Asee peer logo
Displaying results 151 - 180 of 219 in total
Conference Session
Design Tools and Skill Development
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura R. Murphy, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Seda McKilligan, Iowa State University; Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2008.[34] N. Crilly, “Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers,” Univ. Camb. Dep. Eng. Trumptington Str. Camb. CB2 IPZ UK.[35] E. P. Torrance, “Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom,” Duboque Iowa William C Brown Publ., 1970.[36] B. J. Lucas and L. F. Nordgren, “People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 232–243, 2015.[37] N. L. Leech and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 57–584, Dec. 2007.
Conference Session
Qualitative Research Methods
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diana Jaleh Arya, University of California, Santa Barbara; Noreen Balos, University of California, Santa Barbara; Maria Teresa Napoli, University of California, Santa Barbara; Elizabeth Sciaky, University of California, Santa Barbara
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
perceptions, whichwe believe warrant serious consideration when recruiting and designing programs for supportingtheir transition into higher education. ReferencesAgar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow& Company.Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourseanalysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographicperspective. Routledge.Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizingschools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dia St. John, University of Arkansas; Eric Specking, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
Libraries’ Efforts in Inclusion and Outreach Activities Using Social Media,” LIBRI, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2015.[11] B. M. Moskal, C. Skokan, L. Kosbar, A. Dean, C. Westland, H. Barker, Q. N. Nguyen, and J. Tafoya, “K-12 Outreach: Identifying the Broader Impacts of Four Outreach Projects,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 173–189, 2007.[12] M. Borrego, “Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2007.[13] E. Specking and R. Almaian, “An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Engineering Outreach Decisions,” in IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 2013, p. 1078.[14] S. H
Conference Session
International Educational Experiences (1)
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donna M. Ebenstein, Bucknell University; Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Jeffrey C. Evans P.E., Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
International
as 2008 Beijing Olympic stadium (Bird’s Nest), the Great Wall and Three Gorges Dam; 2. Cultural sites with engineering significance including the Terra Cotta Warriors, the Forbidden City and Tiananmen Square; 3. Businesses sites including DuPont, GE, HP, AECOM, IBM, Lenovo, Air Products & Chemicals, and Shanghai Xin Tai Printing Company; and 4. University sites including Southeast University in Nanjing and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China in Chengdu.When visiting a company, students often attended a presentation and a Q&A session led by thehost to discuss what the business does, how the business works in a global environment, and whatimpact the business has on China and on the
Conference Session
Aerospace Hot Topic: Unmanned Aerial Systems
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks; Catherine F. Cahill, Alaska Center for UAS Integration, University of Alaska, Fairbanks; John Monahan, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Upward Bound
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
workshop.- Student topics. This activity was rated as highly rewarding by students. Most of the students (undergraduate and many graduate) had not yet had an opportunity in their academic career to organize and lead a classroom discussion. Feedback from students was overwhelmingly positive. Students appreciated the opportunity to work through the process of organizing and leading a facilitated discussion and noted the boost in confidence this activity provided them for general public speaking skills. Students also noted value in the expectation that they were to provide questions of other student presentations. Students liked having the limits of a 30- minute period for the presentation and Q&A with a buffer for the instructor to fill
Conference Session
Curricular Issues in Computing
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tony Andrew Lowe, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
, aspects of teamwork, or work that is not deemed to use or be a direct precursor to CTconcepts (e.g. statistics). The pedagogical approach used a semi-flipped classroom whereinstudents are expected to engage in the materials and come to class prepared. The typicalsequence of assessment is shown in Figure 1 and as follows.Figure 1 Pedagogical overview of HFYE 1. Reading – The course is supported by an online textbook which includes programming exercises. Problems are assigned from the text book weekly. 2. Q&A – Each class starts with a question and answer session based on the readings to focus the class session. 3. Readiness Assessment Test (RAT) - Students take this initial quiz to assess their self- guided learning
Conference Session
Learning and Assessment in ME 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn Anne Wingate, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert Kadel, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amanda G. Madden, C21U
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
Conference Session
Life After Graduation
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois, Chicago; Elnaz Douzali, University of Illinois, Chicago; Fazle Shahnawaz Muhibul Karim, University of Illinois, Chicago; Samuel Thomas Harford, University of Illinois, Chicago, PROMINENT Labs; Hereford Johnson, University of Illinois, Chicago
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
that programsmeet and surpass the standards necessary for technical fields; and that programs are “leading theway in innovation, emerging technologies and anticipating the welfare and safety needs of thepublic”9. One of many papers written that discusses the designing and teaching of courses tosatisfy ABET regulations was presented by Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent10. Topics suchas ethics and technical skills are readily available, but there is room for growth in the area of lifeand soft skills for engineering graduates. As far back as 1998 where Duyen Q. Nguyen wrotethat engineering careers remain technical but are shifting towards soft-engineering due to themultidisciplinary nature of the changing workplace11. The two areas he included
Conference Session
Makers, Making, and the Maker Movement
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Larson, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Steven Weiner, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, 82(3): 330-348.[9] Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods : strategies for product design (3rd ed.): Wiley.[10] Neeley Jr, W. L. (2007). Adaptive design expertise: A theory of design thinking and innovation. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.[11] Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social science research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[12] Foster, C., Lande, M. & Jordan, S. (June, 2014). An Ethos of Sharing in the Maker Community. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (DEED Division); Indianapolis, IN[13] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002
Conference Session
Life After Graduation
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Mitikaa Sama; Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Ruth A. Streveler, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
out of male-dominated occupations? In Eds. H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles, Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.16. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.17. Brown, P., & Matusovich, H. (2013). Unlocking student motivation: Development of an engineering motivation survey. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26.18. Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure
Conference Session
Pre-College: Fundamental Research in Engineering Education (1)
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emilie A Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Elizabeth Suazo-Flores, Purdue University; Corey A Mathis, California State University, Bakersfield; Tamara J Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Kyle Stephen Whipple, University of Minnesota
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
argument. New York, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.24. Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann,M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research anddevelopment. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SagePublications, Inc.26. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Conference Session
Technical Session 2: Improving Information Literacy Programs
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chelsea Leachman, Washington State University; Talea Anderson, Washington State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
revolution, continued: Librarians lead the way with open educational resources. Library Issues. 35(5):1-4.11. Jensen K, West Q. 2015. Open educational resources and the higher education environment A leadership opportunity for libraries. College & Research Libraries News. 76(4):215-218.12. Mitchell C, Chu M. 2014. Open education resources: The new paradigm in academic libraries. Journal of Library Innovation. 5(1):13-29.13. Okamoto K. 2013. Making higher education more affordable, one course reading at a time: Academic libraries as key advocates for open access textbooks and educational resources. Public Services Quarterly. 9(4):267-283.14. Pitcher K. 2014. Library publishing of open textbooks: The Open SUNY
Conference Session
Computing Technology Session 1
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jingwen(Jess) Li, PSU; EUNSIK KIM, Pennsylvania State University; Alec M Schultis, Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; Andrew Joseph Kapfer, The Pennsylvania State University ; Jimmy Lin, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Peter A Yake; Domenic M Erjavec; Benjamin Dabat; Ling Rothrock, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
, the quality of the analysisprocedures was not the focus of this study.After applying the designed criteria to the assigned game products, the two teams gave theirrecommendations to improve the products. Since both teams have a positive outcome in terms oflearning effectiveness (education perspective), neither of them recommended changes on thefundamental designs related to the education. For example, all the game products included somequiz questions for the end users to answer, but neither team actually made changes, such aschoosing different questions, to the Q&A section. One exception is that in the Avenger gameproduct from Case Study 1, the original game includes one-coin flipping section to help endusers understand the distribution
Conference Session
Investigating Instructional Strategies
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ada Hurst, University of Waterloo; Mehrnaz Mostafapour, University of Waterloo; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Andrea Prier, University of Waterloo; Erin Jobidon, University of Waterloo; Carol Hulls P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Christopher Rennick, University of Waterloo; Jason Grove P.E., University of Waterloo; Eugene Li, University of Waterloo; Sanjeev Bedi P.Eng., University of Waterloo
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
; Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-437.McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R.A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, 149-203. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Nguyen, D. Q. (1998). The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global Journal. of Engineering Education, 2(1), 65-75.Nurmi, N., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., Sivunen, A., & Fruchter, R. (2009). Who shouts louder?: Exerting power across distance and culture. Proceedings
Conference Session
New Tools for Teaching Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bernd Steffensen, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt; Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2), S. 329-344. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8486(02)00074-2.Rüdig, W. (1991). Green party politics around the world. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 33(8), 6-31.Sarnoff, D. (1941, July). A new world? The Scientific Monthly, 53(1), p. 37.Sheng, H., Ricci, P., & Fang, Q. (2015). Legally binding precautionary and prevention principles: Aspects of epistemic undertain causation. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 185-198.Sociovision, S. (2010). Die Sinus-Milieus. Update. HeidelbergVDI [Verein Deutscher Ingenieure] (1991). Technikbewertung - Begriffe und Grundlagen (Richtlinie 3780
Conference Session
Innovation and Reflection
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chris Gewirtz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Kirsten A. Davis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ramon Benitez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
the team presentations, theinstructors controlled the Q&A sessions. Since they were in the front and facing the front, theyoften did not notice when people in the audience had their hands raised, which resulted in eitherthe question being ignored or forcing the presenting team to be brave enough to override theinstructors and call on audience members to ask their questions. This act, through a learningpartnership lens, is tantamount to taking the floor from an authority figure. In the course thishierarchical structure may have led to tighter teams in which students learned to self-author andindependently collaborate. However, this hierarchical obstacle also may have restricted theamount of co-learning that can happen between the different
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Michael L. Vaughan, University of Delaware; Kenneth A. Bright, University of Delaware, College of Engineering; Rachel Davidson, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
Conference Session
Engaging Ethics, Internationally
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., and Rabins, M. J. (2009). Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 2. Zhu, Q. (2010). Engineering Ethics Studies in China: Dialogue between Traditionalism and Modernism. Engineering Studies, 2(2): 85-107. 3. lZahir, S. and Kombo, L. (2014). Towards a Global Code of Ethics for Engineers. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, Chicago, IL, May 23-24, 2014 4. WFEO. (2006). WFEO Model Code of Ethics. Paris, France: WFEO. Available at: http://www.wfeo.org/wp- content/uploads/code_of_ethics/WFEO_MODEL_CODE_OF_ETHICS.pdf 5. WFEO. (2008). Who We Are. Paris, France: WFEO. Available
Conference Session
Engaging Ethics, Internationally
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University; Shuxin Yang, Chinese society for engineer education(CSEE)
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
.” Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology Vol. 14, No.1: 10-16.[16] Yi, Y. 2013. “College Students’ Engineering Ethics Education Survey Report.” The Guide of Scienceand Engineering January: 239-242.[17] Li, Z., Cong, H., and Wang, Q., 2016. Engineering Ethics [Gong Cheng Lun Li]. Tsinghua UniversityPress.[18] Alexander, Larry, and Michael Moore. 2015. “Deontological Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ethics-deontological/.[19] Davis, Michael. 1991. “Thinking Like an Engineer: The Place of a Code of Ethics in the Practice of aProfession.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 20 (2): 150–67.[20] Herkert, Joseph R. 2001. “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Poster Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carolin Christin Dungs, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
/group/design_education/cgi-bin/mediawiki/index.php/Engineering_Majors_Survey.Dungs, C.C. 2016. “Design Thinking and (Extra) Curricular Activities: A Way to FosterStudent’s Innovation Self-Effic’acy and Career Goals in Entrepreneurship andInnovation? (Master’s Thesis).” Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich.Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2011a). The DNA of Disruptive Innovators:The five discovery skills that enable innovative leaders to "think different". In J. Dyer, H.Gregersen, & C. M. Christensen (Eds.), The Innovator's DNA: Mastering the Five Skills ofDisruptive Innovation (pp. 1–28).Gilmartin, S.K., Chen, H.L., Schar, M.F., Jin, Q., Toye, G., Harris, A., Cao, E., Costache, E.,Reithmann, M., & Sheppard
Conference Session
Instrument Development
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sixing Lu, University of Arizona; Loukas Lazos, University of Arizona; Roman Lysecky, University of Arizona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Integrating technology into computer science education (ITiCSE '96). ACM, pp. 52-54, 1996.[6] Simon, B., J. Parris, and J. Spacco. ​How we teach impacts student learning: peer instruction vs. lecture in CS0. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2013.[7] Porter, L., D. Bouvier, Q. Cutts, S. Grissom, C. Lee, R. McCartney, D. Zingaro, B. Simon. A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16), 2016.[8] Lyman, R.. ​Think-pair-share: An expanding teaching technique. Maa-Cie Cooperative News 1.1, pp. 1-2
Conference Session
MET Papers 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Orlando M, Ayala, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
problemsencountered in the class, as different techniques and mathematical approaches are needed fordifferent parts of the course. Flipped classroom technique seems to offer the opportunity toincrease the number of practice problems solved during lecture classes. In this study, the flippedclassroom technique has been implemented during four consecutive semesters in a FluidMechanics Class in an Engineering Technology Department. Lectures were recorded with theassistance of staff from the Center of Learning Technologies. The students were asked to watchrecorded lecture modules before the class time and classroom time was used for problem solving,discussions and Q/A sessions related to the material. Particular to this implementation was thatthe course was
Conference Session
Teams, Capstone Courses, and Project Based-Learning
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Molly A. McVey, University of Kansas; Carl W. Luchies, University of Kansas; Adrian Joseph Villicana, University of Kansas
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
, & Bloom, 2001).Table 2. Learning objectives and associated test questions for Fall 2014 and Spring 2016 (Ex=Exam, Q= question number). Topics Fall Spring 2014 2016CHAPTER 12: Kinetics of a Particle12.6 Projectile Motion EX1 EX 1LO 12.6 Analyze the free-flight motion of a projectile. Q1 Q112.9 Absolute Dependent Motion EX 1 EX 1LO 12.9 Relate the
Conference Session
Writing and Communication
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Katie Snyder, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
creative solutions, but the rubrics didn’t encourage orvalue that creativity.Students were focused on points instead of learningAnalytic rubrics can lead students to focus more on their targeted score or grade and less onwhether their product is an effective example of what they were expected to produce (Panadero& Jonsson, 2013). It’s not surprising that our students are focused on their grades or that theycare about how their score on a particular assignment could have been higher; however, theassociation of points with the specific categories on the analytic rubric (e.g., 5pts for includingcenter of buoyancy and center of gravity calculations; 10pts for performance during the Q&A)seemed to lead students to focus too intently on the
Conference Session
Computing Technology Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susan L. Miertschin, University of Houston, College of Technology (MERGED MEMBERSHIP WITH COE); Barbara Louise Stewart, University of Houston; Carole E. Goodson, University of Houston (CoT)
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
communicatione-books online content alternatives support synchronous online timee-contact online homework with instructore-interaction online lectures teacher-led blogselectronic Q&A forms online technologies test solutionsexamples online tests user-friendly technologiesfree content online videos variety of technologiesguided hands-on work resource appsIn addition to these items suggested by students as desirable for courses, students
Conference Session
Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hyung S. Choi, Greenville College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
revolutionize 21st century (June 30, 2016)https://phys.org/news/2016-06-quantum-technologies-revolutionize-21st-century.html[5] Charles Q. Choi, Qubit Revolution, PRISM, January 2017.[6] Quantum Engineering Center for Doctoral Training, University of Bristol. See also MIT’sInterdisciplinary Quantum Information Science & Engineering (iQuiSE) program supported bythe National Science Foundation. iQuiSE is a pioneering doctoral program that is focused onproviding the comprehensive education-to-employment pathway for students in quantuminformation science and engineering.[7] http://www.bristol.ac.uk/quantum-engineering/about/[8] For instance, see Mark Beck, Quantum Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, CambridgeUniversity Press, 2012; and John S. Townsend
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Penny Rheingans, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Lee Blaney, UMBC; Marie desJardins, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; E. F. Charles LaBerge, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Susan Martin, University of Maryland; Carolyn Seaman, UMBC; Gymama Slaughter, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Anne Marie Spence, Baylor University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
. 31: p. 37-59. 16. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., and Brown, J. W. The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1976.T-SITE: A UMBC COMMUNITY OF TRANSFER SCHOLARS 11 17. Martin, S., Marshall, A., and Zhu, L., “S-STEM Programs for Computing and Engineering Majors.” Presentation at the 22nd National Conference on Students in Transition, October 19-21, 2015, Baltimore Maryland. 18. Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development. CyberMaryland. [Report] [cited 2014 July 7]; Available from: http://issuu.com/cybermaryland/docs/cyberreport#. 19. Maton, K., Hrabowski III, F
Conference Session
Engaging Ethics, Internationally
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Prakash G Bapat, Business Ethics Foundation; Aravind Joshi, Business Ethics Foundation; Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Guruji Education Foundation; Nupur Kulkarni
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
2011- Harper Collins India6. Alliance for Integrity -www.allianceforintegrity.org7. Tata LOG – Harish Bhat- Penguin Books India 20128. Business Ethics- Today & Tomorrow ISBN 978-81-927223-1-3Appendix-1 Questionnaire Form for 25 CEO's ( Year 2015) Q# Text of the Question 1 The present i.e Year 2015 Level of Ethics in India 1-poor to 7- Outstanding 2 Prediction /Estimation by Year 2020 1-poor to 7- Outstanding American Management Association identified reasons for Unethical behaviour among 3 the corporate. What's your rating A Pressure to meet unrealistic business objectives
Conference Session
Aspects of Engineering Literacy and Community and Industry Engagement
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lina Trigg, William Mason High School; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. ​International Journal of Production Economics, ​62(1-2): 107-118.Patton, M. Q. (2002). ​Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). ​Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.Reed, S. K. (1992). ​Cognition: Theory and Applications​. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Stevens, R., Johri, A, & Connor, K. (2013). Chapter 7 - Professional Engineering Work.​ ​In A. Jorhi, & B. M. Olds (Eds.) ​Cambridge Book of Engineering Education Research​. (pp.119-138), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Tjahjono, B.,​ Ball​, P., Vitanov, V .I. , Scorzafave, ​C., ​ ​Nogueira​, ​J. ​., Calleja​, J., ​Minguet​, M., Narasimha, L
Conference Session
Quantitative Research Methods
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, distance is not considered and despite the visible dissimilarity between profiles on the right plot, entities would likely be assigned membership to the same cluster. 2) Euclidean distance. An intuitive measure for distance, Euclidean distance is the straight- line distance between two points in multidimensional space. It is calculated using 𝑑𝐸 (𝑝, 𝑞) = √(𝑝1 − 𝑞1 )2 + (𝑝2 − 𝑞2 )2 + ⋯ + (𝑝𝑛 − 𝑞𝑛 )2 where n represents the number of dimensions or variables being considered and p and q represent the respective measures of two points on each of the dimensions. A variation on this distance is the Squared Euclidean distance which eliminates the square root