: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2008.[34] N. Crilly, “Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers,” Univ. Camb. Dep. Eng. Trumptington Str. Camb. CB2 IPZ UK.[35] E. P. Torrance, “Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom,” Duboque Iowa William C Brown Publ., 1970.[36] B. J. Lucas and L. F. Nordgren, “People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 232–243, 2015.[37] N. L. Leech and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 57–584, Dec. 2007.
perceptions, whichwe believe warrant serious consideration when recruiting and designing programs for supportingtheir transition into higher education. ReferencesAgar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow& Company.Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourseanalysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographicperspective. Routledge.Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizingschools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001
Libraries’ Efforts in Inclusion and Outreach Activities Using Social Media,” LIBRI, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2015.[11] B. M. Moskal, C. Skokan, L. Kosbar, A. Dean, C. Westland, H. Barker, Q. N. Nguyen, and J. Tafoya, “K-12 Outreach: Identifying the Broader Impacts of Four Outreach Projects,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 173–189, 2007.[12] M. Borrego, “Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2007.[13] E. Specking and R. Almaian, “An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Engineering Outreach Decisions,” in IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 2013, p. 1078.[14] S. H
as 2008 Beijing Olympic stadium (Bird’s Nest), the Great Wall and Three Gorges Dam; 2. Cultural sites with engineering significance including the Terra Cotta Warriors, the Forbidden City and Tiananmen Square; 3. Businesses sites including DuPont, GE, HP, AECOM, IBM, Lenovo, Air Products & Chemicals, and Shanghai Xin Tai Printing Company; and 4. University sites including Southeast University in Nanjing and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China in Chengdu.When visiting a company, students often attended a presentation and a Q&A session led by thehost to discuss what the business does, how the business works in a global environment, and whatimpact the business has on China and on the
workshop.- Student topics. This activity was rated as highly rewarding by students. Most of the students (undergraduate and many graduate) had not yet had an opportunity in their academic career to organize and lead a classroom discussion. Feedback from students was overwhelmingly positive. Students appreciated the opportunity to work through the process of organizing and leading a facilitated discussion and noted the boost in confidence this activity provided them for general public speaking skills. Students also noted value in the expectation that they were to provide questions of other student presentations. Students liked having the limits of a 30- minute period for the presentation and Q&A with a buffer for the instructor to fill
, aspects of teamwork, or work that is not deemed to use or be a direct precursor to CTconcepts (e.g. statistics). The pedagogical approach used a semi-flipped classroom whereinstudents are expected to engage in the materials and come to class prepared. The typicalsequence of assessment is shown in Figure 1 and as follows.Figure 1 Pedagogical overview of HFYE 1. Reading – The course is supported by an online textbook which includes programming exercises. Problems are assigned from the text book weekly. 2. Q&A – Each class starts with a question and answer session based on the readings to focus the class session. 3. Readiness Assessment Test (RAT) - Students take this initial quiz to assess their self- guided learning
that programsmeet and surpass the standards necessary for technical fields; and that programs are “leading theway in innovation, emerging technologies and anticipating the welfare and safety needs of thepublic”9. One of many papers written that discusses the designing and teaching of courses tosatisfy ABET regulations was presented by Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent10. Topics suchas ethics and technical skills are readily available, but there is room for growth in the area of lifeand soft skills for engineering graduates. As far back as 1998 where Duyen Q. Nguyen wrotethat engineering careers remain technical but are shifting towards soft-engineering due to themultidisciplinary nature of the changing workplace11. The two areas he included
, 82(3): 330-348.[9] Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods : strategies for product design (3rd ed.): Wiley.[10] Neeley Jr, W. L. (2007). Adaptive design expertise: A theory of design thinking and innovation. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.[11] Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social science research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[12] Foster, C., Lande, M. & Jordan, S. (June, 2014). An Ethos of Sharing in the Maker Community. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (DEED Division); Indianapolis, IN[13] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002
out of male-dominated occupations? In Eds. H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles, Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.16. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.17. Brown, P., & Matusovich, H. (2013). Unlocking student motivation: Development of an engineering motivation survey. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26.18. Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure
argument. New York, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.24. Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann,M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research anddevelopment. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SagePublications, Inc.26. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
revolution, continued: Librarians lead the way with open educational resources. Library Issues. 35(5):1-4.11. Jensen K, West Q. 2015. Open educational resources and the higher education environment A leadership opportunity for libraries. College & Research Libraries News. 76(4):215-218.12. Mitchell C, Chu M. 2014. Open education resources: The new paradigm in academic libraries. Journal of Library Innovation. 5(1):13-29.13. Okamoto K. 2013. Making higher education more affordable, one course reading at a time: Academic libraries as key advocates for open access textbooks and educational resources. Public Services Quarterly. 9(4):267-283.14. Pitcher K. 2014. Library publishing of open textbooks: The Open SUNY
, the quality of the analysisprocedures was not the focus of this study.After applying the designed criteria to the assigned game products, the two teams gave theirrecommendations to improve the products. Since both teams have a positive outcome in terms oflearning effectiveness (education perspective), neither of them recommended changes on thefundamental designs related to the education. For example, all the game products included somequiz questions for the end users to answer, but neither team actually made changes, such aschoosing different questions, to the Q&A section. One exception is that in the Avenger gameproduct from Case Study 1, the original game includes one-coin flipping section to help endusers understand the distribution
; Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-437.McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R.A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, 149-203. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Nguyen, D. Q. (1998). The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global Journal. of Engineering Education, 2(1), 65-75.Nurmi, N., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., Sivunen, A., & Fruchter, R. (2009). Who shouts louder?: Exerting power across distance and culture. Proceedings
Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2), S. 329-344. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8486(02)00074-2.Rüdig, W. (1991). Green party politics around the world. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 33(8), 6-31.Sarnoff, D. (1941, July). A new world? The Scientific Monthly, 53(1), p. 37.Sheng, H., Ricci, P., & Fang, Q. (2015). Legally binding precautionary and prevention principles: Aspects of epistemic undertain causation. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 185-198.Sociovision, S. (2010). Die Sinus-Milieus. Update. HeidelbergVDI [Verein Deutscher Ingenieure] (1991). Technikbewertung - Begriffe und Grundlagen (Richtlinie 3780
the team presentations, theinstructors controlled the Q&A sessions. Since they were in the front and facing the front, theyoften did not notice when people in the audience had their hands raised, which resulted in eitherthe question being ignored or forcing the presenting team to be brave enough to override theinstructors and call on audience members to ask their questions. This act, through a learningpartnership lens, is tantamount to taking the floor from an authority figure. In the course thishierarchical structure may have led to tighter teams in which students learned to self-author andindependently collaborate. However, this hierarchical obstacle also may have restricted theamount of co-learning that can happen between the different
. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., and Rabins, M. J. (2009). Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 2. Zhu, Q. (2010). Engineering Ethics Studies in China: Dialogue between Traditionalism and Modernism. Engineering Studies, 2(2): 85-107. 3. lZahir, S. and Kombo, L. (2014). Towards a Global Code of Ethics for Engineers. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, Chicago, IL, May 23-24, 2014 4. WFEO. (2006). WFEO Model Code of Ethics. Paris, France: WFEO. Available at: http://www.wfeo.org/wp- content/uploads/code_of_ethics/WFEO_MODEL_CODE_OF_ETHICS.pdf 5. WFEO. (2008). Who We Are. Paris, France: WFEO. Available
.” Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology Vol. 14, No.1: 10-16.[16] Yi, Y. 2013. “College Students’ Engineering Ethics Education Survey Report.” The Guide of Scienceand Engineering January: 239-242.[17] Li, Z., Cong, H., and Wang, Q., 2016. Engineering Ethics [Gong Cheng Lun Li]. Tsinghua UniversityPress.[18] Alexander, Larry, and Michael Moore. 2015. “Deontological Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ethics-deontological/.[19] Davis, Michael. 1991. “Thinking Like an Engineer: The Place of a Code of Ethics in the Practice of aProfession.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 20 (2): 150–67.[20] Herkert, Joseph R. 2001. “Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research
/group/design_education/cgi-bin/mediawiki/index.php/Engineering_Majors_Survey.Dungs, C.C. 2016. “Design Thinking and (Extra) Curricular Activities: A Way to FosterStudent’s Innovation Self-Effic’acy and Career Goals in Entrepreneurship andInnovation? (Master’s Thesis).” Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich.Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. M. (2011a). The DNA of Disruptive Innovators:The five discovery skills that enable innovative leaders to "think different". In J. Dyer, H.Gregersen, & C. M. Christensen (Eds.), The Innovator's DNA: Mastering the Five Skills ofDisruptive Innovation (pp. 1–28).Gilmartin, S.K., Chen, H.L., Schar, M.F., Jin, Q., Toye, G., Harris, A., Cao, E., Costache, E.,Reithmann, M., & Sheppard
Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Integrating technology into computer science education (ITiCSE '96). ACM, pp. 52-54, 1996.[6] Simon, B., J. Parris, and J. Spacco. How we teach impacts student learning: peer instruction vs. lecture in CS0. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2013.[7] Porter, L., D. Bouvier, Q. Cutts, S. Grissom, C. Lee, R. McCartney, D. Zingaro, B. Simon. A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16), 2016.[8] Lyman, R.. Think-pair-share: An expanding teaching technique. Maa-Cie Cooperative News 1.1, pp. 1-2
problemsencountered in the class, as different techniques and mathematical approaches are needed fordifferent parts of the course. Flipped classroom technique seems to offer the opportunity toincrease the number of practice problems solved during lecture classes. In this study, the flippedclassroom technique has been implemented during four consecutive semesters in a FluidMechanics Class in an Engineering Technology Department. Lectures were recorded with theassistance of staff from the Center of Learning Technologies. The students were asked to watchrecorded lecture modules before the class time and classroom time was used for problem solving,discussions and Q/A sessions related to the material. Particular to this implementation was thatthe course was
, & Bloom, 2001).Table 2. Learning objectives and associated test questions for Fall 2014 and Spring 2016 (Ex=Exam, Q= question number). Topics Fall Spring 2014 2016CHAPTER 12: Kinetics of a Particle12.6 Projectile Motion EX1 EX 1LO 12.6 Analyze the free-flight motion of a projectile. Q1 Q112.9 Absolute Dependent Motion EX 1 EX 1LO 12.9 Relate the
creative solutions, but the rubrics didn’t encourage orvalue that creativity.Students were focused on points instead of learningAnalytic rubrics can lead students to focus more on their targeted score or grade and less onwhether their product is an effective example of what they were expected to produce (Panadero& Jonsson, 2013). It’s not surprising that our students are focused on their grades or that theycare about how their score on a particular assignment could have been higher; however, theassociation of points with the specific categories on the analytic rubric (e.g., 5pts for includingcenter of buoyancy and center of gravity calculations; 10pts for performance during the Q&A)seemed to lead students to focus too intently on the
communicatione-books online content alternatives support synchronous online timee-contact online homework with instructore-interaction online lectures teacher-led blogselectronic Q&A forms online technologies test solutionsexamples online tests user-friendly technologiesfree content online videos variety of technologiesguided hands-on work resource appsIn addition to these items suggested by students as desirable for courses, students
revolutionize 21st century (June 30, 2016)https://phys.org/news/2016-06-quantum-technologies-revolutionize-21st-century.html[5] Charles Q. Choi, Qubit Revolution, PRISM, January 2017.[6] Quantum Engineering Center for Doctoral Training, University of Bristol. See also MIT’sInterdisciplinary Quantum Information Science & Engineering (iQuiSE) program supported bythe National Science Foundation. iQuiSE is a pioneering doctoral program that is focused onproviding the comprehensive education-to-employment pathway for students in quantuminformation science and engineering.[7] http://www.bristol.ac.uk/quantum-engineering/about/[8] For instance, see Mark Beck, Quantum Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, CambridgeUniversity Press, 2012; and John S. Townsend
. 31: p. 37-59. 16. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., and Brown, J. W. The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1976.T-SITE: A UMBC COMMUNITY OF TRANSFER SCHOLARS 11 17. Martin, S., Marshall, A., and Zhu, L., “S-STEM Programs for Computing and Engineering Majors.” Presentation at the 22nd National Conference on Students in Transition, October 19-21, 2015, Baltimore Maryland. 18. Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development. CyberMaryland. [Report] [cited 2014 July 7]; Available from: http://issuu.com/cybermaryland/docs/cyberreport#. 19. Maton, K., Hrabowski III, F
2011- Harper Collins India6. Alliance for Integrity -www.allianceforintegrity.org7. Tata LOG – Harish Bhat- Penguin Books India 20128. Business Ethics- Today & Tomorrow ISBN 978-81-927223-1-3Appendix-1 Questionnaire Form for 25 CEO's ( Year 2015) Q# Text of the Question 1 The present i.e Year 2015 Level of Ethics in India 1-poor to 7- Outstanding 2 Prediction /Estimation by Year 2020 1-poor to 7- Outstanding American Management Association identified reasons for Unethical behaviour among 3 the corporate. What's your rating A Pressure to meet unrealistic business objectives
). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2): 107-118.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.Reed, S. K. (1992). Cognition: Theory and Applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Stevens, R., Johri, A, & Connor, K. (2013). Chapter 7 - Professional Engineering Work. In A. Jorhi, & B. M. Olds (Eds.) Cambridge Book of Engineering Education Research. (pp.119-138), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Tjahjono, B., Ball, P., Vitanov, V .I. , Scorzafave, C., Nogueira, J. ., Calleja, J., Minguet, M., Narasimha, L
, distance is not considered and despite the visible dissimilarity between profiles on the right plot, entities would likely be assigned membership to the same cluster. 2) Euclidean distance. An intuitive measure for distance, Euclidean distance is the straight- line distance between two points in multidimensional space. It is calculated using 𝑑𝐸 (𝑝, 𝑞) = √(𝑝1 − 𝑞1 )2 + (𝑝2 − 𝑞2 )2 + ⋯ + (𝑝𝑛 − 𝑞𝑛 )2 where n represents the number of dimensions or variables being considered and p and q represent the respective measures of two points on each of the dimensions. A variation on this distance is the Squared Euclidean distance which eliminates the square root