Paper ID #18876Toward A Decision Support Tool for Selecting Engineering Design Method-ologiesMr. Jack William Giambalvo, Stevens Institute of Technology I am currently a senior year student at Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, NJ, and am pursuing a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering. Furthermore, I am currently a candidate to receive a Master’s degree in Systems Engineering, which I will hopefully obtain by December 2017.Miss Julia Kathryn Vance, Stevens Institute of Technology Julia Vance is a Bachelor of Engineering degree candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology and will
Paper ID #18292The Importance of Doing rather than Discussing: How Curricular ChangesAffected Student Design-task Prioritization in a Hands-on Design ProjectMr. Christopher R. Saulnier, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Chris Saulnier is a PhD Candidate at MIT developing, teaching, and researching innovative approaches to design education. He is particularly interested in constructionist project-based design experiences for undergraduate engineering students. He has a background in leadership development and experiential education, having worked as an Instructor with Outward Bound Canada, and now brings that hands-on
Paper ID #19834Understanding Young Students’ Problem Solving Pathways: Building a De-sign Process Model Based on Sequential AnalysisMr. Euisuk Sung, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Euisuk Sung is a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University. He is majoring Engineering and Technology Teacher Education. He has computer science degree and worked as a computer software developer for three years. then he served as an engineering and technology educator in high school for 9 years in South Korea. Currently he is working in NSF Funded project, titled TRAILS. His research interests are design cognition, design
connect theirrequired design projects to use of the makerspace. Several courses in the mechanical and civilengineering, digital media, and technology management are requiring makerspace use this springsemester, with more planned in following semesters. Including a question about course usewould lead to assessment of whether course integration changes perception and use of the spaceand equipment. Figure 8: Engineering Design Self-Assessment ResultsFinally, the three statements in Figure 9 attempted to relate student community and teamworkperception. As discussed, the neutral or negative responses to the community responses seem tosupport the qualitative analysis of limited community involvement between core users andnewcomers
Education, (July), 310–326.9 Oplinger, J. L., & Lande, M. (2014). Measuring Qualities of Different Engineering Design Process Models : A Crit- ical Review. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.10 Wynn, D. C., Eckert, C. M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2007). Modelling iteration in engineering design. ICED 2007 International Conference on Engineering Design, (August), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.designsociety.org/index.php?menu=15&action=9&date=2007-08-2811 Smith, R. P. (1992). Development and Verification of Engineering Design Iteration Models. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.12 Adams, R. S., & Atman, C. J. (2000). Characterizing Engineering Student Design
Paper ID #18662An Exploratory Study of Power Dynamics and Feedback in Design ReviewsMr. Mitchell James Cieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Mitchell J. Cieminski was born in Fontana, CA in 1995 and grew up in Greeley, CO. He received a B.S. in electrical and computer engineering from Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering in Needham, MA in May 2017, and currently studies science and technology studies at Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute. In 2014, he worked at Insper University in S˜ao Paulo, Brazil as a Junior Partner and visiting student to their developing engineering program. His research interests
engineers at three different technology companies of varied size and withindiverse product sectors. The study focused on how engineers working on cross-disciplinarydesign teams use artifacts to communicate and how those artifacts affect design decision making.Examinations of the artifacts practicing engineers use supported the development of designprinciples for instructors to create modules, assessments, and activities for engineering designclassrooms. The educational design principles, presented in this paper as ‘how might we’statements, include: (1) How might we encourage students to report honestly and accuratelyabout status? and (2) How might we foster the use of documentation in student engineeringprojects? Findings from this study will be
Paper ID #19259Negotiating Tensions of Autonomy and Connection in Makerspace Cultures:A Qualitative Examination of a University’s MakerspacesMs. Megan Tomko, Georgia Institute of Technology Megan E. Tomko is a Ph.D. graduate student in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineer- ing at the Georgia Institute of Technology under the guidance of Dr. Julie Linsey. She completed one semester in her graduate studies at James Madison University with Dr. Robert Nagel as her advisor. Her B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering is from the University of Pittsburgh where she also worked as a Field Telecommunications Intern
Paper ID #19152Work in Progress: A Delphi Study to Investigate the Value of Board Gamesto Teach Teamwork SkillsDr. Kevin Ray Hadley, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Hadley received his BS in Chemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. At Vanderbilt, he also completed their teaching certificate program and was the first participant to publish the results of his project in a national peer-reviewed journal, Chemical Engineering Education. Afterwards, Dr. Hadley completed a postdoctoral study at NASA. IN 2012, he joined the faculty at South
Paper ID #19845Students’ Self-regulation in a Senior Capstone Design Context: A Compari-son Between Mechanical and Biological Engineering Design ProjectsAndreas Febrian, Utah State University, Engineering Education He received his bachelor and master degree in computer science (CS) from Universitas Indonesia, one of the top university in Indonesia. He was an active student who involved in various activities, such as research, teaching assistantship, and student organizations in the campus. He developed various CS skills through courses and research activities, especially in computer architecture, robotics, and web develop
Paper ID #19637Approaches to Coaching Students in Design ReviewsDr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Mr. Tiago R. Forin, Rowan University Tiago Forin is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education and researcher at Purdue University affiliated with
critical design pedagogy, and the ways in which the pedagogy and underlying studio environment inform the development of de- sign thinking, particularly in relation to critique and professional identity formation. His work crosses multiple disciplines, including engineering education, instructional design and technology, design theory and education, and human-computer interaction.Dr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional
work; team processes and decision-making; ethical reasoning, constitution, and processes; engineering design; technology and its impacts on organizational and personal life; network analysis; as well as organizational identity, identification, and culture.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum
Paper ID #17708Integration of Engineering Capstone within a Makerspace EnvironmentMr. Luis Javier Martinez, New Mexico State University, Department of Industrial Engineering Luis J Martinez is a MS graduate student in the Department of Industrial Engineering at New Mexico State University. His current work involves the integration of capstone projects from the College of Engineering of NMSU with the Aggie Innovation Space (the university maker space) with hopes of transitioning these projects to a Technology Acceleration process with the Student Technology Incubator of the University. Luis is involved in the Institute of
, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017. Dr. Jordan co-developed the STEAM LabsTM program to engage middle and high school students in learning science, technology, engineering, arts, and math concepts through designing and building chain reaction machines. He founded and led teams to two collegiate Rube Goldberg Machine Contest national championships, and has appeared on many TV shows (including Modern Marvels on The History Channel and Jimmy Kimmel Live on ABC) and a movie with his chain reaction machines. He serves on the Board of the i.d.e.a. Museum in Mesa, AZ, and worked as a behind-the scenes engineer for season 3 of the PBS engineering
Paper ID #18145Work in Progress: Quantifying the Differences Between Professional ExpertEngineers and Engineering Students Designing: Empirical Foundations forImproved Engineering EducationDr. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University, Center for Engineering Education Research Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design
issues.[8] As increasing technology allows engineers to learn more about existing andemerging problems, it also provides opportunities to develop solutions like never before.[9]Consequently, engineers must be successful in idea generation[8, 10] by fully exploring solutionspaces through the generation of multiple and diverse ideas[11]. Considering a wide spectrum ofideas at the front end of the design process is important in order to consider strong aspects ofconcepts to develop while filtering out other aspects. Generating diverse ideas to consider requiresdivergent thinking,[4, 12] while engineering methods focus on converging on a single solution.While experienced designers appear to use strategies in their idea generation process[13, 14
Paper ID #18282Case Studies of Problem Exploration Processes in Engineering DesignMs. Jaryn Studer, Iowa State University Jaryn Studer is a Graduate Research Assistant at Iowa State University pursuing her M.S. in Human Computer Interaction. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering at West Virginia University. Her research interests include design and strategies to develop creative thinking.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in
and design needs. She also has substantial experience using design ethnog- raphy and building sustainable partnerships within intercultural settings. Maria has led the development of the Socially Engaged Design Academy at UM, aiming to provide students with an on-demand training program to hone skills imperative to designing appropriate technologies for every context.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through
, accommodation andtransportation arrangements, weather conditions and subjective initiative of the students. Thepaper also discusses the measures that could be taken to better the students’ emotions, so as tooptimize productive practice effect.IntroductionAlong with the profound changes of human society, economy, science and technology sincethe 21st century, newer and higher requirements are constantly proposed for engineering andtechnical personnel’s quality through the integration and complexity of engineering. There isan urgent need for the modern higher engineering education reform and development tofoster high-quality engineering and technical personnel with innovative spirit and practiceability. This will be needful in satisfying the requirements
Paper ID #20484Identifying Affordances of Physical Manipulative Tools for the Design of Visuo-haptic SimulationsMs. Yoselyn Walsh, Purdue University, West Lafayette Yoselyn Walsh graduated with her bachelor’s degree in industrial design engineering with a specialization in visual communication and information architecture in 2010 from the Costa Rica Institute of Technol- ogy. After four years working in educational software design and designing learning objects for online courses, she returned to school and graduated with a master’s in computer and information technology from Purdue University. She is currently pursuing a
interests include: the appli- cation of arts based research methodologies to consider ”wicked problems”; the curricular impacts of art and technology on education; exploration and development of cross disciplinary STEAM initiatives, and using the lenses of affect theory and aesthetics to craft alternate forms of assessment.Ms. Kate Rice, University of Cincinnati c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Sticky Innovation: Exploring the Problem of the Bees Through Engineering and ArtIntroduction STEAM is an initiative that proposes to incorporate arts and design with the sciences;STEM and Art = STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art & Mathematics
with a Master of Science degree in Data Science and Analytics from the University of Oklahoma. She is currently employed full time as a Data Scientist. Her research interests include text mining, machine learning, and data analytics.Prof. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering of University of Oklahoma. His research interest include product family design, advanced material and engineering education. He is interested in motivation of engineering students, peer-to-peer learning, flat learning environments, technology assisted engineering education and experiential learning. He is the coordinator of the
Associate (2005-2007) and Assistant Professor (1999-2005) of Mechanical Engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received his Ph.D. from the Uni- versity of Texas at Austin in 1999. He teaches undergraduate courses in design methods, biologically inspired design, and machine element design and graduate courses in product design and dynamics. Dr. McAdams research interests are in the area of design theory and methodology with specific focus on func- tional modeling; innovation in concept synthesis; biologically inspired design methods; inclusive design; and technology evolution as applied to product design. He has edited a book on biologically inspired design. c
nebulous “fuzzy”front end and ‘wicked problem’ area of design and development when the outcomes are more unclear.10Engineering Design ProcessLike the disciplines in the design field, the engineering field also has its own variations on the approachesto the design process; there is agreement within the community about what the engineering design processencompasses at a high-level, however many variations exist.Engineering students across the nation are familiar with the Engineering Design Process, as it is aninfluential process in industry and thus a notable part of any accredited engineering curriculum, as manyreaders will know. ABET (The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) has articulatedseven student learning outcomes that are
) in the Advanced Capabilities and Systems Group. Dr. Pacheco receive the B.S., M. Eng., and PhD degrees all from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Electrical Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Impact of Professional Communications Training on Teamwork and Leadership Skills for Engineering Capstone TeamsAbstract: Experience has shown that one of the biggest challenges facing engineering capstoneteams is team members learning to work together effectively. This is compounded when theteam is comprised of students from multiple engineering disciplines.Our engineering capstone curriculum has always included training on team dynamics and teamconflict
developed design based curriculum for multiple K-12 teach PDIs and student summer camps.Dr. Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University Dr. Kimberly G. Talley is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, Senior Research Fellow and Maker Space Co-Director for the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research at Texas State University, and a licensed Professional Engineer. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. from the University of Texas at Austin in Structural Engineering. Her undergraduate degrees in History and in Construction Engineering and Management are from North Carolina State University. Dr. Talley teaches courses in the Construction Science and Management Program, and her research
Champaign, Texas A&MUniversity, Georgia Institute of Technology).18-25 These may be taught by engineering and/orphilosophy faculty. Other common places to teach ethics include first year introductory courses(e.g. Cornell University, Penn State University)26-28 and capstone design (e.g. KetteringUniversity)22,29-30.One might expect that capstone design courses would be an ideal setting for ethics education.Vanasupa’s Four Domain Development Diagram (4DDD)31 proposed that ethical reasoningcould be enhanced as students moved through cognitive, affective, psychomotor, and socialdomains of learning. Capstone design often incorporates all of these learning environmentsthrough hands-on team projects. Further, the 4DDD model proposes that internal
technol- ogy. In that regard he was an IDEA Studio fellow at Autodesk LLC in San Francisco and is one of the Autodesk faculty Fellows. He was a member of the National Association of Schools of Art and Design working group on the future of design education and served recently as Midwest District Vice President of the Industrial design Society of America. He is currently a member of the Core Planning committee for the new Seibel Center for Design at UIUCMs. Baigalmaa Batmunkh, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Baigalmaa Batmunkh received a Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Engineering and Technology from Mongolian State University of Agriculture and a Master of Science degree in Industrial Engineering
Paper ID #18507Examining the Effect of a Paradigm-Relatedness Problem-Framing Tool onIdea GenerationAmy E. Rechkemmer, University of Michigan Amy Rechkemmer is a junior student of Computer Science Engineering at the University of Michigan.Maya Z. Makhlouf, University of Michigan Maya Makhlouf is a sophomore student of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan.Jennifer M. Wenger, University of Michigan Jennifer Wenger is a senior student of Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michi- gan.Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Eli Silk is an Assistant Professor of