Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 9: Persistence and Retention

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nena E. Bloom, Northern Arizona University; Jennifer Johnson, Northern Arizona University; Jennifer Marie Duis, Northern Arizona University; Pauline Entin, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

discussed how the semester was progressing, any areas of struggle, andgoal setting. A number of students described that having a peer mentor was helpful. As onestudent commented, “it was comforting to know someone was looking out for us,” and anothercommented, “[as a STEM transfer student] the mentor knows exactly what we are going throughand can give suggestions from [the mentor’s] perspective.” Several students also described thebenefit of goal setting and having the opportunity to reflect on these goals. Other students foundthe peer mentoring less useful during year two, because they already felt successful in theircoursework, and had already identified their goals. Because these meetings could occur throughe-mail, most students did not find

Conference Session

Engineering Cultures and Identity

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anita Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Maura Borrego, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Research Methods I: Developing Research Tools and Methods

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Roberts, University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences; Denise Wilson, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

psychographic measures developed in this study reveal nuances in student values ofsustainability and global citizenship, highlighting the importance of constant revision ofeducators’ understandings of student understanding in order to graduate informed and dedicatedstudents who will engage in, design for, and implement sustainability in their future careers.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the TUES program (grant number DUE-1245464). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s)and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography 1. Beane, T.P., &

Conference Session

Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech; Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

CAREER grant #EE-1351156. Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this poster are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 26.1450.14References1. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.2. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297-308.3. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research

Conference Session

Measurement and Instrumentation

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, Virginia Tech; David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, which was comprised of thetheory’s transformational items as well as contingent reward items was named developing. Thisname articulates the notion that all items relate to leadership in a positive and constructive sense.Factor 2, comprised of both laissez faire and passive management by exception was namedpassive-avoidant/laissez faire, consistent with previous analyses of the MLQ (e.g.12). All of theitems of management by exception-active (MEA) loaded on Factor 3. Correspondingly, the factorwas renamed active management by exception (MEA) to reflect the fact that this factor maintainedthe same dimensions as the original MLQ sub-component. Table 6 shows the reliabilities of theresulting scales. The resulting three scales showed adequate

Conference Session

Assessment and Outcomes: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

ePortfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and 3) reimagining the traditional academic transcript.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia TechDr. Sheri Sheppard P.E., Stanford University Page 26.371.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparing Disparate Outcome Measures for Better Understanding of Engineering GraduatesAbstractDespite a strong emphasis on increasing post-graduation engineering retention, few researchstudies have examined what it actually means to stay in or leave engineering work. This studyaddresses this limitation using a

Conference Session

Retention

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Niranjan Hemant Desai, Purdue University Northwest; George Stefanek, Purdue University Northwest

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Additionally, it was found thatstudents did not want an easy course; they were aware of the challenges that lay ahead them asengineers. However, they did enjoy the excitement that the course added to their curriculum,while preparing them for their future career. The feedback reflected student’s interest in thecourse and reinforced the strong and positive elements of the course’s structure.Improving math skills, Providing community-based support system: Weatherton et al.30 tried toincrease retention by providing freshman students with academic support services in calculus andbasic mathematics. They studied the retention and performance of incoming freshmen that wereinvolved in one of four freshman interest groups (FIG), called FORCES (Focus on