engineers of our profession.References[1] B. Jesiek, Y. Haller, and J. Thompson, “Developing Globally Competent EngineeringResearchers: Outcomes-Based Instructional and Assessment Strategies from the IREE 2010China Research Abroad Program”, Advances in Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 4, No. 1,2014.[2] U.S. Department of Education, “The Condition of Education 2019,” IES National Center forEducation Statistics, Report NCES 2019-144, May 2019.[3] A. Flores, M. H. Lopez, and J. M. Krogstad, “U.S. Hispanic population reached new high in2018, but growth has slowed” July 8, 2019, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/08/u-s-hispanic-population-reached-new-high-in-2018-but-growth-has-slowed/.[Accessed February 4, 2020].[4] V. MacDonald
. (2019). “What to Know as a First-Generation College Student,” USNews.com. Accessed July 15, 2019. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/articles/2019-05-14/what-you-should-kno w-as-a-first-generation-college-student[2] Cardella, M.E., Knight,D.B., Lee, W.C., Reid,K.W., Hynes,M.M., G.D. Collins, Beauchamp, Dandridge, T., Colquitt, D., (2019). “Promoting the Participation of Elementary School African Americans, Hispanics, and Girls in STEM by Expanding Summer Engineering Experiences” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc.,[3] Drummond, M., Cardella,M.E., Sydlik, M., Everett, M., (2019). “Developing Summer Research Programs at an NSF ERC: Activities, Assessment, and Adaptation”, ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc
staff position with ASCE. Up through November 2019, he continued to serve the engineering profession as a member of ABET’s Board of Delegates, Engineering Area Delegation, Global Council, and Gover- nance Committee and several of ASCE’s educational and professional committees. He remains an active member of the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Lessons Learned from the Implementation of Board Certification in the Medical ProfessionBackgroundFor over two decades, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) pursued its “Raise theBar (RTB)” initiative, for the purpose of better preparing civil engineers to attain
a Distinguished Member of ASCE and a Fellow of ASEE. In January 2014, Dr. Lenox retired from his staff position with ASCE. Up through November 2019, he continued to serve the engineering profession as a member of ABET’s Board of Delegates, Engineering Area Delegation, Global Council, and Gover- nance Committee and several of ASCE’s educational and professional committees. He remains an active member of the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Is it Time for ASCE to Withdraw from ABET?Purpose and ScopeOver the past few years, faced with persistent budget pressures, members of the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers (ASCE
staff. When reviewing accreditation criteria, the ACCE considers trends in construction technology as they relate to means and methods, societal and professional needs, and construction industry association recommendations and needs. [13]• Prior to 2019, the criteria review and revision process used by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) was largely “haphazard and ad hoc” [14]. But effective January 1, 2019, the AIA’s Standards for Continuing Education Programs [15] established a standardized review cycle of at least every two years. The Continuing Education Committee consists of nine AIA members and two representatives from AIA chapters and is responsible for reviewing and approving criteria revisions. AIA works
Engineering Education National Conference (125th ASEE- 2018), Paper ID #21771, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 24-27, 2018.[6] R. Zaurin, “Learning by Doing: Collaborative Active Learning Hands-On Project-Based Homework for a Large Gateway Engineering Class,” in Proceedings of the 126th American Association of Engineering Education National Conference (126th ASEE- 2019), Paper ID# 25095, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15 - 19, 2019.[7] R. Zaurin, “Investigating the Impact on Students' Engagement, Perception, and Success of Several Active Learning Strategies for a Large Gateway Engineering Course: Statics,” in Proceedings of the American Association of Engineering Education Southeastern Section Conference (ASEE-SE
of the survey results is included in Appendix D ofthe CEBOK3 [1] and in the 2019 ASEE paper, “Constituent Input in the Process of Developing the ThirdEdition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK3)” [12].There is no doubt that the surveys proved instrumental in development of the CEBOK3 and were criticalin both providing input and generating discussion among the committee members. However, theCEBOK3TC was fortunate to have two committee members who had extensive experience withdesigning and conducting surveys and providing the analysis for the committee. This was notdeliberately considered in the selection of committee members for CEBOK3TC. The authors recommendthat any future committees that may have extensive survey work
inalignment with the social pillar of sustainable design. However, classes rarely give students theopportunity to interact with communities to develop these listening skills. A small ethicallistening exercise was integrated into three civil engineering courses in fall 2019. Videos withstories from community members impacted by engineering were shown during class. The panelCommunity Engagement Ethics – First Steps in a Conversation with Affected Communities thatwas held at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference in2019 served as the main source of community voices. In a first-year Introduction to CivilEngineering course, discussion of the human-centered design process was supported bycomments from Lena Young-Green in
: It’s Really Not Very Hard” 2018 ASEEAnnual Conference and Proceedings, ASEE, Salt Lake City, June 24-27, 2018.2 ABET, Inc. “Visiting Programs Transitioning to C3 & C5” Webinar presented by Patsy Brackin Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, EAC Criteria Committee Past Chair and Bopaya Bidanda University ofPittsburgh Chair, EAC Training Committee. April 26, 2019, located at: https://www.abet.org/events-and-workshops/assessment-planning-resources/webinars/ (28 Jan 2020).3 ABET, Inc. “FAQs for EAC C3 & C5 Criteria Changes”. Engineering Accrediting Commission. October1, 2018 https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/FAQs-for-EAC-C3-C5-4-8-2019.pdf (28 Jan2020)4 ABET Inc. “Guidance for EAC Criteria 3 and 5 Changes” Engineering
response data indicates that studentscompleting the first-year course positively value the design and peer mentorship experience, andtheir STEM confidence, affinity towards math and science, and their sense of belongingimproves. Since the redesign in 2017, the first to second-year retention rate has increased from42% in 2016 to 57% in 2017, 70% in 2018, and 73% in 2019; and the first to third-year retentionrate has increased from 38% in 2016 to 50% in 2017 and 60% in 2018. In addition, the seniormentors feel that peer mentorship experience is an excellent addition to the curriculum andgained valuable insights while mentoring first-year students.IntroductionFreshman first-year experiences have been shown to impact student GPA [1] and retention [2
Braced Frame Analysis o Single Story Buildings: Grocery Store, Steel Warehouse o Multistory Buildings: AISC 3 Story Steel Building, 4 Story Building o Bracing Vs. Shear Wall Analysis Rigid Frame Analysis: 4 story Building – Unbraced Rigid FrameVI. AssessmentAssessments of the changes in the Structural Analysis, Structural Steel Design, and ReinforcedConcrete Design courses are being conducted using the Student Outcomes from the 2019-2020ABET Engineering Programs Criterion 3.10The student outcomes that are specifically assessed in the Structural Analysis course are asfollows: 1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of
. Effective for Reviews during the 2020-2021 Accreditation CycleIncorporates all changes approved by the ABET Board of Delegates Engineering AreaDelegation as of November 2, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/E001-20-21-EAC-Criteria-Mark-Up-11-24-19-Updated.pdfAssociation of American Colleges & Universities. (2009). Member Survey Findings. Retrievedfrom https://www.aacu.org/about/membership/surveytalkingpoints.https://www.aacu.org/leap/hipsAidoo, J., & Sipes, S. M., & Hanson, J. H., & Lovell, M. D. (2013, June), Capstone DesignAlumni Survey Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta,Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19283Brouwer, R., & Sykes, A., & VanderLeest, S. H
: Perceptions of Requirements and Impediments for Civil Engineering & Construction Disciplines, in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.7. Rose, A.T., et al., “The Spaghetti Factor” – A Peer Leadership Model for the “Sticking Together” of Untenured Faculty Prior to Their Tenure Decision, in 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2005: Portland, OR.8. Lipscomb, J.W., Acquiring Tenure In Engineering Technology, in 1999 ASEE Annual Conference. 1999: Charlotte, NC.9. Porter, J.R., R. Fink, and J. Ochoa, Balancing Tenure Requirements With Family Life: Perspectives From Three Tenure Track Faculty Members, in 2001 ASEE Annual Conference. 2001: Albuquerque, NM.10. Stalcup, A.M., The
develop and deliver flipped sections of undergraduate courses. She is a licensed professional engineer. She has attended several teaching workshops and received certificates from UConn CETL (Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning) and NETI (National Effective Teaching Institutes). Sarira is recipient of 2019 Distinguished Engineering Educator Award at the University of Connecticut, Winner of 2010 James D. Cooper Student Award at the International Bridge Conference, recipient of 2016, 2017, 2018 Klewin Excellence in teach- ing award and 2016 nominee for Mentorship Excellence Award from UConn office of undergraduates. American c Society for Engineering
Project-Based Study Abroad Programs in Developing Countries,” Presented at the 2008 ASABE AnnualInternational Meeting, Providence, RI, 2008.[14] S.S. Wu and Y.S. Park, “Effectiveness of High-Impact Practices (HIPS) in an EngineeringCourse,” Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[15] W. Zhan, J. Wang, and M. Vanajakumari, “High Impact Activities to Improve StudentLearning,” Presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[16] V.G. Gude, B.S. Magbanua, and J.L. Martin, “Student Perceptions of High-Impact LearningActivities and Teaching Strategies,” Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[17] T.S. Henderson, “Exploring the Post-graduation Benefits of High
– Opportunities and Challenges at University of North Georgia," Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. XL-1, pp. 377-380, 2014.[8] J. Sanson, "Drone use in the construction industry leads to integration into the current civil and construction engineering technology curriculum," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2019.[9] N. D. Opfer and D. R. Shields, "Unmanned aerial vehicle applications and issues for construction," presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[10] M. Kosmatin Fras and D. Grigillo, "Implementation of active teaching methods and emerging topics in photogrammetry and remote sensing
, “Sustainability Education: Approaches for Incorporating Sustainability into the Undergraduate Curriculum,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 102–106, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000049.[17] D. M. Riley, “Pushing the Boundaries of Mass and Energy: Sustainability and Social Justice Integration in Core Engineering Science Courses,” Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., p. 1, Jan. 2015.[18] S. Burnley, S. Wagland, and P. Longhurst, “Using life cycle assessment in environmental engineering education,” High. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 4, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1080/23752696.2019.1627672.[19] H. Murzi, A. Mazzurco, I. Pikaar, and B. Gibbes, “Measuring Development of Environmental Awareness and Moral Reasoning: A
focused topics that couldbe on the weekly quiz. Information presented in lecture was then primarily via lecture andboard writing, progressing through the study guide list. Through 2017, 2018 and 2019, all ofthe information presented in lectures was converted into PowerPoint slides, some of whichwere simply highlighted parts of the text or other references. The slides are made available tostudents through Blackboard. Also posted on Blackboard are listed of “Helpful Videos”,usually 4 or 5 per week that have been ‘discovered’ on YouTube, which present portions of theweek’s content. When appropriate, the students are asked to view a video prior to class, butonly a few ever seem to have the time to view these before class. Many do comment that
Engineering Education within the College of Engineering at the PennsylvaniaState University.References[1] M. W. Ohland, A. G. Yuhasz, and B. L. Sill, “Identifying and Removing a Calculus Prerequisite as a Bottleneck in Clemson’s General Engineering Curriculum,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 253–257, Jul. 2004.[2] J. J. Pembridge and M. A. Verleger, “First-year math and physics courses and their role in predicting academic success in subsequent courses,” in 120nd American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[3] E. Schott and C. Orndoff, “Engineering Prerequisites at Florida Universities,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[4] R. E. Efimba and T. R. Smith
, andPurpose.” The American Statistician, vol. 70:2, pp 129-133, 2016.[22] A. Hill and M. Nelson, “Application of the Project Management Body of Knowledge(PMBOK) in an Interdisciplinary Capstone: The AISC Steel Bridge Competition.” InternationalJournal of Engineering Management, vol. 3, pp 17-24, 2019.[23] J. Etringer, S. O’Brien, A. Updegraff, T. Langerhans, A. Nadjari, C. Kim, A. Hill, and M.Campbell, Analyzing Multidisciplinary Team Effectiveness in an Engineering Environment: ACase Study of the West Point Steel Bridge Team: Paper presented 2018 at the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference at The University of Texas at Austin.
2018 ASEE Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration. August, 2018, SanAntonio, TX. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31342[8] Brookhart, S. M. "Appropriate criteria: key to effective rubrics." In Frontiers in Education,vol. 3, p. 22, 2018. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00022[9] Barrella, E., & Cowan, C. M., & Girdner, J. D., & Watson, M. K., & Anderson, R. “StudentExperience and Learning with a Formative Sustainable Design Rubric.” In Proceedings of 2019ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019. [ONLINE] Available:https://peer.asee.org/33293
Massed Than Spaced Inductive Learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016;42(6):978-984. doi:10.1037/xlm000021612. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded Edition). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2006. doi:10.17226/985313. Mirth JA. A specifications-based approach for the design and delivery of a statics/dynamics course. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Tampa, FL: American Society for Engineering Education; 2019. https://peer.asee.org/31998.14. Felder RM, Brent R. Teaching and Learning STEM. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2016.15. Butler AC, Marsh EJ. Integrating Cognitive Science and Technology Improves
courses heavily focus on gravity systems’ analysis and design. All students were 4th yearstanding in 5-year program. None of the students in either offering had taken either classespreviously and all were architectural engineering majors with a structural focus. Also, the sameset of students were mandated to take both classes in their 4th year. As such, the student populationis identical from one class to the next which allowed for identical teams in both semesters. Thisresearch study has had two deployed iterations, the first was in the 2017-2018 academic year whilethe second was in the 2018-2019 academic year. The evaluation included student survey data ontheir experiences that was correlated to assessment grades.Course Structure CompositionThe
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020Using Case Studies and Educational Technology to Teach Structural Analysis and Designto Construction Engineering and Management UndergraduatesAbstractDuring the Fall 2019 semester, 19 construction engineering and management undergraduatestudents were enrolled in one four-credit course that combined structural analysis and design,which has typically been taught as two separate courses for civil engineering students. To engagethe students and increase subject mastery, case studies and MasteringEngineering™ are used.The main objective of this study is to examine relationships of student learning when analyzingand calculating design loads on structural members
Paper ID #28724Building Bridges – Spanning the gap between the classroom andprofessional practiceCol. Brad Wambeke P.E., United States Military Academy Colonel Brad Wambeke is the Civil Engineering Division Director at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from South Dakota State University; M.S. from the University of Min- nesota; and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. He is a member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His primary research interests include construction engineering, lean construction, and engineering education. c
and the component of theclass, students have credited highest for assisting their learning. In terms of computational tools,until Spring 2019, students were using Excel but because of limitations with using Excel duringexams, they were also instructed on using calculators and statistical tables on paper, for theirexams. This created student resistance to use of Excel, with students complaining that they couldnot see why they were made to use Excel, when their exams required only a calculator and tableson paper. Therefore, one motivation behind the project implementation was to lead the studentsinto discovering the value of computational tools. The project also created an appropriate carrierto transition to a more powerful for statistical
Engineering. Upon completing multidisciplinary PhD on Structural Health Monitoring Using Computer Vision, he joined UCF in 2010 as a Lecturer at the Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering (CECE) Depart- ment. He has published computer vision related research work in prominent journals and still mentors graduate students in this particular area. Dr. Zaurin has been very active in the STEM area as he is one of the selected faculty members for the NSF funded EXCEL and NSF funded COMPASS programs at UCF. Dr. Zaurin received College Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award in 2015 and 2019, TIP Award in 2016, and also received 4 Golden Apple Awards for Undergraduate Teaching for a record four years in a row
component implemented to address this isa reference structure interleaved into course content throughout the semester. This referencestructure is the bridging connection between each component of the class which allows for avariety of approaches to appeal to different learning styles, and is integrated through a dualapproach in assignments. Assessment has included 6 years of anonymous student survey resultsand direct feedback from a survey distributed to alumni graduating in 1998 through 2019, allshowing positive learning experiences through the course. The method of interleaving thereference structure throughout the class is presented. The general concept could be implementedto varying degrees in many other courses.IntroductionDesign courses in
, 2007. 4. C.A. Prado da Silva Jr, H.B. Fontenele, & A.N. Rodrigues da Silva, Transportation engineering education for undergraduate students: Competencies, skills, teaching-learning, and evaluation. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(3), 2014 05014006.5. A. Karabulut-Ilgu, S. Yao, P.T. Savolainen, C.T. Jahren, A Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Transportation Engineering. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.6. A. Kondyli, M. McVey, and C.P. Melgares, Assessment of Active and Team-based Learning Techniques in a Transportation Engineering Introductory Course. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
the foundation stones of an arch, the new courses are called “Springers”because they serve as the foundations of the transformed curriculum. Through a project-basedlearning approach, Springer courses mimic the senior capstone experience by immersing studentsin a semester-long practical application of civil engineering , exposing them to concepts andtools in a way that challenges students to develop new knowledge that they will build on and useduring their junior and senior years. In the 2019 spring semester, a pilot of the first Springercourse introduced students to three civil engineering sub-disciplines: construction management,water resources, and transportation. The remaining sub-disciplines are covered in a follow-onSpringer 2 pilot. The