their findings to their peersand a panel of judges using a rubric based on one used for regional science fair competitions. TheBioengineering 101 module has been performed four times from 2019-2023 at the same highschool; however, the design and implementation of the module significantly evolved due to studentfeedback, faculty observations, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The evolution of how the modulewas implemented included changes in the age of the students (first year vs. third year students),the duration of the modules (two weeks vs. four weeks), and how the chemical engineering facultymember was able to directly engage with the students (in-person, virtually, or asynchronously).Assessment of the program through pre- and post-surveys found
interactive textbook," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 49-79, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/3-1-1153-36028.[6] N. Sambamurthy, A. Edgcomb, and F. Vahid, "Animations for learning design philosophy and student usage in interactive textbooks," in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32095.[7] A. Edgcomb and F. Vahid, "Effectiveness of online textbooks vs. interactive web-native content," in ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--20351.[8] J. S. Yuen, A. Edgcomb, and F. Vahid, "Will Students Earnestly Attempt Learning Questions if Answers are Viewable?," in ASEE Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2016, p. 16595
. Maslow, “A Theory of Human Motivation,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 370- 396, 1943.[3] T. L. Strayhorn, College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success for All Students, 2 ed. New York: Routledge, 2019.[4] S. Craps, M. Cannaerts, J. Veldman, V. Draulans, C. Van Laar, and G. Langie, “Enhancing (future) students’ sense of belonging to increase diversity and inclusion in engineering,” in The European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) - SEFI, 2022.[5] M. Schar et al. “Classroom Belonging and Student Performance in the Introductory Engineering Classroom.” Presented at ASEE Annual
facilitate teamworkamong university students, enabling the development of their transferable and soft skills throughcontinuous practice while learning technical expertise.Within engineering education, collaborative efforts can augment learning beyond the requiredtextbooks and other materials, proving to be more efficacious than in-class instruction, particularlywhen focusing on higher-order cognitive processes (Bayram & Bütün, 2020). An examination byIsmail et al. (2019) evaluated the impact of teamwork within project-based learning, shedding lighton its influence on individual cognitive and affective performance to complete coursework. Anotherresearch conducted by Misaki et al. (2020) also aligned with the growing consensus advocating
them in our virtual community. Our nextsteps are to gather more names of teaching-focused faculty in CHE that were not included inthis survey and to use a validated tool to address belonging and professional developmentsupport.1 https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/TrendGenerator/app/trend-table/5/51?trending=column&rid=1652 https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Engineering-and-Engineering-Technology-by-the-Numbers-2021.pdf)3 Bayles, Taryn Melkus. "Alternatives to the tenure track." Chemical Engineering Education 54, no. 1(2020): 14-21.4 Lord, Mary. "Rumbling in the Ranks." ASEE Prism 29, no. 2 (2019): 28-32.5 https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/10/01/scores-full-time-non-tenure-track-instructors-were-promoted-last-year-under6
justice are connected: • General engineering and social justice o Free Radicals “Science Under the Scope” [21] o Donna Riley’s Engineering and Social Justice book [22] o Caroline Baillie’s “Engineering and Social Justice” chapter [23] o ASEE workshop on the “Foundations of Social Justice for Engineers” [24] • Specific case studies in fields o Case study bioengineering ethics “SUMO-1” [25] o Coded Bias documentary [26] o Nicholas Sakellariou’s “A Framework for Social Justice in Renewable Energy Engineering” chapter [27]This area is emerging. There are several scholars documenting their attempts at adding socialjustice to the engineering courses [28]–[31], though
Framework for Transition with Greater Fidelity in Artifacts Supporting Student Performance ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020, Conference Paper ID #28668.2. B. Pejcinovic, Design of Rubrics for Student Outcomes in 2019-2020 ABET Criteria International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2020.3. A. Battistini, Kitch, W.A., Make Assessment Straightforward: A Case Study on the Successful Implementation of ABET Student Outcomes 1-7 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021, Conference Paper ID #34918.4. K.S. Grahame, Pfluger, C., WIP: A Comparison and Assessment of Capstone and Cornerstone Student’s Perceptions of the Application of ABET Design Criteria ASEE
, and M. Koretsky, “Destigmatizing Confusion – A Path Toward Professional Practice,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32625. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32625.[2] M. Kapur, “Learning from productive failure,” Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–65, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195.[3] A. D. Robertson, R. Scherr, and D. Hammer, Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics. Routledge, 2015.[4] H. S. Barrows, “Problem-Based, Self-directed Learning,” JAMA, vol. 250, no. 22, pp. 3077– 3080, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.1001/jama.1983.03340220045031.[5] D. R. Woods, “Problem‐based learning for large classes in chemical engineering,” New
enrolled in a STEM major during their first year: NO NO Took The Design of Coffee or Food Science Folklore and Health YES YES during their first year: Took a “core” STEM course during their first year before or YES NO while taking a non-core STEM course:For both groups, data was obtained for students graduating before pandemic-related remoteinstruction began (students graduating Fall 2019 and earlier) and for students that would havebeen impacted by remote instruction. Due to the constraints on the population studied of (i) beingin their first year when they took TDOC or FSFH and (ii) having since graduated from UCDavis, all students would have taken either of the
total faculty at Title IV grantinguniversities, 57% are tenured/tenure-track (T/TT) while 39% are nontenured. Of those who arenontenured, 56% are on a one-year contract, 28% are on a multiyear contract, and 16% are on acontract that is indefinite.2 Focusing on engineering, the latest ASEE report in 2018 found thatthere are 5026 non-tenure track faculty who make up 14.4% of the total faculty in engineering.Also, in 2018, Bayles reported that 8% of all 2323 chemical engineering faculty in the US wereon the teaching track3.The Education Division of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) started a peergroup for TFF in 2022. This group has met monthly on Zoom as well as in person at the AIChEand ASEE national conferences. The goal of
worsens [4]. Despite this, the issue of representation within chemical engineeringspecifically remains under-researched. Indeed, a literature search of Chemical EngineeringEducation (CEE) and the ASEE chemical engineering division proceedings yielded only twostudies focused on gender [2, 4]; we did, however, find studies in CEE focused on studentdemographics more broadly [5] and one study in an international journal focused on theexperiences of women in chemical engineering [6].Most research about gender diversity in chemical engineering has focused on women’saspirations to study chemical engineering. Godwin and Potvin (2013) conducted a detailedquantitative analysis of pre-college factors related to students’ reasons for choosing
://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-policy-and- procedure-manual-appm-2023-2024/[2] J. M. Cruz, C. Hampton, S. G. Adams, and N. Hosseinichimeh, “A systems approach to instructional change in academia,” presented at the 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, Jun. 2019.[3] J. E. Groccia and W. Buskist, “Need for evidence‐based teaching,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 2011, no. 128, pp. 5–11, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1002/tl.463.[4] M. Borrego and C. Henderson, “Increasing the Use of Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies: Increasing Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 220–252, Apr. 2014, doi
Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications.Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, ThatStatsGirl Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Research Scientist. Sreyoshi’s expertise lies at the intersection of workforce development, AI and emerging technology, and engineering education. As a Research Scientist in the tech industry, Sreyoshi leverages AI for mixed
, Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 197-214, 2019.[5] S. Claro, D. Paunesku, and C.S. Dweck, “Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty onacademic achievement,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 31, pp.8664-8668, 2016.[6] J. Rhee, C. Johnson, and C.M. Oyamot, “Preliminary findings using growth mindset andbelonging interventions in a freshman engineering class,” ASEE Conferences, 2017.[7] M. Tavakol, and R. Dennick, “Making sense of Cronbach's alpha,” International journal ofmedical education, vol. 2, pp. 53-55, 2011.[8] E. Blackwell, and P. Pinder P, “What are the motivational factors of first-generation minoritycollege students who overcome their family histories to pursue higher education
. Boston, MA: NortheasternUniversity. 2015 [8 1/2" X 11" comic. 1-8] Retrieved from: http://bit.ly/PIDControl Accessed 30Jan. 2024.(9) Shepherd, D. * (w) and Lubchansky, M. (p). Recycle and Purge Streams. Boston, MA:Northeastern University. 2016 [8 1/2" X 11" comic. 1-6] Retrieved from:http://bit.ly/RecyclePurgeComic Accessed 30 Jan. 2024(10) Landherr, L.J.T. “Integrating Comics Into Engineering Education To Promote StudentInterest, Confidence, and Understanding”. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.(11) R.M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences.” J. Engr. Education, 94(1),57-72 (2005).(12) Iyer, N. (w+p), ed. by Landherr, L. Chocolate is Chemical Engineering!. AIChEFoundation. 2022 [8 1/2" X 11" comic.] Retrieved
/dci-arrangement/ms-ets1-engineering-design (accessed April 8, 2021).[31] Allen D, Tanner K. Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biol Educ 2005;4:262–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113.[32] Carlsen R. Effectiveness of Incorporating Inquiry-Based Learning into Pre-Laboratory Exercises. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences; 2017. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28206.[33] Brame CJ. Active Learning. Science Teaching Essentials, Elsevier; 2019, p. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814702-3.00004-4.[34] Haak DC, HilleRisLambers J, Pitre E, Freeman S. Increased structure and active learning
. 1Does endorsement of masculine ideals predict sense of belonging and identity over performance and peer interactions?A student’s social identity can be defined as “an individual’s knowledge of belonging to certainsocial groups, together with some emotional and valuational significance of that groupmembership” (Ellemers 2019). We chose to evaluate this concept using the peer relationsquestions from established work regarding the welcoming nature of engineering culture and therole of peers (Davis et al. 2023). Informal group discussions within the department indicated thatstudents felt their peers facilitated more judgement and served as a greater hindrance tobelonging within the department than their
Competency standard for professional engineers," Engineers Australia, 2019. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/publications/stage-1-competency-standard- professional-engineers[3] R. Lawrence, "The promotion of future opportunities and possibilities for engineering graduates," Australian Council of Engineering Deans, 2020. Accessed: April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aced.edu.au/downloads/Engineering%202035%20report.pdf[4] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, "Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science," in 2011 Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2011: IEEE, pp. F1C-1- F1C-5.[5] J. Burdett, "Making groups work: University students