cognitive career theory at 25: empirical status of theinterest, choice, and performance models," Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 115, pp. 103316,2019.[24] A. Bandura, "Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control," New York, NY: Freeman, 1997.[25] D. Wang, X. Liu, and H. Deng, "The perspectives of social cognitive career theory approachin current times," Frontiers in psychology, vol. 13, 2022.[26] Gentry, A. N., Bermel, P., Holloway, E. A., & Douglas, K. A.(2022). Validity evidence for exposure and motivation scales in a microelectronics workforcedevelopment program. Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Minneapolis, MN.[27] T. Buthelezi, D. Alexander, and J. Seabi, "Adolescents' perceived career challenges and needsin
+, Horizon Research Inc., 2018.[2] E. J. Kang, C. Donovan, and M. J. McCarthy, “Exploring elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and confidence in implementing the NGSS science and engineering practices,” Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 29, pp. 9-29, 2018.[3] A. Simpson and P. N. Knox, “Children’s engineering identity development within an at- home engineering program during COVID-19,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 12, Article 12, 2022.[4] S. Alexandre, Y. Xu, M. Washington-Nortey, and C. Chen. “Informal STEM learning for young children: a systematic literature review,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol 19, Article 8299, 2022.[5] J
differing roles, interests,and perspectives can contribute to stakeholder disagreement. This is the driving concept behindthe FEW Model: by creating educational and programmatic opportunities that contribute tostudents’ intercultural competence, students can learn to navigate and understand these elementsthat lead to stakeholder disagreement to effectively address wicked sustainability problems. 4Research Design and ApproachOverviewTo investigate and gather insights into the curricular impacts of the HE minor on studentsintercultural competence a multi methods approach was taken, incorporating both quantitativeassessment and qualitative data. The data collection took place during the 2021-2022
.[9] R. Reck, K. Ansell, J. TerBush, C. Schmitz, J. Popovics, and H. Golecki, “Development of a Community of Practice for Rethinking Best Practices in Post-COVID Experiential Learning,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Sep. 04, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41339[10] Anthony S. Bryk, Louis Gomez, and Alicia Grunow, “Getting Ideas into Action: Building Networked Improvement Communities in Education.” Springer Publishing, Jul. 01, 2011. Accessed: May 05, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/resources/publications/getting-ideas-action-building- networked-improvement-communities-education/[11] P. G. LeMahieu, A. Grunow, L
Metacognition to Promote Learning. IDEA Paper# 63. IDEA Center, Inc.[10] Sloan, J.A. and Scharff, L.F. (2022). “Student self-assessment: Relationships between accuracy, engagement, perceived value, and performance.” ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. 148(3): 04022004. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000063[11] Nuhfer, E. B. (1993). Bottom-line disclosure and assessment. Teaching Professor. 7(7): 8.[12] Nuhfer, E. B. (1996). The place of formative evaluations in assessment and ways to reap their benefits. Journal of Geoscience Education, 44, 385-394.[13] Stanford, M. S., & Sloan, J., & Pocock, J. B., & Russell, M. M. (2020, June), A Construction Management Competition as the Basis of a Capstone
(0.7%)For the five camps, students ranged from 14-17 years old, with eighth graders going into ninthgrade attending the 2017 camp, ninth graders going into tenth grade for the 2018 camp, and tenthgraders going into eleventh grade for the 2019 camp. Finally, juniors attended the 2022 and 2023camps. The distribution of sexes was 57.4% male, 41.9% female, and one non-binary student.The program was designed to promote hands-on learning and minimize passive classroomlearning. The main theme of the three engineering camps was water and environmentalengineering. The 2018 camp specifically included advanced water engineering with drones usedin agriculture and air quality engineering. Before the camp activities started, students completeda pre-camp
Competency Framework (DECF): Critical Skillsets to Support Digital Transformation,” INSIGHT, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 35-39, 2022, doi: 10.1002/inst.12396.[2] L. M. C. Benavides, J. A. Tamayo Arias, M. D. Arango Serna, J. W. Branch Bedoya, and D. Burgos, “Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 3291, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20113291.[3] Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering, Digital Engineering Strategy, 2018. Available: https://ac.cto.mil/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2018- Digital-Engineering-Strategy_Approved_PrintVersion.pdf.[4] M. J. de C Henshaw, “Systems of Systems, Cyber-Physical Systems, the Internet-of-Things
line with findings fromqualitative studies in engineering, which has found that students viewed help-seeking behavior ascontrary to engineering cultural norms due to indirect and direct messages received fromprofessors and peers [21]. Some students may even believe that by agreeing to become anengineering student, they had implicitly committed to prioritizing academic success over theirmental well-being [23]. A 2022 qualitative study reported that interviewees often perceivedengineering students as superior, or smarter and more capable than students in other majors [37].This could lead them to believe that struggling with mental health would mean that they are not fitto be engineer. Because first-year engineering students are navigating a new
Education, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 87-112, 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20190.[2] T. Anagnos, C. Komives, N. J. Mourtos, and K. M. McMullin, "Evaluating student mastery of design of experiment," Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. T3G-7-T3G-12, 2007, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2007.4417923.[3] ABET Inc. "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2024 – 2025." https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2024-2025/ (accessed 1/2024.[4] H. Helmbrecht, "Effective laboratory education with TEXTILE: Tutorials in EXperimentalisT Interactive LEarning," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1-11, 2022, doi: 10.18260/2-1
ETD 435References[1] W. Fishman and H. Gardner. “Students are missing the point of College. Too many of them are alienated from their institutions. Here’s what to do about it.”, The Review | Opinion, The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 25, 2022.[2] P. Yanik, C. Ferguson, S. Kaul and Y. Yan, “Enhancement of Engineering Student Engagement”, ASEE Journal of Engineering Technology, Fall 2021, pp.24-36.[3] L.M. Sánchez Ruiz, S. Moll-López, J. A. Moraño-Fernández, and N. Llobregat-Gómez, “B-Learning and Technology: Enablers for University Education Resilience. An Experience Case under COVID-19 in Spain”, MDPI Sustainability 2021, V.13, N.3532, 22 pages, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063532.[4
has the opportunity to participate in these processesfor brand new programs being developed from scratch. For example, preparing for an ABETvisit just after your very first cohort of students graduates or having the privilege to develop acourse from the ground up that has been designated to meet a specific internal campus criteriaare more unique opportunities for university faculty. These rare opportunities did indeed presentthemselves at the University of Washington Tacoma (UWT) after the state authorized, andfunded two new baccalaureate ME and CE programs in the fall of 2021 and 2022 respectively.Furthermore, fall 2022 was one author’s first year back in the classroom after 28 years serving inadministrative roles and was also the first year
-bar. The four-bar secured on the delivery system allows for the angle of the conesto remain the same throughout delivery while being transferred from the ground to the junctionthrough the intake and delivery systems. Both the intake and delivery systems are allowed torotate horizontally in a two-turret system, granting our team the ability to remain stationaryduring the delivery process. This not only greatly reduces the chances of the driver makingmistakes in the process of delivering cones (i.e., reducing “driver errors”), but also lessens therobot’s need to move around the field for delivery positioning (i.e., improving the effectivenessin accomplishing the task within a short given amount of time).Figure 2: The field layout for the 2022
graphics course.According to the 2023 institution’s admissions and enrollment tracker, the university has24,897 undergraduate students enrolling during the 2022-2023 academic year,including at least 11,000 in some form of undergraduate STEM degree program. Whentaking a closer look at the colleges at the university, the institution’s 2023 admissionsand enrollment tracker demonstrates fall 2022-2023 enrollment saw 7,421undergraduate students in the college of engineering, 3,127 in the college of sciences,765 in the college of textiles, and 221 in STEM-related education majors in the collegeof education. The course, from which data arrives, builds learning objects around thefoundational elements of engineering design graphics that enable
the students in your cohort and give them access to that, or you simply just restrict. I wouldn't be okay, personally, with just using whatever you want.’ (Serena)While the equivalent of access is guaranteed, it is also important to provide a proper guide to thestandard use of GenAI (Mhlanga, 2023). On the one hand, there should be an advancedsupervision mechanism that corresponds with the fast development of GenAI technology. On theother hand, to ensure sustainable development, faculties should teach their students in the verybeginning stage how to use GenAI in the right way, particularly for developing their problem-solving and ethical critical thinking skills, which have been identified by Venkatesh et al (2022)as indispensable
prepare students better for the norms of academia, for the process of researchpublication, and for critical review of scholarship. Research librarians with both engineering and scholarly communication expertise areuniquely situated to fill in the gaps of the research lifecycle. Scholarly communication skills arevital for high-impact research writing – understanding and critically evaluating scientometrics,reviewing conferences and journals, evaluating and reviewing literature, navigating authorship,planning for data management, understanding various paper types, interpreting disciplinarynorms, and more. In 2022, the primary author designed and proposed the semester-long first-year graduatecourse “Research Lifecycle and Publication in
in Engineering Lifelong learning Module 5: Science and knowledge in Engineering EducationImpact on Engineering EducationSince its inception, LACCEI has made strategic alliances with different institutions such asCONFEDI, ASIBEI, ACOFI, GEDC, ENTER, ASEE and IEEE1, among others, and in1 CONFEDI: Federal Council of Engineering Deans; ASIBEI: Ibero-American Association of Engineering Teaching Institutions; ACOFI:Colombian Association of Faculties of Engineering; GEDC: Global Engineering Deans Council; ASEE: American Society forEngineering Education.2022 it formed the Multi-Society Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, made upof 7 societies: AEEA, ASEE, CEEA
bachelor’s degrees, we began conducting exit interviews with students inMay 2022, when the 2018 cohort began to graduate (10 students interviewed). These exitinterviews were repeated with the 2019 cohort in May 2023 (5 students interviewed).Each interview was conducted and recorded via Zoom by a member of our research team andlasted from 30-45 minutes. Students volunteered to participate and provided consent, includingpermission to record the interview. Questions asked during these interviews were designed toelicit students’ reflections on any long-term benefits they received from participating in RAMP,suggestions for continuing the program to the academic year, and plans for after graduation.Opportunity for students to ask their own questions and
Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP
Table 1 below. Notably, two districts (1 & 3) stronglyencourage their schools to pursue STEM or STEAM certification. District 1 schools werepreviously permitted to pursue certification by either the GaDOE or by a private organizationnamed Cognia; however, in 2022, the district mandated that all schools undergo the GaDOESTEM or STEAM certification process by the 2025-26 school year. Thus, despite the threeDistrict 1 schools previously obtaining STEM certification through Cognia, they were allpursuing GaDOE STEM or STEAM certification as well. Table 1. Certification Status Current Encouraged School School
, J. P. Rayner, and M. M. Gore, “Changing the Order of Newton’s Laws— Why & How the Third Law Should be First,” Phys. Teach., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 406–409, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1119/1.4752043.[7] S. W. Chong, “Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 92–104, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765.[8] T. Wongvorachan, O. Bulut, Y.-S. Tsai, and M. A. Lindner, “Improving Student Feedback Literacy in e-Assessments: A Framework for the Higher Education Context,” Trends High. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/higheredu1010002.[9] A. C. Braet, “Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A re-examination
process, and then reading theconclusion to see if that article informs our research. We must resist the urge to followinteresting branches from the main topic in these exclusion and inclusion criteria to help theresearcher stay focused.Bork and Mondisa’s 2022 article presents a practical five-stage approach where the outcomes ofeach stage provide a scoping literature review [16]. The stages are inclusion and exclusioncriteria; a reduced batch of references for study from the eligible references, and then literaturedata for analysis. The last outcome is to identify current literature trends and potential researchgaps that will be written about [16]. The author’s experience as a career professional engineerand educator with a sustainability focus
PetroleumEngineering (CHPE) with 4 participants (8%), a joint degree in BIOE & MBA with 1participant (2%), Master of Science (unspecified discipline) with 1 participant (2%), andMaster of Science in Public Administration (MS-MPA) with 1 participant (2%).Participants also reported their academic year to help us gain the insights of students’ varyinglevels of experience with GEES program. The majority (74.07%, n=20) started in the 2020–2021 academic year. Smaller groups began in the 2019–2020 academic year with 2participants (7.41%) and in the 2021–2022 academic year with 5 participants (18.52%).Enhancements in Technical SkillsParticipants reported significant enhancements in their perceived engineering or technicalabilities during the GEES program. The
Experiences and Outcomes in an Innovative Course on Wearable and Collaborative Robotics,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 263–273, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TE.2022.3229201.[13] M. Shamir et al., “Development of a graduate-level capstone course for interdisciplinary researchers: design approaches and lessons learned,” 2022.[14] M. Jamieson, A. Ead, A. Rowe, J. Miller-Young, and J. Carey, Design at Scale in a First-Year Transdisciplinary Engineering Design Course. 2021.[15] H. Zhu and A. Trowbridge, “Work-in-progress: Defining criteria to evaluate achievement of the NAE grand challenges scholars program competencies,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual Conference
Success," to improve advisingpractices for chemical engineering faculty and provide guidance for the successful mentoring ofgraduate students. The workshops aim to elicit reflections and encourage discussions amongfaculty to identify their beliefs about mentoring, explore how they align their mentoring practiceswith their research agenda, and how they define success for their students. This paper describesthe development and implementation of the first workshop in the series “Facilitating EngineeringFaculty Advising Success: Effective Strategies for Mentoring Graduate Students,” which wasoffered during the Fall 2022 semester. Emergent themes from participant contributions duringthis workshop highlighted collective difficulties in navigating and
primary research project is sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration, and focuses on improving engineering education methods. I am also contributing to a research project sponsored by the US Department of Energy, in which I am assisting with the solid mechanics modeling of moisture swing polymers for use in low-energy carbon capture. For my senior capstone, I led the development of a theoretical offshore wind farm for the 2022 Collegiate Wind Competition, and helped our team earn second place at the competition. This experience led me to become the current president of NAU’s Energy Club, where I now manage two interdisciplinary engineering teams who are working to complete the Collegiate Wind Competition and
–338, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00982.x.[3] A. Benham, R. Fotherby, A. Johnson, and C. Bowen, “Student Perspectives of Aerospace Engineering Macroethics Issues and Education,” Oct. 2022, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962654.[4] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, C. Swan, D. Knight, and N. Canney, “An overview of the microethics and macroethics education of computing students in the United States,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2017, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190445.[5] J. R. Herkert, “Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 373–385, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1007
beyond)” [19]. The existence and increasingsubmission rates to journals such as the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science andEngineering is also promising. Of note is an increase in the number of studies published byWOC about intersectionality in Engineering Education (Main et al. [21], McGee et al. [22], andCross et al. [23] to name a few).In Our Own WordsHow It StartedDr. Cox saw The Trouble with White Woman by Kyla Schuller, a white woman AssociateProfessor [24], advertised on Instagram. The book presents counterstories of white women andWOC and merges stories of white feminism and intersectional feminism. Although the title wasintriguing and controversial, she had no idea how the text might relate to Engineering Education.In May 2022, a
-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI Grad: 08/2014 Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Grad: 08/2007 BachelorDr. Phapanin Charoenphol, Texas A&M University Phapanin Charoenphol is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her M.S., and Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She teaches thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, engineering laboratory, and senior design studio courses. Her research interests include engineering education and targeted drug delivery. In 2022, she was awarded the ASME Best Teacher Award and earned the ACUE Certificate in Effective College