molecular biotechnology. Current research foci include developing micro- biome engineering approaches for the built environment and bioremediation, investigating the ecological impacts of emerging contaminants on environmental microbiomes, studying microbial evolution follow- ing exposure to anthropogenic contaminants and developing innovative water treatment technologies. Dr. Gunsch was named ASCE Environmental & Water Resources Institute Fellow in 2022. She currently serves as Editor in Chief for Biodegradation and is a member of the Editorial Board for npj Clean Water and Industrial Biotechnology.Dr. Joseph L. Graves Jr., North Carolina A&T State University Joseph L Graves, Jr. received his Ph.D. in
her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Northwestern University in 2022. Her areas of expertise include computational modeling of cell-based therapies and integrating social justice concepts into engineering curriculum.Chlo´e M. ArchuletaAdrien DeberghesBeth DiBiaseRuihan LiJeffrey RichardsLinsey SeitzDr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer L. Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. Mc- Cormick School of Engineering and the Associate Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research at Northwestern University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Designing, codifying, and implementing social justice
work has involved studying intersectional and spatial visualization devel- opment.Sydney Free, Purdue University, West Lafayette Sydney Free is a junior in mechanical engineering at Purdue University and has been working with the DeBoer Lab within the Purdue School of Engineering Education since the Spring semester of 2022. Her work involves developing adaptable learning technologies for displaced communities.Michael Dunham, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michael Dunham is an undergraduate at Purdue majoring in Mechanical Engineering, and has worked with the DeBoer Lab in Purdue’s school of Engineering Education Research since 2022. His work has focused on the use of educational tools in engineering curricula in
amentored-career pathway experience that reflects their interests. We interviewed Rachel twice, inFall 2021 and again in Spring 2022. Our first interview in Fall 2021 was conducted at SPU,where we interviewed all 16 participants in the first cohort. The first interview protocol wassemi-structured and focused on the three different pathways offered by the program and theirperceptions of them: graduate school pathways/research, professional pathways/internships, andentrepreneurship pathways. Rachel was one of the 16 interview participants, and her interviewstood out to us because of a strong impression of lacking self-efficacy and being worried abouther future career pathway. The lead author was the primary interviewer and followed up withRachel and
completed the questionnaire at the end of the Spring 2022 semester. Aftercleaning the dataset using a process described by Leiner [64], 314 responses were retained foranalysis. Participant characteristics are included in Table 1. Among the participants, 227 (72%)reported that they had taken a sociotechnical engineering course. Most engineering students arerequired to take a first-year sociotechnical engineering course at the university this study wasconducted at, which is likely contributing to the high percentage of students reporting taking asociotechnical engineering course.Table 1. Participant Characteristics Category n % Gender Females
the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001- 8791(81)90019-1 [4] Hurst, M. A., Polinsky, N., Haden, C. A., Levine, S. C., & Uttal, D. H. (2019). Leveraging research on informal learning to inform policy on promoting early stem. Social Policy Report, 32(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sop2.5 [5] Removed for Double Blind Review [6] Lester, S., & Ruth, K. D. (2022, August). ’ook Who's Talking: Exploring the DEI STEM Librarianship Conversation. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. [7] Roy, J. (n.d.). Engineering by Numbers - ira | ASEE. ASEE. Retrieved February 8, 2023, from https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018
tocompare the needs of the faculty from both engineering and business, and to determine where theoverlap in needs exists. By determining the overlap, UB librarians could then coordinateoutreach and instruction activities that would be beneficial for both of these major schools, aswell as potentially streamline collection development needs.Local ContextThe University at Buffalo (UB) is part of the State University of New York (SUNY) system,which comprises 64 campuses. As of the 2021-2022 academic year, it has 32,347 students with22,306 undergraduate students and 10,041 graduate-level students. The student populationrepresents 48 states and 102 countries [14]. UB has three campuses with 13 schools and colleges.The School of Management (SoM) at UB has
successful implementation of ABET student outcomes 1-7,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021. [2] ABET, “Fundamentals of program assessment workshop,” ABET, Tech. Rep., 2019. [3] G. Watkins, “Incorporating new ABET outcomes into a two-semester capstone design course,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Capstone Design Conference, Dallas, Texas, 2022. [4] K. Meah, D. Hake, and S. D. Wilkerson, “A multidisciplinary capstone design project to satisfy ABET student outcomes,” Education Research International, vol. 2020, 2020. [5] D. C. Davis, K. L. Gentili, M. S. Trevisan, and D. E. Calkins, “Engineering design assessment processes and scoring scales for program improvement and accountability,” Journal of Engineering
Engineering Education) Donna Riley is Kamyar Haghighi Head of the School of Engineering Education and Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Riley earned a B.S.E. in chemical engineering from Princeton University and a Ph.D. from Carnegie Mellon University in Engineering and Public Policy. She is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com A Third University is Possible? A Collaborative Inquiry within Engineering EducationAbstract:Engineering education is a terrain of struggle dominated by capitalist, white
STEM persistence for underrepresented minority students attending predominantly white institutions. Journal of Career Development, (2023), 50(1), 87-103.[12] D. Chakraverty, A cultural impostor? Native American experiences of impostor phenomenon in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 2022, 21(1), ar15.[13] E. O. McGee, P. K. Botchway, D. E. Naphan-Kingery, A. J. Brockman, S. Houston, & D. T. White, Racism camouflaged as impostorism and the impact on Black STEM doctoral students. Race Ethnicity and Education, (2022), 25(4), 487-507.[14] J. L. Mondisa, J. Millunchick, C. Davis & D. Koch, The University of Michigan's M-STEM academies program: Examining the social community of future engineers. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in
Professor Courtemanche 16 Fall 2019 Professor Park 9 Spring 2020 Professor Park 11 Fall 2020 Professor Park 2 Spring 2021 Professor Park 8 Fall 2021 Professor Park 5 Spring 2022 Professor Swihart 9 Fall 2022 Professor Ford Versypt 7 Spring 2023 Professor Kofke 10 Fall 2023 Professor Ford Versypt 6 Spring 2024 Professor Sepesy 7 sum Eight faculty 319 students average
Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) in Mechanical Engineering in 2022 and his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics from Oklahoma State University in 2018.Reese Emily Simancek Reese Simancek is a Mechanical Engineering major at the University of Miami who is looking to help the world through more sustainable technology.Emma Telepo, Michigan State University Emma Telepo is a junior at Michigan State University studying mechanical engineering, with minors in business and environmental & sustainability studies. Emma is committed to advancing modern technology and innovation, and aims to integrate the principles of sustainability into her work.Jo Machesky, Yale University Jo Machesky recently
led usFigure 1: The desktop flow loop showing key features. Tracer fluid is introduced through injectionports: one upstream for a needle to inject into the main flow from an adjustable height; and twodownstream that dock with the false floor and are routed to the body to eject from the surface.to continue using it after lockdown (2022, 2023, 2024, and in future) but in a classroomenvironment.3.2 Description of the apparatusThe apparatus is a transparent water flow loop, with flow visualisation features, illustrated inFigure 1. It is small enough that it can be used on a table top in a classroom, with studentsworking in pairs or alone. The ability to schedule large numbers of students together — while stillworking in pairs on their own
significant Research and Practice Implications for these themes.Dr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in India. He has worked as an Assistant Professor (2014–2018) in the department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, KLE Technological University, India
, collaborative, and challenging engineering tasks.A pilot initiative was formulated based on prior experience in two separate ASU ResearchExperience for Teachers (RET) programs in 2022 and 2023. The pilot program began oncampus, designing and testing initial kits and exchange procedures (Fig.1). The primary resultwas a naturally rigorous standard of communication and reporting between students. The firstiteration of project reports were rudimentary and poorly reported, as students hadn't traded Fig. 2; First student report on an ASU sourced project. Note the limited reporting and lack of detail. This is Fig. 3; First stage of ASU-sourced Coral before students began exchanging information for project. collaborative development cycles
global leader in innovation is of utmost importance especially during a time weresolving the world’s most pressing and complex issues, including the recent pandemic, climate,environmental challenges, and a sustainable economy require innovative solutions. This need isreflected in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) occupation growthwhich has increased 79% since 1990 and is projected to grow by 10.8% by 2031 (U.S. Bureau ofLabor Statistics, 2022). The demographics of the United States are undergoing a profoundtransformation, marked by the significant and growing presence of Hispanic and Latinoindividuals within the population. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, as of 2020, Hispanicsand Latinos constituted approximately 18.7
requires an equity explicit perspective,” presented at the Conference on Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Philadelphia, PA, USA, May 23–24, 2022.[2] J. Kurose, “Dear Colleague letter: Pursuing meaningful actions in support of Broadening Participation in Computing (BPC) (NSF 17-110).” nsf.gov. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17110/nsf17110.jsp (accessed Feb. 13, 2023).[3] J. Margolis, R. Estrella, J. Goode, J. Jellison Holme, and K. Nao, Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, and Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.[4] C.L. Fletcher and J.R. Warner, “CAPE: A framework for assessing equity throughout the computer science
TA support which evolve over timeand that such preferences are not uniform across student demographics. This dynamic landscapeof what students expect from their TAs suggests that techniques for exploring studentexpectations at the start of a course can make a valuable addition to TA professionaldevelopment programs. Understanding this dynamic landscape can also enable TAs to targettheir teaching efforts for maximum and equitable effectiveness across both underrepresented andmajority student populations.IntroductionIn terms of gender, race, and ethnicity, engineering has a diversity problem that has persisted fora very long time. In 2022, women accounted for less than a quarter (24.2%) of engineeringbachelor’s degrees in the U.S., marking a
early2025 on the Georgia Tech campus. The team working on the project includes two faculty, aprofessional composer, art and science teachers from an elementary school, and students in ranksranging from elementary school to master’s, with the large majority being undergraduates. Thestudents involved participate in several courses and programs, including Vertically IntegratedProjects (VIP), ENGAGES (Engaging New Generations at Georgia Tech through Engineering &Science), and interdisciplinary senior capstone design. BMG follows the first exhibit by theElectronic ARTrium lab, Raise Your Hand, which was shown for two weeks in November 2022,in the Ferst Center for the Arts, and was described in a paper last year in this conference [1].Raise Your Hand
ways they are seen as deficient, to focusing ourattention on the perpetuation of white supremacy through actors such as institutions and systemsthat continue to produce the same identities in STEM and engineering: “pale and male” [62, p.9].References 1. K. V. Hardy, The Enduring, Invisible, and Ubiquitous Centrality of Whiteness. W. W. Norton & Company, 2022. 2. National Center for Educational Statistics. “Race/Ethnicity of College Faculty.” Institute of Education Sciences. (accessed Dec. 1, 2023). https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61 3. American Society for Engineering Education. (2020). Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019. Washington, DC. 4. R. Fry, B. Kennedy, and C. Funk
. 201–216, 2014.[2] S. Rankin and J. C. Garvey, “Identifying, quantifying, and operationalizing queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students: Assessment and research in student affairs,” New Dir. Stud. Serv., vol. 2015, no. 152, pp. 73–84, 2015.[3] National Academies of Sciences Engineering, Medicine, and others, Measuring sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation. 2022.[4] R. DeHority, R. Baez, T. Burnett, and L. Howell, “Nonbinary scientists want funding agencies to change how they collect gender data,” Sci. Am., 2021.[5] K. Langin, “LGBTQ researchers say they want to be counted,” Science, 2020, doi: 10.1126/science.caredit.abg1972
Study represented by (a) undergraduate and (b) graduate student participantsStudents were matched based on their academic and professional goals as well as their interest inadvanced degrees. Ideally, we paired undergraduates with graduate students in the same field ordiscipline (e.g., mechanical engineering undergraduates with mechanical engineering graduatestudents) or with graduate students who had relevant experiences (e.g., internships, research) thatthe undergraduates found interesting. In cases where there was minimal overlap in interests, wepaired undergraduates with graduate students who could mentor on a general level, focusing onproviding guidance and information about graduate school.This study focuses on our second cohort for 2022
their first visit to a college campus, so this novel experience in a modern facility couldserve to amplify the students’ interest in pursuing a STEM career. Students generally increased their awareness of the field of environmental engineering,and they improved their knowledge of biomedical engineering, as only 11% thought thatengineers discover how cells talk to each other in the body before participating in this event. Theauthors plan to examine data from the two post-COVID years (2022 and 2023) where the eventreturned to an in-person format to compare with prior in-person offerings and with this virtualevent.Lessons Learned Other engineering programs that transitioned to a virtual format reported successesduring the COVID-19
/2611987978/se-2[2] C.A. Mertler. Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2019.[3] National Science Board, National Science Foundation. 2021. The STEM Labor Force of Today: Scientists, Engineers and Skilled Technical Workers. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022. NSB-2021-2. Alexandria, VA. Available https:// ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212.[4] American Society for Engineering Education. “Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology, 2021.” Washington, D.C. 2022.[5] S. Jaschik. “New Push for a Shift in Promotion and Tenure: A Proposal to Add Innovation and Entrepreneurship to Tenure and Promotion Criteria,” Inside Higher Ed, September 30, 2020
. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 31:486–490, 2012. [2] Heisawn Jeong, Cindy E Hmelo-Silver, and Kihyun Jo. Ten years of computer-supported collaborative learning: A meta-analysis of cscl in stem education during 2005–2014. Educational research review, 28:100284, 2019. [3] Geoffrey Herman, Yucheng Jiang, Yueqi Jiang, Seth Poulsen, Matthew West, and Mariana Silva. An analytic comparison of student-scheduled and instructor-scheduled collaborative learning in online contexts. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [4] Yu-Tzu Lin, Cheng-Chih Wu, and Chiung-Fang Chiu. The use of wiki in teaching programming: Effects upon achievement, attitudes, and collaborative programming