. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, 2005.[12] D. Breid, “Replacing Cheating with Metacognition – Reevaluating the Pedagogical Role of Homework in Foundational Engineering Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Jan. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/replacing-cheating-with-metacognition-reevaluating-the-pedagogical- role-of-homework-in-foundational-engineering-courses.[13] J. A. Mirth, “A Specifications-Based Approach for the Design and Delivery of a Statics/Dynamics Course,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Jan. 25, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a- specifications-based
Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[6] M. Basitere and E. N. Ivala, "An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the use of Multimedia and Wiley Plus Web-Based Homework System in Enhancing Learning in The Chemical Engineering Extended Curriculum Program Physics Course," The Electronic Journal of e- Learning, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 156-173, 2017.[7] J. L. Davis and T. McDonald, "Students – Ask Them to Eat Their Vegetables!," in ASEE Annaul Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[8] J. L. Davis, T. McDonald and J. Kloosterman, "Students – Ask Them to Eat Their Steaks!," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[9] W. A. Friess and M. P. Davis, "Formative homework assessment strategies to promote
(Full Paper)Improving student accessibility, equity, course performance, and lab skills:How introduction of ClassTranscribe is changing engineering education at theUniversity of IllinoisAbstractThis paper presents three case studies that examined the use of ClassTranscribe in a diverse setof undergraduate engineering classes in 2019 and 2020 at the University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign. ClassTranscribe, a video viewing system designed with accessibility andlearning in mind, was first presented to the ASEE community in 2019 [1]. The pedagogicalfeatures of the tool include: pause, leave and resume viewing; captions available in multiplelanguages; downloadable transcriptions; shareable links to video moments; and searchablecontent within
number of national leadership positions in the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN), having served in the latter organization as national president (2009-2010). In recognition of her outstand- ing contributions to those organizations, Dr. Martin won the WEPAN distinguished service award in 2012 and founders award in 2019. She was inducted as a Fellow of ASEE in 2019. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 What no one tells you about writing a CAREER proposal: Advice from a former program NSF officerAbstractThis paper is designed as a resource for anyone
., & Schmitz, C. D., & Fagen-Ulmschneider, W. (2019, June), Adoption of an Online Queue App for Higher Education: A Case Study Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32042AppendixQueue adopter survey questions 1. What is your affiliation (department or office)? 2. How do you use the Queue? 1. Office hours 2. Advising 3. In-class activities 4. Other, please specify:Queue in Office Hours3. How many students are in your course? 1. Fill in 2. N/A4. If you use the Queue in a course, how many instructors are involved? 1. Faculty 2. Graduate TAs 3. Undergraduate TAs
., MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2007.[3] S. Bante, and E. Hilton, and K. Talley, and K. Shryock, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “Board 65: Changing Homework Achievement with Mechanix Pedagogy,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32398[4] B. Williford, and M. Runyon, and J. Cherian, and W. Li, and J. Linsey, and T. Hammond, “A Framework for Motivating Sketching Practice with Sketch-based Gameplay,” in Chi Play ’19, Barcelona, Spain, October 22-25, 2019. doi: 10.1145/3311350.3347175.[5] R. Brooks, and J. Koh, and S. Polsley, and T. Hammond, “Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment
to achieve academic honesty among all students. She was the 2018-2019 Chancellor’s Scholar-in-Residence, responsible for organizing faculty development workshops and developing protocols to enhance teaching across disciplines, focusing in particular on the teaching of professional writing across disciplines and prevention of academic dishonesty.Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamen- tals of
and they have no resale value. Eachcourse implements the workbooks in different ways with different content to fit their particularcourse structure or instructional style. These different implementations are discussed below.Computer Applications Course The Computer Applications course at The Citadel is typically taken during sophomoreyear and focuses on teaching students computer-aided design (CAD) using SolidWorks.Workbooks were implemented into this course for the first time in Fall 2019 and is the first in-major course in the Mechanical Engineering curriculum in which students utilize a courseworkbook. This course was transitioned to a flipped classroom in Fall 2016 and the requirementfor a course textbook was removed in Fall 2017
Results on an Innovative Homework Process,” p. 10.[11] A. Badir and R. O’Neill, “Homework Graded by Students,” in ASEE Conf. Proc., Jun. 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28440.[12] Derek Breid, “Replacing Cheating with Metacognition – Reevaluating the Pedagogical Role of Homework in Foundational Engineering Courses,” Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33237.[13] D. G. Kay, “Large introductory computer science classes: strategies for effective course management,” ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 131–134, 1998.[14] P. G. Sokolove and G. Marbach-Ad, “The Benefits of Out-of-Class Group Study for Improving Student Performance on Exams: A Comparison of Outcomes in Active-Learning and
engagement in the learning process, theinstructor decided in summer 2019 to embed weekly CIQs in the course. Her initial thought was,the CIQs would encourage students to reflect on their learning while informing the instructorabout the students’ learning experiences. The data collected by the instructor indicated studentsbiggest frustration was with 1) the first site visit report (course assignment requiring that theyapply sustainability evaluation on a real site), and 2) with the amount of new knowledge theyacquired.The CIQ was offered as an integrated part of a five-week long online course, offered to studentsfrom three majors: construction management, architecture, and agricultural engineering. Studentscompleted the CIQ each Friday. Qualitative
director of the Translational Biomechanics Laboratory where his research applies approaches from mechanical testing, image analysis, mathematical and computational modeling, and device design to solve problems related to female pelvic health. He has secured funding from the NIH, DOD, NSF, and other sources to support these efforts. He is also co-director of 2 NSF sponsored programs focused on the success of underrepresented minorities and a national award winner (BMES 2019) for his work in diversity and inclusion.Dr. SYLVANUS N. WOSU, University of Pittsburgh Sylvanus Wosu is the Associate Dean for Diversity Affairs and Associate Professor of mechanical engi- neering and materials science at the University of Pittsburgh
engagement of all students enrolled in our seminar.References[1] R. M. Lima, P. H. Andersson, and E. Saalman, Active Learning in Engineering Education: a (re) introduction. Taylor & Francis, 2017.[2] D. Schon, “The reflective practitioner,” 1983.[3] J. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integrating reflection into engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2014, vol. 35, p. 64.[4] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer,” Australasian journal of engineering education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 2–16, 2003.[5] R. Dimeo, “Sketchnoting: an analog skill in the digital age,” ACM SIGCAS Computers