Paper ID #38658Assessment of a Distributed Implementation of the EntrepreneurialMindset in an Experimental Projects CapstoneDr. Brian D. Ritchie, The Ohio State University Dr. Ritchie is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engi- neering at The Ohio State University. He teaches a variety of courses in thermal and fluid sciences in addition to the introductory course and an experimental projects capstone sequence. He completed this work as part of his Engineering Unleashed Fellowship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Assessment of
engaged in several teaching and research activities, largely focused on furthering the Space Systems Engineering Program at ODU. He has engaged in research collaboration with National Aeronautics and Space Administration as a Science Collaborator and a Principal Investigator and has been awarded grants by the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and National Science Foundation, among others. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Exploring Additive Manufacturing in a Space Environment - A Capstone Design Project ExperienceAbstractThis paper discusses the experiential learning from engaging in a capstone design project
Controls and believes that student aerospace design competitions are ideal avenues for students to express their creativity while complementing the knowledge gained in the classroom with hands-on experience as well as promoting greater collaboration and learning across disciplines. Dr. Gururajan’s research interests are interdisciplinary and in the fields of fault tolerant flight control, real time systems, experimental flight testing using small UAS, and the design/development of natural language interaction with drones. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work-In-Progress: Student Rocketry – Out of Class Learning Experiences from a Year-Long Capstone Project at
strong supporter of capstone classes, often funding programs, providing projects,and acting as project customers or mentors [2]. The Accreditation Board for EngineeringTechnology (ABET) recognizes that capstone design is a critical aspect of engineering curriculaand requires all engineering programs to ‘culminate in a major engineering design experiencethat 1) incorporates appropriate engineering standards and multiple constraints, and 2) is basedon the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work’ [4]. Further, capstone designcourses often support the attainment of ABET student outcomes 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7, preparingstudents to enter the professional practice of engineering [4].Challenges faced by students and faculty with increases in
engineering.All students at WSU, enrolled in engineering and engineering technology programs, are required tocomplete a senior capstone project. The proposal to develop the Concept Hybrid Rocket Demonstrator(CHRD) into the high temperature materials testbed was conceived of as a unique opportunity to engagestudents in engineering activities beyond what is possible to accomplish in a typical two semester, sixcredit hour capstone project. Members of the Mechanical Engineering faculty as well as themanagement team at Miller Advanced Research and Solutions Center (MARS) recognized that a muchmore immersive student experience than what is possible in the standard capstone curriculum, waspossible in the development of the experimental testbed. For the
the likelihood of system failures and their associated effects.Figure 2. PFMEA Steps.AN AVIATION SAFETY COURSE – CAPSTONE PROJECT RELATED TO FMEAThis paper aims to demonstrate how FMEA (specifically, PFMEA) may be taught in an aviationsafety course at the undergraduate and/or graduate level. and how the application of PFMEA inanalyzing HAA operations and accidents may be demonstrated to students. Therefore, within thescope of the prospective aviation safety course, this paper uses the Process Failure Modes andEffects Analysis (PFMEA) as per the SAE AS13004™ [3] standard to identify the risksassociated with HAA operations to demonstrate the PFMEA methodology with a real-worldsituation. Once the students have strengthened their theoretical
are studied to assess the short term and longer-termdevelopment of the students. The research questions considered are 1. What are the students’ initial responses to encountering an open-ended analysis project? 2. Do the students’ technical skills develop linearly during the courses or is the development recursive? 3. How do students’ conceptualizations of an open-ended problem develop throughout the project? 4. Does an open-ended project in a cornerstone course provide improved preparation for senior capstone?These research questions are assessed via a sequence of surveys and interviews of students fromboth cohorts.IntroductionThe arrival of COVID-19 in 2020 to North American university campuses was disruptive
year.Since I also teach two CFD courses at the University of Denver, it is easy to create newgeometries for different airfoils meaning that student projects will have slightly different resultsfrom year to year depending on the chosen airfoil.In additional to using a computational wind tunnel, in recent years, the students are additionallyexposed to a low-speed wind tunnel experiments with an airfoil either at the end of “Introductionto Aerospace Engineering I” or in “Mechanical Engineering Capstone Lab”, both of which aretaught by the me. In the future, students will use our makerspace to 3D print airfoils for use inthe wind tunnel while performing computational wind-tunnel analysis on those same airfoils.Since developing this course with a PBL and
course is a different type of technical writing course in which the instructor creates contentthrough in-class demonstrations and experiments. Here, students receive feedback both on theprecision and clarity of their writing. In addition, students also receive feedback on highlightingthe most important details.While many proponents of PBL in engineering scaffold major projects as preparation for a finalmajor capstone effort, the course design featured here adopts a more modular approach. EachEngineering Communication (EC) skill is introduced and reinforced through mini-projects,allowing adequate opportunities for students to reflect on their strategy and ultimate performanceand benefit from instructor and peer-based evaluation and feedback
milestone has suffered some delays, there is no doubt inhow serious our nation and others are in achieving this goal soonest.Satisfying these programs and other aerospace-related efforts will require a substantial workforce.According to the US Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, aerospace engineering isexpected to grow at a pace of 6% from 2022 to 2032, above the average of all occupations. “About3,800 openings for aerospace engineers are projected each year, on average, over the decade. Manyof those openings are expected to result from the need to replace workers who transfer to differentoccupations or exit the labor force, such as to retire.” [2] The 2022 Aerospace and Defense WorkforceStudy, conducted by the Aerospace Industries
that orbital debris is an issue, butconflict starts when deciding who should do what to solve the problem [16]. The lesson wasdesigned to introduce students to the exploration of macroethics without pushing them to a‘panic zone’ in which they would disengage and shut down [17]. Future lessons will build ontheir confidence by presenting more disputed topics.A table outlining the agenda of the 80-minute macroethics lesson is provided in Appendix A.While students walked into the classroom (a large lecture hall with stadium-like seating anddesks), we presented what we called the “hook.” We projected a paragraph-long issue brief on1 The authors note that they learned post-lesson and wish to help educate others that “stakeholders” is not