Paper ID #27659Deploying Virtual Product Dissection Lesson Modules in Introductory Engi-neering Classrooms: A Research-Driven ApproachDr. Elizabeth Marie Starkey, Pennsylvania State University Elizabeth Starkey is a Post-Doctoral Scholar in the School of Engineering Design Technology and Pro- fessional Programs at the Pennsylvania State University. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University and her B.S. in Computer Engineering and Applied Mathematics from Elizabethtown College.Dr. Scarlett Rae Miller P.E., Pennsylvania State University Scarlett Miller is an Associate
projects that include the layout optimization for wind farms, array design for novel wave energy conversion devices, optimization of collaborative power systems, the sustainable redesign of commuting bicycles, and the quantification of sustainability during the early de- sign phase. Dr. DuPont completed her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 2013 in the Integrated Design Innovation Group, and her projects are currently funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Oregon State University, and Oregon BEST/Bonneville Power Association.Dr. Christopher Hoyle, Oregon State University Dr. Christopher Hoyle is currently Assistant Professor and Arthur Hitsman
adapt our user testing methodology to improve theusability of similar assessment tools. Our discoveries about rubric structure improvements couldbe explored further to define best practices in the design of universal rubrics. Our next stepsinclude applying what we have learned to refine the rubrics and develop accompanying trainingmaterials. The refined rubric rows will be evaluated for inter-rater reliability, trialed in focusgroups with undergraduate students, and deployed in academic courses.Background: Learning Outcomes Assessment and the DARCA ProjectThere is a need for valid and reliable tools for assessing learning outcomes in engineeringeducation. In the United States the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) defines
,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 83, no.3, 1994, pp. 193-201.4 Dutson, A.J., Todd, R.H., Magleby, S.P., and Sorensen, C.D., “A Review of Literature on Teaching EngineeringDesign through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 1, 1997, pp. 17-28.5 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology: http://www.abet.org6 Prince, M. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93,2004, pp.223-31.7 Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition, Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.8 Atman, C.J., Adams, R.S., Cardella, M.E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., and Saleem, J., “Engineering Design
AC 2010-647: THE TECHNICAL, PROCESS, AND BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONSFOR ENGINEERING DESIGN – A 10 YEAR RETROSPECTIVEWilliam Michalson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. William R. Michalson is a Professor in the ECE Department at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute where he performs research and teaches in the areas of navigation, communications and computer system design. He supervises the WPI Center for Advanced Integrated Radio Navigation (CAIRN) where he is developing a Public Safety Integration Center focused on the integration of communications, navigation and information technologies for public safety applications. His research focuses on the development, test, and evaluation of systems
. Muraleedharan has participated in many professional and service activities university wide. In summer 2015, she in- structed Middle school Robotics and Beyond Camp, and in 2014 served as a judge for A.H. Nickless Innovation Award at SVSU. Dr. Muraleedharan strives to promote science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education for young girls and aspire young women engineers by volunteering for MindTrekkers event, Delta College, Middle school girls camp, ISD Bay Arenac and Girls Scouts, Michi- gan yearly. Dr. Muraleedharan is a member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineering (SPIE), Women
Paper ID #22268The ’Structured’ Engineering Design Notebook: A New Tool for Design Think-ing within a Studio Design CourseMs. Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Engineering Education Research Manager at the Center for Sensorimo- tor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington, where she is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development. Previously, Kristen worked as an ed- ucational consultant offering support in curriculum design and publication. She received her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction (Science Education
Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2005, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.[15] M. Denton, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 556–580, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20322.[16] D. Verdín, A. Godwin, and B. Capobianco, “Systematic review of the funds of knowledge framework in STEM education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, vol. 2016-June, doi: 10.18260/p.25999.[17] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, C. E. Brawner, J. B. Main, and C. Mobley, “Military Veteran Students’ Pathways in Engineering Education (Year 5),” in Proceedings of the
level of understanding andconfidence in implementing projects using the engineering design process.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Sue Wainscott for her insightful comments concerningassessment of student knowledge, as well as Drs. Ming Huang, Rick Olson, and Susan Lord, fortheir help in collecting assessment data during the design exercise. The authors would also liketo thank the DEED reviewers for their helpful feedback. USD Institutional Review Boardapproval was obtained in the Fall 2008 semester (project number 2008-09-009).Bibliography1 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 1998 ABET Accreditation yearbook, IV.C.3.d(3)(c), 1998.2 W. C. Oakes, L. L. Leone, and C. J. Gunn, Engineering Your Future: an
) in the Advanced Capabilities and Systems Group. Dr. Pacheco receive the B.S., M. Eng., and PhD degrees all from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Electrical Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Impact of Professional Communications Training on Teamwork and Leadership Skills for Engineering Capstone TeamsAbstract: Experience has shown that one of the biggest challenges facing engineering capstoneteams is team members learning to work together effectively. This is compounded when theteam is comprised of students from multiple engineering disciplines.Our engineering capstone curriculum has always included training on team dynamics and teamconflict
AC 2007-2201: SELF-MANAGEMENT OF COGNITION IN A TEAM-BASEDENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECT: A CASE STUDYOenardi Lawanto, Univ Of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Page 12.1264.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 SELF-MANAGEMENT OF COGNITION IN A TEAM-BASED ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECT: A CASE STUDYDespite little direct guidance and instruction received from their professors, working on an open-ended task such as designing an engineering artifact is expected to be a rich learning experiencefor students. In order to be successful on such a task, students need to set reasonable goals forthemselves and adopt intrinsic standards for success so that they will be able to
AC 2012-5456: GAMIFICATION AS A STRATEGY FOR PROMOTINGDEEPER INVESTIGATION IN A REVERSE ENGINEERING ACTIVITYMr. Jason A. Foster, University of Toronto Jason Foster is the Senior Lecturer in engineering design education within the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. Trained as a Systems Design Engineer and with industry experi- ence in software development and management consulting, he currently teaches engineering design at the corner- and capstone levels. His research focus in on scaling innovative engineering pedagogies to suit large classes, and his teaching integrates the theories of Vygotsky, Kolb, Papert, Perry, and Pugh.Ms. Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto Patricia
Paper ID #32970Mechanical Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Design SkillsThroughout a Senior Design Course SequenceValerie Vanessa Bracho Perez, Florida International University Valerie Vanessa Bracho Perez is a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering student and Gradu- ate Research Assistant in the School of Universal Computing Construction and Engineering Educations (SUCCEED) at Florida International University (FIU). She also holds a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from FIU. Her research interest includes integrating LAs into engineering courses, examining responsive teaching practices in
AC 2007-849: ASSESSING LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SENIOR MECHANICALENGINEERS IN A CAPSTONE DESIGN EXPERIENCEOlga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech Olga Pierrakos is currently a National Academy of Engineering CASEE AGEP Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher (PEER) at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Pierrakos holds an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her Ph.D. work pertained to vortex dynamics in left ventricular flows. She has served as faculty advisor to over thirty mechanical engineering seniors involved in biomedical engineering design projects and taught several mechanical engineering fluid mechanics
Paper ID #34238Adding a ”Design Thread” to Electrical and Computer Engineering DegreePrograms: Motivation, Implementation, and EvaluationDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by 14 years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in
. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Page 25.343.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Constructivist e-Portfolios: The use of media in the collecting and evidencing of student learningAbstractLewis argues that there are a variety of generative cognitive processes that are more likely tooccur in technology education than elsewhere in the curriculum1. Design based TechnologyEducation supports the development of higher cognitive thinking and problem solving skills,where students have the capacity to express their creativity and innovation through thecompletion of
project can be described as designing a portable robotic workcell for industry to showcasestate-of-the-art equipment and technologies in robotics. The industrial sponsor for this project isApplied Manufacturing Technologies (AMT) located in Orion, Michigan. AMT plans to use theworkcell for demonstrating current robotics technology in tradeshows, industrial open housesand/or robotics conferences. In addition, the workcell is to be used as a platform to providetraining to engineers working in robotics industry on robot programming, machine vision andsystems integration. The small size, flexible design and durability make the workcell appealingto many other applications in robotics engineering.An engineering senior project design team composed of
emerging technology integration in design.Mr. Efe Kutuk, Kean University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A SURVEY ABOUT INTERNET of THINGS (IoT): WHAT DOES IoT MEAN to INDUSTRIAL DESIGN STUDENTS Prof. Bekir Kelceoglu, Syracuse University Prof. Efecem Kutuk, Kean UniversityAbstractThe concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) is not new. The first “traceable” practical applicationof the IoT technology was a vending machine, which reports the condition of the beveragesinside, developed by Carnegie Mellon University in 1982 [1]. It was a simple system withsimple sensors, compared to today’s extremely sophisticated IoT applications
Paper ID #33168Augmented Reality Computer-aided Design Education (ARCADE) Tool toImprove Student Motivation, Engagement, and Spatial CognitionDr. Ulan Dakeev, Sam Houston State University Dr. Ulan Dakeev is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Technology Department at Sam Houston State University. His areas of research include Virtual & Augmented Reality, renewable energy (wind energy), quality in higher education, motivation, and engagement of students.Dr. Reg Recayi Pecen, Sam Houston State University Dr. Reg Pecen is currently a Quanta Endowed Professor of the Department of Engineering Technology at Sam Houston
Paper ID #8004Development of an Open-Source Concurrent Enrollment Course that Intro-duces Students to the Engineering Design and Documentation ProcessProf. Richard Cozzens, Utah Educational Network This paper will be presented by four of the TICE Grant Curriculum Development Team members: Richard Cozzens Professor at Southern Utah University Jeremy Farner Professor at Weber State University Thomas Paskett PhD Isabella Borisova Professor at Southern Utah UniversityMr. Jeremy Ray Farner, Weber State University Assistant Professor Design Engineering Technology Weber State University, Ogden Utah Bachelors in Design
AC 2012-4725: ONLINE LEARNING COMMUNITIES FOR DESIGNMs. Natasha Perova, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natasha Perova is currently a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She previously worked at the Harvard Graduate School of Education as a Research Assistant focusing on students’ learning algebra and also taught an introductory physics course at Suffolk University, Boston, Mass. Before that, she worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at the Center for Engineering Edu- cational and Outreach at Tufts University, Medford, Mass. Natasha received her M.S. in mathematics, science, technology, and engineering education in 2008, M.S. in electrical engineering in 2005 from Tufts
globally, working on multiple continents and with many cultures, which produce sophisticated defense electronics equipment, complex automotive systems, and advanced semiconductors. Dr. Hovsapian has personally been recognized nationally for his process improvement activities in manufacturing excellence. He received his Masters of Science and doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from Florida State University.Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State UniversityBruce A. Harvey, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Dr. Bruce Harvey received his Bachelor degree from Auburn University in 1984, his Master of Science from University of Alabama in Huntsville in 1986 and his Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in
AC 2009-190: STUDENT EVALUATIONS OF SPONSOR INTERACTION IN ACAPSTONE INTERDISCIPLINARY SENIOR DESIGN PROGRAMPeter Schmidt, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Peter L. Schmidt received his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Louisville, a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his doctorate degree in mechanical engineering from Vanderbilt University. He is currently an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has served as a research associate and as an instructor at Vanderbilt University. He has also worked at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Crane, Indiana; at Precision
Paper ID #17251Crossing the group-individual divide; brainsketching in design educationDr. Keelin Siomha Leahy, University of Limerick Keelin Leahy is a lecturer of Technology Education at the University of Limerick. Keelin received her PhD from the University of Limerick in 2009, which focused on approaches for design activities in second level education. Keelin’s main research interests include developing approaches for the development of creativity and design based activities and pedagogy. Keelin lectures in the areas of Design for Teachers, 3D CAD Modelling, Wood Design and Technology, Wood Processing Practice and
AC 2010-2185: ENHANCING THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHEXPERIENCE IN A SENIOR DESIGN CONTEXTFarrokh Attarzadeh, University of Houston FARROKH ATTARZADEH earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Houston in 1983. He is an associate professor in the Engineering Technology Department, College of Technology at the University of Houston. He teaches software programming, operating systems, digital logic, and is in charge of the senior project course in the Computer Engineering Technology Program. He has developed a concept referred to as EMFA (Electromechanical Folk Art) as a vehicle to attract young students to the STEM fields. He is the Associated Editor for student papers at
Paper ID #6820A Team-effectiveness Inventory for Guided Reflection and FeedbackMs. Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto Patricia Kristine Sheridan is a PhD Candidate with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She holds a BASc and MASc in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto. She is a member of the teaching team and a course developer for the Praxis cornerstone design courses.Miss Lobna El Gammal , Institute For Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto Lobna El Gammal is currently completing her third year of chemical
using empirically- based prediction techniques. Dr. Wood’s research also includes the development of robotic ground and air vehicle systems using innovative conceptual design techniques for current technology implementations, as well as futuristic projections, applied in the framework of a senior capstone design course. Page 22.292.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Body-Storming, Super Heroes and Sci-Tech Publications: Techniques to Enhance the Ideation ProcessAbstractThe ideation (concept generation) step in the design process likely has
Society for Engineering Education, 2019AbstractIn recent years, makerspaces have become an increasingly common feature in the engineeringbuildings of academic institutions. Through the creation and continued funding of these spaces,access to rapid prototyping technology has allowed for fast, straightforward project developmentacross the engineering disciplines. While many hypothesize that students’ participation withinthese facilities has a positive impact on their educational experiences and outcomes, there is littleempirical data that describes how and to what extent individuals are impacted by exposure to amakerspace.In this paper, we seek to understand how the use of a university makerspace in a course projectimpacts students’ engineering
- neering and Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is an fellow of the ASEE and NSPE. .He was the first engineer to win the Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service- Learning. He was a co-recipient of the 2005 National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education for his work in EPICS. Page 22.444.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Designing in a Social Context: Situating Design in a Human- Centered, Social WorldIntroductionSince the appearance of the
AC 2008-426: IT TAKES TWO TO TEACH CAPSTONE DESIGNDon Dekker, University of South Florida Don Dekker is currently an Adjunct Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of South Florida. He is currently teaching three of his favorite courses Mechanical Engineering Laboratory I, Internal Combustion Engines, and Capstone Design. Before his retirement in 2001, Don taught at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He first joined ASEE in 1974 and some of his ASEE activities include Zone II Chairman (86-88), Chairman of DEED (89-90), and General Chair of FIE ‘87. His degrees are: PhD, Stanford University, 1973; MSME, University of New Mexico, 1963; and BSME, Rose Polytechnic Institute