AC 2011-48: INFORMING COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT THROUGHCITATION EXAMINATION OF THE CIVIL ENGINEERING RESEARCHLITERATUREScott A. Curtis, University of Missouri - Kansas City Scott Curtis is the Research and Instruction Librarian for Science and Engineering at the University of Missouri - Kansas City. He most recently held positions as a Bibliographer for Science and Engineering, the Head of Reference Services, and the Search Service Coordinator at Linda Hall Library of Science, Engineering, and Technology. Prior to his library career, he worked in engineering and management roles in electronic instrument and refractory materials manufacturing companies. He has a BS in Physics from the University of Pittsburgh, an MS in
Paper ID #7705Re-tooling Information Instruction Delivery and Assessment for the Fresh-man Engineering Class: the Good, the Bad and the UglyMs. Mary L. Strife, West Virginia University Mary is the Director of the Evansdale Library of West Virginia University since 2002. She has worked as an engineering and sciences librarian for over 30 years. Her B.A. in biology comes from SUNY College at Potsdam and her M.L.S. comes from the University of Buffalo. Her career includes positions at Cor- nell, Syracuse University, University of Rochester, and SUNY Utica/Rome. She is active in ASEE/ELD, ALA/ACRL, SLA Aerospace/Engineering.Ms
. ● Discuss why you believe that the major you identified is the best fit for you in terms of turning your passion into a career to meet the three, five and ten year goals. Include at least two example to support your choice of major. ● Provide three specific examples and explain how the non-technical, non-academic programs you have chosen will help you in achieving your goals. ● Reflect on your commitment to your engineering, engineering technology, or construction management degree. Describe, in detail, why you are – or are not - more committed now than before to your chosen major, the College of Engineering, and/or UNC Charlotte,Successful Completion of the AssignmentYou will submit this assignment to your manager
profile the first time theymake an ILL request, and selecting a department is part of that one-time form. NO DEPThappens to be the first entry in a long dropdown box, so users who are in a hurry to get theirrequest filled out may just select the first categorization and move on. There is no validation codeset up to certify that the departmental choice was indeed correct, such as checking against thepatron’s username or email they used to log in to ILLiad. Compounding the issue, unless thepatron takes it upon themselves to go back into their user profile and correct the departmentalselection, subsequent requests during their collegiate career will continue to be categorized in theNO DEPT classification, further skewing the data. It should be clear
increased engagement with the material, students oftenselect research topics based not on interest, but rather on the availability of information1.The Introductory Engineering CourseIntroduction to the Engineering Profession (EGS 1006L) is a one-credit course offered tostudents entering the engineering curriculum at FGCU. When this course was first created, it wasdone so within a brand new school of engineering. As such, “Introduction to the EngineeringProfession” was originally developed to provide an overview of the engineering programs atFGCU, and encourage students to consider engineering as a potential career choice. In Fall 2014,the course was revised to provide a more cohesive, meaningful first year experience that tied intothe pedagogical
scholarly journals, books, and proceedings in thesciences, social sciences, and arts and humanities” [14]. As the goal of this study was to lookholistically at research interests and scholarly outputs over entire faculty members’ entireacademic careers, the authors of this study included all available indexes, date ranges, andpublication types available from WoS for faculty publications for inclusion within this study’s datacollection. Therefore, faculty publications were not limited to the time periods in which they areemployed at their current institution. As a cut-off date for inclusion in this study, the authors onlyincluded faculty publications that were published before December 31, 2019.In order to disambiguate common author name searches
multiple times in their academic careers. Certainly, LibGuides are a frequently usedmethod of making information about information available to students.ConclusionHopefully, this study will shine the light on the need for librarians to share best practices forengaging with their faculty in engineering technology departments to improve the integration ofIL into the 3.g outcome and beyond. Engineering technology programs also would benefit fromsharing their practices with their institution’s librarians. Based on the results of this paper,librarians are an untapped resource when it comes to contributing to the assessment of students’‘identify and use appropriate technical literature,’ for accreditation purposes. Librarians could bedeveloping rubrics
required to complete Drexel University’sIntroduction to Engineering Design (ENGR 101-103) program. This is a three course, year-longengineering design sequence which aims “to provide students with an understanding of thesimilarities, differences, and career options available in the various engineering disciplines, theimportance of multidisciplinary teams to innovation, an appreciation for engineeringmeasurements, errors, units, significant figures and reproducibility, and the ability tocommunicate relevant technical information concisely and incorporate experimental dataclearly.” In the course sequence, all incoming engineering students representing the disciplinesof Architectural Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Sciences and Health Systems
July 1953. As another example, Crosland collaboratedwith W.H. Cady of U.S Finishing Company in Rhode Island to write Literature of Dyes,Mordants, and Bleaches, a 15 page chapter in volume 10 of Literature Resources for ChemicalProcess Industries, published by the American Chemical Society in 1954. Additionally, Croslandwas co-editor of the April 1954 issue of Library Trends (Box 1, Series 1).ConclusionCrosland devoted 46 years of her career to help establish and develop an outstanding library withan excellent science and technology collection, providing high quality service to Georgia Techstudents and faculty. In her final 1970-1971 annual report, Crosland stated “I leave behind twomagnificent buildings, one of the finest collections in
and potential collaborationbetween engineering librarians and mechanical engineering faculty. For the course in this study,the plan for next year will be to use these instructional activities again. It also has started thediscussion of where additional library collaboration earlier in the mechanical engineeringprogram would be appropriate and beneficial. This additional exposure and training will buildfamiliarity with information fluency skills, which may be perceived as difficult, but are essentialin the professional environment.Works Cited[1] G. Kerins, “Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The cases of engineering and law students in Ireland,” Inf. Res. Int. Electron. J., vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2004.[2] S
information literacy competency requirements The recently revised Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board’s accreditation criteria6have higher expectations of information research skills for undergraduate engineering graduatesthan ever before. Among the 12 graduate attributes, problem analysis, investigation,communication skills, ethics and equity, and life-long learning are closely associated withinformation literacy (IL) competencies and can be addressed by academic librarians themselvesor in collaboration with different units on campus. IL training may help this group of studentsbecome better empowered to use information effectively, which has the potential to contribute totheir overall academic and career success.Role of undergraduate