advocating ashift from a sole focus on student outcomes, we call attention to outcomes 4 and 5, which reflectsystem-level abilities, “An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities inengineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts; An ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborativeand inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” Transdisciplinarylearning mirrors an authentic setting of “real world” engineering practice.Table 1. New Accreditation Board on Engineering and Technology (ABET) student outcomes. An ability
Paper ID #21480Representations of ’The Public’ in Learning Through Service (LTS) Versus’Mainstream’ Engineering Foundational Professional DocumentsDr. Nathan E. Canney, Dr. Canney’s research focuses on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsi- bility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seat- tle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering
Process Self-Study Assigned reading of human-centered design process along with completing quiz. Ethics 4 part YouTube series includes common design ethics scenarios, moral, professional, and ethical codes, and ethical frameworks.Design Reviewer RecruitmentConsistency is a challenge among 40 sections and conducting design reviews twice per semester,once at the midterm and once in the final weeks of the semester, are a mechanism to increaseconsistency that involves external reviewers. The design reviews also provide needed technicalrecommendations for the projects, as well as giving the student teams an opportunity to practiceprofessional skills. Design
thatwould directly impact the community and foster students’ appreciation for the relationshipbetween engineering and social responsibility.Fostering students’ “Base Skills,” a facet of the professional development realm related tosocially responsible engineering, as defined by Canney and Bielefeldt,1 aligns with the project’sconnection between technical abilities and resultant societal benefits. This connection is viewedas imperative for developing future engineers’ attitudes towards human-centered design and theirroles in society.2,3 Similarly, ABET calls for holistic skillsets that encompass both technicalskills and “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,” while the NationalAcademy of Engineering has emphasized the
andinstitutions—are positioned to “broaden the narrow technical focus” of engineeringeducation and see themselves as co-learners and co-teachers in project-focusedrelationships (Lucena 2015, p. 16). Further, when this form of collaboration isprivileged, then relationships no longer have as their focus a given project or deliverablebut rather those relationships endure and are nourished by their place in a broadernetwork to effect deeper and more systemic local, national, or international change.Socio-technical Project-based Learning Model and AssessmentAn engineering instructor should play an important role in leading students to view socialand ethical choices as vital parts of their future lives, both as professionals and ascitizens. Traditionally
engineering education, empathy is increasingly recognized as an important construct inpreparing engineers abilities to respond to 21st century challenges [23]–[25]. Empathy impactscommunication [26], design processes [27], professional success [28], ethics [29], and the overallculture of engineering [24]. In this paper, a framework of empathy developed within theneurosciences is adopted. Decety & Moriguchi [30] neuroscience approach to empathy hasestablished four components of empathy: affective sharing, self-awareness, emotion regulation,perspective taking & mental flexibility. Affective sharing means one can reflect upon the feelingsof another. Self-awareness allows one to distinguish the self from the experience of another.Perspective
Paper ID #23311Engagement in Practice: Tensions and Progressions of a Robotics Service-learning ProgramMr. Matthew Aruch, University of Maryland College Park Matthew Aruch is the Assistant Director of the Science Technology and Society Program and PhD candi- date in International Education Policy at the University of Maryland College Park.Dr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. David also does public
: an awareness of the stakeholders • Teamwork: an ability to function on multidisciplinary and diverse teams and an appreciation for the contributions from individuals from multiple disciplines • Communication: an ability to communicate effectively both orally and written with widely-varying backgrounds • Ethics: an awareness of professional ethics and responsibility • Social Context: an appreciation of the role that their discipline can play in social contextsABET outcomes that are difficult to meet in traditional classroom setting, in particular f – h, arean inherent part of student participation on EPICS teams. In addition, alumni surveys of EPICSparticipants have shown that students better understand how engineering
Paper ID #21174Engagement in Practice: Using Community Engagement to Teach DraftingSoftware to Civil Engineering StudentsDr. Nathan E Canney P.E., Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on struc- tural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the
engineering, mechanical design, engineering mechanics, engineering education, engineering ethics, tech- nology and society. He is a member of ASEE, ASME and SAE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: CAE Education via Service-LearningThe Call"To Seek to Learn is to Seek to Serve." This is our university’s motto [1]. It fits well with theintents and purposes of service-learning for students. Service-Learning has long been proven tobe an effective tool for engineering education [2], [3], [4]. In a National Academy of Engineering(NAE) report titled Educating the Engineer of 2020 - Adapting Engineering Education to theNew Century, service-learning is listed as one of six
to dissolve tomorrow's crisis... today. WhartonSchool Publishing.[10] Braun, W. (2002). The System Archetypes. In: Braun, W., The Systems Modeling Workbook[11] Sterman, J.D. (2000). Business Dynamics, Systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. Mc Graw Hill.[12] Leydens J A & Lucena J ( 2006 ) The Problem of knowledge in incorporating Humanitarian Ethics in EngineeringEducation: Barriers and Opportunities. Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual[13] Leydens J A & Lucena J (2014) Social justice A missing, unelaborated dimension in Humanitarian Engineering andLearning through Service – Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO,USA[14] Gobernación de Cundinamarca. (2016). Plan de Desarrollo Cundinamarca 2016-2020. Cundinamarca
and ethical issues 5 2 0 71% 7 0 1 88%Students learn that they are a contributing member of a community 3 3 2 38% 8 0 0 100%The personal transformation of students can lead to societal change 3 1 3 43% 4 0 4 50%Students are learning to use their professional work for social good 2 5 0 71% 6 1 1 75%Students are impacting their community as citizens 1 1 6 75% 3 0 5 63%Personal- TransactionalIt
need a different kind of engineer, one who has a long-term, systemicapproach to decision making, one who is guided by ethics, justice, equality and solidarity, andhas a holistic understanding that goes beyond his or her own field of specialisation” (Declarationof Barcelona 2005).The increased interest in and attention to engineers’ roles in sustainable development havecoincided with complementary initiatives in engineering degree programs, and sustainabledevelopment has made its way into engineering education curriculum in a variety of forms(Lucena and Schneider 2008). There is still a question of the most effective method throughwhich to introduce engineering students to sustainable development problems and approaches.Arguably, a method that
Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 268–275, 2016.[22] H. K. Evans and J. H. Clark, “‘You Tweet Like a Girl!’ How Female Candidates Campaign on Twitter,” American Politics Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 326–352, 2016.[23] H. Karbasian, H. Purohit, R. Handa, A. Malik, and A. Johri, “Real-Time Inference of User Types to Assist with more Inclusive and Diverse Social Media Activism Campaigns,” in Proceedings of the 1st AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, New Orleans, USA, 2018.[24] A. Johri, H. Karbasian, A. Malik, R. Handa, and H. Purohit, “How Diverse Users and Activities Trigger Connective Action via Social Media: Lessons from the Twitter Hashtag Campaign# ILookLikeAnEngineer,” in Proceedings of the