on the collaborative development of robotics textbooks as open educational resources.D. Matthew Boyer (Research Associate Professor) Research Associate Professor - Department of Engineering & Science Education Educational Proposal Writer - Office of the Associate Dean for Research College of Engineering, Computing and Applied SciencesYang Wu (Open Resources Librarian) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Role of Libraries in Collaborative OER DevelopmentLibraries and librarians at post-secondary institutions are uniquely positioned to promote andadvocate for Open Educational Resources (OER) by engaging
University of Tokyo in 2001. He is a Pro- fessor in Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at SIT. His research interests include minia- turized robots using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems technologies and robot education for STEM.Prof. Hatsuko Yoshikubo, Shibaura Institute of Technology Dr. Hatsuko Yoshikubo is currently an Associate Professor and a deputy director of the Innovative Global Program, a research-based full English degree engineering program at the College of Engineering at Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), Tokyo, Japan. She is a Principal Investigator of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Grants 20K02943 and the AY 2022 SIT Grants for Educational Reform and Research
course inCriminology, and 2 sections of a 400-level Computer Science class. In Spring 2021, 12 classesparticipated: upper division electives in Anthropology, Business/Management, ElectricalEngineering, Linguistics (cross-listed as a 200-level Honors course), Journalism/AfricanAmerican Studies, Sociology, and Women’s Gender and Sexuality Studies, one 200-levelelective in Engineering and Technology Education, four sections of two different upper divisionrequirements in Computer Science, and two capstone courses—one in English and one inStatistics. In Spring 2022, 10 classes participated: 300-level electives in Anthropology,Sociology, and Women’s and Gender Studies, 100- and 200-level requirements in Business,Civil Engineering, and Criminology, 300
Industry Immersion and a Focuson Identity,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,Tampa, FL: ASEE 2019.[3] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with Engineers:Fostering Engineering Identity through Industry Immersion,” 2020 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition, Montreal, Québec, Canada: ASEE 2020.[4] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, “Engineering with Engineers:Fostering Engineering Identity,” 2021 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual: ASEE2021.[5] Han, Y.-L., Cook, K., Mason, G., Shuman, T.R., and Turns, J., ‘Cultivating a Culture toFoster Engineering Identity,” 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, MN:ASEE 2022.[6] K
Paper ID #37772Creating Innovation for Interdisciplinary Robotics Workshops: SolvingIssues in the Online Project-Based Learnings in Engineering EducationProf. Hatsuko Yoshikubo, Shibaura Institute Of Technology, Japan Dr. Hatsuko Yoshikubo is currently an Associate Professor and a deputy director of the Innovative Global Program, a research-based full English degree engineering program at the College of Engineering at Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), Tokyo, Japan. She is a Principal Investigator of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Grants 20K02943 and the AY 2022 SIT Grants for Educational
assignment grades includedin the research. All data collection and assessment methods described herein are approved underIRB #20211121456EX.5.2 Course assignmentsGrades were analyzed for four different assignments done throughout the course. Two of theassignments (Assignments 2 and 4) required students to use the robotic arm and two were moretraditional assignments (Assignments 1 and 3) that did not incorporate the robotic arm. Theassignments were worth different numbers of points based on the number of steps and questionsinvolved, so the analysis was done on students’ percentage scores for each assignment.5.3 AnalysisQuantitative analysis was conducted in SPSS v. 25. All qualitative coding analysis was conductedin MAXQDA Plus 2022 (Release
university just as the COVIDpandemic began. Cohort 2 is now completing their third year, so third year retention rates(retention from their third year into their fourth year) are not yet available for that cohort.So far, 13 of the 18 participants (72%) have been retained. Figure 1 shows only 67% retention(in second year cohort retention), but this does not include the student who recently returned tothe program, after the census taken at the beginning of the academic year (fall 2022).We also note that these annual retention rates are higher for even the comparison group whencompared to retention rates just before the program began. For example, first year retention ratesin the major were ~50% for CS and CpE students who graduated just before the
. References[1] H. Wilkinson and A. Minichiello, “U.S. Military Students in Civilian Undergraduate Engineering Programs: A Narrative Review of the Student Veteran and Servicemember Literature,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/u-s-military-students-in- civilian-undergraduate-engineering-programs-a-narrative-review-of-the-student-veteran- and-servicemember-literature[2] B. J. Novoselich, J. L. Hall, K. A. Landry, J. B. Main, and A. W. Dean, “Supporting Veteran Students Along Engineering Pathways: Faculty, Student, and Researcher Perspectives,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus
tenured and tenure-track instructors and professors of practice across four engineering departments. A total of fiveinstructors participated, of which three of the instructors were female which was anoverrepresentation of females compared to the College of Engineering’s overall demographics.Data CollectionData were collected during the Fall 2022 semester. Each instructor participated in a singleinterview. The interviews were conducted via Zoom video conferencing and lastedapproximately one hour each. A think aloud protocol was used where participants were asked toverbalize their thinking while responding to the items on the CBE adaptability instrument. Theinterview protocol included semi-structured and open-ended questions related to the
, “Mapping and Recontextualizing the Evolution of the Term Latinx: An Environmental Scanning in Higher Education,” in Critical Readings on Latinos and Education, Routledge, 2019.[4] “Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 2021,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2022.[5] P. Taylor, M. H. Lopez, J. H. Martínez, and G. Velasco, “When Labels Don’t Fit: Hispanics and Their Views of Identity,” Wash. DC Pew Hisp. Cent., 2012.[6] A. Lozano, C. Salinas, and R. C. Orozco, “Constructing meaning of the term Latinx: a trioethnography through Pláticas,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–18, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1080/09518398.2021.1930251.[7] R. Contreras, “The X
/cshe[6] S. Danielson, A. Kirkpatrick, and E. Ervin, “ASME vision 2030: Helping to inform mechanical engineering education,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2011. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6143065.[7] S. Pierson, J. Goss, and H. Hu, “Enhancing Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Education with CAM and CNC Machining,” in ASEE Midwest Section Conference 2022, 2022.[8] J. Marsh, C. Dunlap, S. Pierson, and H. Hu, “Introducing LabVIEW and Arduino as Data Acquisition System Alternatives,” in ASEE Midwest Section Conference 2022, 2022.[9] S. Pierson, N. Nawar, and H. Hu, “Comparing the Thermal Performance of Microchannel Heat Sinks Produced by CNC Milling Versus Power Bed Fusion,” in 8th
) Annual student surveysrelated to project goals, improvement suggestions, and access to career development, c)Participant observation in S-STEM course activities twice annually, from 2019 to spring 2022, d)Participant observation at the Great Minds in STEM conference, an annual event held in personas applicable (2019) and virtually in 2020 and 2021, e) Participant observation in competitionssuch as hackathons and National Security Agency competitions, including participantobservation in Discord channels related to student participation, f) Eight site visits to the four-year institutions engaged in the grant, including course observation, informal participation inclub meetings and work meetings, formal and informal interviews with staff and
Engineering, and Physics (~150-450 graduate students); all otherdepartments were considered to be small size (fewer than 150 graduate students).** For Race and for Gender, multiple options could be selected.Procedure. Consent and demographic information were conducted online using the Canvas LMS[14]. We conducted audio-recorded interviews with the participants four times during the 2021-2022 academic year. Forty-minute initial interviews were conducted in October; 10-20-minutefollow-up interviews were conducted in December, February, and April. Participants werecompensated with $40 Amazon.com gift cards for the initial interviews and $10 gift cards foreach follow-up interview. Some participants did not complete all three follow-up interviews; 157of a
credits. The students reported theirpart-time employment status. Nine students out of twenty-one reported not being employed. Fourstudents were employed more than 20 hours per week, and eight were employed less than 20hours per week. All students in this population took the Structural Analysis course with the sameinstructor in the 2022 spring semester, in which they were first introduced to mindfulnessactivities in an engineering course. During the spring 2022 semester, mindfulness activities werenot carried out in every class. However, when mindfulness practices occurred, the selectedpractices included short (3-5 minute) mindfulness activities such as listening, body awareness,lovingkindness, and yoga at least once a week. Students in the course
mayrepresent 50.5% of the population in the United States (U.S.) [2], only 22.3% of bachelor’sdegrees in computer science (CS) are awarded to women, as of the 2022 Taulbee report [3].Likewise, 13.6% of the population in the U.S. identifies as Black or African American [2], butonly 3.2% of bachelor’s degrees in CS are awarded to Black or African American students [3].Meanwhile, 18.9% of the population in the U.S. identifies as Hispanic or Latino [2], but only9.1% of CS bachelor’s degree recipients are [3]. Diversifying students and professionalpopulations working in computing can have important implications for equity in society. As such,it is necessary to find new opportunities to recruit and engage additional populations, while alsobearing in mind
participation of students from low SES backgrounds and co-leads the University’s Teamwork Community of Practice. In 2022, Peter was made a Fellow of the UNSW Scientia Education Academy – a select group of outstanding educators. Previously, he conducted techno-economic research with Dairy Australia and CO2CRC and was Deputy Head of School (External Relations) with the UNSW School of Petroleum Engineering.Dr. Sarah Grundy, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Dr Sarah Grundy is a Lecturer at the School of Chemical Engineering. Sarah has over 15 years’ experi- ence in industry developing graduate engineers and scientists. She has come back to UNSW (2020) as an Education Focused (EF) academic teaching
Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Exploring Student’s Interdisciplinary Contributions to More Sustainable Solutions in the Built Environment and Infrastructure Design Alisson Bedón1, Holbeein Velásquez1, MiguelAndrés Guerra2*, Milagros Jiménez31 Undergraduate student, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.2 Assistant Professor, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.3 Instructor, Universidad
, Biomechanics, Motion Analysis, Finite Element Analysis, and Mechanical Medical Devices Design. Highly interested in Higher Education Curriculum Design, Academic Leadership, and teaching and classroom innovation. Courses taught: Intro to Engineering, Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Vibration, Intro to CAD (SolidWorks), Senior Design Project, Numerical Methods, Intro to Biomechanics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Teaching core engineering courses, Statics and Dynamics, considering different types of learnersAbstractStatics and Dynamics are complex core courses in the engineering
a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering Science in 2014, M.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2016 and PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2018 from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.Brittany Hunt Brittany D. Hunt is a member of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina. She is a postdoctoral research associate at Duke University. Her research centers they ways that Indigenous peoples are made invisible or stereotyped in the classroom and in media and the effects of this erasure and distortion.Arna EregaPeter Tkacik Professor of Mechanical Engineering (retired) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
resident social scientist in the Electrical Engineering Department at Bucknell, exploring how to teach convergent (deeply interdisciplinary) problems to undergraduate engineers. Past research projects include studies of governance in engineering education and the influence of educational technology on engineering education.Melissa Shuey © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Asian Identity in the Online ClassroomAbstractDuring the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, Asian American students in higher educationwere faced not only with the move to online learning but the nuances that came with anti-Asianrhetoric
advisees.Sonia M. Bartolomei-suarez (Professor)Oscar Marcelo Suarez (Professor)Pedro O. QuinteroCarla Lopez Del Puerto (Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Assessing the Effectiveness of The LIAT College Access and Success Model (L-CAS) on Low-income Hispanic Engineering Students (Experience)Keywords: Intervention model, College success, Low-income students AbstractThis paper assesses the effectiveness of an intervention model aimed at propelling low-income,academically talented (LIAT) engineering students in a Hispanic Serving Institution (HIS) intoactions, immersing them into real-life contexts. The model, named the
masters students, and published over 90 peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Multidisciplinary Engagement of Diverse Students in Computer Science Education through Research Focused on Social Media COVID-19 Misinformation1 AbstractThe ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted vital elements of personal and public health,society, and education. Increasingly with the viral pandemic, misinformation on health andscience issues has been disseminated online. We developed an undergraduate training programfocused on producing and presenting research to combat the
teaching engineering science courses to bridge the gap between theoretical, well-defined coursework and ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Michigan, and a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Prior to re-joining Michigan, he was an instructor in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. Aaron enjoys reading, collecting LEGO NASA sets, biking, camping, and playing disc golf.Kayla Brooks (Data Analyst) Kayla Brooks is a data analyst at the University of Colorado Boulder. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Paper ID #38082Work-in-progress: Reflection & Projection: An Explorationof a Scavenger Hunt Assignment in an Introduction toAerospace Engineering CourseKali Morgan Learning ScientistKelly Ann GriendlingJakob Ryan Kinney © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reflection & Projection: An Exploration of a Scavenger Hunt Assignment in an Introduction to Aerospace Engineering CourseThe first year of college is a significant transition for most first-time-in-college students, as well as fortransfer students in their first year
Controls and believes that student aerospace design competitions are ideal avenues for students to express their creativity while complementing the knowledge gained in the classroom with hands-on experience as well as promoting greater collaboration and learning across disciplines. Dr. Gururajan’s research interests are interdisciplinary and in the fields offault tolerant flight control, real time systems, experimental flight testing using small UAS, and the design/development ofnatural language interaction with drones. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com What We Learned, When We Learned It, and How We Learned It
outcomes. Open ended responses were coded based on the learning outcomespreviously identified in the literature [1]. The survey was distributed via snowball sampling, withinitial distribution at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers’ annual meeting in 2022 andvia social media. Faculty response data was analyzed to identify trends across the three differentresponse types. Across the survey responses, there was agreement on the high level ofimportance of four learning outcomes: design experiment, compare to theory, analyze data, andcommunication. While the learning outcome of ethics was rated as significantly important for alaboratory course, many faculty did not include this in their ranking of the top five learningoutcomes or their open
total, and the present studyrelates to the two most recent offerings in 2022 and 2023. It is open to both upper-divisionundergraduate students and lower-division graduate students across the College of Engineering,but it primarily serves Mechanical Engineering students. To make the class accessible to a largenumber of students, there are no human-centered design prerequisites. Yet this one-semesterelective course involves a term project during which student teams interview a need-knower tomotivate an invention concept around upper-limb dexterity. Our goal is to introduce students –who are drawn to assistive technology design, but do not yet have critically relevant skills – tointeract with individuals in this space. Students mechanically or
per month. That trend continued until late August 2021 whenthe view count suddenly doubled and kept increasing. By the end of August 2021, the video hadgarnered 35,000 views. Figure 1 – USS Missouri Missile Video- Days Published / Views CountThere is a clearly visible spike in YouTube view count that coincides with the Afghanistanwithdrawal. From September 2021 to January of 2022, the view count rose from 35,000 views to2.3 million views, with the first million views happening by early October 2021. From Januaryof 2022 to August of 2023, the view count continued to increase, but at a comparatively slowerrate, gaining around 100,000 views during those next 20 months (about one and a half years). Asone of the video’s commenters
Engineering Program Criteria," in Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference, Minneapolis, 2022.[9] NCEES, "Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) CIVIL CBT Exam Specifications," NCEES, July 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ncees.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/FE-Civil- CBT-specs-1.pdf. [Accessed 21 April 2024].[10] M. K. Swenty and B. J. Swenty, "Alignment of the FE Exam with Civil Engineering Program Content," Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 148, no. 4, 2022.[11] M. K. Swenty and B. J. Swenty, "Alignment of Civil Engineering Program Criteria with the ASCE Body of Knowledge," Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 149, no. 4, 2023.[12] J. S. Russell and W. B. Stouffer, "Survey of the National Civil
similar course at a Saint Mary’s College untilSpring 2022. In this experience report, we share our experience of having removed the calculusprerequisite and requiring minimal prerequisites for the CS 1 programming course. Dr. Das was theprogram director at the Loyola when the change was put in place and has since moved to SaintMary’s College of California as of Fall 2021. Prof. Fulton is the current program director at Loyolawho has left the minimal prerequisite requirement for the CS 1 course as is based upon their priorexperience with similar requirements at a large public R1 university and a technical college offeringassociate degrees. Several major types of academic institutions are thus covered by our collectiveexperience and demonstrates