improvingquality and promoting innovation.” Keynote at the 13th Annual Colloquium on International Engineering Education:Moving Forward, Nov. 4-7, 2010 Newport, R.I.; Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). TheABET “professional skills”—Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1),41-55; Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education throughaccreditation: The impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its global influence. Journal of Engineering Education,94(1), 165-184.4 McMasters, J. H. (2004). Influencing engineering education: One (aerospace) industry perspective. InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 353-371; Bybee, R
College. Previously, he practicedengineering in the petroleum, aerospace, integrated circuit fabrication andfiber-optics industries. Dr. Levert is a member of STLE, and ASME, and was awarded the bestpaper award by the ASME Tribology Division in October, 2000 (as co-author)for “Interfacial Fluid Mechanics and Pressure Prediction in ChemicalMechanical Polishing”.Andy Grosso received his Bachelor's degree in Management from St. John'sUniversity, Queens, NY, USA, and his Master’s degree in Management fromAdelphi University, Garden City, NY, USA. Mr. Grosso is currently an Adjunct Professor of Marketing at The Collegeof St. Rose in Albany, NY and is Vice President of Business Development atthe New York State Industries for the Disabled, Inc. in
, S. Hashim, A. F. Zakaria, A. Ariffin, M. H. Amirudden, M. B. Rahim, N. Razali, I. M. Ismail and N. Sa'adan, "Gender Analysis of Work Readiness among Vocational," JOURNAL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, pp. 270-277, 2020.[15] M. Pareitti, L. Lower and K. McCray, "The Career Readiness of Intercollegiate Athletes: Is There a Gender Gap?," Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics , pp. 283-302, 2016 .[16] M. Chen, "Facilitating aerospace engineering senior design: Integrating lab curriculum redesign with student project and new technologies," Engineering Reports, vol. 6, no. 11, 2024.[17] M. Chen, "Synergizing computer-aided design, commercial software, and cutting-edge technologies in an innovative nozzle
% 24% 26% Table 1: Student gender in Great Problems SeminarsThe students enrolled in the seminars represented 21 different majors. For Power the World,about 40% could be categorized as “traditional engineering” (Aerospace Engineering, ChemicalEngineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical Engineering).For Feed the World, only about 13% came from these majors. On the other hand, about 40% ofthe students in Feed the World had declared a major in the Life Sciences (Biology, BiomedicalEngineering, and Chemistry) while only about 3% of the Power the World students had declaredone of these majors.The largest number for a single major in the Feed the World seminar was Biology
. Introductory Computation/Programming Requirement for Transfer Students Environmental Manufacturing Biochemical Mechanical Biomedical Aerospace Computer
n % Gender Female 10 29 Male 25 71 Race/Ethnicity White 6 17.1 Black or African American 27 77.1 Hispanic or Latino 1 2.9 Asian 1 2.9 Major Mechanical Engineering 8 22.9 Computer Science 2 5.7 Aerospace
J. Shryock, PhD, is the Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She is also a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. She is an experienced educator specializing in student engagement and development of innovative educational practices with a focus on preparing the engineer of 2050. Her research encompasses helping educators understand and integrate strategies that enhance student success, particularly in response to rapid disruptions in education, such as the impact of generative AI. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Lived Experiences
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Industrial Engineering,where he is the Director of the Design of Actuators, Robotics, and Transducers Laboratory (DARTLab). He holds a B.S.in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Riverside and both a M.S. and Ph.D. in MechanicalEngineering from The Pennsylvania State University where he was a Sloan Scholar with the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Education
& Development].Ms. Danaii Elizondo is a sophomore studying Interdisciplinary Engineering at Texas A&M Higher Education Center in McAllen. She’s interestedin pursuing a career in the aerospace industry and wants to advocate for new ways to teach and inspire future engineers. Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Education
. Hajjar, "Electricity Theft Concerns within Advanced Energy Technologies," IEEE National Aerospace & Electronics Conference (NAECON), 2017.[8] D. Carr and Thomson, M., "Non-Technical Electricity Losses," Energies, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 2218, 2022.[9] Power Finance Corporation, The Performance of State Power Utilities for the Years 2010- 2022. Power Finance Corporation, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://pfcindia.com/ensite/Home/VS/29.[10] "World Bank National Accounts Data," World Bank Group, [Online]. Available: data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. [Accessed 10 11 2024].[11] V. Gaur and E. & Gupta, "The determinants of electricity theft: An empirical analysis of indian states," Energy Policy, pp. 127-136
Paper ID #36982Sensitivity Preservation and Precision of Plagiarism DetectionEngines for Modified Short ProgramsDylan Ryman Dylan is currently an undergraduate studying computer science and mathematics at the University of Cincinnati. He is preparing to begin graduate studies in engineering education. His current research interests include source code plagiarism detection and computational thinking education with a focus on visual programming languages.P.K. Imbrie (Head and Professor, Department of Engineering Education andProfessor, Department of Aerospace Engin) Head and Professor, Department of Engineering
journals in the field of educational psychology and technology, including Contemporary Educational Psy- chology (2017 – ), Educational Technology Research and Development (2011-2013; 2016-2018), Tech- nology, Knowledge, and Learning (2013 – present), Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning (2010 – 2015).Prof. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering of University of Oklahoma. His research interest include product family design, advanced material and engineering education. He is interested in motivation of engineering students, peer-to-peer learning, flat learning environments, technology assisted
Undergraduate Engineering at CPSUAt Comprehensive Polytechnic State University (CPSU), the number and percentage of womenin engineering varies from major to major (Figure 3). In Fall 2013, the CPSU incoming cohorthad the following majors with the highest proportions of female students: EnvironmentalEngineering (57%), Biomedical Engineering (49%), Architectural Engineering (46%), IndustrialEngineering (29%), and Civil Engineering (28%). Those majors with the smallest percentage offemale students as incoming students in Fall 2011 were Mechanical Engineering (16%),Aerospace Engineering (15%), Electrical Engineering (15%), and Computer Engineering (14%),This data generally follows the national trends with some areas where CPSU exceeds thenational data for
motivated and talented people to learn how to define and achieve their dreams. Farrokh Mistree holds the L. A. Comp Chair in the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma. Prior to this position, he was the Associate Chair of the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech – Savannah. He was also the Founding Director of the Systems Realization Laboratory at Georgia Tech. Farrokh’s current research focus is model-based realization of complex systems by managing uncertainty and complexity. The key question he is investigating is what are the principles underlying rapid and robust concept exploration when the analysis models are incomplete and
Research Laboratories. Research interests include active learning and engineering education, spatial disorientation, rehabilitation engineering, sports biomechanics, and aerospace physiology. He worked on a team that developed the Dynamics Concept Inventory and is currently collaborating on a grant to develop and assess Model Eliciting Activities in engineering. Brian is the 2008-2010 ASEE Zone IV Chair and serves as Cal Poly’s ASEE Campus Representative.Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Ronald L. Miller is professor of chemical engineering and Director of the Center for Engineering Education at the Colorado School of Mines where he has taught chemical engineering and
of “story” (as described by Pink and Kelley)21,17 as a powerful method of Page 23.17.3discerning and conveying rich context and wisdom, separate from the more traditionalengineering methods employing data and quantitative analysis.The study team was joined in this research by innovation leaders from over a dozen companies,selected as a representative sample of innovative corporations from America. These includedcompanies from a wide array of industries including aerospace/defense, automotive,chemical/materials, construction, food/consumer, information and medical devices. The teamconducted in depth visits and discussions with ten of these
Kay White, University of Texas, AustinDr. Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dan Jensen is a professor of engineering mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (mechanical engineering), M.S. (applied mechanics), and Ph.D. (aerospace engineering science) from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of micro air vehicles, development of innovative design methodolo- gies, and enhancement of engineering education. Jensen has authored approximately 100 papers and has been awarded more $2.5 million of
Paper ID #36790Peer oral exams: A learner-centered authentic assessment approachscalable to large classesMarko V. Lubarda, University of California, San Diego Marko V. Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engi- neering pedagogy and enriching students’ learning experiences through
, there's probably going to be an electrical engineer, not one, but a group of them, and also aerospace, or others. I think a good skill to have is to understand a little bit of everything. The classes that we take now agree with this, because we take a little bit of electrical courses. We also take material science courses. It helps us because we're so broad, and for all engineering fields in general, we're constantly working with engineers from other fields. I think it's really important, maybe more than any other fields. It's almost like a bridge. We have to understand a little bit of every other field, so we can communicate with them. I think that's a really important skill to have." Summary
...................................................................................................................................... 297“Spaghetti Bridges: Build, Load and Repeat” Jeff Burmeister & Kyle Watson .............................................................................................................. 307“A Laboratory-Based Course in Aerospace Engineering Failure” David Lanning, Wahyu Lestari, & Shirley Waterhouse .......................................................................... 313“Low-Cost Take-Home Experiment on Classical Control Using Matlab/Simulink Real-Time Windows Target” Eniko T. Enikov, Vasco Polyzoev, & Joshua Gill ................................................................................... 322Session GE2: General Engineering Education“Conceptual Change and Understanding in Engineering Education” Devlin Montfort
as spatial learning (Checa & Bustillo, 2020;Martin-Gutierrez, Saorin, Martin-Dorta, & Contero, 2009), physics (Adams, Pilegard, & Mayer,2016; Kavanagh, O'Hara, Palmer, Lowe, & Raftery, 2017), computer science (Alonso et al., 2010;Sevin & DeCamp, 2016), chemical engineering (Dry et al., 2016; Ribeiro et al., 2015), computerand electrical engineering (Dyer, 2015; Pantoja, 2017), mechanical engineering (M.E.) (Coller &Ieee, 2010, 2011; Coller & Scott, 2009), computer-aided design (Kosmadoudi et al., 2013;Tumkor, 2018), and aerospace engineering (Okutsu, DeLaurentis, Brophy, & Lambert, 2013).Many studies have explored engineering games' efficacy in enhancing overall studentperformance, game design, and development
faster than the average for all occupations;• employment in architecture and engineering occupations is projected to grow 4 percent from 2021 to 2031, with some areas of engineering, such as industrial and biomedical growing at rates of 10%.In northeast Indiana [2], engineering and computer science graduates support economicdevelopment in the broad sectors of manufacturing and health care, as well as specifically targeted,growth industries such as defense & aerospace, distribution & e-commerce, medical devices,specialty insurance, and vehicles. A continuous and steady supply of engineers, technologists, andcomputer scientists is necessary to sustain economic growth [3].Purdue University Fort Wayne (PFW) is a public institution
characteristics ofpotential users, as overly realistic models or complex simulations may necessitate advancedhardware that some students do not possess. Consequently, a trade-off exists betweenperformance and realism.AcknowledgmentsThe authors extend their gratitude to the numerous members of the Algetec Company, EcoEducacional, and faculty members from different universities who collaborated with us duringthe design and deployment of the virtual labs. Without their expertise and dedication, thecreation of such virtual laboratories would not have been possible.References[1] W. Tsutsui, R. Lopez-Parra, G. Silva Coutinho, A. W. Mello, and T. J. Moore, “The Implementation of Virtual Labs in Aerospace Structures Education,” 2020.[2] P. J
, Wearable Technology Bryan MacGavin, Jennifer Tennison, Sridhar Condoor, and Jenna Gorlewicz Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Saint Louis UniversityAbstract:In this paper, a learning module is introduced to teach undergraduate engineering students aboutthe principles of haptics and inclusive design thinking through wearable technology. To that end,a novel wearable haptic (touch) device was created, referred to as the HapConnect, that containsmodular vibration components for student teams to explore the use of haptics in a simple context,design and create their own versions of the device, and deploy it in a use-inspired setting.Through a series of lecture and hands-on design sessions, student teams were tasked
. Anticipated future improvements include increasing the number of students in theprogram, expanding the graduate student instructor opportunity to other engineering disciplinesand STEM fields, and reaching out to past participants (both students and instructors) to assesscollege and career outcomes. Overall, these improvements would increase the impact of theprogram and better measure outcomes of students and instructors experienced.REFERENCES[1] Real Academy of Engineering, “Engineering and economic growth: a global view,” Sep. 2016.[2] Aerospace Industries Association et al., “STEM and the American workforce.”[3] V. Wadhwa, G. Gereffi, B. Rissing, and R. Ong, “Where the Engineers Are,” Issues in Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 73
% were from Institution I, 15.94%of were from Institution II, and 16.67% were from Institution III. The majority of the participantsbelonged to Mechanical Engineering majors. However, there were also a few students from othermajors as well. 83.33% belonged to Mechanical Engineering, 4.35% were from Aerospace En-gineering, 4.35% were from Material Science and Engineering, and 2.90% were from IndustrialEngineering. There was one participant ( 0.72%) each from Biomedical, Chemical, and Nuclearengineering. The majority of the participants were males and graduate students; 76.09% were men,18.84% were women, 84.06% were graduate students, and 16.67% of them were undergraduatestudents. 10.14% of the participants were First-generation students, 86.96
32nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002, vol. 1, pp. T2A-9-T2A-15 vol. 1.[15] D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2002, pp. 16–19.[16] N. Hotaling, B. B. Fasse, L. F. Bost, C. D. Hermann, and C. R. Forest, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 630–656, 2012.[17] C. Frank, J. McGuffee, and C. Thomas, “Early undergraduate cybersecurity research,” J. Comput. Sci. Coll., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2016, Accessed: Sep. 23, 2018