minds about aerospace engineering, though they hadyet to take an actual aerospace course. At the same period in time there was much publicity ofdownturns in the industry, etc., that likely influenced their decisions as much as any otherfactors. The number of our students continuing on into graduate school has been increasing, andwe are retaining more of our best undergraduates. Much of that trend can be immediately tracedto the introduction to students of senior research faculty in lectures to the intro classes, and thesubsequent employment of undergraduates on research projects that interest them. Building onthat interest and continuing into graduate research from undergraduate wage employment is adefinite consequence of the familiarity with
Paper ID #33970A Comprehensive Review of U.S. Minor Degrees in Aerospace, Aeronautical,and Astronautical Engineering and Unmanned Air SystemsDr. Thomas A. Ward, Cedarville University Dr. Tom Ward currently works at Cedarville University in the Mechanical Engineering department. He has worked at several universities in both the US and Southeast Asia, since shifting from federal employment as an aerospace engineer with the US Air Force in 2006. He is an experienced lecturer in aerospace and mechanical engineering, specializing in propulsion, thermofluids, design, and energy. He has served as associate dean, research director
sector, “there is consensus on primarymechanisms that enable or obstruct systems thinking development in engineers” [12].Experiential learning, such as work and life experiences, is one of the three mechanisms thatenable systems thinking development, and was the top ranked mechanism with 40% or more ofthe interviewees including work or life experiences [12]. The second mechanism was individualcharacteristics and traits, listed as: “thinking broadly, curiosity, questioning, open-minded,communication, tolerance for uncertainty, strong interpersonal skills, and thinking outside thebox”; the third mechanism is a “supportive environment” [12].Critical Systems Thinking CourseCritical Systems Thinking (CST) is a course in the MS Aviation and Aerospace
Paper ID #27698The Search for the Commercial Space Technologist: A Comparison of Avia-tion and Commercial Space-related Postsecondary ProgramsMs. Tracy L. Yother, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Tracy L. Yother is an instructor in Aeronautical Engineering Technology and a PhD candidate in Career and Technical Education in the College of Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Ms. Yother currently teaches the undergraduate Powerplant Systems and Design Supportability courses in the Aeronautical Engineering Technology (AET) program. She possesses a B.S. and M.S. in Aviation Technology. She also holds an
AC 2012-5044: INJECTING THE REAL WORLD INTO THE CAPSTONEDESIGN EXPERIENCEMr. David B. Kanipe, Texas A&M University A native Texan, David Kanipe attended Texas A&M University beginning in Sept. 1966, where he re- ceived a bachelor’s of science degree in aerospace engineering in May 1970, followed by an M.S. in aerospace engineering in Aug. 1971. He accepted a position with NASA at the Manned Spacecraft Cen- ter in Houston in Nov. 1972. He served as the Chief of the Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Division in the Engineering Directorate at the Johnson Space Center until retirement in Dec. 2010. A month after his arrival at NASA, the last Apollo mission, Apollo 17, was launched. Obviously, that was exciting
presenterreceives feedback from the peers as well as the industry representatives; therefore, improvingtheir projects based on the input of other well respected engineers. The peers benefit from thisexchange with new ideas and techniques for their own presentations. The industryrepresentatives ideally gain knowledge on the academic level and creativity of the present daystudent and in turn lend their wisdom to the young minds of the future workforce. Nowadays most engineering projects are increasingly complex, as such, requiring a team Page 14.299.3effort. It is improbable that a single person can lead all areas of a project with absolute skill
for actuallyimplementing “kit” aircraft into existing aerospace engineering curricula. In a humble spirit,the purpose of this document is to provide a few of these guideposts.Course ObjectivesIt has been important from the outset that a laboratory course involving aircraft constructionbe more than one that merely turning students into “kit builders,” though that may certainly beone of the outcomes. The official course objectives of Aero 572, “Aircraft Manufacturingand Fabrication,” were specifically developed with this in mind. The course is offered twoquarters of every academic year, and the specific objectives as taken from the study guide arelisted and discussed below.13 The course objectives are to provide a hands-on demonstration and
system development” with mind-numbing Trade Studies.At a session titled “Space: The Next 50 Years” conducted at a famous space operations center afew years ago, the Session Chair opened the proceedings with the grand declaration: “The NextFifty Years Are Already Here! With the introduction of the (Giant Aerospace Company) ModelXXX Version yyy Booster!” Aerospace appears to have lost its edge as a leader of technologicaldevelopment. At the same time, it is the continuing experience of the author that casualconversations with people in all walks of life all over the world, still turn into a sincere “wow!”when they find out that one is an aerospace engineer. The vision of spending one’s time “amongthe stars” or pursuing grand dreams, is still very
the game would benefit from collaborationwith educators who can provide insights to a young student’s mind. Moving forward, the authors areworking with more teachers, especially those who do not have a background in aerospace, to obtainfeedback. Hopefully, approvals will be granted soon to allow students playing the game to be surveyed toobtain a richer set of feedback.AcknowledgementsSupport for this project was graciously provided by NSF project REvolutionizing Diversity OfEngineering (REDO-E) (project 1730693).References[1] Data USA: Aerospace Engineers. 2018.[2] Elam, M. E., Donham, B. L., & Soloman, S. R. (2012). An engineering summer program forunderrepresented students from rural school districts. Journal of STEM Education
AC 2010-2255: EXTROVERT: SYSTEM FOR LEARNING ACROSS DISCIPLINESNarayanan Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor, Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering.Marilyn Smith, Georgia Institute of Technology Associate Professor, Daniel Guggenheim School of Aerospace Engineering. Page 15.572.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 EXTROVERT: SYSTEM FOR LEARNING ACROSS DISCIPLINES ABSTRACTThe EXTROVERT project builds resources to enable engineers to solve problems cutting acrossdisciplines. The approach is to enable learners to gain confidence with the process of
, there are too many so called professionals, who rely blindlyon test data with no or very little understanding of basic principals of engineering. Figure 3: “Dog bone” sample in the tester. Page 12.1166.6Theoretical calculations will sink deeper into the minds when people see the end result. AT308,Inc. delivers exactly what is needed: learning by validation of the theoretical side of the course.There is another way to learn. The Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering in Needham,Massachusetts offers a different approach to engineering education. Guizzo reverses the “theoryfirst, practice later” model and gets students
truly affect the overall flight characteristics of aircraft.In addition to these design goals, the last major goal of the project is to house the Stewartplatform within ORU’s virtual reality lab in the Global Learning Center. In addition to educatingengineering students, the simulator will also be used as a promotional tool, both for theuniversity and the engineering department, and allow it to be a resource for what other needs theuniversity might have for a Stewart platform. With this in mind, a few more practical designgoals are being pursued. First, the simulator must be safe enough for people of all ages and sizesto ride in. Also, the platform must carry a professional look so that the university can showcase itand people will feel
Paper ID #34094Honeycomb Panel Buckling: An Exercise in Flight Vehicle Structures CourseDr. Sanjay Jayaram, Saint Louis University Dr. Sanjay Jayaram is an associate professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department of Saint Louis University. He obtained his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Central Florida in 2004. He teaches control systems/mechatronics, space systems engineering and astronautics related courses as well as engineering sciences courses. He has published several peer reviewed journal and conference papers in these areas. His research areas are space systems, robust
seems to make more sense in the way they are able to work, so I get a deeper understanding.□ Discussing helicopters and their components is a great way for the topics we are covering in class to come alive. It offers us another window in topics like stress and strain, and does so in a way that is interesting and very realistic.□ Any chance to relate real life engineering practices to what is being studied in the class is beneficial to everyone. In this case, helicopters fit the bill quite well.□ The theme approach is effective and should definitely be part of the class curriculum.□ Studying helicopters in our course in order to teach us about the different mechanical ele- ments is a great idea. It really opened my mind and gave me a
CDIO initiative in aerospace engineering, contextualization isfound to be a compelling learning approach that goes beyond the regular educationalenvironments: “The evidence for adopting a contextual learning approach is compelling. This approach encourages students to choose specific careers and remain in their respective career preparation programs. Learning environments and experiences set in professional contexts open students’ minds, enabling them to become more thoughtful, participative members of society and the workforce. Moreover, a contextual learning approach assists students in learning how to monitor their own learning so that they can become self-regulated learners.”52 As a point of
is why software simulations are so important notonly for the simulator but for engineering in general. Finding concrete evidence of a successfuldesign saves lives and saves money. Pinpointing weak points and fixing the issues before thefabrication of the final product are very important. For the simulator, our group started with apartially completed simulator which is why any changes to the design were so difficult. Thisforced our group to think outside the box and put all our minds and engineering skills to the test. Student #5: Although, not exactly the way full size flight motion simulators are made, ourprototype provides a very good educational base. The project had most of the design andplatform build completed. Using reverse
AC 2009-1469: INSIDE THE DESIGN CHALLENGE: MOTIVATING STUDENTSTHROUGH THE DESIGN PROCESSDebbie Mullins, Texas Space Grant Consortium Debbie Mullins has a been a Higher Education Program Coordinator for the Texas Space Grant Consortium (TSGC) since 1999. She was instrumental in designing the features of TSGC's flagship higher education program: The TSGC Design Challenge Program in 2002 and has been responsible for managing the program since its inception.Wallace Fowler, University of Texas, Austin Wallace Fowler is the Paul D. & Betty Robertson Meek Centennial Professor in Engineering and Distinguished Teaching Professor at the University of Texas at Austin. He was the 2000-2001
Paper ID #11519Improving Image Quality of a Color Infrared Digital Camera mounted on aSmall UAV Platform: An Iterative Active Learning ExperienceMr. Christopher E Hartman, University of Maryland, Eastern ShoreDr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Dr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri is currently a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at University of Maryland Eastern Shore. He is a member American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and, American Society for Agricultural and Biological Engineers(ASABE) and is actively involved in
). It is very important for aneducator to make the students fully understand the problem before they have the chance to thinkof creative solutions while keeping in mind the importance of real-world application. By havingthe students understand the theory by means of application, the development of creative thinkingtakes place, transforming the students into better problem solvers (O'Brien and Abulencia, 2010). In a conventional classroom, lower levels of Bloom’s taxonomy: knowledge,comprehension, and application are practiced (Bloom et al., 1956). The instructor introduces atopic, shows its applications, and assigns practice problems to the students with the goal ofrepetitive solutions making them familiar with engineering concepts
Paper ID #8130Learning to Innovate Across Disciplines: A Case Study on Three Team ProjectExperiencesMr. Juan Pablo Afman Afman, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Narayanan M. Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Dr. Narayanan Komerath is a professor of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology, and director of the Experimental Aerodynamics and Concepts Group and the Micro Renewable Energy Systems Laboratory. He has over 300 publications, over 120 of them peer-reviewed. He holds three U.S. patents, and has guided fifteen Ph.D.s, more than 50 M.S.s and more than 160 undergraduate research
2006-1971: LEARNING BY ITERATION: EVOLVING CAPABILITIES INAEROSPACE CURRICULANarayanan Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 11.873.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Learning by Iteration: Evolving Capabilities in Aerospace CurriculaAbstractElectronic media allow engineering lectures to be covered in less than half the time it used totake. This paper explores the background and related issues, and argues for finishing the lecturematerial quickly, then using the time savings to revisit concepts, and integrate knowledgethrough several iterations. The experience from teaching five different courses at different levelsis mined to gauge the lessons
AC 2008-2403: PREPARING EFFECTIVELY FOR ABET ACCREDITATION:WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?Kristi Shryock, Texas A&M University Kristi J. Shryock is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She received both a B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M and is actively involved in the ABET process.Helen Reed, Texas A&M University Dr. Helen L. Reed is Professor and Head of the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She is active in computational work in boundary-layer transition, flow control, and hypersonic flow; in unmanned and micro aerial vehicle systems; and in micro
AC 2010-435: IMPLEMENTING A PROGRESSIVE APPROACH TO TANGIBLEAIRCRAFT DESIGNMatthew Rowland, Dept. of Civil & Mechanical Engineerint at United States Military Academy MAJ Matthew Rowland graduated from the University of Washington in 1998 with a Bachelor of Science in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering. He earned a Master of Science degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from the University of Washington in 2008. He has served in various command and staff positions during his Army career and during his tenure at USMA has course directed the aeronautical subdiscipline course for Aircraft Performance and Stability. He is the current faculty advisor for the SAE Design Build
Paper ID #32368Connecting Critical System Thinking Principles with Hands-On DiscoveryActivitiesMary E. Johnson, Purdue University at West Lafayette Mary E. Johnson is a Professor in the School of Aviation and Transportation Technology at Purdue Uni- versity in West Lafayette, Indiana. She earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. After 5 years in aerospace manufacturing, Dr. Johnson joined the Au- tomation & Robotics Research Institute in Fort Worth and was program manager for applied research programs. Fourteen years later, she was an Industrial Engineering assistant
, aLightweight Fighter Design Project, a Glider Design Project, homework, two exams and acomprehensive final exam. The desire was to update the course with new approaches to teachingintroductory aeronautics. The framework for change came as a result of a Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN) Innovating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial (ICE) MindsetWorkshop. Since 2007 Baylor University has been involved with the KEEN. KEEN is “a nationalpartnership of universities with the shared mission to graduate engineers with an entrepreneurialmindset so they can create personal, economic, and societal value through a lifetime ofmeaningful work” [1]. This is accomplished by incorporating entrepreneurially minded learning(EML) into the classroom
ability to have students keep in mind possible 5.2 obstacles and errorsTSAT and ELEO Satellite Documentation and ASEE PublicationsAnother assessment marker was the evaluation of all of the documentation (Figure 15) byEngineers at the AF. In addition, the students gave their Critical Design Review (CDR) forTSAT to an engineering review panel at the ITT Aerospace (Exelis) company and werequestioned and approved for their work. For ELEO-Sat the AF flew four engineer reviewers toour university for a 12 hr. student design review. In competition the students were commendedfor their thoughtful work. Figure 15. Documentation.The students also worked in four small groups to write four professional engineering
AC 2008-337: PARTNERSHIP FOR MENTORING: THE GEORGIA TECH CSEMSPROGRAM AT AGE SIXNarayanan Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor of Aerospace Engineering. Directs the Experimental Aerodynamics and Concepts program. Served as Fellow of the NAIC, Boeing Welliver Fellow in 2004, Sam Nunn Security Fellow at the Center for Strategy, Technology and Policy, 2004-06, and Hessburgh Senior Teaching Fellow, 2005.Marilyn Smith, Georgia Institute of Technology MARILYN J. SMITH Marilyn J. Smith, an Associate Professor in the School of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Tech, joined the faculty in 1997 after fifteen years of industry experience at Lockheed-Georgia (now LMAS), McDonnell
Paper ID #14185An Integrated Curriculum Design for Teaching Flying Qualities Flight Test-ingDr. M. Christopher Cotting, United States Air Force Test Pilot School Dr. Chris Cotting is the Master Instructor of Flying Qualities at the United States Air Force Test Pilot School. During his professional career he has also worked for the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Lockheed Martin Skunkworks. He has worked on numerous experimental aircraft projects in- cluding the X-43A and X-43C, X-35, and X-33. He has a BS and MS in Aerospace Engineering from Mississippi State University, and a PhD in Aerospace Engineering from
], and train engineers [10], [11], [12]. Since virtual technologies enable us to see a subjectmatter with our own eyes, it is a much more intuitive approach than imagining the subject matterin our minds. Therefore, the virtual technologies are useful visualization tool in learning thecomplex and conceptual problem that requires spatial understanding [13]. Due to theoverwhelming advantages of virtual technologies, the use of such technologies during theCOVID-19 pandemic and beyond is a must. However, how we can incorporate virtualtechnology into our teaching depends on how and what each instructor wants to capitalize on thepotential of virtual technologies [14]. Therefore, the research question to which we would like tocontribute is as follows
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Integrated Teaching Model: A Follow Up with Fundamental Aerodynamics Sidaard Gunasekaran1 AbstractThe integrated teaching model was implemented for the second time in the undergraduatefundamental aerodynamics class at the University of Dayton. As with any aerospace classes, thefundamental aerodynamics relies heavily on mathematics. The integrated teaching model is speciallydesigned to let the students think beyond the equations and understand through experience theapplications and impact of the concepts and equations in real life. Both student-centered and teacher-centered experiential learning