at the university (Appendix A) with the largestrepresentations from general engineering (28%), aerospace engineering (7%), and chemicalengineering (11%). From the 46 participants, we analyzed three reflective journals each for a total of 138student data sets. Student data consisted of course reflective journals due in weeks 10, 13, and 16of the fall 2017 semester. The journals were submitted through the course learning managementsystem and downloaded for analysis after the course commenced in December 2017.Data Analysis We used a grounded theory thematic process to interpret the narrative data (Charmaz,2009). This type of analysis is contingent on the types of coding skills and categories thatsurface from the narratives of
do alone. Creates a partnership relationship with departments interested in focusing on recruitment of women. Continually exceed national averages in enrollment of women in most departments.Historical – Overall Undergrad Women Enrolled 18.4% Aerospace 47.6% Architectural 45.9% Biomedical 37.8% Chemical 36.2% 2017
Identity Guide: Love, Race, and Liberation. “Who Am I? The Question of Identity”, by Tanesha BarnesLeadership/Grp Work [14] Activity 3.1: Aerospace team activity: Survival on the MoonImplicit Bias Resume review (name bias activity) [15] Project Implicit (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html) [16] Rate my professor’s gender (theconversation.com/rate-my-professors- gender-37370) [17] Ben Schmidt’s Gender and Teacher Reviews interactive website (benschmidt.org/profGender/#)Currently an on-line survey is open for the first-year students, which they have
-based framework of engineering design. She is also interested in cross-cultural work in engineering education to promote access and equity. She is an aerospace engineer, and is the present Vice President (Educational Content) of the Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED).Ms. Chanel Beebe, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Chanel Beebe is an Engineering Education Researcher at Purdue University where her work focusing on broadening participation in engineering and engineering thinking. Her passion lies in empowering communities to solve their own problems using creative pedagogies and engagement strategies. Her research looks at using the engineering design
ImprovementDiversity in Engineering Workplace Developing Industry Partners Campus Engagement Experiential EducationApproaches to Diversity in Engineering Workplace Developing Industry Partners Utilized Industrial Advisory Boards, CSU Board of Trustees and Cooperative Education Program Industry Partners with Diversity in the Workplace Seminars were: NASA, Lincoln Electric, UTC Aerospace, FirstEnergy Diversity in Engineering Networking Program Year One: 8 companies with 20 underrepresented students in attendance Year Two: 30 companies with 50 students in attendanceCampus Engagement
% 20% 10% 0% Aero BMED CEE CPE CSSE EE IME MATE MEFigure 2. Mental health screenings by major. Aero: Aerospace, N=56-65; BMED: Biomedical, N=74-87; CEE: Civil andEnvironmental, N=118-132; CPE: Computer Engineering, N=51-60; CSSE: Computer Science and Software Engineering, N=103-119;EE: Electrical Engineering, N=73-86; IME: Industrial and Manufacturing, N=38-46; MATE: Materials Engineering, N=17-22; ME:Mechanical Engineering, N=132-151.According to these numbers, Computer Engineering (CPE) students are at the highest risk for seriousmental illness as measured by the Kessler instrument. This is particularly of note since at
the regulations as a model forincreasing inclusion of people with disabilities. For instance, creating a goal of establishing acompany workforce of 7% could be adopted by engineering organizations not yet operating atthat level. While the average proportion of engineers with disabilities in 2015 was 9% of allengineers, several engineering occupations are operating below or just at the 7% thresholdincluding aerospace engineer (7%), chemical engineer (4%), civil engineer (7%), and industrialengineer (6.1%) meaning that there is great work still needed within these occupational workinggroups from engineering organizations across the US. The statistics available also do not giveinformation about the amount of variation in the employment of people
SampleOur final sample for this paper included 15 FGSVEs who were enrolled in an undergraduateprogram in engineering. These students indicated that both parents had an educational attainmentlevel of “some college” or less; that is, neither parent had earned a college degree of any kind.The one woman and 14 men in our final sample included the following engineering majors:mechanical (ME; n=4), aerospace (AE; n=3), electrical (EE; n=3); chemical (CH; n=1),construction (CN; N=1) general (GE; n=1), material science (MS; n=1) and textile (TX; n=1)engineering. Participants served in the Air Force (n=4), Navy (n=4), Army (n=3) and MarineCorps (n=3); one participant had served in both the Coast Guard and Air Force. Three had alsoserved or were serving in
The study took place at an urban, research-intensive, and predominately white institution.Snowball sampling was used due to the relatively small number of Latinas in engineering. Thefive participants were 18 or over, identified as Latina, and were senior undergraduateengineering majors who came from varied fields including aerospace, architectural, biomedical,chemical, and mechanical engineering. Four of the participants were of Mexican origin, and oneidentified as Salvadoran. The participants varied in their self-identified socio-economic status(three high; one middle; one low). One identified as a first-generation college student; three ofthe five had at least one parent who possessed a bachelor’s or master’s degree. This qualitative
Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research interests
EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the curriculum for the new Minor in Global Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Ms. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and earned her Ph.D. in the Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership program from the University of Northern Colorado in 2017. c American Society for Engineering