Paper ID #43419Engineering a Bridge Across Cultures: Insights to Support Dialogue withEngineering Professionals on Ethical and Social Design ConsiderationsMs. Tiffany Smith, NASA Tiffany Smith serves as NASA’s Chief Knowledge Officer (CKO) and Director of the Office of the Chief Engineer’s Academy of Program/Project and Engineering Leadership (APPEL). Ms. Smith is responsible for managing NASA’s APPEL Knowledge Services learning and development program, providing strategic communications and continuous learning to project management and systems engineering personnel, and overseeing knowledge services across the agency in
Paper ID #41379Engagement in Practice: Innovating a Project-Based, Community EngagedCourse for Engineering Students that Fosters Ethical ThinkingProf. Tucker Krone, Washington University in St. Louis Tucker Krone joined the faculty in the McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis in 2017. He teaches statistics, ethics, publication writing, communication, and community engaged courses. Tucker emphasizes engineering and statistics as forces for equity and social justice. Tucker Krone’s current passion focuses on integrating community engagement, social justice, equity, diversity and inclusion into
education programs found that engineering educators often attribute engineering project failures to technical, communication, or cultural issues and overlook the oppressive systems that could contribute to a pattern of failures across projects.I nstead, students have expressed frustration with only being shown cases of failure[21]and wanting examples of success stories. HE students have expressed “just wanting to know what to do" when encountering complex ethical and ambiguous questions. Further, without clear answers, they express frustration and disengagement from discussion topics around systematic oppression[5]. Other scholarship has shown studentsdropping out of engineering spaces when
advantage of their participation is due to having returning students as peer mentors.Faculty and staff are important elements of collaboration infrastructure, with a high factor ofinfluence in not only the students’ outcomes and guidance, but also to the partnerships. By havinga shared dedication to community work, they contribute by guiding students to maintain highstandards, helping to ensure continuity with ethical and functional designs. The faculty are alsocommitted to understanding each other’s long-term institutional goals. Rather than seeing them asexternal objectives, the willingness to support looks like integrating those visions into their ownsystems and goals, with joint initiatives. Each of the IIT professors understands the excitement
ideologicalseparation of technical and social concepts thus reducing inequality in the field? Similarly,McGee and Bentley describe a desire in black and Latinx STEM students to practice equity andjustice within and outside their career and coined this concept as ‘equity ethic’ [12].Interestingly, Swan, Paterson, and Bielefeldt suggest that women and minorities tend to invest inand benefit from involvement in service-learning in engineering due to their potential for socialimpact [13]. Is it possible that student involvement in HEPs could create an equity ethic whichleads to more inclusive practices in their career? Lastly, Reynante details a connection betweenstudent involvement in community engagement, a field closely related to humanitarianengineering, and
extent does the program increase a trainee’s intentions to pursue a research or innovation-related career? o To what extent does the program increase a trainee’s preparedness to perform professional skills related to obtaining a job?To address the evaluation questions, we gathered data from surveys and student reflections. Thebaseline/post-survey assessed research skills (e.g., problem identification, hypothesisconstruction, research design, data analytics, products), socio skills (e.g., ethics, socioeconomicimplications, policy/regulatory challenges, dialogue), professional skills (e.g., leadership,teamwork, and management), communication skills (written, translational, and presentation),community
justice,political dimensions, structural conditions, and ethical considerations, as well stakeholderunderstanding, values, and dynamics, which also aligns with ABET-EAC’s Criterion 3 StudentOutcomes. [5] By providing students an opportunity to learn from and about multidisciplinaryand multicultural elements present within engineering design considerations, they can develop,with this approach students will develop intercultural competence and be better prepared totackle wicked problems [10].The FEW Model builds upon the current literature and particularly the idea of the engineer’sresponsibility relating to social elements that even exceed traditional notions of engineeringethics as described with the Engineering for Social Responsibility
destroyed. This separated communities and decreased the value of the properties because it’s by a noisy highway. I saw through this lab first hand some of the houses that used to be where Highway 75 now is. In CIVE 101, I learned more in depth how the highway being built there affected the community and reinforce the consequences of redlining from the presenter who came and talked about redlining, and the exhibit we went to on Dodge Campus. This matters because redlining is an unfortunate truth about our city’s history, and it still affects the city, and the people in the city, today. It matters to me as a civil engineer because as a civil engineer, it is my job to uphold the ethics that we
Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Gibson contributes to multiple NAE and cross-Academies initiatives, focusing primarily on the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering program. Gibson completed her M.S. from the Colorado School of Mines as a member of the inaugural cohort in Humanitarian Engineering and Science (HES). In the HES program, Gibson specialized in Environmental Engineering and conducted research under the NSF-funded ”Responsible Mining, Resilient Communities” project in Colombia. She was named Outstanding Graduate Student in HES. Gibson earned her B.S. in Biological/Agricultural Engineering and minor in Sustainability from the University of Arkansas, along
, over 40% of whom are female, spread across 165 university/collegechapters [12]. Studies have found that participating in this organization supports the developmentof professional skills such as teamwork, leadership [13], project management [14], appreciationfor other cultures, and increased awareness of the role of ethics in engineering [15], while notdiminishing any technical competencies [16]. EWB-USA has also been found to serve as a multi-faceted retention tool for engineering students, particularly women [14]. However, previousstudies have not specifically investigated the views of the program’s alums, and a study of anothercommunity engagement program called EPICS found that alums of that program often developedsignificant new insights
sciences and complemented by professional and graduate programs. Elon Engineering is aunique blend of a liberal arts education and a traditional engineering education. The mission andcommitment of Elon, emphasize “putting knowledge into practice” and the establishment of an“ethic of service.” This aligns with the first tenant of the engineering profession, servinghumankind; therefore, integrating service-learning projects into the engineering courses isembraced. Service-learning has been done in both introductory engineering and upper levelthermodynamics courses at Elon.Curriculum/Learning GoalsFirst-year engineering students facilitated an afterschool activity through a service-learningpartnership with a nearby elementary school. The aims of the
Paper ID #42408Work in Progress: Quality Indicators for Community-Engaged Education,Scholarship, and ResearchDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. The IDE program includes an IDE BS degree accredited under the ABET EAC general criteria and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Bielefeldt’s research includes community engagement, engineering ethics, social responsibility, and
, and P. A. Ralston, “Why Engineering?: Students’ reasons forchoosing an engineering major,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.[22] M. K. Watson, S. T. Ghanat, D. Michalaka, K. Bower, and R. W. Welch, “Why DoStudents Choose Engineering? Implications for First-Year Engineering Education,” 7th FirstYear Engineering Experience Conference, August 3-4, 2015, Roanoke, VA.[23] G. A. Rulifson, A. R. Bielefeldt, and W. Thomas, “Understanding of Social Responsibilityby First Year Engineering Students: Ethical Foundations and Courses,” 2014 ASEE AnnualConference, Indianapolis, IN.[24] A. R. Bielefeldt, “Disengaged or Disappearing? Losing the most Socially MotivatedStudents from Engineering?” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH.[25] E. H
needs to be combated at primary levels of prevention by nurses,” Nurs. Open, vol. 7, pp. 678-679, 2020. 3. S. Oerther and D.B. Oerther, “The ethical challenges of antimicrobial resistance for nurse practitioners,” Nurs. Open, vol. 7, pp. 904-906, 2020. 4. H. Kosiyaporn, S. Chanvatik, T. Issaramalai, W. Kaewkhankhaeng, A. Kulthanmanusom, N. Saengruang, W. Witthayapipopsakul, S. Viriyathorn, S. Kirivan, W. Kunpeuk, R. Suphanchaimat, A. Lekagul, and V. Tangcharoensathien, “Surveys of knowledge and awareness of antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in general population: A systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. e0227973, 2020. [Online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1371