://peer.asee.org/demonstrating-use-of-natural-language-processing- to-compare-college-of-engineering-mission-statements.[23] C. G. P. Berdanier, E. Baker, W. Wang, and C. McComb, “Opportunities for natural Llnguage processing in qualitative engineering education research: Two examples,” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2018, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8658747.[24] A. Satyanarayana, K. Goodlad, J. Sears, P. Kreniske, M. F. Diaz, and S. Cheng, “Using natural language processing tools on individual stories from First-year students to summarize emotions, sentiments, and concerns of transition from high school to college,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun
also an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineer- ing Department where he teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is the Director of Vertically Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on transportation. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based cur- riculum, first-year engineering, and transportation. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and is the Webmaster for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engi- neering Experience
the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for Engineering Studies (INES); past chair of the ASEE Liberal Education / Engineering and Society Division; and a former member of the Society for the History of Technology’s (SHOT) Executive Council. Publications include /Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers and Computers during the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research/ (MIT Press, 2006).Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany Sarah Appelhans is a PhD candidate in Cultural Anthropology. Her dissertation research, ”Steel Toes and Ponytails: Gender and Belonging in Engineering”, investigates the boundaries of membership in engineering in the Capital District of New
Paper ID #33283Rethinking Engineering Education: Lessons from the Learning Experiencesof Early-career EngineersMiss Yike Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yike Li received a Bachelor’s degree in Human Resource Management from Nanjing Agricultural Uni- versity of China (2019), and is studying for a Master’s degree in Higher Education at SJTU. Her research interest includes early-career engineers’ learning experiences and entrepreneurship education.Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni- versity. Her primary research
and Research Infrastructure in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. Dr. Martin’s research focus is on methodological activism, the use of research methods to advocate for social change. She served as the Program Director for Engineering Education in the Directorate for Engineering, at the National Science Foundation (NSF) from 2017-2019. Since 2004, Dr. Martin has held a number of national leadership positions in the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN), having served in the latter organization as national president (2009-2010
, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research interests include student development of identity and motivation in graduate engineering environments and understanding creativity in engineering design processes.Heather Perkins, North Carolina State University Heather entered the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the fall of 2014, after com- pleting her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. She has participated in various research projects examining the interaction between
Paper ID #30991WIP: Undergraduate Research Experiences Survey (URES) and EngineeringIdentityDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin D. Wylie is an Assistant Professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Vir- ginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly
interests include underground construction, tunnel engineering, engineering mechanics, engineering education, productivity, and creativity.Lt. Col. Brad C McCoy, U.S. Military Academy Brad C. McCoy is a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army, and currently an Asst. Professor in the De- partment of Civil and Mechanical Engineering and the Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). He holds a BS degree in civil engineering from USMA (2001), and MS and PhD degrees in civil engineering from North Carolina State University (2011 and 2019). Brad is a licensed Professional Engineer (Missouri). His research interests include sustainable infrastructure development, composite
Education’s First in the World Grant awarded to San Jos´e State University, in partnership with Cal Poly Pomona and California State University- Los Angeles.Dr. Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University Maria Chierichetti joined the department of Aerospace Engineering as a full-time assistant professor in Fall 2019. Her interests lie in the field of aerospace structural design and vibrations, with particular emphasis on developing methodologies for combining finite element analysis and machine/deep learning for structural health monitoring and unmanned Structural inspections in the context of urban air mobility. Maria is also interested in investigating how students learning is affected by external factors, such as
Engineering Lab at Montana State.Emma Annand, Montana State University Emma Annand is striving for a B.S. in Industrial and Management System Engineering at Montana State University – Bozeman. Emma is a research assistant for MSU’s NSF supported engineering leadership identity development project. She is also the fundraising team lead for MSU’s chapter of Engineers With- out Borders (EWB@MSU). Over the summer of 2018, Emma traveled with EWB@MSU to Khwisero, Kenya to implement a borehole well at a primary school there. During the summer of 2019, Emma will once again travel to Khwisero – this time to assess for a structure at a secondary school.Monika Kwapisz, Montana State University Monika Blue Kwapisz (they/them) is an
identities are encouraged and how strongly they are expressed. Separating bygender, the results show the significant difference between men, women, and nonbinaryengineering students and how they consider their gender identity. The average Model for MultipleDimensions of Identity based on school type can help understand students' priorities when decidingto attend a small school.References[1] A. D. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26428.[2] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors Relating to Engineering Identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14
energy, advanced water treatment, carbon cycle including carbon generation and management, and biofuels. He has extensive expertise in education, re- search, and outreach in energy resources including water quality and quantity, renewable energy and en- vironmental issues. His research areas of interest include risk-based decision making, renewable energy and water, carbon management and sequestration, energy efficiency and pollution prevention, multiphase flow and process control. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WORK-IN-PROGRESS (WIP): THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRACK A COLLABORATIVE EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING APPROACH TO ACADEMIC SUCCESS FOR UNDERSERVED
the ASEE ECE Division, served as an as- sociate editor for the ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, and served on the IEEE Committee on Engineering Accreditation Activities, the IEEE Education Society Board of Governors, the ABET EAC (2009-2014), and EAC Executive Committee (2015-2018). Dr. Rover is a Fellow of the IEEE and of ASEE.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student
held early spring of 2019 based on the student’s availability. The first interviewfocused on understanding their background, pathway to engineering, pathway to their engineeringmajor, and first-year engineering experiences. The second interview protocol elicited responsesabout their experiences throughout their second year of engineering. We also asked students abouttheir classroom experiences (intellectual), resources, and connections that were related to theirexperiences (institutional), and interactions with faculty and staff in the college of engineering,peers in engineering, and professionals in their field (networking). Each interview wasapproximately 30 to 60 minutes in duration and conducted primarily by one researcher.AnalysisThe
Paper ID #33176Student Recognition, Use, and Understanding of Engineering for OnePlanet Competencies and Outcomes in Project-based LearningJames Larson, Arizona State University James Larson is a graduate of Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus. The general engineer- ing program in The Polytechnic School takes a project-based pedagogical approach when designing the curriculum. James has previously researched influences for this program design in examinations of the Maker Movement. Previous contributions to ASEE on this subject include conference papers, ”Sup- porting K-12 Student Self-Direction with a Maker Family
Teaching Approach of a Combined Undergraduate and Graduate Course in PowerElectronics”, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 16-19, 2019 (CD Proceedings).28. R. Rupnow, K., Davis, R., Johnson, E., Kirchner et al., “Service experiences of undergraduate engineers”,International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, Vol. 6(1), Article 14, 2018,ISSN: 2374-9466 | https://ijrslce.scholasticahq.com/.
arXiv:1902.11278, 2019.[8] V. Svihla, J. R. Gomez, M. A. Watkins, and T. B. Peele-Eady, "Characterizing framing agency in design team discourse," in Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exhibition: ASEE, 2019.[9] V. Svihla, T. B. Peele-Eady, and Y. Chen, "Agency in framing design problems " in AERA Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019.[10] R. Alsop, M. F. Bertelsen, and J. Holland, Empowerment in practice: From analysis to implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 2006.[11] J. Restrepo and H. Christiaans, "Problem Structuring and Information Access in Design," Journal of Design Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 218–236, 2004.[12] D. A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner
to analyze search behavior [31, 32]. We defined search behavior in terms of frequency ofsearches, types of search queries, frequency and types of other events (Table 2) around searchperformed by students. Previous work [28] used a similar definition of search behavior foreducational video search, but our analysis was more detailed (e.g., we also studied the types ofsearch queries).Figure 3 shows an overview of the study design. With approval from the Institutional ReviewBoard (IRB), we collected anonymized student interaction data logged by ClassTranscribe. Thedata included interaction events from 1,894 students across 25 engineering courses during09/2019 to 07/2020. For each user interaction with the tool, the event logs contain
management expertise,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 51–60, Oct. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(97)00017-1.[6] S. Gillard, “Soft Skills and Technical Expertise of Effective Project Managers,” Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, vol 6, pp. 723-729, 2009. doi: 10.28945/1092[7] E. Miskioglu and K. Martin, “Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Instrument to Measure ‘Engineering Intuition,’” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33027.[8] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications Limited, 2021.[9 J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in Interpretive
recipient of School of Engineering Education Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and the 2018 College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: An Intersectional Conceptual Framework for Understanding How to Measure Socioeconomic Inequality in Engineering EducationIntroductionSince the late 2000s, there has been a surge of research that focuses on the effect of socioeconomicdisadvantage in the American engineering education context [1]–[8]. Through these studies,authors have continued to uncover more about the experiences of socioeconomicallydisadvantaged students in engineering education
-computer interaction techniques to education. Wai-Tat Fu is the Associate Editor of the ACM Transactions on Intelligent In- teractive Systems (TiiS) and the Topics in Cognitive Science journal. He is m the program chair of ACM IUI (Intelligent User Interfaces) 2017, and the general chair of ACM IUI 2019.Dr. Molly H. Goldstein, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Molly H. Goldstein is Senior Lecturer in the Industrial and Systems Engineering & Design at the Univer- sity of Illinois. She earned her B.S. in General Engineering (Systems Engineering & Design) and M.S. in Systems and Entrepreneurial Engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue
Paper ID #25711A Preliminary Exploration of Student Attitudes about a Continuous GradePoint Average SchemeMr. Wan Kyn Chan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Wan Kyn Chan is a undergraduate student in Purdue University currently pursuing his Bachelors in Me- chanical Engineering and will be graduating in Spring 2019. Beyond academic courses he is engaged with, he also pursues research in the areas of Color Changing Metamaterials and Engineering Education. Coming from the Singapore, a country with high educational rigor, the latter area of research has been an interest and passion of
, Apr. 1994.[37] K. Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Rev., vol. 43, p. 1241, 1990.[38] D. G. Solórzano and T. J. Yosso, “Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 23-44, 2002[39] E. P. Douglas, G. A. Dietz, and E. D. McCray, “The In/Authentic Experiences of Black Engineers,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[40] J. Good, G. Halpin, and G. Halpin, “Retaining Black Students in Engineering: Do Minority Programs Have a Longitudinal Impact?,” J. Coll. Stud. Retent. Lond., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 351–364, 2001.[41] P. C. Lam, D
. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135467996387534 [4] E. A. Maloney, J. R. Sattizahn, and S. L. Beilock, “Anxiety and cognition,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 403–411, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26308653/ [5] M. Suárez-Pellicioni, M. I. Núñez-Peña, and À. Colomé, “Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases,” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2016. [6] J. C. Major, M. Scheidt, A. Godwin, E. J. Berger, and J. Chen, “Effects of Test Anxiety on Engineering Students’ STEM Success,” in 2020 ASEE Annual Conference &
, entrepreneurship, or Innovation a similar subject and that is new to you and prepare a lesson about it to teach to your classmates. Table 1. Brief descriptions of You Teach Us peer teaching assignment iterations.This study analyzes student feedback from two iterations of the course in 2018 and 2019. Thefirst YTU assigned in both these semesters, You Teach Us – What You Know, required studentsto make connections between the course and a topic of which they were alreadyfamiliar. Examples of student-selected topics include data visualizations, pediatric nursing,advertising, and automotive mechanics. In each of these lessons, students needed to makeexplicit connections to the themes of the course; creativity
. Ralston and C. Bays, "Refining A Critical Thinking Rubric For Engineering," in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 2010.[12] J. Newell and K. Dahm, "Rubric Development For Assessment Of Multidisciplinary Team Projects," in 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003.[13] J. A. Enszer, "Developing Reliable Lab Rubrics Using Only Two Columns," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[14] N. M. Hicks and H. A. Diefes-Dux, "Grader Consistency in using Standards-based Rubrics," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[15] C. Chan, "Rubrics for Engineering Education," in Engienering Education Enhancement and Research Asia (E3R Asia), 2015
strategies. Since the use of UORs extendsbeyond engineering programs, this study may be of interest to other academic disciplines as well.Possible future work stemming from this study includes a future iteration of the survey in whichboth the student and instructor samples would be taken in a way that produces collections ofrespondents more likely to be representative of their respective populations.References [1] T. J. Ryan, C. Janeiro, and W. E. Howard, “Perception of academic integrity among students and faculty: A comparison of the ethical gray area,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.25878. [2] W. J. Bowers, Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau
dimensions materials and the characterization and modeling of their material properties. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: The Attributes of a Prototypical Leader As Viewed by Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe professional development of leadership skills by undergraduate engineering students is keyto a successful long-term career. Increasing diversity and inclusion in leadership is also criticalfor technology companies as they become global enterprises. Within engineering education, theNational Science Foundation funded a multiyear research project lead by the American Societyof Engineering Education beginning in 2014 on “Transforming
women in engineering. Her technical work and research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, mixed integer nonlinear programing, and multicriteria decision making. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Epistemic Beliefs of Chemical Engineering Faculty (Work in Progress)This paper is a work-in-progress for proposed research. The purpose of this paper is to introducethe engineering education community to the field of epistemic beliefs research and to seekfeedback concerning a planned research study.BackgroundEngineering education researchers frequently call for improving students’ critical thinking as aprimary skill to
Faculty Mentor of the Year.Dr. Daina Briedis, Michigan State University DAINA BRIEDIS is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University and Assistant Dean for Student Advancement and Program Assessment in the College of Engineering. Dr. Briedis is involved in several areas of education research including student retention and the use of technology in the classroom. She has been involved in NSF-funded research in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of ASEE, ABET