. Kajfez and L. McNair, “Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[4] D. L. Liddell, M. E. Wilson, K. Pasquesi, A. S. Hirschy, and K. M. Boyle, “Development of professional identity through socialization in graduate school,” J Stud Aff Res Pract, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 69–84, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1515/JSARP-2014-0006/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.[5] T. Luft and R. Roughly, “Engaging the Reflexive Self: The Role of Reflective Practice for Supporting Professional Identity Development in Graduate Students,” Supporting the Success of Adult and Online Students Proven Practices in Higher Education, pp. 53–62, 2016.[6] H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, M. A
dynamics for high performance teamwork,” Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 378–394, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.002.[4] M. C. Paretti, J. J. Pembridge, S. C. Brozina, B. D. Lutz, and J. N. Phanthanousy, “Mentoring team conflicts in capstone design: Problems and solutions,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013, doi: 10.18260/1-2--22284.[5] M. C. Paretti, K. J. Cross, and H. M. Matusovich, “Match or Mismatch: Engineering Faculty Beliefs about Communication and Teamwork versus Published Criteria,” 2014.[6] G. A. Callanan and D. F. Perri, “Teaching Conflict Management Using a Scenario-Based Approach,” Httpsdoiorg103200JOEB813131-139, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 131–139, 2010, doi
traditional LIWC analysis with the standard dictionarygives a psychologically verified and impartial look at the language, while with the customdictionary it gives a measure of the known signposts for a topic. The MEM analysis gives theemergent themes within the topic. When these two a priori and in vivo thematic computationalmethods arrive at similar landmarks, researchers can be confident that although this took lesstime, the adventure has not only been worth the computations, but it has also arrived in thecorrect place.6 References[1] ASEE, “Engineering by the Numbers, 2010,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2011.[2] ASEE, “Engineering &
’ engagement with co-curricular and extracurricular activities [41]. • Examining how instructional innovations or educational interventions could enhance student engagement. This research area involves intervention studies that include student engagement as an outcome. It constituted the largest research area within the ASEE conference papers that included “student engagement” in their titles, as revealed in our literature search on the PEER repository in January 2024. As an example, one study reported the contribution of a hands-on design experience to first-year engineering students’ increased engagement with engineering studies [2]. This research area can overlap with the second one that examines the
: Accelerating female talent in science, engineering, and Technology. Center for Talent Innovation, 2014. [Online]. http://www.talentinnovation.org/publication.cfm?publication=1420 [3] J. Williams, S. Li, R. Rincon, and P. Finn, “Climate Control: Gender and Racial Bias in Engineering?,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4014946. [4] R. Yonemura and D. Wilson, “Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive, and Otherwise Chilly Conditions,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 26-29, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26843. [5] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Autonomy and Need Satisfaction in Close Relationships