, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi- Year Single Institution Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6–27, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x.[11] K. L. Lewis et al., “Fitting in to Move Forward: Belonging, Gender, and Persistence in the Physical Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (pSTEM),” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 420–436, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0361684317720186.[12] T. M. Freeman, L. H. Anderman, and J. M. Jensen, “Sense of Belonging in College Freshmen at the Classroom and Campus Levels,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 203–220, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.3200/JEXE.75.3.203-220.[13] L. Gao, J. Peranson, J. Nyhof-Young, E. Kapoor, and J. Rezmovitz, “The role of ‘improv’ in health
Paper ID #34090Design and Build at Home: Development of a Low-cost and VersatileHardware Kit for a Remote First-year Mechanical Engineering Design ClassTania K. Morimoto, University of California, San Diego Tania K. Morimoto received the B.S. degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, in 2012 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Stanford University, Stanford, CA, in 2015 and 2017, respectively, all in mechanical engineering. She is currently an Assistant Professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering and an Assistant Professor of surgery with University of California, San Diego. Her research interests
. Some capstone design projectsare multidisciplinary with students from across multiple majors and multiple departments. Thedesign review process gives students the opportunity to learn about their project from a differentengineering perspective, consequently growing their breadth of knowledge. The University ofSouth Carolina’s Department of Mechanical Engineering studied the impact that “mechatronics”has on engineering education [2]. Victor Giurgiutiu et al. define mechatronics as an academicdiscipline that combines the fields of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, computerengineering, and information technology. They state that the goal of mechatronics is to “developin our students the right blend of technical knowledge, scientific
transportation technology,”Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 24-28,2017. http://peer.asee.org/281835[17] M. Poynter, S. Bansode, T. C. Dube, and J. Zhang. “Integration of SAE student competitionwith project course,” Proceedings of the 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa,FL, June 15-19, 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32998[18] K. S. Grahame, S. F. Freeman, and J. A. Levi. “Community engagement and servicelearning: putting faces to a community to create better engineers,” Proceedings of the 126thASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 15-19, 2019.https://peer.asee.org/32521[19] S. M. Kellam, J. Stewart, D. C. Richter, B. M. Michaelis, and R. E. Gerlick. “Anundergraduate
Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Automating Detection of Framing Agency in Design Team TalkAbstractThose who teach design contend
Paper ID #22345Exploring Students’ Product Design Concept Generation and DevelopmentPracticesMr. Jin Woo Lee, University of Michigan Jin Woo Lee is a PhD student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs
. Daniel J. Robertson, University of Idaho, MoscowDr. Sean Michael Quallen, University of Idaho, Moscow Dr. Sean M. Quallen is an instructor in the Mechanical Engineering department at the University of Idaho– Moscow. He teaches dynamics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer. His interests include improving the representation of young women in engineering fields and the integration of personal/mobile technology into the classic lecture period. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Development and Implementation of a Longitudinal Design AssessmentAbstractAn assessment tool has been developed to measure and track student design skills longitudinallythrough the curriculum. The rubric
have funded Pfefferkorn’s work. He is a recipient of the 2007 Kuo K. Wang Outstanding Young Manufacturing Engineer Award from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers and a Machine Tool Technology Research Foundation equipment loan award. Page 26.184.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An Examination of ME449: A New Design and Fabrication Coursein the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin - Madison Page 26.184.2IntroductionThis paper details the development of a new design and fabrication course
Paper ID #31254Senior Capstone Team Formation Based on Project Interest: Team Selectionby Students Compared to Team Selection by InstructorsDr. Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Peter Schuster earned a B.A. in Physics from Cornell University, an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan Technological University. He worked at Ford Motor Company as a design engineer and technical specialist for ten years before transi- tioning into academia. He is currently a professor in Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic
Paper ID #29717”Where I’ve been, where I am, where I’m going”: Exploring DesignAwareness through an Undergraduate Student SeminarAaron Justin Joya, Georgetown University Aaron Joya is a research assistant at the Center for Engineering Learning And Teaching (CELT) at the University of Washington. He is currently a graduate student within the Learning Design and Technology program at Georgetown University.Khadijah JordanMs. Miranda Nicole WashingtonGrace Barar, University of WashingtonAlison Gray, University of WashingtonMs. Rylie SweemDr. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the
AC 2007-2024: CONVERGING-DIVERGING DESIGN STRATEGIES IN ASOPHOMORE LEVEL DESIGN SEQUENCE: REVIEW OF ANELECTROMECHANICAL PROJECTParis von Lockette, Rowan University Paris von Lockette is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 1999. His interests include the physics or polymers and numerical / computational methods in materials science.Eric Constans, Rowan University Eric Constans is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University. His areas of interest include developing innovative techniques in engineering education and engineering curricular reform. His research areas
2006-1758: SOFTWARE EVALUATION OF AN AUTOMATED CONCEPTGENERATOR DESIGN TOOLCari Bryant, University of Missouri-Rolla CARI BRYANT is a Ph.D. student at The University of Missouri-Rolla, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. The objective of her research is to develop design methods and tools that build on existing design knowledge to support the design process, specifically during the concept generation phase of product development. In 2003 Cari received a M.S. degree in mechanical engineering and an M.S. degree in biomedical engineering from the University of Michigan while doing research in the University of Michigan Orthopaedic Research Laboratories. Contact: crb5ea
sequenceFinal conclusions recommending the WKU hybrid single-semester vs. year-long capstone projectimplementation cannot be made. The WKU ME faculty do not even agree. Single-semesterprojects with a preceding design-only project do not seem to harm either the student experienceor the project success. When industry-based projects with maximally self-sufficient studentperformance are a priority, the single semester approach becomes increasingly preferred. Whenfaculty interaction with students in research or industry-sponsored projects, and results andtiming have a greater priority, a year-long approach gains preference.Bibliography1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore. (http://www.abet.org/)2. WKU Engineering website
AC 2011-649: ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF CO-OP SEQUENCE ON CAP-STONE DESIGN PERFORMANCEBridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Assistant Academic Specialist in the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering DepartmentDr. Gregory J Kowalski, Northeastern University Page 22.242.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Assessing the effect of co-op sequence on Capstone Design performanceIn the Mechanical and Industrial Engineering department at Northeastern University, CapstoneDesign is a two semester course offered in one of two sequences. In one sequence
engineer to receive the U.S. Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in En- gineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the ASEE Chester Carlson Award for Innovation in Engineering Education. He is a fellow of ASEE and the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE).Qin Zhu, Purdue University Page 24.1199.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Discourse of Design: Examining Students’ Perceptions
Paper ID #6224Talkin’ Teams – Strategies for Elevating Student and Team Skill Developmentover Project CompletionDr. Greg Kremer, Ohio University Robe Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering, and the director of the ”Designing to Make A Difference” ME senior capstone design experience. Page 23.1131.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Talkin' Teams – Strategies for Elevating Student and Team Skill Development over Project CompletionAbstractThe purpose of this
Paper ID #11638Exploring the Effects of Problem Framing on Solution Shifts: A Case StudyMs. Samuelina M. Wright, University of Michigan Samuelina Wright is a senior in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has worked in design and ideation research for over a year. Her focus has been on quantifying the diversity of so- lution sets, studying design problem framing, and exploring paradigm relatedness. She is interested in engineering education, which is where her passion for teaching and her technical background in engineer- ing overlap. As an engineering designer herself, she is interested in
engineers thrive when their habitual mind clashes with the social realities. In addition, I test interventions to nudge engineers to reframe problematic schema-incongruent situations into unique opportunities for cognitive growth, creative performance, and effective teamwork. My work contributes to revealing the science behind multicultural, interdisciplinary technological collaboration and providing actionable guidance for building up the next-generation engineers.Prof. Daigo Misaki, Kogakuin University Daigo Misaki is an Associate Professor at Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Kogakuin University. Daigo got a Ph.D. in Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University. Daigo was a visiting Associate Professor at
Engineering at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering of University of Oklahoma. His research interest include product family design, advanced material and engineering education. He is interested in motivation of engineering students, peer-to-peer learning, flat learning environments, technology assisted engineering education and experiential learning. He is the coordinator of the industry sponsored capstone from at his school and is the advisor of OU’s FSAE team.Prof. Farrokh Mistree, University of Oklahoma Farrokh’s passion is to have fun in providing an opportunity for highly motivated and talented people to learn how to define and achieve their dreams. Farrokh Mistree holds the L. A. Comp Chair in the
Conference & Exposition.9. J. K. Estell, "Streamlining the Assessment Process with the Faculty Course Assessment Report," Proceedings of the Best Assessment Practices VIII Symposium, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, 2006.10. H. G. Andrade, Using Rubrics to Promote Thinking and Learning, Educational Leadership, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 6-12. Available online: http://www.nycenet.edu/NR/rdonlyres/5CF749A8-D90F-4646-BEAF- 9DD3130EB82E/2716/AppendixC.pdf11. http://www.onu.edu/engineering/eccs/rubrics.html Page 11.1409.12 ECCS Department - Written Report Rubric
,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), pp. 936–954.[13] Defranco, J. F., Jablokow, K., Bilen, S. G., and Gordon, A., 2012, “The impact of cognitive style on concept mapping: visualizing variations in the structure of ideas,” American Society for Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education.[14] Jablokow, K. W., and Booth, D. E., 2006, “The impact and management of cognitive gap in high performance product development organizations,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), pp. 313– 336.[15] Lindsay, P. R., 1985, “Counselling to resolve a clash of cognitive styles,” Technovation, 3(1), pp. 57–67.[16] McCarthy, R., 1988, “An investigation of role conflict and
AC 2011-2181: RE-DESIGNING CAPSTONE DESIGN: TWO YEARS OFEXPERIENCECameron J Turner, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Cameron Turner is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines where he runs the Design Innovation and Computational Engineering Laboratory. At CSM he teaches undergradu- ate and graduate courses in engineering design and is a member of the Senior Design Leadership group. Dr. Turner is currently the course coordinator for the Engineering Capstone Design program and is active in the Computers and Information in Engineering Division of ASME. Page 22.1213.1
. Moriarty, Smith College Mary A. Moriarty is an Assessment Researcher with the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College and serves as a private evaluation consultant. She has over 15 years of research, evaluation, and project man- agement experience. Her evaluation work has spanned the areas of science and engineering instruction, robotics, technology application, and disability in higher education. Her background includes serving as Principal Investigator and Project Director for several D.O.E. and NSF initiatives that focused on teaching and learning in higher education. She has a doctorate in Educational Policy, Research, and Administration from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Apurva Errabelli
Paper ID #31145Understanding a Makerspace as a Community of PracticeChieloka Mbaezue, Stanford University Chieloka Mbaezue is a senior in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University conducting research to understand how learning happens in makerspaces. Through research, he desires to understand the mechanisms of learning in community in order to democratize the experience of self-efficacy experienced in makerspaces. He hopes to apply his gained understanding to the product development industry in African countries and in the United States, particularly in black communities.Eric Reynolds Brubaker, Stanford University
each subject area. Black represents the sciences and physics, dark gray represents computer science and engineering, and the light gray represents arts and humanities: 1. Computer Science (23); 2. Physics (10); 3. History (8); 4. Art (6); 5. Chemistry (5); 6. Music (4); 7. Math (4); 8. Genetic Engineering (4); 9. Economics (4); 10. Software Engineering (3); 11. Psychology (3); 12. Biology (3); 13. Game Design (2); 14. Literature (2); 15. Linguistics (2); 16. Information Technology (2); 17. Graphic Design (2); 18. Environment (2); 19
runningcrowdfunding campaigns are much more open about the problem which inspired their design,their target customer base, and an overview of the design process they have completed thus far.Furthermore, they are required to lay out the risks and challenges associated with bringing theproject to completion. Because of the increased visibility of the design process, and becausethey often involve innovative design ideas and novel technologies, crowdfunded products showgreat potential for use as case studies in engineering design courses.This paper describes an attempt to leverage the advantages of using crowdfunded projects as casestudies in a sophomore-level engineering design course at a small liberal arts college. Thecourse is part of the required curriculum
, engineering, and mathematics," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, pp. 8410-8415, Jun 10 2014.[7] R. R. Hake, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey ofmechanics test data for introductory physics courses," American Journal of Physics, vol. 66, pp. 64-74, 1998.[8] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan, "Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta- Analysis," Review of Educational Research, vol. 69, pp. 21-51, 1999.[9] R. A. Streveler and M. Menekse, "Taking a Closer Look at Active Learning," Journal of Engineering Education, vol