programs that work to bolster invention and entrepreneurship maypositively impact both students and teachers in their personal and professional growth and alsoinfluence the well-being of rural communities more broadly. Despite the symbiosis between rural areas and entrepreneurship, past attempts to expandthe K12 InVenture Prize program to rural regions have not been successful. A first strategyattempted was to provide travel stipends for students to travel to Georgia Tech for the statefinals. This offering, however, did not address the anxiety that students and teachers have aboutpresenting a project at an elite university. The leap from school competition to state competitionfelt too large for many schools. A second strategy was to
supports Innovation and Start-Up Projects. While at Un- ternehmerTUM, Florian was involved in a marketing project for a tourism startup (Social Tourist) and consulting for another startup that monitors super lightweight structures (fos4x). He joined the Designing Education Lab to learn more about entrepreneurial decision making for profit or non-profit organizations and social entrepreneurship in general.Dr. Qu Jin, Stanford University Qu Jin is a postdoctoral scholar in the Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. She earned her Ph.D. degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2013, M.S. degree in Biomedical En- gineering from Purdue University in 2009, and B.S. degree in Material Science and
3 4 Business risk assessment is the business manager’s responsibility 4 5 I like to learn about entrepreneurship comparison 6 Every time I fail a task, I reflect on why I failed so that I can learn how to do better in the future 6 7 I understand why a monopolistic market is usually not favorable to consumers 7 8 I consider how multiple changes affect each other 8 9 I am confident in leading a team to work on a project
main components: a) thestudent’s computing-related major program; b) the entrepreneurship minor; and c) the culminatingentrepreneurship practicum. The requirements of the student’s major program, of course, varydepending on the particular major. For example, the CSE major consists of required and electivecourses in a range of topics from software design principles and practices to algorithms, fromcomputer systems and architectures to computer networking, from AI to computer graphics andvideo game design; and a culminating capstone project course which may, for example, consist ofdesigning and implementing a set of web services to meet the requirements of a real client.The entrepreneurship minor, offered in the business school, specialized for
have the option ofworking and attending school.As Dean of Engineering at the University of Detroit, and through his exposure to co-op programsas a doctoral candidate at the University of Cincinnati, President Lawrence saw the value thatexperiential learning adds to a student’s academic preparation. Lawrence Tech becamecommitted early on in offering and in actively encouraging experiential learning and workingprograms through co-op, internship and student projects where students would not only have anunderstanding of why something works, but how it will work in real life situations. At the heartof the University’s founding principles is the concept of theory and practice. Students arestrongly encouraged to integrate hands-on work experiences
Board for the Southwest Research Institute.Dr. James R. Hallmark, Texas A&M University System James Hallmark currently serves as Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs for the Texas A&M University System. In this position, Hallmark oversees all matters involving faculty, curriculum, student affairs, stu- dent success, enrollment management/admissions, and special projects for the 11 universities and 140,000 students in the A&M System. Prior to this appointment, Hallmark served as Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs at West Texas A&M University (WTAMU) as well as a lengthy term as Dean of the Graduate School and Research at that institution. In 2016 Hallmark briefly returned to West Texas A&M
theMethodology section below.As researchers who are new to the study of entrepreneurship education, it was important to us toA) control for our own assumptions about entrepreneurship or what students do know or shouldknow on the topic of entrepreneurship, B) learn about the initial impressions of students insteadof making assumptions about where they stand, and C) have an experimental flavor to ourresearch to better understand if our new pedagogical approaches are effective throughcomparison between treatment and control groups.As educators, we feel that authenticity is important for engineering education, so we hope tohighlight courses where authentic practices are found; for example: teamwork, project-basedapproach to learning, incorporation of non
Tsinghua University in China in 2007. Her research interests focus on educational studies that can help improve teaching, learning, and educational policy decision makings using both quantitative and qual- itative research methods. Her current research project in National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) focuses on measuring engineering students’ entrepreneurial interests and related individual characteristics. Her Ph.D. dissertation involved using statistical modeling methods to explain and predict engineering students’ success outcomes, such as retention, academic performance, and grad- uation.Ms. Carolin Christin Dungs, Stanford UniversityDr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D
using bubble-pump technology. • A business to business venture around HVAC energy discounting. • A blimp-type drone for search and rescue operations. • An electronic bike venture for college campuses. • An on-person medical records system to assist with EMT trauma and pharmacy interaction with Alzheimer’s patients. The self-directed components of the program (idea voting, team formation) ensuredthat students felt a sense of buy-in and commitment for the projects. Students were thenpresented with an overview of the lean launch pad methodology [1]. Teams were giventime to then work on the lean launch pad canvas pertaining to their particular ventureclosing out day one. Figure 4: Students present
Material Science and Engineering from Tsinghua University in China in 2007. Her research interests focus on educational studies that can help improve teaching, learning, and educational policy decision makings using both quantitative and qual- itative research methods. Her current research project in National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) focuses on measuring engineering students’ entrepreneurial interests and related individual characteristics. Her Ph.D. dissertation involved using statistical modeling methods to explain and predict engineering students’ success outcomes, such as retention, academic performance, and grad- uation
research involves design education pedagogy, including formative assessment of client-student interactions, modeling sources of engineering design constraints, and applying the entrepreneurial mindset to first-year programming projects through student engagement in educational software development. Estell earned his BS in Computer Science and Engineering degree from The University of Toledo and both his MS and PhD degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 “EMbedding” the KEEN Framework: An Assessment Plan for Measuring ABET Student Outcomes and Entrepreneurial
interdisciplinary theories. In fact, engineering competitions usuallyinvolve designs that need different fields of expertise, fostering cross-pollination. The process oftrial and error involved in competitions helps overcome fear of failure and increase creative risk.The open-criteria of grading in competitions--the variability in possible solutions--is a thirdfeature that professors could use in the classroom to promote an entrepreneurial mindset. Bychanging homework assignments to problems that can have different approaches students aregiven the opportunity to hone their deductive skills, their curiosity and their strategic thinking.Substituting tests for class projects and presentations encourages students to ask for help
. Effectively collaborate in a team setting 2. Apply critical and creative thinking to ambiguous problems 3. Construct and effectively communicate a customer-appropriate value proposition 4. Persist through failure to do what is needed to succeed 5. Effectively manage projects and apply the commercialization process 6. Demonstrate voluntary social responsibility 7. Relate personal liberties and free enterprise to entrepreneurshipWe will continue to work with the KEEN this summer and fall on the deployment andassessment of the KEEN Assessment Program, and feel that this is a critically necessary piece intelling the story of the successes in the KEEN programs, including Baylor’s KEEN Innovatorsprogram.The Future of the KEEN
innovation is realizedevery year.In the senior design course, student teams use a decision matrix to evaluate options for the mostimportant design decision of their project. The students identify and research options. Todevelop the list of options, they rely on the discovery competencies: associating, questioning,observing, experimenting, and networking. To determine which options are viable, they use Page 22.154.10their Discipline Competencies. Only the viable options are evaluated in the decision matrix.Their client either picks or approves the criteria the students use to evaluate the options, and theclient decides the relative importance of each
have people from very different •That they developed familiarity backgrounds to generate well rounded with common makerspace projects processes and technologies.Q2 - Did EM assist the faculty facilitators with the COVID transition? Was there adifference in the facets of EM that helped with this transition?Each facilitation team tackled the remote transition in different ways. Many innovations indelivery were developed by the teams, and several best practices emerged. The focus on creatingvalue for each of the workshop participants was
online discussions ina computer science course; using regression and correlation analysis, they found that the numberof posts responding to others correlated with project grades [17]. A researcher at Stanford [18]used the framework to analyze students working on an engineering challenge where studentswere required to think aloud about how to design and build a variety of mechanical andelectronic devices; the results suggest that simply word counting can reflect the learner’s affect,interest, and identify towards engineering.2.2 Survey Data Collection and Analysis: Student Perceptions of the KEEN-FocusedDiscussion AssignmentThe survey data collection and data analysis required a similar three-phase approach. First, theonline discussion prompts
Paper ID #22826Beyond Problem Solving to Creating Value: A Priority for Engineering Edu-catorsDr. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam Innovation Center which houses campus competition teams, maker club, and projects. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and systems
Leadership program covering engineering designand engineering entrepreneurship [1]. These are junior-level, project-based courses withLean Launchpad [2], [3] and I-Corps [4] as principal inspirations for their curriculum anddelivery. But while our students learned a great deal about product-market fit, design, andbusiness models, the course lacked content that provided direct learning about thestudents’ aspirations, professional growth, career planning.We realized that it might be possible to fill this gap by applying the courses’lessons ofdesign and entrepreneurship to each student’s own professional self. In a sense, eachstudent would be her or his own people group. To this end, we integrated design thinkingabout the students’ own lives into the
intentional scaffolding of the entrepreneurial mindset [19]. In their ElectricCircuits course, Question Formulation Technique (QFT) and Entrepreneurially Minded CircuitDesign-Build-Test with Value Proposition method are used to implement EML [19]. The authorsof the paper “Entrepreneurial Mindset and the University Curriculum [20]” applied technology-based and a dynamic live case-study with color graphics animated computer simulation in theirentrepreneurial course. The live case-study involves multiple student visits to companies.Students construct a company supply-chain under the professor’s guidance. Bilen, et al,suggested providing students with multiple exposures to an entrepreneurial mindset [21].Chasaki described a seven-week mini-project “Cyber
unsafeoutcomes.The goal of this paper is to briefly re-introduce the art of estimation in engineering. This isevident when dealing with entrepreneurial thinking where projections and estimations need to bequickly calculated and frequently modified as necessary. Estimation specifically allowsentrepreneurs to make quick inexpensive decisions, which would otherwise cost time andresources. This paper shares research work that involves various, example-based estimationmethods that are useful in engineering. The methods provide rough predictions of expectedoutcome, allowing students to intelligently guess a reasonable range of expected outcomes, givenbasic raw data within its necessary parameters. The methods include: • Segmentation • Fermi Estimation
. Starting in 2000, Alan began to focus on supporting higher education partners in projects that address broadening participation in the sciences, graduate student development, curriculum innovation, instructional technology, teacher professional development and other education reforms. For the past five years, Alan has been the lead evaluator for Epicenter, an NSF-funded STEP Center focused on infusing entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate engineering education.Mr. Emanuel Costache, SageFox Consulting Group Since joining SageFox in 2009, Emanuel has worked on the evaluation team for a variety of NIH- and NSF-funded projects, including the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter
innovation-development theme.Much has been written about the need to assess entrepreneurship and innovation competencies instudents, but few tools exist. To help fill this gap, the authors created the presented assessmenttool from validated inventories that is focused specifically on innovation inclination, innovationcapability, tolerance for risk and ambiguity, and, over time, changes in those characteristics forstudents. In order to know whether or not innovation-based courses, projects, programs, orinitiatives have a positive effect – or, even any effect – it is necessary to create a baseline, followthe participants through their courses and through their academic studies.Creating a methodology, assessment protocol, and assessment process and
that would better Deleted: ,prepare the workforce to meet new demands. Mertens’ text shows some similarities to Deleted: whichdiscussions and facets entwined around the concept of the T-shaped professional. Although thepaper does not mention “T-shaping” specifically, it emphasizes the value of combining specialistknowledge with more general knowledge to get a comprehensive perspective on the factorsinfluencing decision processes or innovation projects. Disciplinary thinking is seen as limiting,because it tends to neglect the importance of competing values and motives. The key Deleted: ingqualifications mentioned in Mertens’ title facilitate the vertical transfer of ideas and help to
freelancemoms.com, Introspect and Lex- ion Global and worked as a consultant with A F Ferguson (then part of KPMG) and worked on projects with USAID, Fortune 500 firms and the Government. She has volunteered with Junior achievement, Big Brother Big Sister, Page 15, World Affairs Council, Girl Scouts, Hands on Atlanta and Orlando. Dr. Gopalkrishnan earned her Bachelor of Mathematics/statistics degree from Bombay University, Masters in Business (PGDM) from Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, India and her Doctoral credentials from University of Florida. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Abstract Mass scale Online Synchronous Entrepreneurship
collaboration of the program directors to postpone thebeginning of the Module's teaching towards the end of the semester gave us time to investigate,gather information, discuss, reflect, design, iterate and implement.ConclusionsA pilot program is essentially a validation instance that includes methodologies, facilitators'profiles, implementations, application of instruments, and results analysis. This program was thechallenge we faced in 2017. The Faculty Council presented the results to develop the project byincreasing the entrepreneurship and innovation seal to all students. It was necessary to adjustexpected learning, expand coverage, train teachers, among other actions, reaching 100% of thefirst semester students of the faculty nationwide in 2019
, pp. 301–310, 2012.[55] S. Kröger, B. Rutter, H. Hill, S. Windmann, C. Hermann, and A. Abraham, “An ERP study of passive creative conceptual expansion using a modified alternate uses task,” Brain Research, vol. 1527, pp. 189–198, 2013.[56] T. Shealy, and M. Hu. "Evaluating the potential of neuroimaging methods to study engineering cognition and project-level decision making." EPOC-MW Conference, Engineering Project Organization Society, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA USA, 2017.[57] K. Alexiou, T. Zamenopoulos, J. Johnson, and S. Gilbert, “Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results,” Design Studies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 623–647, 2009.[58] K. Goucher-Lambert
for Girls in Urbana, IL. Along with a team of undergraduates, she headlined a project to develop a unique computer science curriculum for middle school students. She then earned her M.A. in mathematics education at Columbia University. Af- terwards, she taught in the Chicago Public School system at Orr Academy High School (an AUSL school) for two years. Currently, Golnaz is working with the Epistemic Games Research Group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison where she has led the efforts on engineering virtual internship simulations for high school and first year undergraduate students. Golnaz’s current research is focused on how games and sim- ulations increase student engagement in STEM fields, how players learn
Maverick Lifestyle Corporation, is an engineer, product designer, and serial entrepreneur with 24 years of experience in PC and consumer electronics markets. Janik founded Maverick Lifestyle Corporation in 2005. Maverick develops and sells innovative consumer electronics aimed at simplifying our digital lives. As one of four founders of Speck Design in 1996, Craig managed both consulting projects and internal R&D. In 2000, Janik founded SimpleDevices Inc., a supplier of software and technology to consumer electronics and automotive OEMs including Motorola, Philips, and Delphi. SimpleDevices pioneered digital media distribution over wireless and wired LAN. As CTO at SimpleDevices, he was responsible product
entrepreneurial traits andskills within undergraduates interested in new ventures is closely aligned with the psychologicalcharacteristics of the students. Vesper and Gartner (1997) demonstrated the positive impact thatuniversity entrepreneurship programs have on students, the university, and the community. Publicsymposia, student consulting projects, and company spin-offs are examples of high valueactivities.Areas influencing entrepreneurial successes have been found to include founder characteristics,firm attributes, business practices, and human resource management practices. Foundercharacteristics are widely believed to influence the cultures and behaviors of the firm (Mullins,1996). Firm attributes of specific value include a growth-oriented vision
assessment oflearning than on the cataloging of activity, i.e. number of startups, amount of funding raised,number of students taking entrepreneurship courses, etc.In an effort to assess the entrepreneurial mindset of our students, the authors began researchingcurrent psychometric tools to assist in this charge. The two assessment instruments selected forthe project were the Entrepreneurial Profile (EP10), which was recently rebranded as the BuilderProfile (BP10), and the Entrepreneurial Mindset Profile (EMP). Both surveys are facilitatedelectronically (web-based) by Gallup and Eckerd College, respectively. Our motivation is toassess if entrepreneurship programs at our institution, both didactic and co-curricular, deliver onthe hypothesis that