Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mariana Silva, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Eric G. Shaffer, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nicolas Nytko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

: Gender differences and interactive effects of students’ motivation, goals, and self-efficacy on performance,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ser. ICER ’16. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, p. 211–220. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960329 [2] B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock, “Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors,” SIGCSE Bull., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 184–188, Feb. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/366413.364581 [3] D. Zingaro, M. Craig, L. Porter, B. A. Becker, Y. Cao, P. Conrad, D. Cukierman, A. Hellas, D. Loksa, and N. Thota, “Achievement goals

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Claire Duggan, Northeastern University; Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University; Nicolas Leo Fuchs, Northeastern University; Emily Chernich; Brittany Fung, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

our grade stepped up to the challenges andencouraged each other. A few of the students chatted about attending a college similar toNortheastern University!”.Students provided their own feedback and upon subsequent analysis, several themes emergedincluding self-efficacy, fun, friendship and an awareness that engineering benefits society:“I liked the wind turbine activity because I felt like a scientist.”“I liked the windmill because it was a really cool experiment.”“I liked making the windmills with my friends.”“I liked the windmills because it makes energy for cities and countries.”Discussion and ConclusionsAlthough Northeastern University’s Center for STEM Education has been offering STEM fieldtrips for the past 10 years at no cost to

Conference Session

Improvements in ECE Circuit Analysis

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kun Yao, University of Georgia; Adel W. Al Weshah, University of Georgia; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

to understand how to promotemetacognitive thinking within engineering pedagogy. In future research effort, wewill also explore how to incorporate generative learning activities (e.g.self-explanation, mapping and peer teaching (Fiorella & Mayer, 2016) withinengineering to promote critical thinking and meta-cognitive thinking in engineeringstudent.Lastly, further research is needed to explore why students exude confidence inresponses that were not based on sound reasoning. It will be interesting to know howsuch self-confidence is associated with self-efficacy, ability to use constructivefeedback and to adopt strategic learning skills.ReferencesBormanaki, H.B., Y.J. Khoshhal, and Research. The role of equilibration in Piaget’s theory

Conference Session

Student Learning Assessment Methods

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Kai Jin, Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Criteria & Supporting Documents.https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/ (accessed on 12/01/2019)[2] Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Economy, D. R., & Kennedy, M. S. (2016).Measuring undergraduate students' engineering self‐efficacy: A validation study. Journal ofEngineering Education, 105(2), 366-395.[3] Newberry, B., Austin, K., Lawson, W., Gorsuch, G., & Darwin, T. (2011). Acclimatinginternational graduate students to professional engineering ethics. Science and engineeringethics, 17(1), 171-194.[4] Li, H., Jin, K., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A Curriculum Innovation Framework to IntegrateManufacturing related Materials and Quality Control Standards into Different Level EngineeringEducation. The 2018 Annual

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cassondra Wallwey, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, “Teacher and Student Attitudes Toward Teacher Feedback,” RELC J., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 38–52, 2007.[4] E. Ekholm, S. Zumbrunn, and S. Conklin, “The relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: writing feedback perceptions as a mediating variable,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 197–207, 2015.[5] R. Yoshida, “Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types,” Lang. Aware., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 78–93, 2008.[6] O. H. A. Mahfoodh and A. Pandian, “A Qualitative Case Study of EFL Students’ Affective Reactions to and Perceptions of Their Teachers’ Written Feedback,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 14–25, 2011.[7] T. Ryan and M

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Marcia A. Mardis, Florida State University; Faye R. Jones, Florida State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

capital in rural development, networking and decision-making in rural areas," Journal of Alpine Research, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 43-56, 2007.[27] C. C. Chen, P. G. Greene, and A. Crick, "Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?," Journal of Business Venturing vol. 13, pp. 295-316, 1998.[28] J. Cheng, "Intrapreneurship and exopreneurship in manufacturing firms: An empirical study of performance implications," Journal of Enterprising Culture, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 153-171, 2001.[29] E. J. Douglas and J. R. Fitzsimmons, "Intrapreneurial intentions vs.entrepreneurial intentions: Distinct constructs with different antecedents," Small Business Economics, vol. 41, no. 1

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Service and Outreach Projects

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University; Francisco Cima, Old Dominion University ; Jennifer Jill Kidd, Old Dominion University; Stacie I. Ringleb, Old Dominion University; Orlando M. Ayala, Old Dominion University; Kristie Gutierrez, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

research provides insight into this issue through partnerships between PSTs andUESs and faculty. In the Paired Peer Mentors project (Fogg-Rogers et al., 2017), pairs of PSTsand engineering students presented engineering design challenges to primary school children.Both groups of college students showed sizable gains in teaching engineering self-efficacy andsubject knowledge confidence after the project. In a study exploring a similar partnership model,PSTs and engineering students collaboratively planned robotics activities for early childhoodstudents using LEGO WeDo robots (Bers & Portsmore, 2005). PSTs used robotics to helpelementary students explore concepts in math and science supported by engineering studentpeers. Although these studies

Conference Session

Degree Pathways and Cocurricular Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joanna Mirecki Millunchick, University of Michigan; Yixian Zhou

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

scorestend to increase with increasing frequency of participation. Nevertheless, we see no statisticallysignificant differences between the regular, super, and selective groups for most of the outcomes,suggesting that the highly active or officer level involvement isn’t related to gains in outcomescompared to more moderate (regular, non-officer). The only outcome for which this is not true isGPA, which is doesn’t change significantly between different clusters of participants.IntroductionIt is well established that participation in co-curricular experiences in college has significantimpact on student outcomes.[1], [2] It has been shown that co-curricular activities that are relatedto the academic endeavor are positively related to self-efficacy in

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mia Minnes, University of California, San Diego; Sheena Ghanbari Serslev, University of California, San Diego ; Madison Edwards

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

[school anonymized for publication] change as a result of your internship? How will yourexperiences this summer shape your approach to next quarter and beyond?” at the end of their internship.This mixed-methods approach helps us track students’ motivations, perspectives, and plans for action andsituates their internship as an integral part of their CSE undergraduate education.B. Background 1) The role of motivation in learning: Motivation is critical to learning and leads one to pursueand continue to pursue an objective [1, Part II]. Importantly, motivation is believed to be an emergentphenomenon, meaning it can develop over time and be updated based on new experiences. As described in[2], self-efficacy theory [3] and situational interest

Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2019 Best PIC, Zone, and Diversity Papers Live Q&A

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alexander John De Rosa, Stevens Institute of Technology; Maxine Fontaine, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

2019 Best Zone & PIC Papers

dramatically by the end of the semester, closing the gap in spatialability initially observed between women and men at the start of the semester.Students who did not attend the workshop also showed significant increases in their test scoreshowever. This result indicates that completing the graphics course yielded similar improvementsin spatial skills as completing the workshop. The question then arises, what advantage does theworkshop provide over the engineering graphics course? If significant improvements in spatialability can be made after a 4-week workshop session, in comparison to a 14-week graphics course,that could have a positive outcome in student self-efficacy and potentially stronger learningoutcomes in the graphics course overall. This

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 10: STEM Outreach

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Afrin Naz, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Mingyu Lu, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Chase Broyles, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Isabel Barrio Sanchez, West Virginia University Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

have designed variousinstruments to collect data throughout this project, as elucidated below. Female middle school andhigh school students’ intention to pursue STEM careers is being assessed using Social CognitiveCareer Theory. The model of Social Cognitive Career Theory accounts for the development andinfluence of students’ self-efficacy, expected outcomes, and interests in STEM professions.Parents respond to surveys before this project and after they attend the “Family STEM Night.”Success will be indicated by positive changes in parents’ conceptions toward STEM across time.According to the feedback we have collected, most of the participating female students findrobotics interesting, and most the participating female students respond that

Conference Session

ET Curriculum and Programs I

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Christine Michelle Delahanty, Bucks County Community College ; Vladimir Genis, Drexel University; Susan Herring, Bucks County Community College; Tracy A. Timby, Bucks County Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Paper ID #29358Enhancing Workforce Readiness of Engineering TechniciansProf. Christine Michelle Delahanty, Bucks County Community College I am the Area Coordinator of Science and Engineering, the Program Coordinator for Engineering and Engineering Technology, and Associate Professor of Engineering and Physics at Bucks County Commu- nity College (Bucks). I hold an Ed. D degree from Drexel University in Educational Leadership and Management, with a concentration in creativity and innovation. My dissertation is entitled: Creative Self- Efficacy of Undergraduate Women Engineering Majors: A Mixed Methods Study. I hold B.S

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Diversity 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicholas A. Bowman, University of Iowa; Lindsay Jarratt, University of Iowa; KC Culver, University of Southern California; Alberto Segre, University of Iowa

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

during group work andcollaborative learning [26], [27], but the lack of negative results among both US and non-UScitizens is notable. An interesting question that these results do not address is whether cross-national interactions led to any overall declines in non-US citizens’ self-efficacy or self-confidence about their CS knowledge and skills (as opposed to comparisons with one’s partner).With the exception of driving role, the lack of effects of partners’ national origin among UScitizens is also noteworthy. Any linguistic or cultural challenges that US citizens encounteredmay been balanced out by the benefits of potentially different perspectives that non-US citizensbrought to these collaborations. It is also possible that the work of

Conference Session

Improving Student Outcomes in Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer E. Holte, University of St. Thomas; Ryan J. Endres, University of St. Thomas; Deborah Besser P.E., University of St. Thomas; Doug Dunston, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

learning andconcludes that even brief activities introduced into the lecture can increase learning. The entirecourse need not be project-based. Simply adding discussions can have a positive impact onstudents’ intrinsic motivation [19]. If we use Bonwell and Eison’s [20] definition of activelearning as “anything that involves students doing things and thinking about the things they aredoing,” the possibilities are vast. Nie and Lau [1] found adding small activities that encouragestudents to explore in-depth, analyze, discuss, write, apply, or question increased students’ deepprocessing strategies and increased self-efficacy. Felder and Silverman [21] also conclude that asmall number of techniques such as alternating lecture with pauses for

Conference Session

Design Teams 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eltahry Elghandour, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eileen W. Rossman P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Sarah Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

approaches is addressed in question 1,the emotional state of the students during teaming. Table 1 shows that students in the twocohorts experienced similar emotional states during teaming, with the exception of their self-efficacy: 50% more of the students in the student-teamed cohort felt happy that they had somecontrol of the process. This is the only statistically significant difference in the question 1responses, and indicates that the student-formed teaming process resulted in the students feelingmore agency, while not significantly increasing anxiety. Table 1: Team-Forming Survey Results for Question 1 (Emotional State During Teaming) Student-formed Faculty-formed Very stressed

Conference Session

Maker Spaces in Design Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chieloka Mbaezue, Stanford University; Eric Reynolds Brubaker, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Paper ID #31145Understanding a Makerspace as a Community of PracticeChieloka Mbaezue, Stanford University Chieloka Mbaezue is a senior in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University conducting research to understand how learning happens in makerspaces. Through research, he desires to understand the mechanisms of learning in community in order to democratize the experience of self-efficacy experienced in makerspaces. He hopes to apply his gained understanding to the product development industry in African countries and in the United States, particularly in black communities.Eric Reynolds Brubaker, Stanford University

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sine Celik, Aalto University; Senni Kirjavainen, Aalto University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

problemsolving approaches and methods often linked to design thinking in a series of paneldiscussions, workshops and assignments. Previous research has demonstrated that betterlearning outcomes of sustainability related challenges are reached when multi-methodlearning experiences are produced [20]. Additionally, problem-based design challenges andteaching have been connected to increase awareness of societal issues, entrepreneurialintentions and innovation self-efficacy amongst engineering students [11,20,51], highlightingthe benefits of generatively applying knowledge within courses. Overall, the students abilityto implement the measured sub-themes of sustainability, ethics and collaboration in seven outof the nine sub themes improved statistically

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 1: Best Practices in Engineering Math Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

JaCoya Thompson, Northwestern University ; Sally P.W. Wu, Northwestern University; Jacob Mills, Evanston Township High School

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

self-efficacy and problem solving. Instructional Science, 45(5), 583–602.[27.] Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2016). Supporting students in making sense of connections and in becoming perceptually fluent in making connections among multiple graphical representations. Journal of Educational Psychology.[28.] Satyanarayana, Ashwin. 2013.Software tools for teaching undergraduate data mining course. Smerican Society of Engineering Education Mid- Atlantic Fall Conference.[29.] Sfard, A. and Leron, U. (1996). Just give me a computer and I will move the earth: Programming as a catalyst of a cultural revolution in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning[30.] Sherin

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Skills Development Across the Undergraduate-to-Workforce Transition

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University; Travis Gehr; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; John Jongho Park, Pennsylvania State University; Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

, 2018.Park, J., Lang, D.H., Handley, M.H., & Erdman, A.M. (2019) Developing undergraduates’ self- efficacy for engineering leadership: relations among leadership attributes, teamwork skills, and creativity. Conference Paper and Presentation: American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada, 2019.Powell, K. S., & Yalcin, S. (2010). Managerial training effectiveness: A meta-analysis 1952– 2002. Personnel Review, 39, 227–241.Reyes, D.L., Dinh, J, Lacerenza, C.N., Marlow, S.L., Joseph, D.L., and Salas, E. (2019) The state of higher education leadership development program evaluation: A meta-analysis, critical review, and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly Vol. 30(5

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development (ATE)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Jyhwen Wang, Texas A&M University; DeDe Griffith, Northwest Louisiana Technical Community College; Cheri Greer, Northwest Louisiana Technical Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Taking guidelines for good evaluation plans [19], the formative andsummative evaluation plan utilizes a comprehensive and widely used CIPP (Context, Input,Process, Product Evaluation) model [20]. Given the relatively small sample size, statisticalanalysis is expected to be largely descriptive, both aggregate and by subgroup, to report onproject implementation and progress toward performance measures. T-tests will be used todetermine significant differences in teachers’ self-efficacy survey responses from pre- to post-test. Qualitative data collected through interviews, product review, and observation, will beanalyzed throughout the project. The outcomes that are being evaluated are briefly outlined:  Institution Outcomes: To strengthen a

Conference Session

Student Experiences with Undergraduate Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wookwon Lee P.E., Gannon University; Nicholas B. Conklin, Gannon University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

is also regarded as acomplex repository of knowledge and skills for planning, implementing, monitoring, evaluating,and continually improving the learning process. Self-regulated learning has been studied over morethan two decades in general classroom settings and various assessment methods exist in theliterature. It is commonly agreed that self-regulation is a good predictor of student’s academicsuccess. For instance, relationships were examined in [1] among motivational orientation, self-regulated learning, and classroom academic performance, and their regression analyses revealedthat self-regulation, self-efficacy, and test anxiety emerged as the best predictors of performance. In recent years, studies on SRL have been extended to

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: First-year Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce Oestreich, Rowan University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, First-Year Programs

three broad learning domains –affective (i.e., self-efficacy), thinking patterns (i.e., developing connections in the pursuit ofvalue creation), and content knowledge/skills [14]. Included in EML content knowledge/skillscan be design iteration and prototyping, which is the assessment focus of this paper and is anelement not seen in many of other first-year engineering design projects that harnesses EML.In the College of Engineering at Rowan University, we set out to foster EM in our first-yearengineering students by transforming a project that leverages Universal Design Principles as aframework for creating toys for children to include EM-related outcomes inspired by KEEN’sthree tenets: Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value (the 3Cs). In

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madeline Nelson, University of San Diego; Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego; Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

surveywas adapted from an energy literacy survey created by Dr. Jan DeWaters that has been used inmultiple contexts, including both K-12 and higher education [17], [18]. Her original survey wasdesigned to gauge energy literacy which encompasses students’ energy-related knowledge,attitudes, and intentions/behaviors [17]. The original survey examined four categories relating tostudents’ understanding of energy: cognitive, affective, self-efficacy, and behavior. The studentsscored lowest on the cognitive questions, but they were aware of many of the issues surroundingenergy and the need for conservation. We selected a total of 43 questions that focused on threeprimary areas: students’ interest in energy topics, students’ pre-existing factual knowledge

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

;Cohen, 2007). Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) indicate that social support can mitigate thesechilling effects. Further, Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) cited mentoring and cross-groupfriendships (so forming friendships with those in the other group – between genders or betweenethnicities/races, e.g.) as forms of social support that they found to have such a mitigatingeffect. Therefore, the proposed student tutoring and resource center is also planned to providesome social events to encourage student friendships, such as these important cross-groupfriendships in addition to the natural mentoring that can develop through tutoring.Belonging has been tied to self-efficacy and engagement, which also are tied to positive careeroutcomes (aka persistence in

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer L. Kouo, Towson University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Bruk T. Berhane, Florida International University; Jumoke 'Kemi' Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University; Kenneth Reid, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cheryl Beauchamp, Regent University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

in my ability to deliver the E4USA content to students. Discussion and Implications The goal of the E4USA project is to promote engineering ‘for all’, which includes bothstudents and educators. The literature shows that educators with greater content knowledgedemonstrate greater comfort with PD in engineering as a discipline. This is not surprisingbecause developing PD for educators with content knowledge allows the developers of that PDto focus on discipline-specific content. Involving educators with little to no experience inengineering introduces issues of lower self-efficacy and differing level of empathy to studentswho will be in their classrooms. Educators with less experience were more

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lina Battestilli, North Carolina State University; Sarah Korkes, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

variablespredefined. The second row shows Q5 Analyze-type questions for the treatment group and thecorresponding Q5 Create-type question for the control group.End-of-Lab SurveyAfter completing the auto-graded exercises, the students completed a survey, which was writtenusing validated questions from 24,25 . We asked the students self-efficacy questions and questionsabout their perception of the auto-graded exercises. Example Exercises Converted to Create-Type Q1: APPLY-type Q5: ANALYZE-type Table 3: Types of Auto-Graded ExercisesResultsLearning Efficiency (RQ1)Figure 2a shows differences in the number of attempts on each question between the two groupsthrough box-and-whisker plots with some outliers

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 4: Tips and Tools

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Randy Hugh Brooks, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Sketchtivity application will focus on self-efficacy of engineering students intheir sketching capabilities in support of enhancing their ability to share their thoughts and ideasin an unstructured sketching environment. The PhET deployment is targeted to evaluate theimpact of providing visual interpretations of physics concepts. The results will be in the form ofstudent self-evaluations and instructor observations in regard to the impact of these tools onstudent learning.BackgroundTwo existing challenges of the engineering educational process targeted by ITS products are:  Students do not receive timely feedback on voluminous and complex practice work.  Student understanding of concepts is improved through timely viewing of a visual model

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Learning 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Héctor Enrique Rodríguez-Simmonds, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Tara C. Langus, University of Nevada, Reno; Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Justin Charles Major, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Pomeranz, and Douglas G. Schmucker. “The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self-and peer evaluation.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11, no. 4 pp. 609-630, 2012.[11] S.P. Schaffer et al., “Self-Efficacy for Cross-Disciplinary Learning in Project-Based Teams,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 82–94, 2012.[12] ABET, “Accreditation Changes,” abet.org, 2019. [Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-changes/. [Accessed: June 27, 2019].[13] K. J. Cross, “The Experiences of African-American Males on Multiracial Student Teams in Engineering,” PhD. thesis

Conference Session

Manufacturing Education Curriculum

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wayne P. Hung, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Shelly Tornquist, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

significantly increase their self-efficacy in STEM teaching, their own interest /attitudes toward science, and their understandingof inquiry-based STEM instruction. Similar findings were reported by other educators [5, 8, 9].School programs with hands-on and manufacturing focuses –as compared to academicmathematics or pure science– would be attractive to students since they can relate the training toeveryday examples, potential employment, and even advanced careers. Some middle /highschools, however, limit the growth of their technology-related programs, robotics clubs, orSkillsUSA programs due to budget constraints and/or lack of technical expertise of teachers. Itwould be necessary to reverse the trend by providing infrastructure and manufacturing

Conference Session

Designing and Implementing Leadership Development Experiences for Engineering Students

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Molly H. Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Joe Bradley, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

. (2010). Engineering leadership development programs: A look at what isneeded and what is being done. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3).[10] Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., & Adams, S. G. (2010). Developing leadership skills of undergraduateengineering students: Perspectives from engineering faculty. Journal of STEM Education:Innovations and Research, 11(3).[11] Knight, David B., and Brian J. Novoselich. "Curricular and co‐curricular influences onundergraduate engineering student leadership." Journal of Engineering Education 106.1 (2017):44–70.[12] Schell, et al. “Exploring the relationship between students’ engineering identity andleadership self-efficacy. 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2019. Tampa, FL.Paper