌𝜌𝐴𝐴 , 𝜌𝜌𝐵𝐵 Density of components A and B (g/cm3)𝜌𝜌̅ Average density of mixture (g/cm3)Q Heat (W) �𝐻𝐻 Specific enthalpy (W)∆H Enthalpy change (W)∆HvapA, ∆HvapB Heat of vaporization for components A and B (W)
communication) IEEE Fellow, past IEEE NW region chair Topics: Career advice, career path, IEEE, and IEEE student branchWeek 3 Speaker: Todd Morton Professor and program director, EE program Topics: EE program overview and curriculum with Q/A sessionWeek 4 Speaker: Aaron Michelle (Area: analog and digital circuits) Alumni, Electrical Engineer, Wood Stone Corporation Topics: Career advice and projects completedWeek 5 Speaker: Kyle Williams (Area: Electronic display systems) Alumni, Engineer, Daktronics Inc. Topics: Career path, advice, and projects completedWeek 6
-269.9. White, H. D.; Griffith, B. C., Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectualstructure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1981, 32 (3), 163-171.10. Small, H., Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society forInformation Science 1999, 50 (9), 799-813.11. Morillo, F.; Bordons, M.; Gómez, I., An approach to interdisciplinarity throughbibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 2001, 51 (1), 203-222.12. He, Q., Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis. Library Trends 1999, 48 (1),133-159.13. Peters, H. P. F.; Van Raan, A. F. J., Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis.Scientometrics 1991, 20 (1), 235-255.14. Borgman, C. L.; Furner, J
in the field studies reported here. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Arnold, A. (1999). Retention and persistence in postsecondary education: A summation of research studies. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation, 5.2. Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555-580.3. Hayes, R. Q., Whalen, S. K., & Cannon, B. (2009). Csrde stem retention report, 2008–2009. Center for
undergraduate research? Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q., 17(163).5 Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.6 Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.7 Gee, J. P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.8 Carlone H. B. and Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color : Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218.9 Cass, C., Hazari, Z., Cribbs, J., Sadler, P. M. and Sonnert, G. (2011). Examining the Impact of Mathematics Identity on the Choice of
’ metacognition during an engineering design project,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 115–134, 2010.[5] O. Lawanto and S. Johnson, “Student’s cognitive self-appraisal, self-management, and the level of difficulty of an engineering design project: are they related?,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2009.[6] B. J. Zimmerman and M. M. Pons, “Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 614–628, 1986.[7] A. H. Schoenfeld, “Episodes and Executive Decisions in Mathematical Problem Solving,” in Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, R. Lesh and M. Landau, Eds. New York
, and F. Sanchez-Figueroa, “The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems,” Educ. Psychologist, vol. 46, pp. 197–221, 2011.[17] W. Ma, O. O. Adesope, J. C. Nesbit, and Q. Liu, “Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analytic survey,” in Amer. Educ. Res. Assoc. Conf., 2013.[18] J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The power of feedback,” Review Educ. Research, vol. 77, pp. 81–112, Mar. 2007.[19] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[20] N. Yelland and J. Masters, “Rethinking scaffolding in the information age,” Comput. and Educ., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 362–382, Apr