Page 14.713.2intelligences to answer this question.Thirty volunteers (five female, twenty five male) answered MI and VAK tests in our ElectricalEngineering department. Subjects were international first semester engineering graduate studentsin ELEG 443-Digital Signal Processing. The age range of the group is between 23 and 25 yearsold. The MI test includes 40 questions, and the VAK test includes 30 questions, each designed tofind our graduate (Master degree) students’ strongest thinking and learning preferences. SeeAppendix A and B for MI test and VAK test questions. The MI test was used for finding thethinking styles and the VAK test was used for finding the learning styles. Thinking and learningstyles show individual differences in academic
AC 2009-693: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE ELEMENTARY-SCHOOLEXPERIENCES, INFLUENCES, SKILLS, AND TRAITS OF TALENTEDENGINEERSMichele Strutz, Purdue University Michele L. Strutz is a doctoral student in educational psychology in Gifted and Talented Education with a specialization in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Michele completed Masters Degrees in both Gifted and Talented Education and in Curriculum and Instruction. Prior to her studies in Education, Michele worked in Marketing at Hewlett Packard, in Computer Systems Design at Arthur Andersen, and in Engineering Sulfuric Acid Plants at Monsanto. Her years of work in the high-tech field stemmed from her undergraduate degrees in
fixed cars, Daisy thought an engineer wasactually an engine, and Paula thought engineers designed, drew, and made/built things. After theengagement, the students had more informed, accurate perceptions. Thus, the assertions made inthis study are supported by the construct that learning takes place in a context4. In this study,student learning was situated within a context that teachers provided through authenticengineering learning activities. As the data indicated, students developed new skills and gainednew knowledge and understanding of engineering and, in some cases, even mastered andtransferred their learning to new situations. This work reinforces the link between the idea oflearning being situated and the need for authentic learning
AC 2009-303: PROJECT MANAGERS, ARCHITECTS, AND ENGINEERS--OHMY! AN INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONDavid Lambert, Arup David Lambert obtained both his masters and undergraduate degrees in Architectural Engineering from California Polytechnic State University. He is currently a structural engineer for Arup in Los AngelesAllen Estes, California Polytechnic State University Allen C. Estes is a Professor and Head for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Until January 2007, Dr. Estes was the Director of the Civil Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy (USMA). He is a registered Professional Engineer in
and time of incident; and ≠ Other relevant information.Cleanup ResponsibilityIndustries that are responsible for oil spills must take immediate action to contain the spill andquickly start the cleanup operations. When a spill occurs, an area co-coordinator (AC) isappointed by Malaysia’s Harbor Master of the Assistant Port Officer who carries out a promptinvestigation of the oil spill incident and forwards the investigation report to the Director ofEnvironment. After notifying the Regional Council or the Department of Environment, thecompany actuates the local/industry Tier 1 contingency plan. If the person in charge assesses thescope as beyond their capability and seeks support, the regional on-scene commander (ROSC)appointed by DOE
11.1037.7 o Licensing Committee of CAP^3• The committee regularly updated its draft Accreditation Master Plan to incorporate those changes needed in response to a changing environment. The Accreditation Master Plan lays out in detail how the committee will work to publish approved criteria in the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC)/ABET document titled Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs (effective for evaluations conducted during the 2008-2009 accreditation cycle) that fulfill the formal educational requirements for entry into the professional practice of civil engineering (i.e., licensure) as specified in the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century.• The committee conducted a
Engineering Education.Stephen Tricamo, New Jersey Institute of Technology STEPHEN J. TRICAMO is professor of industrial and manufacturing engineering, and former dean of engineering and technology, New Jersey Institute of Technology.Harvey Palmer, Rochester Institute of Technology HARVEY PALMER is dean of the Kate Gleason College of engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology.Mohammad Noori, California State Polytechnic University MOHAMMAD NOORI is dean of the college of engineering, California State Polytechnic University.Kathleen Gonzalez Landis, University of Arizona KATHLEEN GONZALEZ-LANDIS is executive director, master of engineering partnership-Arizona, a director of the College
2006-1143: THE INFLUENCE OF MATHEMATICS PREPARATION ON THERETENTION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF UNDERREPRESENTEDENGINEERING STUDENTSAnnita Alting, City College of the City University of New York ANNITA ALTING Annita Alting is an ABET accreditation specialist in the School of Engineering of the City College of New York. She obtained her Ph.D. from the University of Eindhoven in May of 2003 with the thesis “Nut, vertrouwen, toegankelijkheid. Wat docenten kunnen doen opdat meer meisjes natuurkunde gaan kiezen. (Utility, Trust, Access. What teachers can do to increase girls’ participation in physics)”. She holds a Masters degree in Physics from the University of Groningen in The Netherlands. She
factors such as extra work in otherclasses and unfair grading. Because most students are in a dualistic developmental stage, manyof the traditional methods of college life, independence, developing self-regulation, accuratelyassessing what is known and not known, and utilizing peers are difficult to master. When themethods are not mastered, they are perceived as personal rebukes on a student’s own personrather than an assessment of their learned knowledge. Implications for future programs point to the way students learn techniques for academicimprovement. This is an important issue considering the overall low scores from the Learningand Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) surveys indicating students were not using effectivestudy and
, clarify their role,and stress the responsibility and loyalty that they have to their teammates” H. Brooks (personalcommunication, September-December, 1972). Those same aspects apply to the libraryorganization as well. It’s the librarian’s responsibility to place the staff person in a position towin. This means that they must use all the resources that are available to them to support theirstaff. This means providing training in a systematic way that allows the staff member enoughtime to master each task they undertake. The more hands-on repetitions the librarian or staffmember makes, the more confident they become, and the more they will contribute to theorganization. This method of step-by-step repetitious training eventually gives the staff
Paper ID #18053Students’ Perceptions of Software RisksMs. Venkata Rama Chaitra Thota, University of Cincinnati I am a Master of Science student in the Computer Science Department at University of Cincinnati. My area of interest is ”Software Engineering”Dr. Nan Niu, University of Cincinnati Nan Niu is an assistant professor of EECS at the University of Cincinnati. He received his Ph.D. in Com- puter Science in 2009 from the University of Toronto, where he specialized in requirements engineering for software product lines. His current research interests include information seeking in software engi- neering, requirements
hands-on experiences with engineering tasks such as building,prototyping and design, and engineering work experience through an internship.Vicarious Experiences – Bandura describes this source of creating and strengthening efficacy as theinfluences provided by “social models” through relevant vicarious experiences. Bandura (1995)describes these vicarious experiences as “seeing people similar to themselves succeed by perseveranteffort [and raising] observer’s beliefs that they, too, possess the capability to master comparableactivates” (p. 4). There is also an element of aspiration to these vicarious experiences as students “seekproficient models who possess the competencies to which they aspire.” (p. 4) In the context ofengineering task self
Paper ID #18335The Use of a Medical Device Surrogate for Cooperative Product DevelopmentLearning of Engineering DesignDr. Jeffrey Thomas La Belle, Arizona State University Jeffrey T La Belle is currently an Assistant Professor in the School of Biological Health and Systems Engineering and the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University. He holds adjunct status in the School of Energy and Matter Transport (Mechanical Engineering) as well as the College of Medicine at Mayo Clinic. He has a Ph.D. and Masters in Biomedical Engineering from ASU and a MS and BS in Electrical Engineering from Western New England University
development, and engineering leadership development. Kennedy studies complex real-world systems and develops infrastructure decision support systems to promote sustainable development. She directs the Infrastructure Research Group whose mission is to develop thought leaders in engineering and policy for sustainable development. She serves on the Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Envi- ronment of the National Research Council, and is the founding chair of the Committee on Sustainability and the Environment of the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Transportation and Development In- stitute. She earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering (Structures) from Stanford University in 1994, a Master of Science in
arethe system, course, and individual perspectives. Results shows that the students appreciate theopportunity to perform the labs online.The networks security lab discussed in this paper is used to support the instructions of afundamental network security course offered to sophomore students. The course is used tointroduce computer networks and information security principles, devices, and applications. Thecourse is designed to meet the needs of students who want to master practical network andcomputer security. This course, the textbook, and associated lab exercises also provide acomprehensive guide for any student looking to take the CompTIA® Security+ Certification Exam.The following specific topic coverage includes an introduction to
precast concrete slabs. The proposed research will involve both experimental and numerical components. Scaled test specimens will be fabricated and loaded cycli- cally to assess the fatigue life and performance of the shear connectors and a finite element model of the specimens will be generated to evaluate the performance numerically. This research is expected substan- tiate the reliability of using fewer required shear connectors, rendering a more efficient design.Mr. Benjamin Dow, University of Waterloo Benjamin has a Masters of Applied Science degree from the University of Waterloo. While completing his Masters, he was a teaching assistant for several undergraduate courses, focusing primarily on structural analysis
learning exercises. In a similarfashion, ROS has a number of tutorials†† to take students from beginners to more advanced levelsof programming. These examples teach students how to program in the publish subscriberenvironment of ROS. Once again, students were required to work the first dozen or so of theseexamples. Due to the level of difficulty of mastering the ROS programming environment, thisprocess was supplemented using O’Kane’s book A Gentle Introduction to ROS. (O’Kane 2013)Students were required to work through the first seven chapters of the book while doing theTurtlebot and ROS tutorials. The book “Practical Python and OpenCV” was also used toointroduce students to the OpenCV (Rosebrock 2016) libraries for visual operations. Additionally
personalized major map, and to annotate an ABET student outcomes rubric with information on what parts of his/her college experience would help the student master different outcomes. In Fall 2016, we also added an activity relating to learning styles, and a written reflection on learning from failure. Written reflections on guest presentations. Students were asked to write short reflections on talks given by faculty presenters and alumni from our BME program. Faculty talks typically focused on their career trajectories and research expertise, while alumni talks focused on sharing experiences of the BME program and discussing the day-to-day life of different BME career options. In 2015, one talk was given by an alumna in medical school
multidimensional, spanmultiple levels of cognition and incorporate various STEM assessment strategies.Defining and delimiting engineering problems.Students who have mastered this core engineering design idea have the ability to (K-2) “identifysituations that people want to change as problems that can be solved through engineering”, (3-5)“specify criteria and constraints that a possible solution to a simple problem must meet” and (6-8) “attend to precision of criteria and constraints and considerations likely to limit possiblesolutions” (NAP, 2013).Designing solutions to engineering problems.To experience and learn about scientific and engineering practices students must actively engagein practices which are used by scientists and engineers and can include
Paper ID #18296Stepping out of the Comfort Zone - and the Country: Facilitating In-DepthStudent Learning through Nontraditional Communication AssignmentsMr. David Bowles, Louisiana State University David ”Boz” Bowles is a technical communication instructor and Engineering Communication Studio coordinator in the Chevron Center for Engineering Education at Louisiana State University. He earned a baccalaureate degree in English and a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing from Virginia Common- wealth University.Ms. Paige Davis, Louisiana State University Paige Davis has 22 years of experience in the College of Engineering at
Paper ID #18106Sticky Innovation: Exploring the Problem of the Bees through Engineeringand ArtDr. Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati Dr. Gaskins joined the Engineering Education Department in 2014. She earned her Bachelor’s Degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2008. Whitney earned her Masters of Business Administration in Quantitative Analysis from the University of Cincinnati, Lindner College of Business in 2010. She earned her Doctorate of Philosophy in Biomedical Engineering/Engineering Education also from the University of Cincinnati. Her dissertation ”Changing the Learning
craft in thestudio of the master. (Completing this training led to the status of a journeyman artist; somejourneymen might then become masters themselves.) In the Ecole des Beaux-Arts of the late19th century, the studio was formalized as an academic system, with today’s arts and designeducation preserving it essentially intact.For painters or architects, the studio represents intense specialization, its curriculum consisting offundamental techniques of the student’s intended profession. Nevertheless, studio education hasalways encompassed the technical, the practical, and the artistic in a unified experience withclear, consistent purpose that is much more difficult to achieve when component skills ordisciplines are parsed into unconnected
interdisciplinary program in Materials Science and Engineering (MSE), and theinterdisciplinary degree in Computing. The program in ECE emerged first, followed by the MSEprogram, and most recently by Computing.Electrical and Computer EngineeringElectrical and Computer Engineering was one of the founding departments in the College ofEngineering, established in 1997 with a B.S. degree offering. In 2001, the master’s degreeprogram was created. Local industry benefitted from its high quality graduates at the bachelorsand masters level. By Spring 2005, there were 254 undergraduate and 54 graduate studentsenrolled. The establishment of a doctoral program in ECE was in direct support of studentinterest and the regional community and was a specific goal in Boise
Lomiento is Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Cal Poly Pomona. He holds a Master Degree and PhD in Structural Engineering from the Sapienza University of Rome. Prior to joining Cal Poly, he was Project Scientist in the Structural Engineering Department at UC San Diego. His research focuses on earthquake engineering, structural monitoring, and multi-physics analysis. As a Professional Engineer, he has been involved in the analysis, design, and testing of a number of civil engineering structures, including bridges, hospital facilities,recreational facilities, and shipping piers. He is member of the American Concrete Institue (ACI), the Structural Engineers Association of Southern California
engineering skills." Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.5. Puccinelli, T.J., M.E. Fitzpatrick and G.P. Masters. “The evolution of the freshman engineering experience to increase active learning, retention, and diversity-work in progress.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2016.6. Puccinelli, J.P and A.N. Nimunkar. “An experiences with electronic laboratory notebooks in real-world, client-based BME design courses.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.7. Chesler, N.C., C.L. Brace and W.J. Tompkins. “Learning assessment in a
Conservation in Buildings & Community Systems; Vice-Chair of Continental Automated Building As- sociation, and is currently the Vice-Chair of the Canadian Standard Association’s Construction & Infras- tructure. He holds a PhD from Texas A&M University and a Master of Architectural Technology from University of California, Los Angeles. His research focus is on the energy efficiency and environmental control systems of buildings, and development of industry-driven innovation and educational programs for the built environment.Mrs. Samantha Michele Shields, Texas A&M University Samantha Shields is currently working on her doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M University, where she is
Engineering at the NCSU Libraries. She holds an M.S. from the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois in Urbana- Champaign, and an S.B. and Ph.D. from the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Mrs. Honora N. Eskridge, North Carolina State University Honora Nerz Eskridge is currently Director, Centennial Campus Research Services with North Carolina State University where she leads library services to the Colleges of Engineering and Textiles. Eskridge has a Master of Library and Information Science from the Catholic University of America and a Bachelor of Engineering from Manhattan College. c American
Paper ID #20248Lean Six Sigma Case Study within a Public School DistrictMs. Emily M Salmon, Mississippi State University Emily Salmon is a recent graduate of Mississippi State University (MSU) with a bachelor’s in Industrial and Systems Engineering. She is a Research Engineer for MSU’s Institute for Systems Engineering Research (ISER) located in Vicksburg, MS. Her current research involves lean six sigma practices and applications, manufacturability, and modeling and simulations. She received her Six Sigma Black Belt from MSU’s CAVS Extension Center in June 2016 and is currently pursuing her Masters of Engineering at MSU
would represent an intermediate sizing experience, where thefundamentals of machine component sizing would be solidly mastered, before undertaking themajor design experience in the capstone course. This sequence is represented in Fig. 1. Page 2 of 18 INTERMEDIATE-LEVEL SIZING PREREQUISITE KNOWLEDGE IN STATICS, DYNAMICS AND PROJECT IN MACHINE DESIGN EXPERT-LEVEL DESIGN PROJECT MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. - Gradually develop expertise IN CAPSTONE COURSE - Free body diagrams - Emphasize creativity
in the areas of: (1) Advancing and mastering skillsetsassociated with foam core/composite skin construction techniques. (2) Application of new designelements to fixed-wing UAS vehicles (eg, rotary wing-attachment points for rapid UASdeployment). (3) Expanded ability to test UAS stability and flight characteristics using an ‘infinitewind tunnel’ approach (ie, test appliance on the back of a pickup truck). (4) Consolidated andfurthered experience in organizing and administering the team, with numerous improvements toteam leadership and management tools and techniques.2017-2018. In the team’s 3rd year of participation, the AIAA DBF challenge returned to a focus onless complex designs, with more emphasis on flight performance characteristics